Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Leak Investigation: The Russert Deal - What It Reveals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:30 AM
Original message
Newsweek: Leak Investigation: The Russert Deal - What It Reveals
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 08:36 AM by Pirate Smile

Under fire: Rove leaves a fundraiser in Washington, D.C.

Newsweek
Aug. 1 issue - A deal that special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald cut last year for NBC "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert's testimony may shed light on the emerging White House defense in the Valerie Plame leak case. The agreement between Fitzgerald and NBC avoided a court fight over a subpoena for Russert's testimony about his July 2003 talk with Dick Cheney's top aide, Lewis (Scooter) Libby. The deal was not, as many assumed, for Russert's testimony about what Libby told him: it focused on what Russert told Libby. An NBC statement last year said Russert did not know of Plame, wife of ex-ambassador Joseph Wilson, or that she worked at the CIA, and "he did not provide that information to Libby."

This now appears significant: in pursuing Russert's testimony, Fitzgerald was testing statements by White House aides—reportedly including Libby—that they learned about Wilson's wife from reporters, not classified documents. Libby's lawyer did not respond to requests for comment. A source close to Karl Rove, who requested anonymity because the FBI asked participants not to comment publicly, says the White House aide—who passed info about Wilson's wife to Time's Matt Cooper—only knew about her CIA job from either a reporter or "somebody" who heard it from a reporter; he can't remember which or who. Rove did not initially discuss his talk with Cooper with the FBI, but later volunteered info about it and called agents' attention to a subpoenaed e-mail he had written to national-security aide Stephen Hadley mentioning the conversation, the source said.

The emerging White House defense is important in light of recent attention on a classified State Department memo that had key info about Wilson's wife. The memo, dated June 10, 2003, was labeled top secret at the top of the first page; a paragraph referring to "Valerie Wilson" at the CIA had the letters snf in front of it, for "Secret No Foreign," meaning the info is secret and can't be shared with any foreign national, says a government official who reviewed it but asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the material. The memo was taken by Secretary of State Colin Powell aboard Air Force One during a trip to Africa in July 2003, and Fitzgerald has questioned White House aides about who saw it. Fitzgerald has been said to be investigating whether any aides violated the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act—which makes it a felony to disclose the identity of a covert CIA employee: it requires showing the violator knew the agent's undercover status. (The State memo makes no reference to that.) But the CIA's initial "crimes report" to the Justice Department requesting the leak probe never mentioned that law, says a former government official who requested anonymity because of the confidential material involved. Fitzgerald may be looking at other laws barring the disclosure of classified info or the possibility that current or former White House aides made false statements or obstructed justice.

—Michael Isikoff

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8682500/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. please please please please please....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Laughing so loud I
might upset the neighbors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I like that Bush still has his omnipresent flag pin on. Nice touch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandomom Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Just in case we all forget that we're in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. SWEET! Images like this make it easier to VISUALIZE IMPEACHMENT!
Keep 'em coming! Mental PICTURES are EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. It can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azoth Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. I think that could easily become my new meditation mantra.
visualize impeachment...

Oh I love it. That will bring me such inner peace.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SquireJons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Keep up the good work
... and thanks for the lovely touchups. Hopefully, one day we won't need Photoshop for these kinds of pics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. "you dirty rat"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. my new wallpaper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Isikoff item: What it Reveals
that he is a parisan hack, still.

Let's see - on the one hand he mentions that the State Department memo was marked "Top Secret" (that is - Classified); but then he states that the qualifier in the body of the memo refering to Plame - was marked secret from foreign nationals - thus ONLY prohibiting telling foreign nationals - and thus, those reading the memos are cleared from knowledge of her status - and thus no problem leaking it - so goes Isikoff's (aka "never met a Arkansas Project trooper he didn't love") logic in this item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What?
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 09:19 AM by TrueAmerican


What it means is the information is Secret (not relaseable to anyone without at least a Secret Security Clearance and a need to know] and No Foreign "Not releaseable to any foreign national, ever]. I don't know how anyone can put a different spin on it. But you did. Yes the overall Document is "Top Secret", they put the highest classifacation on the document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Isikoff put that spin on it
I just highlighted his ridiculous logic.

I am in complete agreement with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sled Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Unless something's changed...
since I had a Top Secret clearance, in the 70s, nothing within a document classified "Top Secret", can have a lower security classification...if it's stamped "Top Secret", the entire document is "Top Secret"...it doesn't make sense otherwise. How could you read the "Secret" portion, without possibly exposing the "Top Secret" part???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. easy - if you are Isikoff and trying desperately to validate the BS spin
coming from the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. What Isikoff thinks doesn't matter
Its all going to be up to the judges. All these so called 'journalists' can spin all they want. They're only digging their own graves deeper.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Delete - wrong post
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 02:21 PM by DoYouEverWonder
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. true, but at least the memo is being talked about....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too beautiful to die
:kick: Kick it donkey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick!...I think..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. So Rove or someone else tried to pin the blame on Russert
and Russert didn't automatically fall on his sword? I guess Timmy's a wee bit scared of jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. regardless of who saw the memo,
what was the point of her being mentioned in the memo? was there some legitimate reason that she would be in that state department memo or was she being identified to figure out a way to exact revenge on joe wilson?

is there a copy of the memo somewhere? i'd like to know the context for her inclusion in that memo.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. if there were a copy of the memo somewhere,
the republicons would tell us it was a forgery!

I'm really enjoying watching these fuckers twist in the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
24. are NeoCons really starting to hate Clinton bashing Isikoff now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. Neocons eat their own
After years of Russert's dedicated ass-licking of the GOP in every single one of his shows, now they push him under the bus when it's expedient to Rove/Libby. Even if they are in the same camp ideologically.

This should show the media ass-kissers that, after devotedly acting like lapdogs since January 2000, the Bush administration would unscrupulously use them as scapegoats and ruin their lives if necessary. In my opinion, I think these media loudmouths deserve it, for adopting the embarrassingly servile attitude they have paraded for the last five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. yes, it's another example of that famous Bush "loyalty"
that we keep hearing about. Unfortunately, for anyone who goes up against these thugs, the loyalty only runs one way -- to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
28. hmm, was Jim/Jeff given the memo first?
just wondering :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC