Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saudis are becoming top threat to our GIs (NYP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 12:07 PM
Original message
Saudis are becoming top threat to our GIs (NYP)
Yes, it's the New York Post, but I'm glad. At least people read this paper. And keep in mind it was a Murdoch (News Corp.) paper that first published the DSM (The Sunday Times of London).

SAUDIS ARE BECOMING TOP THREAT TO OUR GIS

By NILES LATHEM


June 29, 2005 -- WASHINGTON — U.S. commanders in Iraq are facing a growing security threat from Saudi Arabia — which is emerging as a major center for recruitment and financing of terrorist operations in Iraq, The Post has learned.

Officials said that over the past few months, they have seen the Saudi connection to Iraq terror groups — like Abu Musab Zarqawi's al Qaeda in Iraq — increase as more fanatics cross into Iraq to fight American forces.

New intelligence also suggests that after Zarqawi pledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden earlier this year, there has been an increase in financing and other support from al Qaeda cells, radical clerics and wealthy businessmen inside Saudi Arabia, officials said.

http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/49287.htm

Iraq wouldn't be attracting all these foreign recruits if it weren't for the US invasion. And the invasion would never have happened if BushCo hadn't lied about Iraq, 9/11, and WMDs. Spread the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lets put Saudi Arabia as an axis of evil country!!!
Lets go in and take over Mecca ( sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. both Kerry and Clark went on last night about the borders in Iraq
and my jaw dropped to see for once, two Dems stay on message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't fall for it.
The "Saudis did it!" bandwagon is coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'm not.
I hope to heaven the US doesn't attack Saudia Arabia, or Syria... or Yemen or Bosnia for that matter.

It is downright criminal that Bushco couldn't forsee that occupying Iraq would result in a steady influx of volunteers from all over the world who believe the US has no right to export it's version of "good" government to "unresponsive" countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. as if...
America would never attack the Saudis.

If they were going to you'd think 911 would have given them all the fodder they'd need to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. "The Prize" - Saudi Arabia
Edited on Wed Jun-29-05 05:38 PM by leveymg
Everything -- Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran -- until U.S. troops occupy the Arabian Penninsula and the offshore fields in the Persian Gulf, will just be a warmup act.

Everything is moving up to that. Don't ever forget The Prize: $18 trillion worth of Saudi crude.

How many lives do you think they've calculated that might be worth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. DAMN IT SYRIA!!! Don't make us come over there, SYRIA!!!
Just knock it off, SYRIA!!!

Stop it, SYRIA!!!

Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ovidsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. That would be typical, wouldn't it?
US officials note a significant increase in fighters, weapons and other material crossing into Iraq from Saudi Arabia, so they make plans to attack....

SYRIA!

If this were a movie from, say, Woody Allen, or the Marx Brothers, it'd be funny. But it's not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I dread to quote him, but...
P.J. O'Rourke actually has a pertinent quote here. This is from memory, so it's not exactly right:

"Wherever a country is threatened by violence and injustice, the US will show up six months later and bomb the country next to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. The entire Middle East is a powder keg.
And Commander Cocoobananas just had to go and light it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. If world oil demand continues with stagnant supply, only 35 yrs left
of oil in the world...What will radical wahabi Islam do then ? Bernard Lewis will have to expand What Went Wrong ? by a couple pages for sure.

We need only look at Amory Lovins' Winning the Oil End Game
http://www.oilendgame.com/

but what will the Islamic world end up doing ? Forget Bush, it's the leadership the Dems and rational Repubs show now that he's proving the lamest of lameduck Presidents just minutes into his second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You
I like. :hi: Amory Lovins even provides the book FREE in pdf form.

http://www.oilendgame.com/pdfs/WtOEg_72dpi.pdf

Same with Natural Capitalism. One of the smartest guys on the planet, thanks for posting and reminding me that there is reason for optimism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. His conservationism is what got us thru the first oil shocks. Then 1982
and Reagan tossed out all the good stuff on renewables. What shortsightedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That is how long I have been loving Amory
and despising Reagan. Ok, not despising anymore. Pitying. Shortsighted is the word for all these retreads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Thank you for that link; I was not aware of that free PDF!
Downloading it right now!

Here's your pie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. When the oil runs out, what will those jihadis going to do then ?
Edited on Wed Jun-29-05 05:37 PM by EVDebs
It's all in the arithetic.

In something like 29 years or less, Bernard Lewis' What Went Wrong will really need updating. There's lots of sand for silicon-based solar cells...maybe that's what Bush and Cheney are REALLY after !

1.14 trillion barrels of oil...84 million barrels consumed daily (now) projected to rise to 120 million barrels daily in 25 yrs...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. yep and you guys have been selling them weapons since the 70's :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. The Saudis will reconfigure into a more stable societal configuration
As is stands now the Saudi birthrate is one of the highest in the world, but the annual per capital oil dividend is one that has been steadily decreasing for more than twenty years.

How can high rates of unemployment, idleness and a non-democratic and non-participatory economy not be a recipe for disaster?

That region will not become the next China or India. Moderate fishing, agriculture and trading as was done historically will no doubt return as the center of livelihood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Back to the Future ! 7th Century style
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did Bush mention the Saudis EVEN ONCE in his travesty of a speech last
night? After all, most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis and there was so much Saudi connection witht he event that he had those pages of testimony made secret.

And there is this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1870204
Thread title: Important new essay and info from Sibel Edmonds! ("FBI and 9/11")


(snip)

In certain cases, frustrated FBI agents cited ‘direct pressure by the State Department,’ and in other cases ‘sensitive diplomatic relations’ is cited. I provided the Department of Justice Inspector General and the 9/11 Commission with detailed and specific information and evidence regarding this issue, and the names of other witnesses willing to corroborate this, and the names of certain U.S. officials involved in these transactions and activities.

Now, after almost 4 years, we get to hear new bits & pieces: FBI & Midhar’s Case; FBI & Abdel-Hafiz Case; FBI & Saudi planes leaving just days after 9/11 without having the passengers questioned; FBI & Youssef Case; and the list goes on.

Today, after nearly four years since 9/11, the American people still do not know that thousands of lives can be jeopardized under the unspoken policy of ‘protecting certain foreign business relations.’ The victims' family members still do not realize that information and answers they have sought relentlessly for almost 4 years has been blocked due to the unspoken decisions made and disguised under ‘safeguarding certain diplomatic relations.’

Where is the so-called congressional oversight? Why the 9/11 Commission intentionally omitted this info; although they’ve had it all along? Where is accountability?


(More in opening post of that DU thread and original link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. nope he didn't and why would he, after all we can't forget his good
buddy Bandar Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Actually I was surprised that he DID
mention Saudi Arabia -- my jaw dropped to hear him mentioning it..

his old buddies? Daddy's biz pals?

Yep, he said it, I heard it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Absolutely shocking considering only 15 of the 19 9-11 hijackers alleged
to be Saudis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. to complain about the Saudis would simply result in the Saudis playing
their extrosion trump card yet again...reduced oil production/sales and increasing crude oil prices yet again. Each and every time your government in the past 30+ years balked at an arms sale to them they simply reduced oil production and sales and increased prices. They are truly pigs bar none!!! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Most of the insurgents are Iraqis
Edited on Wed Jun-29-05 02:17 PM by Strawman
This is just trying to feed the myth that by fighting the terrorists "over there" we're somehow safer over here. We're not. We're safer here when we focus on and invest in our security here and don't start unnecessary wars that can be used as a recruting tool for terrorist organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Naturally - it's their country that was invaded. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. WWIII is a-comin'
and the US will live in infamy as the man who let the catalyst live in the WH for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Its the Crusades over again!!! And Mecca is the center of the
World!!! The royal princes are sitting on boatloads of cash but can they protect themselves from the young upstarts galvanized by US in Iraq!!!

We will see We will see!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. and Bush is after the Ark of the Covenant so that he can rule the world. n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. and Bush will say "It's beautiful!" as the Angel of Death appears. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick!
From Murdoch's paper. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. hey - didnt saudis fly planes into prominent US buildings on 9/11
must be a conincidence :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC