Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Drops Effort to Relax Media Ownership Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:39 PM
Original message
White House Drops Effort to Relax Media Ownership Rules
The Bush administration has decided to abandon the effort by Michael K. Powell, the outgoing chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, to relax the regulations that have prevented the nation's largest media companies from growing bigger and entering new markets, government officials and industry lawyers briefed about the decision said today.

In a final slap at Mr. Powell, the Justice Department will not ask the United States Supreme Court to consider a decision last year by a federal appeals court in Philadelphia that sharply criticized the attempt to deregulate the rules and ordered the commission to reconsider its action.
...
If, as now expected, the appeals court decision withstands legal challenge by some media companies, it would prevent the biggest media conglomerates from expanding.

It also would return the rules back to the commission for further consideration. Lawmakers and some officials predicted that whoever succeeds Mr. Powell would be unlikely to embark on a course of wholesale deregulation of the media rules in light of the political furor that Mr. Powell's plan provoked. But they also said the agency could ultimately reconsider and relax a smaller number of the rules.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/27/business/27cnd-media.html?ex=1264568400&en=b0f560bbece8fb57&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does this mean something good
is happening in our favor? Why would they "drop" this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They don't need it or him anymore
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Williams May Very Well Be Iceberg Tip. There's Lots Of FOIA Out There
looking into Media bias.

And deregulating was very unpopular across the board amongst Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It means that they've already largely succeeded. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Right! How much more airwaves
could they possibly have?

Sounds like the want to discredit the whole Powell name!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. They distrust the Powell faction
and making alliances with fewer supermedia moguls is a giant chip they would rather see a bit weakened by good old fashioned competition. It is like a developing checks and balances systems among the bad buys, media, politics, corporate dinosaurs etc, with none allowed to get a monopoly of power on the whole if their "friends" have anything to do with it.

Like any intra gang war or War of the Roses it will do the people or the civil institutions no good whatsoever, a further example of the extreme degeneracy of "elitist" government on the RW model. of course, in the neat world of high finance these look to us like bloodless, mysterious affairs where the presumed conspiracies and alliances reach their limits and heads begin to roll inside the protected clubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. They were going to do it all along
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 07:04 PM by rocknation
Bush is staying in office; the MSM helped him do it amid promises of favorable media legislation; now they're not going to get what they were promised. Business as usual, GOP style, right down to spinning it as a poisonus idea that the departing Powell The Younger had. Maybe the Armstrong Williams revelation was part of the scam: "It's out of our hands--we couldn't push it through now if we wanted to! Think of how it would look!" Will the MSM turn on Georgie instead? I guess we'll have to stay tuned...

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not for nothing, but...
is it me, or is there blood in the water? I think things are going to start shaking out. Of course, I've been here before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mills Street Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Poor Sinclair
They put all that effort into Promoting Bush every underhanded way they knew how, and it was all for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think this has to do with the attempt by some
media investors to mount a hostile take over of the Rupert Murdock's Media empire......

Remember a few months back when Saudi investors stepped in to block a hostile takeover of Murdock's company.......

Stay tuned folks.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikido15 Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks to the activists, AGAIN!
A major grassroots effort beat out lobbyists such as Viacom and CBS. This is a major accomplishment for progressives...

Woooo hoooo!

Thanks to all who stop bitching long enough to take action for a worthy cause!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC