Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hagel: Iraq growing more like Vietnam (Bush should meet with Cindy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:09 PM
Original message
Hagel: Iraq growing more like Vietnam (Bush should meet with Cindy)

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/08/18/hagel.iraq/

Hagel: Iraq growing more like Vietnam
Republican Senator says Bush should meet with protesting mom

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska on Thursday said the United States is "getting more and more bogged down" in Iraq and stood by his comments that the White House is disconnected from reality and losing the war.

The longer U.S. forces remain in Iraq, he said, the more it begins to resemble the Vietnam war.

Hagel mocked Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion in June that the insurgency in Iraq was in its "last throes," saying the U.S. death toll has risen amid insurgent attacks.

"Maybe the vice president can explain the increase in casualties we're taking," the Nebraskan told CNN.
"If that's winning, then he's got a different definition of winning than I do."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course he does. His definition of winning is
Cha-ching!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It always was Iraq-Nam in the minds of many of us here
We told this to everyone AD NAUSEUM 2 and 1/2 years ago.

MORANS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmmm, posturing for a presidential run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If so, at least he's posturing by coming out on the right side of
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 11:26 PM by Benhurst
the issue, unlike some of our senators who shall not be named.

typo :spank: corrected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or he has a good political barometer and clearly sees...
the writing on the wall. Interesting that things have to get this bad before we see the solid right starts to fracture. I expect to see more people peeling away, and distancing themselves from the Bush* administration as the midterms approach. Bush* has become an albatross hanging on the rebublicans' neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kostya Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hmmmm, looks like mid-terms posturing all-right, and then
after the elections, they'll close ranks around BushCo again. - K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. but he's not up for re-eLection in 06
unLess i'm mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Owning Vote Machines makes him brave
When you've got the backdoor to the voting machines, it's easy to stand up to Bush, but Hagel is fake. I don't know this, but that's my instinct. Hagel is posturing to try to look sane next to Bush, but he's just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. weLL, thanks for cLearing that up
hageL is/isn't up for reeLection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I don't think he's up in 2006
I think he's on the 1998/2004 or 1996/2002 schedule. He's probably positioning himself for 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. i'm waiting for the rightwing to start smearing him, so far i've heard
nothing, oh thats right he's a (r) next his name so he'll be left unscathed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. That's how I size it up.
There's going to be a lot of rats that don't want to go down with Bush's sinking ship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yup
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hummm, it is starting to look like people aren't scared of the "dick"
anymore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. whatever his motives
i'm glad he is saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good for Hagel
Sadly he has more backbone then a good number of democratic leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. not really, when it comes to voting in the Senate,Hagel is greased up ...
to take it in the can for Dumbya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. He can say what he wants. The US is there permanently
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 12:39 AM by The_Casual_Observer
enduring bases springing up all over the place. They have squelched any talk of quitting, it would be a blow to the memory of those who have died!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. Thanks for the picture of "The Penguin Wake Up Service" I needed a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyElvis Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. I don't trust
any repuke. He's sees which way the wind is blowing. If Iraq was a success, he would be saying just the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. Jeepers. Aren't Chuck's voting machines working anymore?
He's almost rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
22. Don't get too excited
He's my Senator and while occasionally he makes sense, I don't trust him in the slightest. He's running for President in 2008, all this means is that he can read poll numbers.

That said, he's not a freaky fundie and he'd be a vast improvement over Bush (which franky isn't saying much). I still wouldn't vote for him or get too happy about that interview, though. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hagel has been pretty vocal about the mismanagement of *'s war
for quite a while. He's not liked in the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedingbullet Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hagel
I have been suspicious of Hagel's motives but he has been critical of the Iraq mess for quite some time. I think he (or his advisor's) saw that the direction this was going to take and wanted to distance himself from the mess. Should have been a clue for the Whitehouse: Cluster-fuck coming, run for cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hagel's been opposed to the BushCo™ hostile takeover for a long time.
I don't agree with a lot of his politics (he is, after all, a Repuke), but he did say that he thought that Perle, Wolfowitz, et al. "should be in the first wave into Baghdad."

Yes, he's probably running for president in '08, but this isn't a blowing-with-the-wind thing. He was questioning the war while most others (including many Dems) were cheering it, or at least silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Wow...I never saw that Perle, Wolfowitz quote before
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 10:01 PM by arewenotdemo
I posted a poll in General Discussion (Clinton/Hagel/or 3rd party in 2008) that got locked after some know-it-all complained. I wasn't trying to promote Hagel...I've never voted Repuke in a presidential election and I intend to campaign for Clark...but Hagel could be a real force in 2008.

Especially if he were to run against Clinton with the U.S. still at war in Iraq (or Iran). I tried to show that with the poll (in a squeaker, "3rd party" edged Hagel who actually outpolled Clinton). My point is: there is a need for Demos (especially Clark) to not repeat the mistake Kerry made in continuing to talk about "succeeding in Iraq" when the country is itself already turning a psychological corner on the war.

Hagel will hand them their heads if they're not careful.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Agree. At the moment, I think Hagel is the only R who could give Wes
a run for his money--always provided, of course, that the Dems are smart enough to nominate Wes in the first place (and the Rs are smart enough to nominate Hagel...)

Man, what a horse race that would be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dickie and George's Excellent Iraq Oil Adventure continues!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC