Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blair will say root cause was extremism not Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:18 PM
Original message
Blair will say root cause was extremism not Iraq
<<SNIP>>
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f7614ab6-f7be-11d9-9f64-00000e2511c8,dwp_uuid=46d6f5a8-d260-11d8-b661-00000e2511c8.html

Blair will say root cause was extremism not Iraq

Tony Blair will on Tuesday try to persuade Muslim leaders that the root causes of the London attacks lay in warped versions of Islam, rather than political causes such as the war on Iraq.

The distinction is critical because the prime minister hopes to use Tuesday’s meeting with 20 to 30 representatives of the Muslim community to agree action to tackle religious extremists. Such measures are predicated on accepting that religious extremism can pose a threat – an argument some commentators have rejected. Ken Livingstone, the London mayor, has argued the suicide bombings were not caused by “an ideology . . . or even a perverted faith”.

The argument that the attacks were linked to political factors was bolstered on Monday by the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the think-tank, which said the war in Iraq had boosted al-Qaeda. The government’s ability to combat terrorism was hampered by its position as a “pillion passenger” to the US’s war on terror, the Institute said.

The government mounted a concerted effort to reject any such link between its foreign policy and terrorism in the UK. Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, reacted furiously to the think-tank’s report, saying: “The time for excuses for terrorism is over. The terrorists have struck across the world, in countries aligned with the US backing the war in Iraq and in countries which had nothing whatever to do with the war in Iraq.”

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tony Bush
in denial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Putin said the same thing about Beslan.
No, no. It's all Al Qaeda terrorists. It's radical Islam. It's got nothing at all to do with Chechnya. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Notice the increasing use of the word "extremism" lately.
Stay tuned for ever-lower thresholds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Extremism" eh?
Maybe Saigon68 will come across this thread and post a few pix of "extremism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The use of extremism is getting extreme.
"The extreme use of the word extremism in the defense of non-extremism is not extreme."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tony's making a straw man argument.
Of course the Iraq war is not the root cause of extremism,
but it made the problem worse on many fronts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well now that's strange...
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 06:06 PM by LynnTheDem
Angered By Iraq War, Bombers Driven to Suicide Attacks Say Friends
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBS05H56BE.html

UK Government; Iraq war 'increased terror threat'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3451239.stm

Ties to U.S. Made Britain Vulnerable, Report Says
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/17/AR2005071700995.html

Backing U.S in Iraq put UK at risk, think tank says
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20050718/ts_nm/security_britain_dc

Labour MPs blame bombings on Iraq war
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article299456.ece

72% of Britons say Iraq support left Britain more vulnerable to attack
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/8031

Iraq war has swollen ranks of al Qaeda
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1063717,00.html

Iraq Conflict Feeds International Terror Threat
http://www.skyhen.org/Focus/iraqcoverage/cia_iraq_conflict_feeds_international_terror_threat.php

Poll: Aussies, Brits, Italians say Iraq war increased terrorism
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1576/5027215.html

Everyone is wrong, only bLiar is right? Don't think so.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. One lie after the other....over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. The scary part is that some people are buying this crap. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. You've just GOTTA AGREE with Blair

Extreme fundamentalist Islamists preying on extreme poverty and oppression launch an extremely startling and deadly attack, which is responded to, after a brief moment of sanity, with extreme force directed at the wrong country -- to the extreme..!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The Islamists wanted Hussein gone too, which makes it all kind of f'd up.
Incidentally, this is a poor analogy, but nobody would really say that the Democrats insisting on keeping legalized abortion is to blame for Eric Rudolph's acts of terrorism, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. Nope.
Can't look for 'root causes' there or ask what policies led to his reactions against perceived injustice. Can't say it has nothing to do with Rudolph's religion. Wouldn't be prudent, so I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Tony Blair is as big a liar as Bush
and there are a lot of people in Britain that no longer believe in Bush's poodle and are asking hard questions about the links between the London bombings and the criminal war in Iraq.

Two-thirds believe London bombings are linked to Iraq war

Labour losing battle to convince public

Julian Glover, political correspondent
Tuesday July 19, 2005
The Guardian


Two-thirds of Britons believe there is a link between Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq and the London bombings despite government claims to the contrary, according to a Guardian/ICM poll published today.

The poll makes it clear that voters believe further attacks in Britain by suicide bombers are also inevitable, with 75% of those responding saying there will be more attacks.

The research suggests the government is losing the battle to persuade people that terrorist attacks on the UK have not been made more likely by the invasion of Iraq.

According to the poll, 33% of Britons think the prime minister bears "a lot" of responsibility for the London bombings and a further 31% "a little".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1531347,00.html

Tube bombs 'linked to Iraq conflict'

· Thinktank says war boosts al-Qaida
· Blair dismisses connection

Read the report in full (pdf):

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Politics/documents/2005/07/18/Chathamreport.pdf

David Hencke, Westminster correspondent
Monday July 18, 2005
The Guardian

Britain's involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to the terrorist attacks in London, a respected independent thinktank on foreign affairs, the Chatham House organisation, says today.

According to the body, which includes leading academics and former civil servants among its members, the key problem in the UK for preventing terrorism is that the country is "riding as a pillion passenger with the United States in the war against terror".

<snip>

In the most politically sensitive finding, Chatham House, which used to be known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, concludes there is "no doubt" the invasion of Iraq has "given a boost to the al-Qaida network" in "propaganda, recruitment and fundraising", while providing an ideal targeting and training area for terrorists. "Riding pillion with a powerful ally has proved costly in terms of British and US military lives, Iraqi lives, military expenditure and the damage caused to the counter-terrorism campaign."

This finding runs counter to the line from Downing Street, which has sought to detach Iraq from the London attacks.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,,1530710,00.html




We should not be making excuses for the war criminal Blair. Blair may well be more skilful at communications than Bush, but he lies just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Actually read my post IG.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 08:40 AM by krkaufman
I wasn't making excuses for Blair. (sheesh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. We the people of this planet are caught in a war between extremists.
This is one time I agree with Mr. Blair. Yes, extremism is definitely the root cause of the London bombing AND the war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tony bLIAR
The Yankee Poodle Dandy said: "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Even
most comments in The (London) Times disagree with Blair:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,564-1698827,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
17. Gee, and what causes extremism? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. We'll be needing a think tank to study the matter
As your rhetoric seems to reflect, the public's collective good common sense simply isn't operating, else there simply would be no way Blair would dare to utter such drivel. Hell, collective good common sense has been a non-starter for decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; ....
Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

Remember Barry Goldwater? I don't think Blair is using the same definition of "extremism."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. And what's the root cause of extremism?
Tony, can you answer me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, it is extremism.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 11:42 AM by Skidmore
of the DC-London neocon variety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSWin Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. .....
The attacks probably would have occured with or without British involvement in Iraq. Young British Muslims aren't mad over just some geopolitical event like Iraq but for personal reasons and thinking the surrounding British society wants to destroy their way of life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm not buying that.
The attacks had all the hallmarks of Al-Qaeda which have very specific methods and political aims.

There was virtually no threat to the UK from fundamentalist muslims before the Iraq invasion. The intelligence services know that, the British people know that, it's just Blair and his cabinet who won't own up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattSWin Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Ever heard of Abu Hamza al-Masri...
He was an active militant fundamentalist before the Iraq invasion. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Hamza).

Al Qaeda isn't all about revenge for "attacks" on the Muslim. Many members want an end goal of an Islamic state.

I just find it interesting that we'll come up with all these pragmatic, rational goals Islamic terrorists have for doing what they do but when someone like Eric Rudolph or white supremacists bomb some place we rightfully just call them irrational nutcases.

I hate to tell you this but alot of Islamic terrorists kill simply out of hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. We keep ignoring what the "terrorists" tell us is the root cause.
They keep saying, and no one here (US) dare listen. They keep telling us it's our ME policies and our military presence on their land.
But why should we believe them eventhough they warned us after the first WTC attack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. In that article
you've linked to it mentions that Hamza warned the Uk about Iraq.

Yes, Islamic fundamentalists existed before the Iraq invasion but it was that invasion and its aftermath (Abu Ghraib, Fallujah etc) that made them set their sights on attacking Britain, which previosuly they'd left alone. The fundamentalists say this themselves, as do the British intelligence services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. Uh...yeah right!
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 02:07 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC