Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

France Gets Nuclear Fusion Plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:28 AM
Original message
France Gets Nuclear Fusion Plant
France gets nuclear fusion plant

Project estimated to cost 10bn euros and will run for 35 years
It will produce the first sustained fusion reactions
Final stage before full prototype of commercial reactor is built
France will get to host the project to build a 10bn-euro (£6.6bn) nuclear fusion reactor, in the face of strong competition from Japan.
The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (Iter) will be the most expensive joint scientific project after the International Space Station.

The Iter programme was held up for over 18 months as parties tried to broker a deal between the two rivals.

Nuclear fusion taps energy from reactions like those that heat the Sun.

Nuclear fusion is seen as a cleaner approach to power production than nuclear fission and fossil fuels.

<snip>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4629239.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wish them all the success in the world

but this research effort has been "10 years away" for decades now.
Yes, there has been progress... but it costs us (the planet) billions
and has yet to produce results. I'm not sure, minus a breakthrough,
that it will ever yield commercial power plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree, but wishes are all we have
It would be remarkable and spectacular if we could tap into fusion. Here's hoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The other option is inertial confinement fusion
which has also been 10 years away for decades. The national ignition facility is the latest of these efforts.

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I didn't even know they were THIS far along.
I say, good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. A fusion reactor is the grandest game of trial and error.
The scientist pretty much started from nil with it. But the rewards from it would be astonishing if we could get it to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. So why not just take the energy from the reactions ON the sun?
Edited on Tue Jun-28-05 07:50 AM by mbperrin
Solar is already feasible and here. If we'd spend 1/10 on it that we spend on various nookleeur projects, it would be the cheapest alternative. The biggest fusion reactor in the solar system is already up and running. All we have to do is collect it.

I know, then Carlyle couldn't make money building and researching more nookleeur stuff; after all, we can trust them, can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Solar roof shingles.
And a tax break for everyone who uses them or other renewable energy.

The biggest gains in solar photovoltaic cost appear to be in making the process cheaper, but not necessarily more efficient.

I have nothing against fusion research, but we need to fully fund alternative energy research, and offer real tax incentives for users of a "soft energy path".

But the larger problem is controlling our energy demand, as the cheaper energy is, the more we use in our electrically dependent civilization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Energy amplification seems
just as 'doable " as fusion. 5 more fission plants near populated areas, with a loss of safety protocols,< Challenger> disaster, human lives seem to be expendable now, a departure from "safety first" of the past.Remember 3 Mile Island, I sure do was threatened by it.No Fun.

Stop more fission reactors, and spent fuel, they have storage problems now on reactor sites. Where's the waste going to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. 10bn euros would buy ~2000 MW worth of photovoltaic modules - today
and they would generate electricity - today - not umpteen years down the road...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedom_to_read Donating Member (623 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. research is a good investment
They will learn a lot from this; not all of it will have immediate practical applications. But scientific research is worth the (sometimes large) expense, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZR2 Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. But where do you put 2000 MW worth of photovoltaic modules ?
How much of an are would that take up ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Portugal's 116 MW PV farm will occupy ~250 hectares of a reclaimed mine
Existing large PV arrays take up ~0.5 MW per hectare

2000 MW of PV would take up ~4000 hectares

Where???

Parking lots

Agricultural fence rows

Residential and Industrial rooftops

Brownfields

etc.

and they don't have to be deployed in the same place.

Also, don't forget that central station power plants use hundreds (thousands) of hectares of land for transmission lines and substations...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. On a cloudy day it would buy almost 100W worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Not so
PV panels will produce ~60% of their rated capacity on a cloudy day (they work primarily in the UV region of the solar spectrum).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC