Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Policy Shifts Felt After Bolton's Departure From State Dept.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:33 PM
Original message
WP: Policy Shifts Felt After Bolton's Departure From State Dept.
Policy Shifts Felt After Bolton's Departure From State Dept.

By Peter Baker and Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, June 20, 2005; Page A02

For years, a key U.S. program intended to keep Russian nuclear fuel out of terrorist hands has been frozen by an arcane legal dispute. As undersecretary of state, John R. Bolton was charged with fixing the problem, but critics complained he was the roadblock.

Now with Bolton no longer in the job, U.S. negotiators report a breakthrough with the Russians and predict a resolution will be sealed by President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin at an international summit in Scotland next month, clearing the way to eliminate enough plutonium to fuel 8,000 nuclear bombs.

The prospective revival of the plutonium disposal project underlines a noticeable change since Bolton's departure from his old job as arms control chief. Regardless of whether the Senate confirms him as U.N. ambassador during a scheduled vote today, fellow U.S. officials and independent analysts said his absence has already been felt at the State Department.

Without the hard-charging Bolton around, the Bush administration not only has moved to reconcile with Russia over nuclear threat reduction but also has dropped its campaign to oust the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and made common cause with European allies in offering incentives to Iran to persuade it to drop any ambitions for nuclear weapons.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/19/AR2005061900697.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tmooses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, now we know what he's qualified to do-be an obstacle to
achieving peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. This truly begs the question...
... who in the Bush administration is pushing so hard for him to become UN ambassador, where he could potentially do much more damage than he's been able to do in lower levels of government?

Um, think I answered my own question. Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Has to be Cheney - he has a bunker. The rest of the world
can die as long as he has a "fraide" hole. Fraide is Kansas slang for root cellar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Borowitz has Cheney's and Bolton's number
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Except Russia thinks the US is funding the Chechnian "terrorists".
Remember how they got quit unfriendly after the school take-over? The US behind it was my first thought. I think most of the terrorsts acts around the world are US backed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. well, well, well...
imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. So, after Bolton leaves the UN, progress will be made
Why not skip this added step?

Bolton is no fucking diplomat. He's the elementary school bully that nobody can work with.

Kiss-up and kick-down. He's that kinda guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. did bolton keep colin powell's balls locked in his wall safe?
more evidence that powell was a dupe and front man wielding litte actual power at state. condi may be a liar neocon bitch, but she would not tolerate bolton. thats why the un appointment, cuz condi kicked his sorry ass out of the state department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. What a great resume' Bolton has...
sure a way to solve an age old problem. Fire the man! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thats EXACTLY why they want him in the UN
Somebody in the WH finally figured out that he was fucking things up and said, "hey, maybe we can actually use his incompetence to further our neo-fascist ways"

"How about the UN?!?!"

"Ya, he could fuck things up real good there!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. a positive change without Bolton--impossible, it's outrageous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whosinpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. I GET IT!
My god - it is so typical of Bushco.

Bolton goes in and makes things 1000 times worse at the UN.
Then quietly leaves......and the UN is SO happy he is gone - that they go forward with UN reforms that Bushco wants.

You see - Bushco cannot see progress without pain. Simple as that.

Think about it. Didn't the same thing happen with Libya and its WMD? Wasn't Bolton the tie that binded any progress until he was forced aside?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC