Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House is ambushed by criticism from America's military community

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:32 PM
Original message
White House is ambushed by criticism from America's military community
Independent Digital (UK) Ltd


George Bush probably owes his presidency to the absentee military voters who nudged his tally in Florida decisively past Al Gore's. But now, with Iraq in chaos and the reasons for going to war there mired in controversy, an increasingly disgruntled military poses perhaps the gravest immediate threat to his political future, just one year before the presidential elections.

From Vietnam veterans to fresh young recruits, from seasoned officers to anxious mothers worried about their sons' safety on the streets of Baghdad and Fallujah, the military community is growing ever more vocal in its opposition to the White House.

"I once believed that I served for a cause: 'To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States'. Now I no longer believe that," Tim Predmore, a member of the 101st Airborne Division serving near Mosul, wrote in a blistering opinion piece this week for his home newspaper, the Peoria Journal Star in Illinois. "I can no longer justify my service for what I believe to be half- truths and bold lies." ---

More considered analysis is also available online, such as this reflection from a 23-year-old serving in the US Air Force, who wonders what the Iraq mess is going to do to the future of the US military: "The powers that be are destroying our military from the inside, especially our Army.

"How many of these people that are 'stranded' (for lack of a better term) in Iraq are going to re-enlist? How many that haven't deployed are going to re-enlist ... how many families are going to be destroyed?" he asked. ---

Banish bush From Texas Too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalazh Donating Member (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. WAKE UP, WAKE UP
people please wake up before it is too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Bush is weakening our country on purpose
He destroying our military, bankrupting us, exporting our jobs, and turning our allies against us. Why is he doing this? Does he work *for* Binladen? I can't believe we're letting them do this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ILeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. I used to think it was "just" malicious incompetence...
...but every action taken by the Bush Regime has contributed to the weakening, and possibly destruction, of our Nation. It's becoming difficult to come up with an explanation for their actions that doesn't involve treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. CHIMPANZEE IS NO FRIEND OF VETERANS
Wait til these "kids" are old, disabled and without medical care etc.

They will then see what this AWOL MOTHER FUCKER is about.

At least under Clinton, benefits were granted to the truly deserving. These corporate scumbags (like Cheney) care nothing about the Veteran !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Military ballots...and massive election fraud by Jeb and Kat
Disfranchising tens of thousands of voters had a wee bit to do with it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep I am seeing this
now very much in the open... the boy is NOT getting
too many votes from the military and yes they are
destroying the Armed Forces... as they tout them around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. That'll teach you to not undermine the constitution when your ballot
needs to be postmarked by a certain date. I recall some bragging that they mailed their ballots late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. No threat from military voters
Bush has that sewn up: internet voting for our troops. Nothing but the best (of fraud-vulnerable methods). (Accenture, I think. Don't quote me.)

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. How do you know?
I am military and I have been a Democrat since I passed out fliers for Hubert Humphrey when I was 13 years old.
Just curious what info you have that the military is such a solid republican voting bloc. Was there a survey or something? I have been in some units where it seemed both ways. I would be interested to see any poll info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not Sewn Up Due to Voting Preference
But rather I believe Eloriel was referring to sewing up the military vote through fraud. If they have military personnel voting online, then there's practically no way to guarantee that it's tallied properly or honestly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Oh I see
Better reading comprehension required.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. Internet voting can leave a paper trail
But you have to have the presence of mind to print out your vote before you press "submit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. OT: Such a 'paper trail' is useless.
The only useful paper trail is an auditable paper trail. This means that a parallel voter-verified paper balloting process must be instituted. A casual paper record is of no more use than voter notations in their election guide. Unless uniformly collected, verified, and controlled, such notes are of no use whatsoever since tracking any individual's vote from casual paper notes is nearly unimplementable while still keeping a secret ballot. (Just thought I'd forestall this misapprehension.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's not what she meant... she's talking about the way
the military industrial complex is trying to make military votes electronic so that the totals can be more easily manipulated. Eloriel is one of our heros in the fight against the corporate-owned, fraud-prone voting machines that are taking over elections in the U.S.

THAT is why she said bush had the next election taken care of...same type of crap that happened with Jeb bush's Florida, and the Texas and Georgia elections in 2002. Votes now show totals the machines are being programmed (or hacked) to show, not how people actually cast votes & for whom.

There are lots of DUers who are military and Dems, and Eloriel knows that. She wasn't calling military personnel all republicans.

Just wanted to give you a little history here for clarification.

:loveya:

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I don't know if there are statistics
proving that the military favors the
repugs but would be interested in such
a survey. I have always been lead to
believe that it is true from sniplets
I've read in the news. If it is true
that the repugs finance the military
more it could be the factor. What will
be the new factor is the misuse of soldiers
in an unnecessary war and the sacrifice
of American blood and treasure. I don't
believe that would have happend under a
democratic government. This abuse of our
power will go down in history and perhaps
the military will change its preferred
party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drscm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Republican or not....
the New York Times (sorry, no link) reported that when it came to counting absentee ballots from the military in Florida, the repugs challenged late absentee ballots which were from Democrats. Only the late absentee ballots from repugs were counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Just a little more on the military
making the machines and counting the votes.

Science Applications International Corporation SAIC has been hired by Maryland to verify Diebold Touchscreen Voting machines are secure.
Former President, Chief Operating Officer, and Vice Chairman of SAIC is Admiral Bill Owens, who is now Chairman of the Board for VoteHere. Oweens also served as Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and was a senior military assistant to Secretaries of Defense Frank Carlucci and Dick Cheney. Carlucci's company is Carlyle Group, while Vice President Dick Cheney's former employer is Halliburton.

Diversified Dynamics has brought the election process to the technological level of the new millennium by designing the world's most advanced electronic vote recording and election management system. They are supported in this effort by the engineering and software capabilities of Science Applications International Corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
37. Thanks for the info
This is damn scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Can any one tell me when the service became GOP?
My ex was in for 20 years and I never met a rep. GOP did nothing for the service man it only gives its pals contracts for tanks and things.Their is even a quote that Ike once said all men should be willing to serve free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. I don't know when it happened but-
when I was in Turkey/Bosnia/Kosovo in 1999 playing in a blues band for our
troops, even the mention of the name Clinton brought replies of hisses and boos.

They hate(d) Clinton. They had no idea why they were there keeping the
peace. Nary a soldier knew about the civil war in BH... they were kept
ignorant and Clinton was a handy scapegoat.

oh- and at the posts we played- in EVERY ROOM were pallets loaded with
bottled water.... and if you didn't have a bottle in your hand it was suggested
that you put one there. This was Kellogg Brown and Root supplied...

and now KBR has water rationed to two bottles a DAY????

no wonder our troops are "beginning" to turn on this commander in thief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. As some have already explained...
... Eloriel was referring to how the votes were counted.

But on your point, I think a survey would be fairly hard to find--the military tends not to talk openly about personal political persuasion, in my experience, so whatever information available is likely very anecdotal.

My own experience from the `60s was that people talked a lot of politics, but rarely by saying something such as, "well, I'm a Republican and I believe this," etc.

What I did find, though, was a fairly prominent bias on the part of career military to any candidate that promised to increase military spending, or who talked tough about prosecuting the war. They agreed with that. In fact, even though it was very much against regulation, I had to sit through a talk like that from the unit XO in order to get a military absentee ballot for the `68 election. During that, it seemed, the bias was clearly toward Nixon, because he was talking that way about military spending and the war. I vaguely remember the phrase, "as a soldier, you have an obligation to support the candidate who will support us," with the military equivalent of nudge, nudge, wink, wink. To myself, I said, "yeah, right."

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SummerGrace Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Accenture
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 04:07 PM by SummerGrace
Offshore company captures online military vote
By Lynn Landes
Online Journal Contributing Writer

July 21, 2003—Last year, while George W. Bush marshaled U.S. forces for the invasion of Iraq, the patriots at the Department of Defense awarded the contract for a new online voting system for the military . . . to an offshore company.

It gets worse.

Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment (SERVE) is the system and Accenture (formerly Anderson Consulting of Enron bankruptcy fame) is the company. And although Accenture has not been officially implicated in the Enron scandal, they have created a reputation of their own that is already raising eyebrows.

This is hot off the newswire—7/15/03 NEW YORK (CBS.MW)—Accenture Ltd., the former Andersen Consulting, disclosed Tuesday that it might have violated the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Chairman and CEO Joe Forehand, on an earnings call with analysts and reporters Tuesday, said the consulting firm's Middle East operations could be in non-compliance with the Act, which prohibits the bribery of foreign government officials by U.S. persons.

Accenture has a troubling track record, a close business relationship with Dick Cheney's Halliburton, and 2,500 partners of which more than half are not U.S. citizens.

Last month Accenture bought the public-sector election assets of Election.com, which suffered its own scandal this year when it was discovered that Osan Ltd, a firm of Saudi and other foreign investors, bought controlling interest in it. According to Mark Harrington of NewsDay.com, "Several shareholders of the company said they were surprised by the recent buyout and have asked for securities regulators to investigate."
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/072103Landes/072103landes.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Again notice this appears in the UK
Where's the Friggin' American media. Too busy putting flags on their lapels!

And why the F*ck isn't there an Congressional investigation in to the shortages the troops face - like 40,000 Kevlar vests, lack of rifles for armor troops, still on MRE's and shortages of water.

Oh, I forgot this is a Repug congress and all they do is wave the flag and call liberals traitors as a distraction while they line the pockets of their corporate supporters and their own with our tax money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I found the link to the letter to the Peoria Journal Star by Tim Predmore
it was written in august:

<http://www.pjstar.com/news/opedcolumns/b0gtbbgr059.html>



I don't think any major newspaper picked this up, so it just fell into the vast darkness until the Brits picked it up. How sad for our democracy that we have such media whores here in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. LA Times had it Wednesday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I posted it yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. if the GI's think it's bad now
wait until they are veterans then they will really discover how shabbily the Bushco treats them - cuts in health care, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. R U Aware of HOW he was elected by absentee military votes??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The ones mailed late?
Edited on Fri Sep-19-03 04:31 PM by party_line
Maybe after a call went out from someone familiar with the kind of cash that flows through a repub Pentagon? Lieberman thought it was a good idea to count those, too, as I recall.

edit- What % of the military actually votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Yep, Lieberman threw in the towel on that one
even though it was obvious that the military ballots were cast after Election Day, in a desperate attempt to stuff the Florida ballot.

Bush had help from people in uniform in order to pull this stunt. I hope they are in Iraq today, enjoying the fruits of their election efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. No they are retired
working as civilians for defense contractors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanger Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is Clark relevant to this discussion? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. "our troops are still dying and our government is still lying"
Good quote. I also liked "half- truths and bold lies." The people identified in this article should expect punitive retaliation. Bush is a vindictive little fuck. And Rummy is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, well, well..........Y'all are sacrificing your lives for a Tyrranny?
Hmmmmm..........This is the first step to self realization.

A little late, but it is better than never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-03 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. A fraudulent administration in the name of greed,
has been exposed by the people for the people and of the people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
33. "ambushed"?
It'll be interesting to see how often the words 'ambushed' and 'bushwhacked' are used in the media, and how the frequency of that use increases. It'd be heartening to see this increase in the corporatist American media -- a pretty clear indication of a damage control dam overflowing the spillway. (It's their way of relieving the backpressure.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
36. Sounds like the "New Sheriff in town"
is about to be run outta town. :evilgrin: Wonder how many of these military families would like to have the old sheriff back in charge? Remember, the one they despised so much, but also the one who didn't get their butts shot off daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
39. I wonder if the old
Bring Em On had anything to do with it..

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bringemon4.html

Watch my series of 15 second ads and spread the word please...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. To enlsited people and their families:
Hang in there. Help is on the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC