Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Good & Honest' Iraqis Fighting US Forces--Gulf News (US general)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:54 PM
Original message
'Good & Honest' Iraqis Fighting US Forces--Gulf News (US general)
From the new World Media Watch up now at http://www.zianet.com/insightanalyhtical
Tomorrow at Buzzflash.com



1//Gulf News Online, United Arab Emirates Published: 9/6/2005, 06:25 (UAE)

http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/RegionNF.asp?ArticleID=168406



‘GOOD AND HONEST’ IRAQIS FIGHTING US FORCES

By Phil Sands, Staff Reporter



Tikrit: A senior US military chief has admitted "good, honest" Iraqis are fighting American forces.

Major General Joseph Taluto said he could understand why some ordinary people would take up arms against the US military because "they're offended by our presence".



In an interview with Gulf News, he said: "If a good, honest person feels having all these Humvees driving on the road, having us moving people out of the way, having us patrol the streets, having car bombs going off, you can understand how they could ."



General Taluto, head of the US 42nd Infantry Division which covers key trouble spots, including Baquba and Samarra, also said some Iraqis not involved in fighting did support insurgents who avoided hurting civilians.



SNIP



His comments come in stark contrast to the assertions of other top US figures, who persist in claiming all insurgents are either Baathists or Al Qaida terrorists.


SNIP



He added: "Who knows how big these networks are, or how widespread? I know it's substantial enough to be a threat to the government and it will be for some time."



(MORE)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't realize the US military was also into alternate
realities. Notice the statement, "having us move people out of the way, having us patrol the streets...."

I'd say the US troops have been doing a little bit more than that: like scooping up innocent civilians and dumping them in Abu Ghraib; barging into homes & frisking women, children, even rooting around in baby cribs, even checking donkey carts for hidden explosives.

I think the situation is a little more complex than that, General. But I can see you're obviously not into subtleties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. anxiety and self-deception is setting in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. 'Good & Honest' Iraqis
Aren't the ones who make the news every night with spectacular suicide attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why not?
If the U.S. were invaded by China and occupied because of our WMDs and our belligerence and the fact that we invade other countries without a cause, and because they wanted to 'spread communism' (their form of government), would you fight to have the Chinese occupiers evicted from your country, or would you support the puppet government installed by the Chinese?

I know what I would do, and it wouldn't be cooperating with the occupying forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Because their names are added to militant web sites
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 08:13 PM by ECH1969
After each suicide attack along with their family history. The Washington Post did an analysis of all the names and histories from different sites and information as did SITE and other groups. The WP even went so far as to get people in certain areas where the sites say that they are from to check with the family and in every case they confirmed the information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. So, using primitive weapons against a superior force is something
we should condemn as being, what? Unfair? Primitive? UnAmerican? Wrong?

That is an amazingly condescending attitude to have against an enemy ...reminds me of our characterization of the NVA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. USA would be a paper tiger should this become a people's war
And that means

Iraq = Vietnam II
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. For a Major General to admit that the people who are
fighting against us aren't all "jihadists or dead-enders" is a major departure. I'll bet he gets taken to the woodshed for this. To acknowledge that, oh, a shopkeeper who's been harassed and one of the HUNDREDS of new checkpoints recently set up in Bagdad might have a legit grudge against an occupying army is a very. big. deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree
Wonder where they are going to hide him. They don't want him talking like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. He'll be sent to a timeshare
with Phil Sands, EX Staff Reporter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Is he up for promotion?
Guess he won't be or is it trying to look understanding to the Irakis whike whalloping to bits and pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
u2spirit Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. This General should be commended
and I'm sure he will also be retired, demoted or accidentally killed within 60 days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. For starters, they leveled Fallujah.
Just an idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Taluto's unit is from New York state, how's that for context of "fearless"
here's a little squib and a video link too

Major General Joseph Taluto, Commanding General, 42nd Infantry Division, addresses New York Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines to talk about the progress of the 42nd ID (Task Force Liberty) deployment to Tikrit. Video from 22nd Mobile Public Affairs Detatchment.

http://www.dvidshub.net/video/?c=5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Cool bananas!!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. wonder when the last time a MGen was KIA?
WWII?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Vietnam, Air Force Major General killed in 1968
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 11:49 AM by happyslug
AF Major General ROBERT FRANKLIN WORLEY
http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=7662

Lt Colonel John Paul Vann is often called a "Major General", but that was his rank in the South Vietnamese Army when he died in a helicopter Crash in 1972, his highest US Army rank was Lt. Colonel.
http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jpvann.htm


Whole list of Major Generals from the Civil War:
http://www.civilwarreference.com/people/kia.php
(During the Civil War a higher percentage of Generals died than any other rank, based on so few Generals and so many privates and the tactics of the time period).

I can not find a similar list for WWII, Vietnam or Korea, but a quick search came up with these two for Vietnam.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. After I did the above I Remember General Walker in Korea
Yes, a Lt General Not a Major General, but to my knowledge the highest ranking General to die in Combat since the Civil War (Walker died in a Jeep Accident while going to one of his units in Korea, while not shot, it was still a combat death in the sense he was in a combat Zone and with a fighting unit).

For more on General Walker:
http://www.geocities.com/generalwaltonwalker/11walkerbio.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's not the Iraqis who are shooting at US troops who are the real
scumbags. It's the insurgents who are killing Iraqis that are the real villains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Its the insurgents who are killing Iraqis that are the real villains?
I think the Iraqis who are getting killed by other Iraqis are being targeted as collaborators. Why does killing collaborators make someone a villain?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Because they're not collaborators.
Election workers and people trying to vote are not collaborators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. The elections were over months ago
I had no idea you were talking about elections. My mistake for not assuming you were talking about the elections.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. define collaborator
does not violently resisting make you a collaborator? if so, then your position is tenable, but driving a car bomb into a check point, killing the people waiting in line to cross, those are collaborators? setting off a car bomb on a croweded street, killing people going to market to get bread for their children? collaborators?

Just because something may be a legitimate military target, like a humvee, or a checkpoint, does not excuse the wanton disregard for 'collatoral damage' ON EITHER SIDE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. This on-line freesearch Dictionary definition fits mine
http://www.freesearch.co.uk/dictionary/collaborate+%28support+an+enemy%29

collaborate (SUPPORT AN ENEMY)

verb {I} DISAPPROVING


to work with an enemy who has taken control of your own country:

- Anyone who was suspected of collaborating with the occupying forces was arrested.

collaboration

noun {U} DISAPPROVING

- She was accused of collaboration.

collaborationist

adjective DISAPPROVING

- a collaborationist government

collaborator

noun {C} DISAPPROVING

- wartime collaborators

- a Nazi collaborator

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Yes, but they're a small minority
within a vast insurgency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The Insurgency is a mixed bag of various groups and goals.
There are probably some Iraqis that are part of the Insurgency that work behind the scenes and even part of their Govt. and Military. When the U.S. let the Iraqi Army go and fired scores of people in the de-Baathing they created many Insurgents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
27. We'll be reading about his "voluntary retirement" very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC