Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush to Nominate Rep. Cox for SEC Chairman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:13 PM
Original message
Bush to Nominate Rep. Cox for SEC Chairman
WASHINGTON -- President Bush intends to nominate California Rep. Christopher Cox to head the Securities and Exchange Commission, Republican officials said Wednesday following the resignation of William Donaldson.

These officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said an announcement was possible as early as Thursday.

Cox, 52, is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. He was first elected to Congress in 1988 from California's Orange County.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/01/AR2005060101073.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is an anti-privacy guy. Maybe we can replace him in the House.
With a little effort his seat can go to a Democrat. But the Party has abandoned that seat. It's time to fund a Democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Orange County
no way in hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lorettea Sanchez won in the OC
but this seat is much more puke I believe.

Maybe Rob Lowe is interested. (West Wing reference)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. aaaaaggggghhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Coxe would trash the SEC. There is no way this clown will
enforce any of Donaldson's reforms and Sarbanes Oxley. It will be back to "buyer beware" in the markets. Oh, I forgot, the little guy or gal doesn't belong there, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Teflon" Cox can-not be trusted
He ruined a mans life by accusing him of selling secrets to the Chinese.... It turned out it was all made up and Cox was not held accountable!!

Fuck Cox... he will make a mockery of the SEC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another friend of Dubya...
sure to follow the same path to destruction. SEC, hummm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bush to Nominate Rep. Cox for SEC Chairman
June 2, 2005

WASHINGTON -- Moving quickly to fill a high-profile regulatory vacancy, President Bush intends to nominate Rep. Christopher Cox to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to Republican officials.

Cox, R-Calif., a conservative veteran of 16 years in Congress with wide-ranging policy interests, would succeed William Donaldson, who announced Wednesday he was stepping down on June 30 after a two-year tenure marked by efforts to restore investor confidence in markets shaken by corporate excess.

<snip>

Cox, 52, is chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and a veteran of the Financial Services Committee. The holder of a business and a law degree, he has voted for legislation to make it easier for companies to defend against securities fraud lawsuits.

http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-sec-chairman,0,7893459.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines


Funny, they forgot to mention that Cox was with Rummie and Wolfie in the Pentagon on the morning of 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Uh oh.
Regulatory black hole, here we come.

Watch your wallets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That will really raise confidence in the market (sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't know much about him
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 06:30 AM by DoYouEverWonder
What qualifies him besides being a Bu$h loyalist, to be head of the SEC? Other then the fact that he was on the inside on 9-11. He seems to be very happy to tow the party line regarding the events of that day.


----------------------------------

Chairman Cox's Statement on the Terrorist Attack on America

At 9 a.m. EDT Tuesday, as a hijacked Boeing 767 slammed into the World Trade Center, I was in the Pentagon in the private dining room of the Secretary of Defense. Don Rumsfeld, the Secretary, and Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary, and I were discussing how to win votes for the Bush defense plan that is now pending in the House and Senate.

When minutes later, the Pentagon itself was hit by a Boeing 757 loaded with civilian passengers, virtually the entire building was immediately evacuated. I escaped just minutes before the building was hit. Most of those who remained were huddled in the National Military Command Center in a basement bunker of the building. From there, America's military response is being directed even now.

Ironically, just moments before the Department of Defense was hit by a suicide hijacker, Secretary Rumsfeld was describing to me why America needs to abandon its decade-old two-major-war strategy, and focus on the real threat facing us in the 21st century: terrorism, and the unexpected.

"When I worked on the ballistic missile threat commission , there was an 'event' every few months that focused the attention of those in denial," he told me. "For example, India shocked the world when it detonated a nuclear device. Then Pakistan. Then North Korea launched a two-stage ballistic missile over Japan.

"Terrorist groups, some state-sponsored, are developing these same missile capabilities as we meet here. They are developing the chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons to go with them.

"They do not have all the pieces yet, but they will. That is why Congress has got to give the President the tools he needs to move forward with a defense of America against ballistic missiles, the ultimate terrorist weapons.

"If we remain vulnerable to missile attack, a terrorist group or rogue state that demonstrates the capacity to strike the U.S. or its allies from long range could have the power to hold our entire country hostage to nuclear or other blackmail,'' he said.

"And let me tell you, I've been around the block a few times. There will be another event." He repeated it for emphasis: "There will be another event."

Within minutes of that utterance, Rumsfeld's words proved tragically prophetic.

http://cox.house.gov/html/release.cfm?id=33

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Comment of former SEC chair Arthur Leavitt
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 08:31 AM by reality based
"And I think the future protection of investors you quite correctly point out is very largely a function of enforcement. Also a function of private rights of action. There's a Congressman who comes from Orange County named Chris Cox who's trying very hard to diminish the ability of individuals to sue. I don't support his view of the world in that regard." http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0402/S00244.htm

and

" A year later, you invited me back. There had been
Washington's equivalent of an earthquake in the interim -- for the
first time in 40 years, the Republicans had a majority in both
houses of Congress. All of a sudden, securities litigation reform
was very real: it was part of the Contract with America.
Responsibility for introducing legislation was in the hands of
Congressman Chris Cox of Orange County.

" In that second speech, I told you that while change was
important, we needed measured reform, not wanton revolution. I
said that Congressman Cox's bill had the virtue of jump-starting
the debate, but that it went too far in several important ways.
I repeated my message of 1994: meritless litigation costs capital
and discourages disclosure, but in fighting it, we must be careful
not to eviscerate important investor protections. That would be
a cure far worse than the disease." http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1996/spch070.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Here's a little more background on this appointment:
>
>
Cox, R-Calif., a conservative veteran of 16 years in Congress with wide-ranging policy interests, would succeed William Donaldson, who announced Wednesday he was stepping down on June 30 after a two-year tenure marked by efforts to restore investor confidence in markets shaken by corporate excess.

Donaldson was an activist who often clashed with traditional business allies. They chafed over what they perceived as an excessive regulatory zeal during his tenure.
>
>
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050602/ap_on_go_ot/sec_chairman

"They chafed over what they perceived as an excessive regulatory zeal during his tenure."

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. another bushbaby?
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 06:24 AM by truthisfreedom
if he's not in the womb, eliminate this appointment by Democatic voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bush + Cox = Fucked
figures.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Most ashamed that he is my congress critter.
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 10:00 AM by Pithy Cherub
Wrote him a scathing letter regarding Homeland Security. His staff wrote back and the letter was dated April 1. He is an ass in congress and will bring those same professional whoring skills to the SEC. Good riddance and sorry for America all at the same time...

On edit: my America is capitalized...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Cox said we were still finding WMD in Iraq... as of this February!
Edited on Thu Jun-02-05 10:17 AM by Newsjock
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/02/25.html

Rep. Christopher Cox (R-CA) at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on February 17, 2005:

"Despite all evidence to the contrary, the left persists with the fiction that our efforts in Iraq are a distraction from the war on terrorism. No, this is the war on terrorism. We continue to discover biological and chemical weapons and facilities to make them inside Iraq, and even more about their intended use."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bush Nominating Rep. Cox to Head SEC
<<SNIP>>
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/06/02/national/w063832D40.DTL

Bush Nominating Rep. Cox to Head SEC
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

Thursday, June 2, 2005

Acting quickly to fill a high-profile regulatory vacancy, President Bush on Thursday moved to nominate Rep. Christopher Cox, R-Calif., a conservative veteran of 16 years in Congress with wide-ranging policy interests, to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Cox would succeed William Donaldson, who announced Wednesday he was stepping down.

The White House announced a 10:15 a.m. ceremony for Bush to name his choice and aides confirmed that it would be Cox.

Asked why Bush had selected Cox, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the president's choice "brings a lot of experience and expertise to the position."

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I must be getting jaded.....
the first questions that come to my mind are:

How much money hasv this guy taken from brokerage firms?
How much legislation favorable to brokerage firms has he introduced?
How hard did he campaign for Bush*/Arnold in those elections?
How much money did he raise for Bush*?


and, for our purposes, the most important question,

Can a Democrat win in that District?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I don't know much about him...can't tell if it's good or bad
But, considering the Propagandist's history of nominations I'm going to go out on a limb and say there are probably a few thousand more qualified people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. What it means is Donaldson was fired...
considering they had some one ready early next morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. huhhhhwwhhhaaaaaa?
aside from him being a conservative jerk, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Ho hum, more of the same...
http://nytimes.com/2005/06/02/business/02wire-sec.html

Acting Quickly, Bush Nominates Congressman to Lead S.E.C.

<snip>

His decision to leave gave President Bush the opportunity to appoint, in Mr. Cox, a successor who is expected to tip the balance at the agency toward the more deregulatory agenda favored by the remaining Republicans on the five-member commission.

Mr. Cox, 52, long an ally of business groups, helped rewrite securities laws to make investor lawsuits more difficult to file.

Mr. Cox worked at the White House under President Ronald Reagan and was elected to the House in 1988 after working at a California law firm where he specialized in venture capital and corporate finance. His district includes Orange County, and he is the head of the House Committee on Homeland Security.

In 1995, he was named a defendant in a lawsuit by investors as a result of legal work he did for an investment group in the 1980's. The suit accused Mr. Cox, his former law firm and two former colleagues of misleading regulators and investors about the condition of a real estate investment fund. Mr. Cox, who denied that he had violated any laws, was eventually dropped from the lawsuit and the firm where he worked, Latham & Watkins, settled for an undisclosed amount.

He said his experience as a defendant had helped shape his views about investor lawsuits and led him "to sympathize with people who are victimized in these suits." The bill Mr. Cox helped to write, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, was the only legislation to become law over a veto by President Bill Clinton.

<rest snipped>


IOW, more of the same old * crap.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. investor lawsuits
victimized?..... victimized? so he sympathizes w/ white rich guys who exploit people who aren't.?....Yea, he's a b*shbot. His core constituency is Newport Beach, CA and cox knows how to haul pork home.

I was delighted when I heard this...we have a chance 2 grab this seat! Orange County Democrats need 2 get on this and the CA Democratic party needs to fund this race cuz it can B won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. It actually CAN with the way the district is mapped now compared
to when Cox originally ran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC