Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBC (Saturday): More US troops face Iraq call-up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:58 AM
Original message
BBC (Saturday): More US troops face Iraq call-up
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 10:18 AM by Jack Rabbit
EDITED for typing

From the BBC Online
Dated Saturday September 27 08:25 GMT (1:25 am PDT)

More US troops face Iraq call-up]

About 15,000 US soldiers and reservists have been told to prepare for service in Iraq , as other countries hold back from pledging troops.
The announcement follows earlier statements by senior US officers this week, that National Guard and Reserve troops would be needed.
Other countries failed to respond to President George W Bush's plea for help for help in stabilising the country.
US troops come under almost daily attack.

Read more.
Calling up reserves was the bridge LBJ would not cross in Vietnam. When General Westmoreland attempted to requisition more troops after the Tet Offensive in 1968, Johnson announced his retirement and began his peace initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard Paul Krugman say that there's a rull of thumb in the military:...
out of 33 brigades, the military can only afford to have 1/3rd engaged at any one time.

He said, right now, there are 2 in Afghanistan and 16 in Iraq. He said that there are only 3 more right now that are really ready to go anywhere.

He said that this raises two issues. He says he's not sure what election-padding mischief Bush could get America into before next November (Iran, Syria aren't possible -- he said that we could perhaps re-invade Grenada). He also said that it's incredibly expensive to run a military, and what we're doing now is really expensive, and if we needed a bigger millitary, it would be extremely difficult to pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree--It's going to get DRAFTY in Amerika soon.
Then we will have to choose what to do. Draft resistence or counselling is going to get a lot of people INCARATED due to the PATRIOT ACT

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST (yes I'm pissed off)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. LBJ's generals also wanted troops at home to deal with dissent!
Another reason LBJ was worried about sending more troops to Vietnam was that protest in the street had the admin worried about 'law and order' in the US deteriorationg to the point of needing troops in the street to quench the popular resistance to the war. Don't forget about those camps in the desert that FEMA has ready for occupancy in case The People demand the return of their government from the petro-nazis. See REX84, Reagan's 1984 empowerment of FEMA to impose military rule in the US if The People 'get unruly' in time of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC