Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hit by friendly fire (Hagel - WH "completely disconnected from reality")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:36 PM
Original message
Hit by friendly fire (Hagel - WH "completely disconnected from reality")
With his polls down, Bush takes flak on Iraq from a host of critics--including some in his own party
By Kevin Whitelaw

Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel is angry. He's upset about the more than 1,700 U.S. soldiers killed and nearly 13,000 wounded in Iraq. He's also aggravated by the continued string of sunny assessments from the Bush administration, such as Vice President Dick Cheney's recent remark that the insurgency is in its "last throes." "Things aren't getting better; they're getting worse. The White House is completely disconnected from reality," Hagel tells U.S. News. "It's like they're just making it up as they go along. The reality is that we're losing in Iraq."

That's strikingly blunt talk from a member of the president's party, even one cast as something of a pariah in the GOP because of his early skepticism about the war. "I got beat up pretty good by my own party and the White House that I was not a loyal Republican," he says. Today, he notes, things are changing: "More and more of my colleagues up here are concerned."

Indeed, there are signs that the politics of the Iraq war are being reshaped by the continuing tide of bad news. Take this month in Iraq, with 47 U.S. troops killed in the first 15 days. That's already five more than the toll for the entire month of June last year. With the rate of insurgent attacks near an all-time high and the war's cost set to top $230 billion, more politicians on both sides of the aisle are responding to opinion polls that show a growing number of Americans favoring a withdrawal from Iraq. Republican Sens. Lincoln Chafee and Lindsey Graham have voiced their concerns. And two Republicans, including the congressman who brought "freedom fries" to the Capitol, even joined a pair of Democratic colleagues in sponsoring a bill calling for a troop withdrawal plan to be drawn up by year's end. "I feel confident that the opposition is going to build," says Rep. Ron Paul, the other Republican sponsor and a longtime opponent of the war.

Sagging polls. The measure is not likely to go anywhere, but Hagel calls it "a major crack in the dike." Whether or not that's so, the White House has reason to worry that the assortment of critiques of Bush's wartime performance may be approaching a tipping point. Only 41 percent of Americans now support Bush's handling of the Iraq war, the lowest mark ever in the Associated Press-Ipsos poll. And the Iraq news has combined with a lethargic economy and doubts about the president's Social Security proposals to push Bush's overall approval ratings near all-time lows. For now, most Republicans remain publicly loyal to the White House. "Why would you give your enemies a timetable?" asks House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. " doesn't fight the war on news articles or television or on polls."

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/050627/27bush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hagel grows a spine-could it be? Nah, an ill wind
is beginning to blow, and me thinks he's bailing while the gettin' is good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I always thought Hagel could
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 08:54 PM by Tesla
become a Democrat with out too much convincing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. hagel? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. no way
look at his voting record

also he wants to cover his bases to run in 2008

typical bull shit


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Yup. He's running for sure.
I'm looking for a repudiation of the Repuke Reagan-Bush bunch in 2006 and 2008. DSM, Iraqnam, energy and the economy, stupid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
49. He was going to vote to get rid of the filibuster
This is his way of moving to the middle in time for 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Or is he running for 2006?
If the Bush administration keeps floundering, and more Downing Memoranda
show up, may Hagel is trying to become the next Gerald Ford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think (at least I hope) we're going to be seeing a lot of this
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 08:43 PM by BattyDem




They're bailing out, Chimpy! It's every man for himself! :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Like rats off a sinking ship! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Let the story be Republicans bashing, questioning, criticizing fellow
Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Looks like there's trouble in river city.
Well looks like George is going to have to do Hagel a few more favors to keep the Pequod afloat- better collect now Chuck, there's very little political capital left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
45. Welcome to DU, Buried News
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
47. Welcome to DU BurriedNews!
:hi: :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
63. Thanks all.
"News is what powerful people want to keep hidden; everything else is just publicity."....Bill Moyer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
35. That's correct, IMHO...and we need to encourage them to make that....
...jump, and applaud when they do.

To remove the NeoCons from power, we need to build a coalition of anybody that wants to make that happen. And I do mean anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Hagel
has big shares in voting machine company, he would only fix it so that a more 'credible' repuke would win.
Beware of wolves in sheep's clothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. No Chuck, The reality is NOT that we're losing in Iraq
That war was lost a long time ago.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
70. Actually, it was lost before it even started.
"...we're fighting in a war we lost before that war began,
we're the white boots marching in a yellow land..."

- Phil Ochs



:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is so running
The only change a repub will have in 08 is to be the Un-repub

He may have made a few provacative remarks in the run up, but then he fell right in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:49 PM
Original message
Did hagel vote for the IWR?
I do remember him being skeptical of the Invasion.

Glad he mentioned that damn "last throes" by yomamadickcheney.

And it's hard to believe that there are "41%" who are stupid enough to believe bush's lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. He always seemed more on the Fence than most
Repukes....
Kinda had a heart ...is all I mean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerryin2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hagel must be up for re election in 06? n/t
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 08:49 PM by kerryin2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Rumor has it he's also considering '08. Ha!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm Not Impressed By Hagel
It took him 5 years to come to a conclusion that only took me 5 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. Demeter, no one could have said it better
than you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. tee-hee-hee. while i have no interest in any of these 'puke's opinions,
it's lovely to watch the cannibalization of the thug party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hagel scmagel check this out
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 09:10 PM by Twist_U_Up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't care if they are running in 08' or not...
I'm glad these men are finally speaking out. I'm sure it's not easy surrounded by a bunch of rabid repukes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. Welcome.
Welcome to DU, Lecky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. While its good to hear him speak out...
Hagel is running for the WH in 08'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hagel can talk sh*t to Bush & Co...he's got PC Voting on his side
I trust him as far as I can throw him....

Check this out in case you forgot:

"While Diebold has received the most attention, it actually isn't the biggest maker of computerized election machines. That honor goes to Omaha-based ES&S, and its Republican roots may be even stronger than Diebold's.

The firm, which is privately held, began as a company called Data Mark, which was founded in the early 1980s by Bob and Todd Urosevich. In 1984, brothers William and Robert Ahmanson bought a 68 percent stake in Data Mark, and changed the company's name to American Information Services (AIS). Then, in 1987, McCarthy & Co, an Omaha investment group, acquired a minority share in AIS.

In 1992, investment banker Chuck Hagel, president of McCarthy & Co, became chairman of AIS. Hagel, who had been touted as a possible Senate candidate in 1993, was again on the list of likely GOP contenders heading into the 1996 contest. In January of 1995, while still chairman of ES&S, Hagel told the Omaha World-Herald that he would likely make a decision by mid-March of 1995. On March 15, according to a letter provided by Hagel's Senate staff, he resigned from the AIS board, noting that he intended to announce his candidacy. A few days later, he did just that.

A little less than eight months after steppind down as director of AIS, Hagel surprised national pundits and defied early polls by defeating Benjamin Nelson, the state's popular former governor. It was Hagel's first try for public office. Nebraska elections officials told The Hill that machines made by AIS probably tallied 85 percent of the votes cast in the 1996 vote, although Nelson never drew attention to the connection. Hagel won again in 2002, by a far healthier margin. That vote is still angrily disputed by Hagel's Democratic opponent, Charlie Matulka, who did try to make Hagel's ties to ES&S an issue in the race and who asked that state elections officials conduct a hand recount of the vote. That request was rebuffed, because Hagel's margin of victory was so large.

As might be expected, Hagel has been generously supported by his investment partners at McCarthy & Co. -- since he first ran, Hagel has received about $15,000 in campaign contributions from McCarthy & Co. executives. And Hagel still owns more than $1 million in stock in McCarthy & Co., which still owns a quarter of ES&S. "

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2004/03/03_200.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. so fucking obvious people..........
WAKE UP 2006 is upon us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. 'kay, I'm not going to get a chance to do this very often,
Edited on Sat Jun-18-05 09:39 PM by deadparrot
so I'm going to enjoy it.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sad that it took this long and this much Death
for some in the GOP to wake the fuck up!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. is it just me or is that dated 6/27/05? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. Lemme guess: Chuck's running for pres in 08, right?
Truth: only used by Republicans when convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. But, are most Americans..
.. disconnected from the reality that Bush, his admin, and Congress do not answer to the majority of people who do not approve of what they are doing? After all, the GOP controls the voting machines in swing states.

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. The Moderates are beginning to bail, only the neocons will be left...
One night in morons* bunker...

Moron*: anyone up for a mean game of solitaire? Anyone? hello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. the times they are a'changin'....


Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.


Bob Dylan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. Pretty soon, even Hillary Clinton will be against the war... :)
And yes...I despise her. And no, I am not a freep.

But c'mon..if R's are speaking out against the war, it makes ya wonder what real Dems should be doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. What do you think most of the Dems have been doing? If you're....
...going to be slamming folks, try to stick to using facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. Most Dem leaders, except ones like Conyers, aren't doing enough
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 09:47 AM by Bread and Circus
in my opinion.

And sorry, I still can't get the vision out of my head where HRC vociferously applauded Bush and gave him standing O after standing O at his "we're gonna bomb 'em to hell" SOTU address when they were cooking up this mess.

Sorry, I'm just sick of the Dems that try to play it both ways.

Oh, and I went to HRC's official website homepage to find some statement about the war and guess what - I didn't find one on the homepage, but I did find a bill that she is co-sponsoring w/ Bill Frist.

Interestingly, on Conyers homepage, there is alot about the war, but none involving partnering with Dr. Cuckoobananas.

So there ya go.

I guess it's just a matter of emphasis.

Conyers' emphasis: The war is illegal from the get go. These guys are a bunch of crooks.

Clinton's emphasis: Better to seem "bipartisan" than investigate the bunch of crooks that have stolen our government.

At least that's my take on it.

See, in my mind, Conyers is a real hero, Democrat, and a patriot. HRC is just someone that will do and say anything to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. I have to agree for a slightly different reason ...
Bill Clinton's cozy relationship with H. Worm Bush is enough to turn me against the Clintons as a whole.

With a DLC background now cursed with H. Worm Bush, the Clintons reek of kissing the corporate butts.

That said, if it ends up being Hillary against any Repuke I'd have to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yea, and Hagel didn't like Bolton either ...
I got a letter from him after urging him to oppose Bolton's appointment as UN ambassador

"...the Committee voted to send Mr. Bolton's nomination to the Senate floor without recommendation for an up or down vote by the full Senate. I voted is support of this motion. The Senate leadership is expected to schedule a full Senate vote in the coming weeks. I will vote for Mr. Bolton."

So much for Hagel ...

He talks the talk ... He talked before the Senate vote to permit Bush to invade Iraq. He voted to invade.

He talks ... Pay attention to how he votes.

"Mr. Bolton has the confidence of President Bush and Secretary of State Rice. He has assured me that he will work hard to strenghten our alliances and carry out the policies of the Bush Administration in representing the interests of the United states at the United Nations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
36. No Tom news articles don't fight wars People do!!!
and your US Military are getting scarcer and weakened day by day!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
38. Their only concern is election time is around the corner...
let's get the Iraq war to a close before our window closes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agincourt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
39. Just wait,
Rove will pull out some "veterans" to say Hagel bayoneted babies over in Viet Nam. It'll work with the pigboy radio K-draggers every time. There is nothing this bunch is not below doing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hagel owns 35% of ES&S and became Senator via ES&S vote counting
"The vice president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers."

http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=9751&fcategory_desc=E-Voting%20Machines%20/%20Vote%20Integrity

Hagel is positioning himself to be the 2008 alternative to McCain. Hagel would have voted to get rid of the filibuster, though he made all the right noises on Tavis Smiley about not being sure.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #40
51. Although there's no denying his ES&S ties
I sincerely doubt that the polls had to be fixed for his election. That's not to say that he wouldn't have taken advantage of this loophole, just saying he didn't have to.

Look at Nebraska's Dem Senator. Ben couldn't be more Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #51
69. Hagel's win in 1996 was as questionable as Max Cleland's loss in 2002
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 07:48 AM by ClarkUSA
Hagel was the first Republican voted to the Senate in 24 years from Nebraska
and his win was not only totally unexpected, it was VERY VERY similar to Ohio's results last year.

Here's Thom Hartmann on Chuck Hagel:

Maybe Nebraska Republican Chuck Hagel honestly won two US Senate elections. Maybe it's true that the citizens of Georgia simply decided that incumbent Democratic Senator Max Cleland, a wildly popular war veteran who lost three limbs in Vietnam, was, as his successful Republican challenger suggested in his campaign ads, too unpatriotic to remain in the Senate. Maybe George W. Bush, Alabama's new Republican governor Bob Riley, and a small but congressionally decisive handful of other long-shot Republican candidates really did win those states where conventional wisdom and straw polls showed them losing in the last few election cycles...

The respected Washington, DC publication The Hill (www.thehill.com/news/012903/hagel.aspx) has confirmed that former conservative radio talk-show host and now Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel was the head of, and continues to own part interest in, the company that owns the company that installed, programmed, and largely ran the voting machines that were used by most of the citizens of Nebraska.

Back when Hagel first ran there for the U.S. Senate in 1996, his company's computer-controlled voting machines showed he'd won stunning upsets in both the primaries and the general election. The Washington Post (1/13/1997) said Hagel's "Senate victory against an incumbent Democratic governor was the major Republican upset in the November election." According to Bev Harris of www.blackboxvoting.com, Hagel won virtually every demographic group, including many largely Black communities that had never before voted Republican. Hagel was the first Republican in 24 years to win a Senate seat in Nebraska.

Six years later Hagel ran again, this time against Democrat Charlie Matulka in 2002, and won in a landslide. As his hagel.senate.gov website says, Hagel "was re-elected to his second term in the United States Senate on November 5, 2002 with 83% of the vote. That represents the biggest political victory in the history of Nebraska."

What Hagel's website fails to disclose is that about 80 percent of those votes were counted by computer-controlled voting machines put in place by the company affiliated with Hagel. Built by that company. Programmed by that company.

"This is a big story, bigger than Watergate ever was," said Hagel's Democratic opponent in the 2002 Senate race, Charlie Matulka (www.lancastercountydemocrats.org/matulka.htm). "They say Hagel shocked the world, but he didn't shock me."

.......

"I suspect they're getting ready to do this all across all the states," Matulka said in a January 30, 2003 interview. "God help us if Bush gets his touch screens all across the country," he added, "because they leave no paper trail. These corporations are taking over America, and they just about have control of our voting machines."


more at http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0302/S00009.htm#a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. I live here. I talk to these people.
Voters kept Ben Nelson in the governor's mansion. He's a Republican in all but name. Voters put Hagel in the senate. And when Benny boy ran again, he was elected to the Senate.

You won't convince anyone from this state that Hagel had to rig the vote in either election. This is Nebraska.

Jim Exon could have been re-elected except that he was not running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
truth_is_extreme Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
43. Rats are always the first
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 09:51 AM by truth_is_extreme
to abandon ship. If this Repugnant had had the courage to tell the truth in 2003, maybe 1,700 Americans and 120,000 Iraqis would be alive today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
44. "[Bush] doesn't fight the war on news articles or television or on polls."
Yeah? Then why the hell is Rove's office two doors down from the Oval Office? No coincidence there!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/custom/2005/06/06/CU2005060601310.html

Who's kidding who here, DeLay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
46. Flatulant posturing......
manuevering for '08. Typical puke asshole 100%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. Yup, he wants the McCain voters - and he's moving to the middle
Jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
48. If Bush's poll numbers were up
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 10:18 AM by insane_cratic_gal
we wouldn't see anyone on the Republican side saying anything. They wouldn't have the balls.

Now his numbers are down and he's one of the most unpopular presidents, your going to see bigger divides with those up for re-election in 2006.. those running in 2008.

I don't think Hagel is a bad guy, there are few republicans I'll even listen to. He happens to be one, that I do give attention to. But I still can't shake that the reason he's backtracking is because of the poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
52. Republicans like Hagel unlike Bush have to stand for election in '06
and '08.

They see that the American public, ignorant and oblivious, are starting to rouse and see the obvious--WORST PRESIDENT EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
53. Nebraska Senators....
Hagel-(D)

Nelson-(R)

one is awakining to reality and one is hanging out with Dobson. Go figure. We should trade nelson for hagel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. Repugs can trash Bush now because he's a lame duck n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morffin Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
57. I dont care what his motivation is
I sent him an e mail to thank him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emendator Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
75. Yep
You're right. Hegel's doing a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arkie dem Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. Goddammit Hagel it took you this long
to figure out bush was as Full of Shit as a fertilizer salesman with a mouthfull of samples?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chauga Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
59. No wonder the GOP couldn't keep the nuclear option together.
They're own party hates their leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeaconBlues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
60. in case anyone is fooled into thinking that Hagel is on our side
Here is his partial voting record:

*Rated 36% by the NEA, indicating a mixed record on public education. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 0% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 100% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 92% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record. (Dec 2002)

*Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 12% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 8% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-labor voting record. (Dec 2003)

*Rated 22% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record. (Dec 2003)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavendermist Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
61. "a major crack in the dike"
drip.....drip.....drip :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
62. Anybody else from the Vietnam War era feel like it's deja vu all over
again. I mean I remember people being rabid zealots for the war, but as the casualties mounted and the rationale for the war became more irrational, the American people grew tired and turned -- then the congressional types acted like they'd always had their doubts. I mean there was a point about 1970 that people who I knew had supported the war, came on like , "Who? Me? No I never supported the war." Ah well -- whatever it takes. Tom Hayden figures that the politicians -- even the republicans -- will bail if they get enough pressure from the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
64. A strong argument could be made the WH has been disconnected with reality
from day-one, from the git-go, and it gets worse day-by-day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
65. A little late, don't you think, Chuck?
It was your voting machine company that helped get that loser into the White House along with all his enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainngirl Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. It's okay with me...
if some of the thugs start singing out against the Evil One, even if they are only doing it for future elections. At least maybe some of their dense little sheeple will be more likely to listen if non-Democrats are talking about it. That would be a good thing, since they close their narrow little minds against getting the facts from anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AceAlmighty82 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
67. Hagel is just now picking up on this
The Repubs and Neocons have been out of touch from reality from the get-go. All I have to say to Hagel is tell him where the DSM petition is..have him sign it..if he hasn't already. Give Hagel a treat..like you do a dog when he does something good. Maybe he'll continue to do so. Unless Bush pulls bin-Laden out of his ass..his ratings aren't going to get any better especially if he starts strikes on Iran..here in June like Seymour Hersh's source says he will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
68. Telling words from Delay
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay: "* doesn't fight the war on news articles or television or on polls."

No, Tom. BUSH DOESN'T FIGHT THE WAR AT ALL...he has Americans do it for him. Because bush* is a Chickenhawk, chickenshit coward, which is why Repukes like you LOVE him. Keep sticking your nose up *'s backside, Delay. You'll go down faster that way.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
71. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
73. The bigger issue
The Hagel comments are very important and a breath of fresh air, but the bigger story is that Hagel is now the 10th Republican Senator in less than a month to take a stand against the Bush administration.

I posted an item this morning at http://jabbs.blogspot.com:

"That makes 10 Republican Senators who have spoken out -- dare I say, taken "leadership positions" -- against the Bush Administration in less than a month. It's a list that covers topics such as whether to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center, protecting U.S. consumers from the administration's drug industry pals, and preventing Bush lackey Bill Frist (R-TN) from being able to employ the "nuclear option," upending the Senate's rules on filibusters.

The list of 10, if you are scoring at home, is now:

-- John McCain of Arizona
-- Mel Martinez of Florida
-- Charles Grassley of Iowa
-- Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine
-- Mike DeWine of Ohio
-- Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island
-- Lindsey Graham of South Carolina
-- John Warner of Virginia"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #73
74. It's called "re-election fear" Check out this GOP site...
http://www.gopnation.com/dwarfs.htm
The repugs are pinning a bullseye on their candidates, I certainly hope we have Dems running against them, it will be a double whammy!

Olympia Snow - 2006
Mike DeWine - 2006
Lincoln Chafee - 2006

Susan Collins 2008
Lindsey Graham 2008
John Warner - 2008

John McCain 2010 - (but Presidential Aspirations)
Mel Martinez - 2010 (barely won with 50%)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
76. It is nice to hear some reality check type talking from a pug, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC