Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman Fired From Job For Taking Time Off To Spend With Husband On Leave

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Gunit_Sangh Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:27 PM
Original message
Woman Fired From Job For Taking Time Off To Spend With Husband On Leave
From Iraq (rest of title)

This came across our local news this evening and I found the article on the stations website.

Here's Another Support our Troops company!!!!!


A Jessamine County woman is looking for work after being forced to make a tough decision - take two days to spend time with her husband on leave from Iraq, or lose her job.

Shirley Blankenship thought 10 years of service at McClane Cumberland, a distribution company, was enough to get her a couple of days off to be with her husband David before he returned to Iraq.

"Ever since I worked for them they said we're for family," said Blankenship. "But they wasn't for my family."

<snip>
Shirley said she wanted to take a week off at work while her husband was home. She felt since she had worked there since around the day the company opened ten years ago she could get the time off. But she was told she had used all her allotted vacation and sick time and had to work while David was in town. Blankenship also said she was on a warning for excessive absences - time she says was used over the last few years to care for her epileptic son, Austin.

Link to rest of article
http://www.wlextv.com/Global/story.asp?S=3508540

Here's a link to the company's website. It's a food service distribution company. They don't list any of their customers. If I knew which restaurants/grocery/convenience stores they service, I would start a boycott!

http://www.mclaneco.com/locations/grocery/cumberland/cumberland.asp


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. If her prior absences were due to her epileptic son,
then that should be covered by Family and Medical Leave Act and she should never have been counseled about her absences.
She should consult an attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You might be surprised how many
companies this law does not apply to. It (may) only apply to "illness" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. According to what I've read
any company that employs more than either 25 or 50 employees must abide by FMLA, and, by law, covers illness, death, pregnancy, etc, of either the employee themselves, their spouse, children, and parents.

She should REALLY see an attorney

http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/fmla/

FMLA: What employers are covered by the act?

(a) An employer covered by FMLA is any person engaged in commerce or
in any industry or activity affecting commerce, who employs 50 or more
employees for each working day during each of 20 or more calendar
workweeks in the current or preceding calendar year. Employers covered
by FMLA also include any person acting, directly or indirectly, in the
interest of a covered employer to any of the employees of the employer,
any successor in interest of a covered employer, and any public agency.

Public agencies are covered employers without regard to the number of
employees employed. Public as well as private elementary and secondary
schools are also covered employers
without regard to the number of employees employed. (See Sec. 825.600.)
(b) The terms ``commerce'' and ``industry affecting commerce'' are
defined in accordance with section 501(1) and (3) of the Labor
Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA) (29 U.S.C. 142 (1) and (3)), as
set forth in the definitions at section 825.800 of this part. For
purposes of the FMLA, employers who meet the 50-employee coverage test
are deemed to be engaged in commerce or in an industry or activity
affecting commerce.
(c) Normally the legal entity which employs the employee is the
employer under FMLA. Applying this principle, a corporation is a single
employer rather than its separate establishments or divisions.
(1) Where one corporation has an ownership interest in another
corporation, it is a separate employer unless it meets the ``joint
employment'' test discussed in Sec. 825.106, or the ``integrated
employer'' test contained in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
(2) Separate entities will be deemed to be parts of a single
employer for purposes of FMLA if they meet the ``integrated employer''
test. Where this test is met, the employees of all entities making up
the integrated employer will be counted in determining employer coverage
and employee eligibility. A determination of whether or not separate
entities are an integrated employer is not determined by the application
of any single criterion, but rather the entire relationship is to be
reviewed in its totality. Factors considered in determining whether two
or more entities are an integrated employer include:
(i) Common management;
(ii) Interrelation between operations;
(iii) Centralized control of labor relations; and
(iv) Degree of common ownership/financial control.
(d) An ``employer'' includes any person who acts directly or
indirectly in the interest of an employer to any of the employer's
employees. The definition of ``employer'' in section 3(d) of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. 203(d), similarly includes any
person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in
relation to an employee. As under the FLSA, individuals such as
corporate officers ``acting in the interest of an employer'' are
individually liable for any violations of the requirements of FMLA.


----


Which employees are eligible to take leave under FMLA?

(a) An ``eligible employee'' is an employee of a covered employer
who:
(1) Has been employed by the employer for at least 12 months, and
(2) Has been employed for at least 1,250 hours of service during the
12-month period immediately preceding the commencement of the leave, and
(3) Is employed at a worksite where 50 or more employees are
employed by the employer within 75 miles of that worksite. (See
Sec. 825.105(a) regarding employees who work outside the U.S.)
(b) The 12 months an employee must have been employed by the
employer need not be consecutive months. If an employee is maintained on
the payroll for any part of a week, including any periods of paid or
unpaid leave (sick, vacation) during which other benefits or
compensation are provided by the employer (e.g., workers' compensation,
group health plan benefits, etc.), the week counts as a week of
employment. For purposes of determining whether intermittent/occasional/
casual employment qualifies as ``at least 12 months,'' 52 weeks is
deemed to be equal to 12 months.

(c) Whether an employee has worked the minimum 1,250 hours of
service is determined according to the principles established under the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for determining compensable hours of
work (see 29 CFR Part 785). The determining factor is the number of
hours an employee has worked for the employer within the meaning of the
FLSA. The determination is not limited by methods of recordkeeping, or
by compensation agreements that do not accurately reflect all of the
hours an employee has worked for or been in service to the employer. Any
accurate accounting of actual hours worked under FLSA's principles may
be used. In the event an employer does not maintain an accurate record
of hours worked by an employee, including for employees who are exempt
from FLSA's requirement that a record be kept of their hours worked
(e.g., bona fide executive, administrative, and professional employees
as defined in FLSA Regulations, 29 CFR Part 541), the employer has the
burden of showing that the employee has not worked the requisite hours.
In the event the employer is unable to meet this burden the employee is
deemed to have met this test. See also Sec. 825.500(f). For this
purpose, full-time teachers (see Sec. 825.800 for definition) of an
elementary or secondary school system, or institution of higher
education, or other educational establishment or institution are deemed
to meet the 1,250 hour test. An employer must be able to clearly
demonstrate that such an employee did not work 1,250 hours during the
previous 12 months in order to claim that the employee is not
``eligible'' for FMLA leave.
(d) The determinations of whether an employee has worked for the
employer for at least 1,250 hours in the past 12 months and has been
employed by the employer for a total of at least 12 months must be made
as of the date leave commences. If an employee notifies the employer of
need for FMLA leave before the employee meets these eligibility
criteria, the employer must either confirm the employee's eligibility
based upon a projection that the employee will be eligible on the date
leave would commence or must advise the employee when the eligibility
requirement is met. If the employer confirms eligibility at the time the
notice for leave is received, the employer may not subsequently
challenge the employee's eligibility. In the latter case, if the
employer does not advise the employee whether the employee is eligible
as soon as practicable (i.e., two business days absent extenuating
circumstances) after the date employee eligibility is determined, the
employee will have satisfied the notice requirements and the notice of
leave is considered current and outstanding until the employer does
advise. If the employer fails to advise the employee whether the
employee is eligible prior to the date the requested leave is to
commence, the employee will be deemed eligible. The employer may not,
then, deny the leave. Where the employee does not give notice of the
need for leave more than two business days prior to commencing leave,
the employee will be deemed to be eligible if
the employer fails to advise the employee that the employee is not
eligible within two business days of receiving the employee's notice.
(e) The period prior to the FMLA's effective date must be considered
in determining employee's eligibility.
(f) Whether 50 employees are employed within 75 miles to ascertain
an employee's eligibility for FMLA benefits is determined when the
employee gives notice of the need for leave. Whether the leave is to be
taken at one time or on an intermittent or reduced leave schedule basis,
once an employee is determined eligible in response to that notice of
the need for leave, the employee's eligibility is not affected by any
subsequent change in the number of employees employed at or within 75
miles of the employee's worksite, for that specific notice of the need
for leave. Similarly, an employer may not terminate employee leave that
has already started if the employee-count drops below 50. For example,
if an employer employs 60 employees in August, but expects that the
number of employees will drop to 40 in December, the employer must grant
FMLA benefits to an otherwise eligible employee who gives notice of the
need for leave in August for a period of leave to begin in December.
<60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995>

----

Covered employers must grant an eligible employee up to a total of 12 workweeks of unpaid leave during any 12-month period for one or more of the following reasons:

* for the birth and care of the newborn child of the employee;
* for placement with the employee of a son or daughter for adoption or foster care;
* to care for an immediate family member (spouse, child, or parent) with a serious health condition; or
* to take medical leave when the employee is unable to work because of a serious health condition.



---

FAQ's

Q: Can my employer refuse to grant me FMLA leave?

If you are an "eligible" employee who has met FMLA’s notice and certification requirements (and you have not exhausted your FMLA leave entitlement for the year), you may not be denied FMLA leave.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Epilepsy is a serious medical condition
and clearly within the FMLA. I don't understand what you mean when you imply that epilepsy is not an illness.
I'm aware that companies with fewer than 50 employees are exempt. However, from the message, it sounded like the employer was large.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. She was taking time off to see her husband
not the son.
I feel the company SUCKS for not allowing time to visit her husband. I think this is an ethical question though, not a legal one.
A lawyer couldn't hurt though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. But my point was that she had been counseled before
for excessive absences due to her epileptic son. She should never have been counseled for these absences. The article made it sound as though the employer was terminating her for her history of excessive absences as well as these planned days off to see her husband. My point is that they cannot use her FMLA leave against her in this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. point taken.
I was only focusing on what I thought was the main point of the article. again a lawyer couldn't hurt. The company does suck either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Possible She Used Up Her FMLA
It has happened, some one has a serious medical condition (or immediate family member has the condition) and they can use up all the time alloted by FMLA.

I don't know if it is law or not, but sometimes employees get partial FMLA for sporadic absences if they are due to the approved medical condition. Then it becomes a number of hours away from work within a 12 month period. Furthermore, the company is free to require documentation that each absence is related to the condition.

My guess is, the company wanted to fire her because they were tired of dealing with her absences and if she had her son's health insurance through them it could have been driving up group premiums. So, they made her getting the time off a hassle.

And quite possibly, it could all be within the letter of the law, if not the spirit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Send them an email. Here's the general feedback address.
contact@mclaneco.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. this company makes according to their website..
everything from plastic forks to pepperoni for 20,000 resturants nationwide..good luck starting a boycott..i feel for thye lady fired.
:hi: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I feel sorry for the woman, too. But let's face it, in BushAmerica
it's root hog or die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. what hateful pieces of crap
this woman worked for.

I hope she sues their freakin' pants off.

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I emailed the company president
Dear Ms. Piekarski,

Way to go firing the wife of the serviceman home on leave. What a clever way of encouraging me to learn more about your company, what they sell, and how much money I will save not buying your products in Michigan. Thank you so much for your callous disregard of this woman. If it were possible for your company to be any more stupid, I don't know how. Naturally you would not want me or other consumers to assume that any company that would make such a dumb move should trust your products. I am encouraged that you will find a way to stick it to some other poor employee for this altogether faulty choice. Hey...maybe you can hire an illegal immigrant! I want you to know that I have put the word out via a blog and you should be receiving all kinds of help soon.


Good Luck, you're going to need it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Good letter! I hope she gets 10,000 more like it.
Mine was a one-sentence rebuke.

I found their nearest distribution center and I'm going to call there to see what stores and restaurants they deliver to in my town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. And here's the company president's address.
mary.piekarski@mclaneco.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cornjob Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Thanks! I sent her email...
suggesting that she act now to fire the managers involved, or personally face the axe by Walmart's execs.

I'm sure she is feeling lots of heat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Home page "Christian" values
McLane Beliefs and Values
McLane Company has been through many changes since our beginning in Cameron, Texas. One aspect that has not changed, is our Beliefs and Values.

Our founder, Robert McLane, felt deeply that business should be based on Honesty, Integrity, and High Christian Principles. These Beliefs and Values are the principles that guide our relationships with:

Our Customers
Our Teammates
Our Shareholders
Over 100 years later, we continue to honor these principles in all our business relationships.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. DU'ers send this article to Mike Malloy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Support the Troops - Don't Fire Their Wives (My letter to the company)
"Dear McClane Cumberland:

Having served nine years in the military and being a mother to a current servicemember, whose wife is also in the military and who has a 6 year old daughter, I can tell you it is a hard row to how. When my son was in Afghanistan and my daughter-in-law in Iraq, just getting to sleep was a difficult task for me. Imagine how it must feel to have one's spouse, or children, on the battlefield day in and day out. Imagine how it must feel to have a sick child and having to go to bed everynight wondering if his daddy is ever going to come home - alive. Imagine how it must feel the moment one gets to spend time as a family, with a real live flesh and blood person, to have one's boss tell you, you are to choose between a husband you may never see again, or your job. You should be ashamed of yourself."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's outrageous if true. but I don't necessarily trust media reports
it isn't infrequent that stories about people getting fired for outragious reasons are reported and then it turns out they were fired for something else entirely.

Regardless, I hope the woman finds a better job quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'll cross-post on dKos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Cool. And I just emailed the customer service managers at their...
...grocery and food service distribution facilities in my state. I asked what stores and restaurants they serve in my city. The links to locating the distribution facilities nearest to you are in my previous post here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1572512&mesg_id=1572656
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nominated for Greatest page, and here are links to...
...where you can find the McLane distributors nearest to you:

Groceries: http://www.mclaneco.com/services/grocery.asp

Food service: http://www.mclaneco.com/services/foodservice.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Updated on dKos.
Any other blogs or forums that might be interested?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. That doesn't show what grocers or restaurants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. It provides names, telephone numbers, and email addresses...
...for veeps and managers at each distribution facility. I emailed the food services customer service manager in Phoenix to find out what restaurants they serve in my city. She wrote back and told me that they supply Chuck E. Cheese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. I sent the Company Prez and email & suggested they change
that "Beliefs & Values" page.

I did notice that most of their locations are in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. They're everywhere. Look...
Groceries


Restaurant food service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. oops,,,, not sure what page I was looking at,,,,

it only had Texas contacts, tho,,,

My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. Are they supporting the troops in the same way Fred Phelps is?
Well, picketing soldier's funerals is a bit extreme, but this sounds like a start.

This should be in next week's Top 10 list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ten years of service
that is the crux of the story to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. Kentucky? a red state? I wonder if she voted for Bush?
when will people get a clue that it is DEMOCRATS who defend their rights as workers to do such things (like take time off when they need it), and it is the REPUBLICANS who defend the right of the employers to do such things to their (expendable) employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Hey guys you all should had done deeper to find out who owns this company
About McLane Company:
McLane Company, Inc. provides distribution services to multiple industries throughout the United States. A wholly-owned subsidiary of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., McLane delivers food and non-food products to more than 50,000 customer locations around the world - including the convenience store, mass merchandise, quick service restaurant, and movie theater industries. Headquartered in Temple, Texas, the company operates 18 grocery divisions through its grocery distribution business unit and 18 foodservice divisions through its foodservice distribution business unit, an industry-specific software company, and a contract motor carrier. McLane employs more than 15,000 people in the United States. In the international market, McLane operates several distribution centers, providing third party logistics services to large multi-national companies; as well as providing traffic management and control functions for these clients.

http://www.mclaneco.com/pressroom/press_detail.asp?ID=7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Oooh boy!
gets better by the minute!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Figures...Wal-Mart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I don't think Wal-Mart
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 09:27 PM by okoboji
ownes Mclane anymore.... there was some sort of buy out from Berkshire Hathaway ... Warren Buffett's company ...

something like that about a year ago ... can't remember all of the details.





found it ... McLane is now one of many Subsidiariers of Berkshire Hathaway

http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/subs/sublinks.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Then Warren Buffet needs to dump some people in his organization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeDeMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
33. we don't have both sides
of this story, imho.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. I see them at 7-11
I see McClane trucks at 7-11 all the time. The company I used to work for (which could have done something like this too, but that's beside the point) had to deal with McClane. The guy in charge of the IT work involved hated them with a passion. Said that no one was harder to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. Let's take it a step further...find out who McClane's competition is,
and deliver that information (phone numbers, etc) to all of their customers along with this story. That assists the customers in making the switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC