Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT:WH Said to Reject Panel's Call for Greater Pentagon Role in Covert Ops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:15 PM
Original message
NYT:WH Said to Reject Panel's Call for Greater Pentagon Role in Covert Ops
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 11:15 PM by DeepModem Mom
NYT:
White House Is Said to Reject Panel's Call for a Greater Pentagon Role in Covert Operations
By DOUGLAS JEHL
Published: June 28, 2005


WASHINGTON, June 27 - The White House has decided to reject classified recommendations by a presidential commission that would have given the Pentagon greater authority to conduct covert action, senior government officials said Monday.

The decision is a victory for the Central Intelligence Agency, which has long been the principal architect and instrument of the secretive operations. The agency has been struggling to retain its authority in the power structure headed by John D. Negroponte, the new director of national intelligence, especially as the Pentagon has pressed for a greater role in intelligence operations.

The White House will also designate the C.I.A. as the main manager of the government's human spying operations, even those conducted by the Pentagon and the F.B.I., the officials said.

The decisions are part of a detailed White House response, expected to be announced later this week, to the 74 recommendations issued in March by the commission, headed by Lawrence Silberman and Charles Robb, that examined the role of intelligence agencies in detecting and countering the international spread of illicit weapons. The plan for covert action was the only major recommendation explicitly rejected by a White House team headed by Fran Townsend, the president's homeland security adviser, the officials said....

***

Under Mr. Negroponte, who took office in April as part of the biggest intelligence overhaul in four decades, the C.I.A. no longer has the pre-eminence it commanded for decades....But in addressing the commission's recommendations, the White House appears to have decided to maintain the C.I.A.'s predominance in both covert action and human spying, the areas in which the agency has most rigorously defended its turf....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28intel.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sir
CIA is mine mine dont you dare lessen her power. Crap put them all under CIA control. Next please. Subnect close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algomas Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Now that the CIA has been purged, its back in business!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. This puzzled me, Algomas, but I think you've got it figured. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, with Rummy heading the pentagon... methinks this is a
"pre-'b*sh speech 'adjustment'."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC