Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: EPA Chief Will Emphasize Science

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:53 PM
Original message
Bush: EPA Chief Will Emphasize Science
snip>
Bush attended a ceremonial swearing-in ceremony for Stephen Johnson, the first career employee to take over the agency's reins. Johnson, a 24-year EPA veteran, also is the first administrator with a science background.

"With this background, Steve will help us continue to place sound scientific analysis at the heart of all major environmental decisions," Bush said at a 15-minute ceremony in which White House chief of staff Andy Card administered the oath of office.
...
Environmentalists and some federal scientists have complained that the Bush administration often puts politics ahead of science on issues such as global warming, toxic chemicals, forest and energy policies and protections for imperiled species. Some of Bush's core beliefs are that nature requires intervention, market forces trump regulations, and environmental protections are not possible without economic growth.
...
"As I prepared for today, I thought about how I felt when the president asked me to lead EPA," he recounted. "Even after years of Latin, German, scientific training, the only word I could think of was 'wow.' Wow."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/23/AR2005052301134.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dave Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boosh would not know "sound scientific analysis"
if it bit him on his dumb ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "sound science" = classic neocon buzz-word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's shows how bad it is - that he even has to SAY that...
No, really, guys. Science. Really this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. The EPA Chief should emphasize science.
Bu$h just gets dumber and dumber day by day.

He will go down in history as the most stupid president EVER.

Arggghhhhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. :shocked:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Odd that the article only mentions "scientific training"
What are his degree's where are they from and why does this smell like another smokescreen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Haa. The Headline gave me a great laugh which is really sad.
:D :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is Bush saying we should have faith in Science?
Just curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. the comments below should what he means by sound science!!


......With the visit, Bush became the first president to visit EPA headquarters. Bush, often at odds with environmentalists, used the occasion to plug his agenda while calling Johnson "the right man" for the job.

"As Steve leads the EPA, he will maintain our common-sense approach of collaborating with leaders and volunteers at the local level to find the best solutions to meet our national goals," Bush said.

"We'll continue to vigorously enforce our environmental laws," the president continued. "We'll encourage good stewardship of natural resources, and we will focus on results."

Bush said one of Johnson's first big tasks was to persuade Congress to pass the "Clear Skies" air pollution plan. In March, a Senate committee rejected the bill. Opponents want limits on carbon dioxide, the chief "greenhouse" gas scientists blame for global warming, but which Bush says is too costly to regulate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. '...the best solutions to meet our national goals...'
I shudder to think what HIS national goals R for OUR environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Code words for "global warming has no scientific basis"
something the corporate people have been into ever since they gave up on no link between cancer and smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Too bad Dubya is lying through his teeth.
It would be nice to have science rule at EPA once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. You got it! Everything he says means the opposite. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. so who is this bozo and what industry groups have him in their backpocket
Edited on Mon May-23-05 05:11 PM by dwickham
anyone have any bio on him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. here's some links
Edited on Mon May-23-05 05:47 PM by librechik
advocates testing pesticides on human children
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1037

then he dropped it to get this job
http://earthhopenetwork.net/Johnson_Drops_Kids_Pesticide_Study_Avoid_Losing_Top_EPA_Job.htm

was educated at Taylor University, an intentional, Christ-centered covenant institution
http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/morecheers041405.cfm

was instrumental in the rescinding of lead paint protection
http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0314-04.htm

that's enough for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. so he's a perfect fit for the Bushie white house
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Geez, we have Dr. Frankenstein as EPA chief. Swell.
Edited on Thu May-26-05 10:06 PM by Zorra
Stephen L. Johnson is a scientist of the worst kind. Testing of pesticides on humans provides no health benefit to the subjects, or to society at large. But it does help chemical companies who claim that their products are not dangerous. And that is not who should be leading the E.P.A.

http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1037
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Creation science
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. a balanced synthesis:
<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Talk about
'junk science'... that's what it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. yeah, the GOOD science
like those intelligible design fellows and the ones who work for the oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. HA!
HahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHahaHaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. thanks for saving my fingers
a maniacal laugh was all I could bring myself to type....

What you said.

PUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineYooper Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
18. "...Steve will help us continue to place sound scientific analysis..." ?!?
continue?!?!?!?!

That would seem to imply that they have at some point in the past used "sound scientific analysis".

Somehow, I missed it.

It must have happened on a Monday.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. sound science like this?
<>

And here is the new grant protocol:

<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bush science = Lysenkoism
count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. This clown said LAST WEEK that he was fine with 5% budget cuts
I guess the science is so sound that you don't need money for enforcement or funding environmental mandates anymore.

Words fail me when I even try to describe the corruption and foulness of these ideological science-whore sons of bitches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Translation: "We're gonna destroy the EPA next." eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. may I ask WHAT kind of science?
science?
new-science?
neo-science?
the democratic people's governmental republic approved science?
:shrug:
just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushcrab Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Pscience, or Sharpie science
taking expert biological opinion and recommendations, say, on salmon recovery in the NW, and then black out what you don't want in the final report, to make it magically suit your evil agenda.

Sharpie censorship is cheap, fun, and you can even catch a little buzz from the ink fumes. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. they're going to start blaming trees for shit they didn't do......
and mountain tops will be scapegoated so we can remove them to get to the coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC