Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karen Hughes refused to answer questions re: Plame outing during confirm.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:47 PM
Original message
Karen Hughes refused to answer questions re: Plame outing during confirm.
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Karen_Hughes_refused_to_answer_questions_about_Plame_outing_during_confirmation_he_0727.html

Senior Bush adviser Karen Hughes, headed to confirmation in the full Senate for the State Department's top public relations post, provided a terse two sentence answer to questions submitted by Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) about her role and knowledge about the outing of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson, RAW STORY has learned.

Kerry's line of questioning focused on whether Hughes knew Wilson was a covert operative, and whether she had ever spoken with Bush adviser Karl Rove about the agent.

Hughes response was curt: "Because of my ongoing contact with the White House, I was interviewed as part of that investigation and was happy to cooperate, as I noted in my Senate Foreign Relations Committee questionnaire. As you know, these questions relate to an ongoing criminal investigation. I believe that I should honor the prosecutor's request not to discuss this matter until he has completed his investigation."



See PDF images at RawStory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:49 PM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, BUT
I'd like to have her and Rove on the Democrat team in 2008. The GOP put up a monkey twice and won against two wonderful Democrat prez candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. What is a "Democrat candidate"?
I belong to the Democratic Party. The oldest political party in the world, by the way. The "Democrat Party" was in invention of Newt Gngrich to annoy members of the Democratic Party. Look at the letter head on the stationery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. "Democrat Party" is republican whore gibberish
it is juvenile - right up there with "freedom fries"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. In my part of the country it is none of these things and my usage
of it is more than acceptable and proper. Sorry if it offends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
50. Were (are) Gore and Kerry Democrats
or Democratics.
PS I am also a member of the Democratic Party. I call myself a Democrat. Sometimes a Dem when I don't feeling like spelling it out all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
53. also
Definitions of democrat on the Web:

a member of the Democratic Party
an advocate of democratic principles
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

a person who belongs to the Democratic political party.
www.enchantedlearning.com/election/glossary.shtml


and there are many, many others that agree with my usage of "democrat"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
54. We native English speakers have this nifty productive
grammatical process that's been variously dubbed "conversion" or "zero suffixation". It's where you take a noun and make it into something that functions as an adjective. (It's probably the same process as in German, but since they kept some declensional endings, it has to be kept separate from adjective formation in that language.)

I can build a database, and buy a "database program" to do it; I can have a cell phone, and look at the cell phone case--and then discuss the cell-phone case material. Pretty much any noun phrase that doesn't already have an adjectival form can undergo conversion--and in the last few years I've seen zero-suffixed forms actually *replace* standard adjectival forms already attested in dictionaries in some discourse.

Since we still use 'democratic' as a common adjective, but 'democrat' infrequently as a common noun, I'd expect "Democrat candidate" to win out on functional grounds over time as a less partisan formulation. "Democrat candidate" may be mostly said by repubs, but it's completely comprehensible: a candidate who is a Democrat, or a candidate of Democrats. I personally dislike "Democratic candidate" as ambiguous, and say "Democratic Party candidate" when I want to sound non-partisan in mixed company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I just added you to my buddy list whether you like it or not
THANKS. That was a very interesting analysis and one with which I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
32. they didn't "win" cause of them...... the only reason they won was
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 12:03 AM by Gabi Hayes
the corpwhorate media

the ONLY reason

never forget that; as bad as the pukes are, the media are infinitely worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
56. If MSM had been truly neutral, Gore and Kerry should have won
by millions of votes over the monkey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. Al Gore did not lose to Bush, the American People did.
There was a coup in 2000 supported and condoned by (as another poster here so eloquently stated) the corpwhorate media. Their continous slander against Gore ever since 1998, their refusal to actually do their job and look out for the American People during the contested phase of the 2000 election, or their enabling of the corrupt/incompetent bastard in power now by using obfuscation as opposed to clarification. This has been their M.O. ever since, whether it is social security privatization, honest voter reform, the war against Iraq or the lastest example treasongate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
61. I would not like to have her on my team, or the team I will vote for
Honesty, integrity, caring, and respect are important to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. stunt? eliphunt?
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Blunt runt? Bunt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. And what did you expect from Karen Hughes?
A picnic basket full of fried chicken and sweet potato pie for Mr. Kerry? Nuhh-uhh! Just some plain ol' Texas sass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And Really Stupid Too
but hey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. More like plain ol' Texas ass
I'm just sayin ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. that wasn't Texan sass
that was republican whore sass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe you should speak up
or wait for your confirmation until you are cleared, or indicted.
But that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's exactly right. Why would either party confirm someone who's
part on an "ongoing criminal investigation." It would keep any of us from getting the job, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well: Panel OKs Karen Hughes for State Dept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. Every damn confirmation hearing
should be put on hold if they are going to use this answer for every damn thing!!!

Q: Would you like to break so you can go to the bathroom?

A: That is the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. The copies from Raw Story:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. My copy's blurry...
does that say "sometimes traveling to the White House for meetings" or "meatings"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. In that case, Ms. Hughes, you would of course understand
our reluctance to proceed with your nomination to an ambassadorial position. Perhaps you are correct. We should all just keep quiet, wait to see if you are indicted, and then take another look at whether you still merit becoming America's spokesperson to the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. My favorite Karen Hughes moment involved the 2000 debate notes
that wound up at Gore's office. Anyone who knew Rove then knew immediately it was a Rove trick, but of course Karen Hughes doggedly tried to claim that it was somehow Gore's doing. So she was taking questions, and as usual she was so arrogant the media was getting annoyed.

So one brave soul asked her if she or anyone in Bush's administration had anything to do with it, and she, as she always does, jumped right on the question. "No, of course not, Governor Bush would not stoop yadayadayada."

Next question: "Would you be willing to take a lie detector test to prove it?"

I have never seen someone look so scared in my life! She just stood there, maybe five seconds, in a pure panic, then you could see her eyes as she suddenly remembered she was on camera, and she recovered and said "Of course, we would welcome the chance yadayada."

Would love to own a videotape of that moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But most of the time she is masterful
and comes off as very honest and down to earth and convincing as hell that Bush is the greatest prez ever. WHich is why I hate her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Not if you live in Texas
and have been hearing her since the mid 90s. Then she sounds like a phony. Maybe it's the accent--Texans can tell it's exagerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
40. THANK YOU
she just SCREAMS phony to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. Last night on Sundance they replayed the movie
Uncovered: The Truth about the Iraq War...I just watched these people one after another lieing their asses off...cannot believe people actually believed them, looking at their eyes and body language, it was so clear to me they were lying...especially ** and Hughes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
65. for those of us who have never been fooled
especially those of us in Texas - it just boggles the mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
46. Do most Texans buy *'s accent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #46
62. Not completely. Repubs just pretend they don't notice. You do know what
he's doing with it, don't you? It's just a straight John Wayne imitation, along with the walk and the slur and all the macho stuff. Bush in real life is a little pencilneck coward. Although by now he may actually believe his accent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
49. Was she born in TX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Maybe these are subjective things but I don't think so
the first time I saw her on camera and heard her speak, I couldn't believe she was a valued confidant of George W. Bush.* When things ended up as they did, I very much hoped he would not dream of bringing HER to Washington, D.C. I couldn't believe it when he did. I knew then we were in serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. I have seen her calm down controversies so many times
and get people in lock step behind her. Don't ask me what they were, I can't remember anymore but I recall it happening in his first campaign for prez. It was as if she said 2+2=5 and everyone just said oh, okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #48
63. She used to be a reporter. All she does is play the media
She doesn't convince them of anything, but she knows the game, and knows what they will report, and what they won't. So she plays them. They know it. Some like her, some don't, but no one really believes her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. That was a classic "deer caught in headlights" moment.
You could almost make out her pupils dilating from the panic.

Thank you for reminding me of that funny memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. ooo...I'd *love* to see that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
59. It was indeed a classic! Wish I had recorded the incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hughes: riding high on Wimpocrat support
Before we praise any tepid grilling of the rat-faced Hughes, let's remember a leading politician we all know has already fawned over her in a letter of recommendation.

"She will bring new energy and creativity to our public diplomacy efforts. I commend the president for choosing her and persuading her to return to Washington, and I look forward to working with her for the next three years on this important foreign policy priority.”

Who wrote that? Dick Cheney? Douglas Feith? Paul Wolfowitz?

Actually, it was the coal miner's son, Joe Biden.

For the full letter, see: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/22/excuse-me-but-do-you-enjoy-being-in-the-minority/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yeah, Biden has the "Joe-mentum" thing going on...
He's a corporate tool!

He thinks Bolton is the "real deal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. She's not going to give up her chance
To finally fuck Georgie. She is going to be disappointed...he likes boys. Faghags are so deluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The Rethugs and Rethug Lites..
will all vote for her. Maybe if she cut off a kitten's head in front of them they might not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Why, why would anyone, female or male ever want to boink *?
:puke: Just the visual makes me sick...

Aside from being an idiot and a chimp, he's A-sexual! But, then again, take a good hard look at the crew we are talking about: Rove, Cheney, Hughes, Rice etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im_Your_Huckleberry Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. she reminds me of nurse ratched
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. I guess Kerry got the answer he wanted.
The FRC vote was unanimous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It doesn't matter what orfice she has when or if she
gets indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. "Office" or "Orifice?"
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 10:23 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Spelling actually counts in this case. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Let your mind wander.
I left the i out of orifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. in other words "of course I knew about it"
f*cking animal. Sorry that she is female, she gives us all a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
42. These Bushbots make us ashamed
to be the same species, genus and order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. She was "interviewed" interesting that she chose that word instead of
I was questioned. They are good at framing. Interview suggests that they had control of the situation and that she was not involved, just a little chat over tea. Is that true or was she actually questioned as part of the ongoing investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Umm, I believe that lil interview is called a "deposition" ...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Also interesting is she's copping to the "ongoing investigation" line
Not like she's part of the current administration. She's not hired, yet.

I mean, if the RNC chairman, Meelyman, can spew on and on about this case, then why can't Ms. "Normal"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuck55 Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
33. 'Karen'
..wears underwear with dick holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #33
47. Or is Karen wearing Scotty's McButterpants? No truth for you--on going
investigation, ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. So what will they say when the investigation is over?
They won't have that excuse anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. It was Clinton's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
41. The Dems in DC should just shut down any nominations
until the on going investigation is over....

If that pursed lipped prissy is involved, then maybe the state department can get along with out a public relations hack for a few more months....

Jezzz don't these guys have any balls...
So they ask questions. Big Fucking deal....

Do something. God Damn it DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
43. Uncharacteristically terse for Mrs. Hughes who
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 01:48 AM by Kurovski
is usually a chattering, toothsome Jackal when it comes to explaining away all manner of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Rather telling, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #45
60. Oh yeah,
you know trouble's afoot when loquacious Karen sews her yammer up tight.

They haven't figured a way out of this one yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
58. Bzzzt!
Wrong answer (as usual), Karen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
64. Big deal, meanwhile she got the rubber stamp of approval. Phffft.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/26/AR2005072601551.html


Only two senators were in the room when Karen Hughes testified at her confirmation hearings. When it came time for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to vote on her nomination yesterday, she was easily approved. And thus with no discussion and no debate, Hughes takes over the least noticed, least respected and possibly most important job in the State Department. Her formal title is undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs. In plain English, her job is to fight anti-Americanism, promote American culture and above all to do intellectual battle with the ideology of radical Islam, a set of beliefs so powerful that they can persuade middle-class, second-generation British Muslims to blow themselves up on buses and trains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC