Iran warns against referring it to U.N.

[ECH1969]

LONDON (AP) - An Iranian official on Wednesday warned Europe and the United States against referring Iran to the U.N. Security Council over the resumption of operations at its uranium conversion plant.

Iran's chief delegate to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Sirus Nasseri said such a move would be a step toward "the path of confrontation."

Iran had suspended uranium conversion and enrichment at its plant in the southern city of Isfahan under an agreement reached with EU countries in November, but resumed full operations on Wednesday after rejecting the latest EU offer of economic and political incentives.

Europe and the United States have appealed to Iran to reconsider the proposals, while diplomats at the U.N. nuclear watchdog - the IAEA - are debating how strongly to rebuke Iran.

http://www.bakersfield.com/24hour/world/story/2625878p-11101557c.html

[wli]

1. the SCO will veto anything the US brings up here anyway

[Miss Chybil]

2. How's this for diplomacy... Dear Iran,

You give up your nukes and we'll give up ours. Fair deal? Ok. Good. Let's shake.

Sincerely,
The Coalition of Nuclear Armed Countries

[libra]

3. CNAC -- nt

[Miss Chybil]

4. Don't recognize the acronym. nt

[loudsue]

5. LOL! You ARE a Libra! Compromise for the New American Century

:rofl: Libras! Always trying to make peace! :applause:

It's actually an idea whose time has come!

:kick::kick::kick:

[iconoclastic cat]

6. Not to distract from the rest of the thread, but what if Iran starts a war

I mean, they know we're on our knees. If they get pissed off enough, they could claim the "preemptive" mantle and hand the U.S. forces their asses!

[H5N1]

8. Very interesting thought

[Supersedeas]

7. Mr. Bolton, you assistance is needed in one way 'aisle' three