Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:20 AM
Original message |
Ooops, didnt realize I was in LBN!!! watched the Clark forum |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 01:21 AM by syrinx9999
Wow. That guy is all that's good about Clinton times 3 minus the bad stuff!
Clark will be elected president next year.
|
Girlfriday
(570 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, I was very impressed |
|
I agree with your prediction - and he scares the cons, that's the best thing about him!
|
Rocinante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I tried this once and got smothered. You have a better reputation than I, I'm fairly new.
|
ErasureAcer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:42 AM
Response to Original message |
3. What Clark said in the Town Hall meeting |
|
-Israel has the right to pre-emptively attack the Palestinians.
-The USA had the right to attack Iraq based on U.N. Resolution 1441.
-That he is a new democrat.
Truly now. On point 1, he is just as bad as GW Bush and is doing nothing to help the I/P situation, which in return does nothing to help our nations' security when it comes to terrorists.
CLARK's POLICY PLAIN OUT SUCKS!
On point 2, that is a plain LIE. 1441 didn't give the USA the right to attack Iraq. It said the UN could take further to be determined actions later if Iraq didn't comply and cooperate with UN Weapons Inspectors. Iraq did coopereate and Bush chickened out and never got a resolution to use force against Iraq as he didn't have the votes the 3 African nations, Mexico, and a couple of other nations.
CLARK LIED.
On point 3, the guy isn't even a Democrat. It has been noted that he supported republicans in the past, even George W. Bush as recently as in the past year. The man has not run for anything and thus doesn't have a voting record to really know where he stands on the issues. He sorely lacks an imediate domestic vision(sorry I won't be around in 100 years...it doesn't take 100 years to make the USA a better place) or even a vision at all. What this all comes down to is...
CLARK CAN NOT BE TRUSTED
Clark will not get any of my support. He has already blown his chances with me by distorting the truth. Without trust there is nothing. If Clark is the Dem nominee I'll be more than happy to vote Green party, maybe the Dems will THEN finally learn that you can't run LIARS for President in 2008 or any office for that matter.
You want a real politician who has an immediate vision for the United States and its role in the world? go to Kucinich's website and learn more www.kucinich.us
|
mhr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
This man scares me a lot.
I can see nothing democratic about his policies.
|
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't think we saw the same programs |
Syrinx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Will you vote for the Democratic candidate? |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 02:29 AM by syrinx9999
This Green party bullshit is what is going to bury us! The greens have some good ideas. But there's a place for idealism and a place for pragmatism. And some greens are idealistic shitheads that are going to allow the fucking Bush family evil empire and the rest of the evil and misguided Republicans to finally fucking bury this country. And the blood and ideas of this country will be on their hands!!! Is that you?
|
ErasureAcer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Not if it Clark or Lieberman |
|
these guys are republicans!
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 02:35 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |