Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pilots' joke flight ended in death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:17 PM
Original message
Pilots' joke flight ended in death
Two airline pilots joked and laughed as they flew an empty commercial jet to its limits, switched seats in mid-air and ignored automated warnings before crashing into a residential area, a cockpit voice recorder has revealed.

Captain Jesse Rhodes and First Officer Peter Cesarz were both killed after they decided to "have a little fun" and take the 50-seat Pinnacle Airlines jet they were flying to 41,000ft - the limit of its capability. No one was hurt on the ground in Jackson City, Missouri, where the plane came down after suffering catastrophic engine failure.

"Ooh look at that," Mr Cesarz said, apparently referring to cockpit readings. "Pretty cool."

"Man, we can do it. Forty-one it," the captain replied. "Forty thousand, baby."

Two minutes later Mr Cesarz said: "Made it, man."

more…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1506514,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Candidates for the Darwin Awards, fer sher!. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They should be at the top of the list.
Hopefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now, the real question.
Do their next of kin get sent the bill for the airplane?

In these corporate times, would you be surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Godhumor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Japanese already do this
While I was in Japan, JR, the largest train system in the country, announced a new policy to prevent people from cimmitting suicide by jumping in front of trains as they pulled into stations. I remember when this was first implemented...here is a clipping from a new story about this policy.



Japanese Families Billed for Relative's Suicide
Aug 18, 2002

TOKYO — Committing suicide carries the ultimate cost — life. But just in case anyone thinks that taking their own lives would be an easy way out, perhaps a little deeper thought is called for. In addition to the grief, heartbreak and emotional burdens that come with suicide, comes a very hefty price tag.

Although Shukan Hoseki (10/1/98) notes a vast majority of Japan's 25,000-plus suicides a year take place in the homes of those that choose to die, a popular method for many people is jumping in front of a train. And because so many commuters are affected, railway companies charge relatives of the victim exorbitant fees.

"Trains don't usually stop too long after a suicide, there's rarely much damage to carriages and we rarely have to send anyone off to catch trains on different lines. In that regard, train suicides probably don't cost too much," says an employee of a commuter line. "But to make sure we can cover the costs incurred when a suicide leads to a derailment, we have to ask the bereaved families of suicide victims to compensate us. The costs are usually in the range of 100 million yen <$USD 815,340>, but I've heard of a case where a family was billed 140 million yen <$USD 1,141,555> after someone killed themselves by jumping in front of a train."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. er, well, you're not responsible for the debts of another adult
Why would the family pay? I guess if the suicide left an estate, the estate would pay, otherwise it's a gratuitous cruelty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. you are responsible for the debts of your spouse
and it's not the bill that matters, it's the shame of inconveniencing your family that is the deterrent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. As a General Rule NOT IN THE US, but we are talking of Japan.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 10:14 PM by happyslug
In the US, as a general rule a spouse is NOT responsible for the debt of a Spouse unless that debt is a "Necessity" i.e. Food, Clothing and medical care (Most recent cases involve Medical Care).

Thus, if someone jumped in front of a train in the US and died instantly, his or her spouse is NOT responsible for the cleanup (Through may be responsible for any medical cost involved, if any). Now the dead person's estate is liable for the costs, but if he has none (or it is marital property i.e. in both spouses name which in most state goes to the surviving spouse by operation of law) than the debt is left unpaid.

The same rule goes to Life insurance proceeds (provided there is no suicide exclusion), the proceeds go to the name beneficiary NOT the estate and is NOT attachable by the Creditor.

Again these are US rules, NOT Japanese Rules. Most people reading this column will be American Citizens and as such I am explaining American Rule. Japan being is a sovereign nation which has its own rules which a Japanese Lawyer can explain much better than I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. thanks for the clarification
in Japanese society, the shame of leaving behind debts, even unrevocerable ones, would likely deter some people from committing suicide. While I don't know the actual case law in Japan, the social pressure to pay those debts would be immense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Okay, that does it for me!
I read a couple of days ago about an FAA report that says airlines are falling seriously behind on their airline maintenance.

And now this? A couple of pilots take a JET for a JOYRIDE? Holy crap!

I don't feel comfortable flying right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Let's say
that most of this started with Raygun. The controller strike was not about pay but: SAFETY!
Laissez-faire neo-liberal capitalists do not like SAFETY! Cuts profit from them, the sacred share-holders!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The Road Warriors are the ones that scare me.
I see about 10 psychos every day on the street. It's all a matter of perspective.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wanna be test pilots!
Good god! As the Guardian says makes you wonder about the training as well as the type of people they are hiring!
BTW: they would have never made it as test pilots: TOO DAMN STUPID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gee, maybe the Corporate media has their secondary sensationalist
story to hyper-focus on? Ya know, it's hard to go 24/7 on the Aruba case since the leads have dried up. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is this a fucking joke...
cause damn it sure sounds like it.

Atleast the dumbasses got what they deserved without taking any innocent victims with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Famous last words: "Watch this!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. Famous last words in Wisconsin: "Watch this and hold my beer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
48. I think there is a Craigslist "Best of" story with that EXACT title!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I'm not sure I'd say they got what they deserved.
No one "deserves" to die horribly in a crash for a dumb mistake. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have a few pilot friends and relatives whom I'd like to comment on this.
And, there are some DU pilots on DU. You can just guess what they will have to say.

These guys got "a trip to the cemetery" courtesy of their own idiotic delusions.

Thank God no one else was hurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I'm not so sure you'd guess what I have to say....SO FAr
there are few details in this story and it's not passing my preliminary smell test. FL410 is no big deal for any commercial jet airliner that I know of, and flying one to that altitude is not a reason for or cause of any sort of engine failure (except perhaps a compressor stall which is definitely not 'catatrosphic'...)

And the 'switching seats' part sounds a little fishy...any modern (or even 99% of very old ones) can be flown equally effectively from either seat. If that weren't true, there wouldn't be much need for a co-pilot (First Officer.)

However in my 41 years as a commercial pilot, I have met a few nutballs, but honestly none that had the wherewithal to get a job with an airline.
So for now I must just :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If there was a mechanical malfunction, this may be diversion?
The media might be painting a picture of barnstorming nutballs, so that nobody thinks too hard about the hardware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. More info
http://www.jcrc.com/2004Events/2004CRJ2Crash/2004CRJ2Crash.htm

Canadian-built Canadair Regional Jet CRJ2 Full-scale Airliner belonging to Pinnacle Airlines crashed at 10:15 P.M. on October 14, 2004, in a residential area on the east side of Jefferson City while attempting to make an emergency landing at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport after reporting problems with both engines. Two pilots, and the only occupants of the aircraft; Captain Jesse Rhodes and First Officer Richard Peter Cesarz, were both killed in the crash. Our heartfelt thoughts and prayers go out to their families & fellow employees. snip

The jet was being flown from Little Rock, Arkansas, to Minneapolis, Minnesota, on a transfer flight therefore no further crew members or passengers were on-board the 50-seat airplane. Reports now indicate that around 9:55 P.M., nearly 35 minutes after the plane took off, both engines failed while the aircraft was at an altitude of 41,000 ft. at which time the jetliner experienced an aerodynamic stall and the plane rapidly descended to 34,000 ft. where the pilots regained full control of the jet. The powerless plane then continued to descend at 1,000 ft. per minute while the pilots made numerous attempts to get the engines to start again. At 9,000 ft. (the last radio contact with the flight crew) they were instructed to attempt an emergency landing at the Jefferson City Airport where the pilot reportedly could see the airport beacon. The Jefferson City Fire Department had already been dispatched to the airport and firefighters were already at the airport when the 911 calls started coming in at 10:15 P.M. to report the crash in a residential area on the east side of Jefferson City, near Hutton Lane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. This does seem a bit strange.
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:58 PM by pa28
If the aircraft was certified for 41,000 I'm surprised they just failed. You fly jets, is there any difference in operating procedure between 31k and 41K?

These pilots maybe were not the picture of professionalism but I don't know if it accounts for the accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. the engines could stall at any altitude
it's a matter of airflow, I think, not just altitude. Why they wouldn't restart is more troubling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. I'm in agreement with you.
I would venture to say that 98% of corporate and commercial pilots are very serious individuals.

Something is not right here.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zerex71 Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. At some point, the hardware has nothing to do with it.
The fact that they were screwing around as much as they did and obviously weren't taking the situation very seriously tells me all I need to know. Good thing no one else is hurt, but I can't say they didn't deserve what happened to them. They stress these basics over and over again in ground school and yet some people are just too stupid. Just like with driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
28. not so much delusions as apparent lobotomies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puddycat Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ha! Too much machismo, not enough sense n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tox screen results?
These guys sound like they were flying, all right. Flying high on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Paging Dr. Darwin, Dr. Darwin, you have TWO patients waiting...
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:45 PM by Endangered Specie
room 666 ;)

edit: why do I have a sudden urge to watch the Bugs bunny cartoon "falling hare" (the one where hes stuck in a plane with a gremlin and it takes a huge nose dive...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Where the plane runs out of fuel and stops about a foot off the ground? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. yup
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Erm... So?
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:10 PM by high density
The Guardian seems to be "sexing up" this story and providing few facts about what was going on. It wasn't a "joke" flight, it was a ferry flight from Little Rock to Minneapolis. Though I admit that the pilots do sound a bit drunk. But the article doesn't tell us why the engines failed, and I'm wondering if it was the fault of the pilots or another problem. From the article I can't even tell if this was a recent event or just an old transcript that has finally been made public. (Edit: It appears the incident is from October 2004: http://digbig.com/4drdg and http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20041014-1)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. full CVR transcript link
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 12:05 AM by high density
http://www.ntsb.gov/Events/2005/Pinnacle/exhibits/CVR_Factual.pdf

Reading the entire thing makes them sound a lot less intoxicated. I read on another forum that the first officer was 23 years old, so perhaps he and the captain were just excited to be doing their jobs. RIP... poor guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. I fly Pinnacle all the time. Most of the co-guys are very, very young
and I heard they only need minimal instrument hours to qualify for the job. It is a revolving door job because most can't make it on the salary--17K a yr. Training period is not paid, you get a food allowance and lodging. Folks, welcome to the future of the aviation industry.
It is evolving as we speak--the days of the legacy union wages and retirement are gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
45. GOOD LORD! Worse than I thought! Coguy only had 776 hours
when hired last year, and the 1st officer had been disqualified two or three times during test flights. I wish I didn't need these planes to commute out of my podunk town to work. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
36. yes this is the October 2004 Northwest/Pinnacle crash
Not an old event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. That had to be one long ride down from 40,000 feet with no engines n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. The good news: at impact you would feel NO Pain ...
Splat! All that would be left of their bodies would have to be sopped up with squeegees. This story will be another lauded "Darwin Award" winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. According to this it took about 35/40 minutes from no power until they hit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
27. Will wait for the NTSB report.
I can't believe this is as stupid as it's been made out to be. Will wait to see what the National Transportation Safety Board findings are....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Lots of good reading here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #30
47. Great reading--great link.
sad the truth hurts here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm sorry to hear this, what a sad story
I think many pilots do have the risk-taking gene, or they couldn't get up in the morning and do what they do every day. These men made a mistake and they paid for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
39. Poor bastards. I just read the whole transcript
something went wrong with the power unit... they had no power to get things going again.

This is definately a fuck job by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Oh, those stupid Americans!
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 11:13 AM by redqueen
:eyes:

Yay... I get to complain to overseas media today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
40. fyi

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
41. Here's an article that said they had aborted a flight earlier that day
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 10:17 AM by BlueStateGirl
because of technical problems.

http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Oct/20041021News014.asp

NTSB officials said earlier that the jet had aborted a scheduled flight with passengers from Little Rock last Thursday morning after an indicator light went on for part of its bleed-air system. The system pulls hot, compressed air from the engines to heat other components of the plane. An airplane indicator light signaled a potential problem with the bleed-air sensing loop, which uses heat to determine whether air is leaking from the engine.

The plane’s loop was replaced before it took off for Minneapolis, and the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
42. That's what happens when the pilots are paid McDonalds's wages,
and worked to the point of breaking all the rest legalities. I feel it breeds lack of responsibility, desperation and fatigue related mistakes.,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valkyrie55 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
46. Actually it crashed in Jefferson City, Missouri
The BBC article got it wrong it's not Jackson City, Missouri. I should know I live about 3 miles from where it crashed. http://www.newstribune.com/articles/2005/06/15/news_local/0614050011.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wetbandit2003 Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Ever try to loop a Cessna 172?
I had a friend who claimed he did. If the plane did not have a gravity fed fuel system. I would probobly believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. If they were still within the limits of the plane's capabilities ...
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 07:59 PM by Lisa
... I wonder what went wrong? Either the "envelope" is inaccurate -- or that particular plane wasn't being maintained to the appropriate standard -- or there's other stuff we don't know about yet.

They had enough of their wits about them to choose an empty plane and not one with passengers, anyway. So it's not as if they were showing off or trying to scare people.

Are there situations where a commercial passenger jet would need to fly that high? Perhaps the DU aviation contingent could step in here ... I seem to recall that planes have had to do maneuvers to avoid particulate clouds from erupting volcanoes on at least a couple of occasions. If there are times when one would have to fly that high, if I were a pilot I would like to know if this is possible (for real, not on a simulator) -- but that's just me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. "you've got to be kidding me"
famous last words...

But seconds later, as an automatic system began warning of a stall, one of the pilots is heard to say: "Dude, it's losing it." A voice then said: "We don't have any engines. You got to be kidding me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. But they didn't do anything wrong!
The flight ceiling of an aircraft is the highest altitude it can SAFELY be flown at! If the jet was rated at 41,000 feet and the engines failed at 41,000 feet, then there was a mechanical problem, not a pilot error. By it's very definition, a jet should be able to fly at its flight ceiling all day long without any problems.

Now, if they overshot and killed the engines at 43,000 feet the story would be a bit different, but there's no indication that that happened. All indicators are that the jet engines failed while operating within its published safety boundaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. 12,496 m = 41,000 ft.

As you say, Xithras -- the transcript doesn't seem to indicate that they were trying to go BEYOND 41,000. Nor that they were flying at an abnormally-fast speed.


I think this is the type -- the CRJ 100/200
http://home.ca.inter.net/~rapickler/regional.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC