Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain admits secret planning to cut Iraq forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:10 PM
Original message
Britain admits secret planning to cut Iraq forces
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8544060/

Britain has not decided to withdraw troops from Iraq, although contingency planning is under way, Prime Minister Tony Blair’s office said Monday.

A leaked government memorandum shows Britain is considering scaling back its troop presence from 8,500 to 3,000 by the middle of 2006, saving nearly $1 billion annually.

The memo, marked “Secret — U.K. Eyes Only,” and signed by Britain’s Defense Secretary John Reid, also says there is a “strong U.S. military desire for significant force reductions.”

<snip>

Blair’s official spokesman, who speaks on customary condition of anonymity because he is a civil servant, said the memo merely confirms the government’s long-standing plan to train Iraqi forces and gradually hand over security responsibility.

“It should come as no surprise that we are going through the thinking process of how we achieve that,” he said. “But as John Reid said, the process of transfer will only come at the point where the Iraqi government and ourselves believe that the Iraqi forces are capable of taking that load. Has there been a political judgment to withdraw? ... No.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. “strong U.S. military desire for significant force reductions.”
Isn't 2006 some kind of election year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ding Ding Ding - you win the prize
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 07:15 PM by RamboLiberal
"We'll stay the course" - until it looks like we (meaning R's) might lose the majority!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What did I win ? a Draft Deferment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. ROFL - If you want!
Send a Young Repuke in your place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinsb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well with the number of dead and wounded mounting
and the number signing up falling it would definitely look better to have a "planned troop reduction" than an unplanned troop reduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sophist Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bring them all home now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. I just love these British memos. It is a jolly good trend. I wonder if a
certain poodle is getting tired of being kicked!
Dods tend to leak if they are kicked too hard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. More "faith based" military planning.
Used to be called "Vietnamization". Didn't work then either.
The interesting question is what Iran is going to do when we withdraw?
Instead of N. Vietnam and S. Vietnam, we have E. Iran and W. Iran, or
the soon to be founded "Greater Shiiastan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is not called "cut and run" when the GOP proposes it.
For our part, tomorrow is not soon enough to withdraw all US troops from Iraq.

You think this "leak" is related to the 2006 elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Remember Nixon's secret plan for peace in Vietnam?
The one that took four years to come to fruition?

Now memos are being leaked about a plan so secret that Bush won't admit there even is one---but he expects to win votes for it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Funny, this story was reported two days before the London attack
MoD plans Iraq troop withdrawal
>By Jimmy Burns and Peter Spiegel
>Published: July 4 2005 22:02 | Last updated: July 4 2005 22:02
>>

The Ministry of Defence has drafted plans for a significant withdrawal of British troops from Iraq over the next 18 months and a big deployment to Afghanistan, the Financial Times has learnt.

In what would represent the biggest operational shake-up involving the armed forces since the Iraq war, the first stage of a run-down in military operations is likely to take place this autumn with a handover of security to Iraqis in at least two southern provinces.

Defence officials emphasised that all plans for Iraqi deployments were contingent on the ability of domestic security forces to assume peacekeeping duties from UK troops. Iraqi forces have so far proven unable to take over such roles in areas where the insurgency is most intense, and progress has disappointed coalition officials.

But senior UK officers believe the four south-east provinces under UK command, which are largely Shia and have not seen the same violence as more Sunni-dominated areas north of Baghdad, may be ready for a handover earlier than those under US command.

http://financialtimes.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=FT.com%2B%2F%2BWorld%2B%2F%2BUK%2B-%2BMoD%2Bplans%2BIraq%2Btroop%2Bwithdrawal&expire=&urlID=14745110&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2Fa1384df4-ecbc-11d9-9d20-00000e2511c8%2Cft_acl%3D%2Cs01%3D1.html&partnerID=1701

LynnSin posted this on 07-05, two days before the attack. You don't think maybe Bu$h wanted to give the Brits a wake up call? Nah, I already wear too much tinfoil.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=4018951

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. ahh, now i know why bushie told the US troops to stay out of London.
looks like bush and blair had a little tiff at G8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC