Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Data Not Old, Bush* Aides Insist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:12 PM
Original message
Iraq Data Not Old, Bush* Aides Insist
Rice, Powell Refute Committee Assertion That Intelligence Was 5 Years Out of Date

President Bush's senior foreign-policy advisers yesterday disputed assertions by the leaders of the House intelligence committee that the administration waged war against Iraq based largely on information about Iraq's weapons programs that was five years old, when U.N. inspectors left the country.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice told "Fox News Sunday" that "there was an enrichment of the intelligence from 1998 over the period leading up to the war" and that Saddam Hussein had "very good programs in weapons of mass destruction. . . . It was a gathering danger."

(snip)

Graham said he was struck by how much of the NIE's information was dated prior to 1998, when U.N. inspectors left the country. "Much of it was based on information that was, in some cases, a decade or more old."

Asked about Rice's statement that there was "enriching" new information gathered since 1998 in the NIE, Graham responded: "I'm not aware of what would have been the enriching information."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14347-2003Sep28.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it's not old, it was all made up just since last year !!
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garion_55 Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thats not what Rumseld said in July.
''The coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq's pursuit'' of weapons of mass destruction, Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee. ''We acted because we saw the evidence in a dramatic new light -- through the prism of our experience on 9-11.''

so which one is lying?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. precicely the quote that came to my mind
Things are getting more insane that I even would have anticipated!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. tip for the WH: get your story straight *before* it gets to the media
along the same lines: get your story straight *before* you go to war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spentastic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Admission?
"good programs in weapons of mass destruction. . . . It was a gathering danger"

Programs? We didn't go to war for programs did we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Last night on Russert she kept saying "In 97" when............
refering to intellegence used by bush in his reasoning to invade. Everytime she said it she got a pompous grin on her face. "We used the same intellegence the previous admin used whenm they bombed Iraq." They are now officially blaming Clinton on the matter. No one dares ask, "Why didnt you use 2003 intellegence instead?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Condo and Powell right!
The intelligence they used to sell their pre-emptive Invasion & Occupation of Iraq was NOT 5 years old.....most of it was over 10 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC