Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ambushed U.S. soldiers kill five Iraqis - army

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:14 AM
Original message
Ambushed U.S. soldiers kill five Iraqis - army
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/4757735.htm

HABBANIAH, Iraq, July 15 (Reuters) - U.S. forces killed five Iraqis and captured another on Tuesday after they came under ambush while driving out of an ammunition depot west of Baghdad, the commander of the unit said.

The clash, between the cities of Ramadi and Habbaniyah about 100 km (60 miles) west of Baghdad, took place in particularly hostile territory for U.S. troops. The military has blamed a spate of attacks in the predominantly Sunni Muslim area on die- hard loyalists of ousted President Saddam Hussein.

"Our unit was making its way out of the ammunitions dump when we were ambushed. Our Bradleys (fighting vehicles) fought back and we killed five attackers," Captain Mark Miller, the commander of the company involved, told Reuters.

There were no U.S. casualties.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. ...........killing 5
i hope bush doesnt resort to a 'body count' mentality to prove we are doing something about his failures.. the 'body count' method can be really hard on the civilians. but a body count of 152 prisoners in custody got Bush elected as a can do and did, sorta guy. being that the death penalty is not a deturant to crime, maybe the 152 were a blood sacrafice, after all he does do voodoo economics, and some really impressive magic with defecit stats and the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There is always "good news" like dead Iraqi's before the bad news
Edited on Tue Jul-15-03 09:30 AM by NNN0LHI
The story of dead Americans will be coming very soon. I have noticed this pattern lately. Every time I read a story like this I cringe.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. the conflict is so far from ''over''
it just gets more complicated the longer we stay -- and that business about saddam loyalists -- i'm guessing that people taking pot shots at us now could care less about saddam. they care about killing americans -- an occupying force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRClarkesq Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone heard the "flypaper" theory floating in neocon circles?
Bush's "bring em on" remark was intended to encourage jihad types to travel to Iraq to gat a crack at the Great Satan. Neocons figure this will relieve pressure on Isreal and offer opportunities to kill would be terrorists without having to go find them.

This theory based on assumption that much of the opposition in Iraq is from non-Iraqis, such as the Fedayeen Saddam we heard so much about during the early days of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Notice how we get all the details when we win
and half a dependent clause when one of our boys gets killed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. bush cancels soldiers widows benefit raise...........
Edited on Tue Jul-15-03 08:18 PM by sam sarrha
bush vetoed doubling the widows benefit for soldiers killed in action from $6,000 to $12,000. i guess there are rich republicans that need the money. he also vetoed housing improvements, maybe he figures not many of them are comming back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC