Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Observer: Party ready to turn on PM (Blair)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:01 PM
Original message
Observer: Party ready to turn on PM (Blair)
The Observer, Sunday September 28, 2003

The Prime Minister faces a complete breakdown in his relations with large sections of the Labour Party after a poll of members revealed a remarkable level of disquiet about his leadership and the war on Iraq.

The YouGov poll of more than 300 party members over the last three days found that more than 40 per cent want Tony Blair to stand down before the next election and nearly 60 per cent believe he was wrong to sanction war on Iraq. More than 80 per cent believe he exaggerated the case for war either deliberately (37 per cent) or unintentionally (44 per cent). Less than 20 per cent believe there was no exaggeration.

Revealing that the issue of trust has poisoned the Prime Minister's relationship with many of his own party, more than a third said they either do not trust the Prime Minister 'at all' or 'very much'.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tony will do fine
The have his seat on the Halliburton Board of Directors all warmed up for him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Blair goes down...
Chimpy is right behind him. Know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Explain the logic of this. Labour and Democrats have historically moved...
...in tandem. Republicans and Tories have moved in tandem.

If Bush stays in '04, Blair goes, and Tories will win in no time. If a Dem wins in 2004, Blair will win in 2006, after they work together to fix Iraq (and they will remove, forever, the possibility that Republicans can use Iraq to justify American imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LivingInTheBubble Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. You forgot the Lib Dems
They are neck and neck with the other two parties.
I do not anticipate the tories getting back in at the moment.
My current guess is that Blair will be replaced as leader from witin the labour party after which they may well go on to win the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is big...
He is toast but I bet you anything he doesn't step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cappurr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hooboy
This guy is toast. And he can thank his "pal" Bush for that (who doesn't give a shit, of course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. One of our Brit DU'ers said Labour won't leave Tony....the alternative is
too terrible...but I don't know if they are aware of this latest poll......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The guy's in his second year of a five year term. This poll isn't the...
...worst news. It's the equivalent of Jim McGeevey. The strange thing is that McGeevey is unpopular because of a bad economy created by Republicans. Blair is actually doing incredible things with the British economy considering the crappiness of the global economy (which is mostly a refelctiong of what what a little liberalizing can do after years of conservativism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. see Poodle
you wanted to be * whistle ass's lapdog, and now you're all but done in your political career. nd don't think that nice Halliburton job will be waiting for you either, Unca Dick's having a few problems himself these days :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. He didn't want to be Bush's bitch. The fact is, Britain IS America's bitch
and has been since the 40s. Blair is holding out, staving off economic sabotage, until the UK and Europe has its act sufficiently together so that it CAN stand up to the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MariMayans Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. quite correct
The UK has as much autonomy as the Ukraine did pre-Gorbachev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nice legacy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nottingham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Liberal Party Kennedy is making a huge surge
Tony is getting ready to be ousted! :bounce: He will have a Billion dollar job for Bush don't worry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I would love to see a single tiny shred of evidence supporting this often
repeated theory.

I think it would be strange for Blair to be offered a job by Bush when Blair was so supportive of Gore's candidacy that Murdoch's lobbyist threatened Blair after Bush won (it's in Pallast's book). I think Blair would want to keep his distance from a guy whom CIA agents on Democracy Now! suggested was intentionally sabotaging him. I think former foreign service official Richard (?) Kiesling wasn't alone in recognizing on the Diane Rehm show that Bush was making life extremely hard on him. I think Blair realizes this too. If they wanted to give him money, why wouldn't they let him run his country too?

And, hey, obviously Tony is going to be appointed UN Ambassador, or he'll carry the liberal flag in EU government, or, if the Tories do take control of the UK, he'll go back to being a barrister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's Gotta be Blackmail
Bush must be blackmailing Blair somehow. Nothing else makes any sense.
Why would Blair support something that should be anathema to himself and
his party, and which will almost certainly bring down both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Of course he's blackmailing Blair -- Bush will destroy the British economy
and will undermine Blair through the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The theory of the Lib Dem surge?
Heard about the Brent East By-election AP? 29% swing to the Liberal Democrats, Blair had his arse kicked in a previously rock solid inner city Labour seat.

Blair's betrayal of the progressive cause has caused a lot of people to turn to the Liberal Democrats. Of course they are still a third party but I can assure you that their platofrom is many timnes better then the Blairite one and when all is said and done, why should we vote for a party whose policies we abhore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LivingInTheBubble Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Popularity figures
All three parties had around 31% in a poll on support for parties.
I think its hard for some to imagine more then two parties in the run for power but it does happen at some points.

Labour moved right to capture more voters leaving a space for a more left wing party and the field is now split in three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Agreed
The Lib Dem surge at the expense of the Labour is not a theory, it is an established fact. Anyone who doesn't know this is not paying attention.

In Britain, the Left has something better to do than hold its nose and support Blair because he's better than Duncan Smith.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. If I Was a U.K. Citizen
I would vote for the Socialist Alliance: http://www.socialist-alliance.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LivingInTheBubble Donating Member (360 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thankyou for the advice. I have bookmarked them. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC