Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marine Harrier Jet Crashes in Arizona

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:18 PM
Original message
Marine Harrier Jet Crashes in Arizona
YUMA, Ariz. - A Marine Harrier jet carrying four 500-pound bombs crashed Wednesday in a residential neighborhood, forcing the evacuation of 1,300 people. There were no reports of injuries and the pilot ejected safely, authorities said.

The jet was coming in for a landing at Marine Corps Air Station-Yuma when it crashed in the backyard of a home about a mile from the base, said Marine Cpl. Michael Nease. It was also carrying 300 rounds of 20-milimeter ammunition, he said.

Police said the house where the jet landed had been set on fire, but they didn't have further details. A one-mile radius around the crash site was evacuated while a military explosives disposal team was brought on the scene.

About 1,300 people were being evacuated, including a trailer park that is less than a block from the crash site, said Betty Conner, a training consultant for the Red Cross. A shelter was set up at a nearby middle school.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050616/ap_on_re_us/harrier_crash;_ylt=AozS4IGFkNTzwAZ4bqmB0S.s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2MTQ3MTFjBHNlYwN0cw--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dqueue Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh...
just about 12 hours early to be a diversion from Rep. Conyers' hearing tomorrow on Downing Street minutes...

Crazy. What's an armed Harrier doing flying around residential neighborhoods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yuma is an operational base,
there are ranges there for live-fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep, Barry Goldwater....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. They fly over us ALL the time... all kinds of choppers, etc.
they use Yuma as a mock Iraqi urban area for training. You drive down the main drag in town and they just come up from over the horizon and surround you and start circling. It's very intimidating and you realize how choppers actually do have half a chance in urban combat. Our trailer gets buzzed by choppers all the time. and the harriers are crashing all the time, mostly in fields and in the desert... this is the first time in a residential area fully armed.

I was at work, around 2:30-3 the cell phones started going off.... of course there was tons of misinformation and rumors. Somebody said that their wife said it was in the middle of 24 and Arizona and the autocannons were firing automatically with the backfire causing the plane to spin around on its belly so the arc of fire being 360. I had no reason to NOT believe it because we knew there was a crash so I imagined all these automobiles and homes being shredded with flying body parts and all that. And then like an hour and a half AFTER we first heard of the crash, our work gets notified to send everyone who lived in between Pacific and Arizona Avenue and 24th and 32nd home to evacuate. like 2 hours later they tell everyone to go INTO the danger zone to pack up to evacuate. real smart. I am thinking we might have a DU problem too or just a simple case of over-reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if crashed military jets is a disaster covered by home insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. "the most dangerous plane in the U.S. military..."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-na-harrier8jan08-hp,1,5866176.story

January 8, 2003 latimes.com :

Congressional Hearings Will Focus on Marine Harrier Jet
Rep. Hunter cites a recent Times series that reported on the plane's shortcomings. He vows to call for additional spending.

The report detailed the Harrier's history as the most dangerous plane in the U.S. military. It has been involved in 143 major noncombat accidents during its 31 years of service, killing 45 Marines and destroying a third of the jump jet fleet.

The Harrier is unique among active military jets for its ability to lift straight off the ground like a helicopter, hover in midair, and then blast off into conventional flight.

But that innovative technology has placed a tremendous strain on the plane. Recurrent failures of the engine, wing flaps and ejection system have led to fatalities, as have mistakes by inexperienced and undertrained mechanics. Inadequate flight time for pilots has also contributed to the plane's high accident rate.

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. The dipsticks can't read can they?
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 09:19 AM by Nihil
> Rep. Hunter cites a recent Times series that reported on the plane's
> shortcomings. He vows to call for additional spending.
> ...
> ... mistakes by inexperienced and undertrained mechanics.
> Inadequate flight time for pilots has also contributed to the
> plane's high accident rate.

What's the betting that this "additional spending" will go into
"studies" by GD (or whoever got the US manufacturing licence for
the Harrier) rather than on improving the ability of spanner-pilots
to train or fly-boys to cross-train properly?

Seem to recall that most of the "143 major noncombat accidents during
its 31 years of service" were concerning the VTOL/STOL aspect of the
plane, the one thing that has NOTHING in common with other USAF fixed
wing craft. (No link: this came from a colleague who helped write the
simulator for the Harrier ... he knew what he was talking about.)

If something goes wrong when you have little or no forward speed, you
are basically sat in a heavy metal box (armed or not) a little too
high above the ground for comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Not only dangerous, but expensive
I presume the Harrier is equipped the way it is for things like emergency extraction of trapped soldiers. I know that I wouldn't want to be the commander who orders a Harrier into action, knowing that the instrumentality of my men's rescue could be more lethal than whatever situation they were facing on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. If by "equipped" you mean the VTOL/STOL capability ...
... then the reason is that it was originally designed to be capable
of operating from small forest clearings in Germany (and throughout
Western Europe) against Soviet bloc ground forces after the latter's
initial attack destroyed primary airstrip facilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Okay, expensive, lethal and obsolete
Picky, picky. Although I suppose the Harrier's vertical landing capabilities would be useful anytime there isn't sufficient landing space for a conventional fixed-wing aircraft. I also wouldn't want to be the commander to order a rescue operation where the Harrier would have to descend vertically slowly to bring out a bunch of guys who were surrounded in the desert, as it would make an inviting target for the besiegers.

There's no disputing the very cool nature of the Harrier's ideal capabilities. But is it a practical aircraft that will withstand the rigors of wartime operation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would rather have seen an ending like The Great Santini...
but I guess the pilots don't really know exactly where they are and where the jet is headed. I hope everyone is okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmmm. 1 mile radius? 20mm ammo? can you say
DU?
I thought you could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackhorse Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. 25mm ... (Yahoo story edited)
Might have been DU ... following from GlobalSecurity.Org

"PGU-20 25mm ammunition

In the past, the Navy used the 25 mm PGU-20 round but has phased it out of use. The U.S. Marines developed the GAU-12 air-to-surface gun system for the AV-8B Harrier Close Air Support System. This six-barreled 25mm gun pod was designed to be centerline mounted. The AV-8B Harrier aircraft deployed to the Gulf flew 3,342 sorties. A typical combat load would include 300 rounds of 25mm with an equal mix of DU and high expolsive rounds. The average turnaround time for flight operations during the ground war was 23 minutes.

The U.S. Marines fired 25mm PGU-20 munitions, each having a 150-gram DU penetrator slug from the GAU-12 Gatling gun center mounted on the AV-8B. The Marines fired 67,436 (PGU-20) 25mm DU in the Gulf War. This relates to about 20 DU rounds per sortie. Therefore, it is estimated that the U.S. Marines expended about 11 tons of DU during the Gulf War. The PGU-20 round has about 3 percent of the mass of an M829A1 120mm round. Therefore, it would take about 31 PGU-20 25mm rounds to equal the mass of DU in an M829A1 round."

Even if the rounds were standard high explosive, those are awful things to have cooking off in a neighborhood -- and, IMO, a mile's evacuation radius is small for the range of a 20mm shell.

Cheers

BlackHorse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bomb-laden plane crashes in Arizona city
Much better headline...

A Marine Harrier jet carrying four 225-kilogram bombs crashed in a residential neighborhood in this city near the Mexican border. There were no reports of injuries and the pilot ejected safely, authorities said.

The jet was coming in for a landing Wednesday at Marine Corps Air Station-Yuma when it crashed in the backyard of a home about 1.6 kilometers from the base, said Marine Cpl. Michael Nease. It was also carrying 300 rounds of 20-milimeter ammunition, he said.

There was no immediate word on the cause of the crash.

Police said the house where the jet landed had been set on fire, but they didn't have further details. A 1.6-kilometer radius around the crash site was evacuated while a military explosives disposal team was brought on the scene.

Another Spin Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope the bombs were
inert target practice types
Good thing a fire didn't set of the ammo. Why didn't he spend his stores at the range!?!
I remember when El Paso still had Biggs Field during the Korean War, a bomber crashed with full stores and it was quite a fireworks show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. most likely had just been up to Tustin
or somesuch to get the ord and was coming back to refuel before the run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bennywhale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Are the Harriers those Vertical lift off British planes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. AV-8B Harrier = "Widow Maker"
Aka "The Converter" (converts fuel into noise).

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/av-8.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I thought the "Widow Maker" was the F104
There again, it is a nice tag to associate with whichever plane du jour
has a bad run. The combination of under-trained pilots & ground-crew
with a complex, unique flight platform doesn't make for a forgiving
record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. But one of the funniest things I have ever seen
was a Harrier pilot in a dogfight with F14's... they would chase him, he would dive to the deck and hide and as they sped by... he would pop up and put two right up their poop shoots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. They have a design flaw
When doing the VTOL/STOL stuff the engine can injest its own exhaust gases from the downward firing nozzles - no oxygen, no combustion, engine goes out at the most vulnerable moment. The JSF design avoids this by using a vertical fan driven by a shaft off of the engine. I have no idea if this problem reared its head in this crash.

And holy crap are Harriers loud. The loudest thing I ever heard in my life was a harrier hovering 200 yards off of a carrier deck when I was 12 or so. The sound just cuts you in two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. I saw a flight of 8 Harriers hovering at the Farnborough Air Show.
There is no way to describe the noise level.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight armadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Are your ears still bleeding?
You have my sympathy!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Worse than the Concorde?
Now THAT is the loudest sound I've ever heard... taking off 100 ft. over my house. The waves actually made my skin shake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC