Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. must win war despite cost, say lawmakers of both parties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:18 AM
Original message
U.S. must win war despite cost, say lawmakers of both parties
WASHINGTON — Members of Congress, including many who have traveled to Iraq to see the war for themselves, are wary about this weekend’s election there and pondering questions such as whether Iraqi soldiers can be trained quickly enough to bring U.S. troops home soon.

Still, those lawmakers, Democrats as well as Republicans, are resolved to finish the war despite mounting costs and casualties.

"Whether you were for this or against this, we have to try to see this to a successful conclusion," said Sen. Evan Bayh, DInd., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

They see Sunday’s election to choose a national Iraqi assembly as the crucial next step toward Iraqi sovereignty and the eventual withdrawal of the 150,000 U.S. forces there. They also are jittery as election plans go forward, perhaps a reflection of general unease about the war among the American public.

http://www.dispatch.com/national-story.php?story=dispatch/2005/01/25/20050125-A9-01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. What's Schumer have to say?
He always seems to have an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Define "win". That would be a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm sure they will define it to be whatever they do to cut & run as soon
as possible. Maybe, "Welp, they've had elections! We won!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bono71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Actually, I hope that is how they define it...at least the cut and
run part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Tricky Dick used "Peace with Honor"
The Repugs will be careful to avoid saying "defeat", using similar terms as Nixon did in on 23 Jan 1973, 32 years ago.

Now the rightwing just blames the liberal Democrats for the defeat in Vietnam. LBJ was a liberal? No, he doesn't count because that won't fit into their perverted logic.

The best way to 'not lose a war' is pretty simple - don't start one in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Win = No oil left in Iraq n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. "Win" -- when we control all of the oil and...
Haliburton's pockets are full!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
46. ask them if we "won Viet Nam"...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Frig this. After the elections, pull out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Partition the country and leave
Iraqi self-determination would probably result in the partitioning of Iraq or at least the creation of a loose confederation in which the Kurds, Sunni and Shia would autonomously govern their own affairs. Had the Clinton administration allowed the partitioning of multi-ethnic Bosnia, the United States and other nations would probably not be saddled with the task of keeping the peace in this continuing tinderbox nine years after the Dayton Accords were signed. If the peacekeepers withdrew today, the fighting among Bosnia’s ethnic groups would probably resume.

http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1310

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. It always comes back to Clinton...
Gees, will the MSM give it a rest already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Let our allies take over: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia
that would be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. You mean those "threatened neighbors" used to rationalize invasion?
I think they went the way of the WMD. I've heard absolutely nothing about any assistance given by any of those "threatened neighbors." Funny that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh no, we can't respond to changing conditions!
That would be weak!

Forward! Into the buzzsaw!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. So what the fuck exactly IS
"a successful conclusion?"

"Finish the war" in specifically what way?

I get so God damned sick and tired of hearing people say "Well, we're there already, so we can't bring our soldiers home; we have to stay and "finish the job."

Yet nobody who says this has defined for me what "job" that is, beyond vague mumblings about elections and democracy and sunshine, daisies, and butterflies, with Truth and Justice and the American Way shining over all, forever and ever amen.

Can anyone clarify this "winning" goal for me?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I think it's all about domestic politics
Edited on Tue Jan-25-05 09:35 AM by htuttle
Almost everything the Bushes have done overseas has everything to do with how it plays here at home.

So they can't withdraw until they decide they can convince people here in the US that they've "won", under whatever circumstances they can talk us into believing. The actual situation on the ground in Iraq seems to have almost no bearing on the decision whatsoever.

There's also the not-so-small matter of wanting to ensure that whatever government we end up propping up in Iraq continues to honor Bremer's laws allowing foreign piracy and control of Iraq's resources, but I bet they'll be willing to give that goal up within a few more months.

They'd never admit that, of course -- wouldn't play well at home...

on edit:
Oh, and the Congressional Democrats can't push for withdrawal, since they are in a huge game of 'chicken' with the Republicans regarding who is 'stronger' (not sure exactly who's 'strength' is being measured, though). I think it actually is a question of who's stupider and more pigheaded about not admitting a catastrophic mistake.

For some reason, stupid pigheadedness seems to play well here at home...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Or what?
The chimpministration would have to admit to a huge f*cking mistake and a lot of his buddies will lose a shitload of money? I can live with that. As long as he and his henchmen wind up in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. What a sorry bunch we have in Congress
a lot of bad leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. bullshit. they need to get the f out after 1/30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. They could dump twice as much money into Iraq and they still won't win.
They have no chance...And the 30th elections will be the beginning of the end of this war and *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. Choose your wars carefully
Do the same when seeking a Prez...some jackass may have a perpetual hard on for quagmire pudenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Viet Nam talk
such utter bullshit, spending other people's money and other people's lives for a lie and to save their silly 'faces'.

These 'representatives' are just like the pricks who sent thousands off to die and be maimed for nothing 30 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. I agree
"We" have learned nothing. This is just becoming a big sinkhole for U.S. lives and money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
48. Your simple statement......
is the bottom line truth on this "adventure" of Bush's.

Anyone who is old enough to remember VietNam knows this is the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. I agree with RFKjr
75% Dems and 90% Reps corrupt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Sounds about right to me.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. There must be no peace without honor.
Or oil. How much more Nixonian can you get?

I guess they haven't looked at a history book lately, 'cause they surely haven't learned its lessons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
20. what constitutes a "win"?
since we're fighting an ideology and not a country - even if the bushies like to paint it that way - when will we know we've won? as long as there are people who disagree with our policies enough to cause harm, we'll be at war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. That's easy to say when you're not the one dying


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. How?
Tell us how you plan to do that, or shutup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guns Aximbo Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. Sounds like VietNam
Escalating the war... The costs and the number of personnel not to mention the scope.

At all costs? how many lives does that equate to?

How many allies does that mean we lose?

How much money?

Who will pay?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yinkaafrica Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. Where did my party go?
We used to call them Democrats and they stood up for most of the people, even those who didn't deserve it.
Remember them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. buried in the article
just because the AP buries Woolsey, et al, and the TV ignores them, doesn't mean we have to:

The rising number of U.S. casualties - climbing by 70 or more each month as the election draws near to at least 1,365 - also has been cause for alarm. The uptick prompted a small group of House Democrats to ask President Bush to start bringing troops home.

"Our troops are like sitting ducks," said Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., the effort's ringleader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. The effort's *ringleader*?
:wtf:

Why not just "leader", or even "spokesman"? "Ringleader" implies involvement in illegal or improper activities.

This biased Pravda-esque pablum that passes for "journalism" is really infuriating. Edward R. Murrow is spinning in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. The German high command probably thought the same of Stalingrad
This is just another bit of sophistry used to gain consent. It is the way kids get other kids to go along - "Aw, come on, you came this far, so you can't back out now".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. But at least the Germans could blame Hitler for this bad decision!
History will judge us badly if we Democrats are willing collaborators in this war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. Democrats in congress should stop sucking up Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
34. How can these people be so stupid! Is it possible they don't see we
will NEVER win in Iraq? I can't WAIT until they kick our asses out...save a whole lot of unnecessary deaths.

Evan Bayh...you couldn't possibly be more wrong...you don't continue an illegal genocidal slaughter of people who did nothing to us.

I am so ashamed of my country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh well, I guess alot more Iraqis and American are going to die
in service of these misguided fools. The only problem in Iraq is the presence of the Americans. Remove them and you remove the problem.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. Hey! Now we've got only one party. Get over it!
Some more re-framing and everybody will agree with everybody on everything. Guess that's what democracy under god is. And of course, if you don;t agree you can burn in hell. Scalia and his apostles will see to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. "It's a quagmire, a disaster, Vietnam in slow-motion . . .
. . . and we're going to keep on spending money until we win it!" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
40. Red, White & Blue: These Colors Don't Run!
... the world.

Does the cost include re-instating the draft?

Comparing the costs and benefits:

The additional costs are between $75 - $100 billion and 7 or so dead soldiers per week

But what are the additional benefits?
The only benefits I can think of is OIL and military bases.

Providing Iraq with 'democracy' is not a direct benefit to the American people.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. I wish we were getting out...
I can't see that happening... Bush is asking another 80 billion dollars for the war, unless he is planning on getting out of the Iraq and going into Iran with this money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
41. Senators who want to keep on with the war at any cost

should give up their salaries and Senatorial benefits till the war is completed!!

That will certainly not be accepted!!

Jacob Matthan
Oulu, Finland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
43. Despite Cost!?!
While our deficit is down the proverbial toilet, our society's only security nest-egg (however meager) is about to be pulled from under us and future generations (not to mention I'm sick of hearing about us baby-boomer's when it is "us" that paid-in so we'd have something to live on), and of course the great Medicare outage about to be robbed from any of us (God forbid you become "disabled," a dirty word these days) as the list goes on and on...

So, despite the Cost to the American public, while the 1% get more drunk with power and "In God We Trust Greenage," everything they do is of course, Clinton's fault.

Way too many drastic, extreme changes all at once, when we're just getting over the 9/11 shock mentality; still coming down from the "Elevated Terrorist Alerts" that kept us notified daily so we'd never forget to be "afraid."

Oh, let me stop before I get any sicker! I've said it before and I'll say it again... "What's wrong with the other's?" "Where are their heads?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
44. Hey, I thought that asshole Loser Paul Bummer already gave them...
Edited on Wed Jan-26-05 03:25 AM by pinniped
their 'sovereignty' back?

I saw it on tv and that stupid note that said "let freedom reign".

What gives????

--They see Sunday’s election to choose a national Iraqi assembly as the crucial next step toward Iraqi sovereignty and the eventual withdrawal of the 150,000 U.S. forces there.--

Boy, have they been lied to or what?

On second thought, the facts are clearly laid out and many are too stupid to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
45. They will drag this war out as long as they can, they are evil
:kick:

Bring the troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-05 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. as long as corporations can make money and steal OUR tax $$$'s
the war will be on....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC