Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venezuela slams Robertson over remarks (studying its legal options)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:29 PM
Original message
Venezuela slams Robertson over remarks (studying its legal options)

http://www.modbee.com/24hour/nation/story/2654216p-11160100c.html

Venezuela slams Robertson over remarks

The Associated Press

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - Venezuela's vice president accused religious broadcaster Pat Robertson on Tuesday of making "terrorist statements" by suggesting that American agents assassinate President Hugo Chavez.
Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel said Venezuela was studying its legal options, adding that how Washington responds to Robertson's comments would put its anti-terrorism policy to the test.

"The ball is in the U.S. court, after this criminal statement by a citizen of that country," Rangel told reporters. "It's huge hypocrisy to maintain this discourse against terrorism and at the same time, in the heart of that country, there are entirely terrorist statements like those."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick Ass, Venezuela!
Chavez rocks!

www.handsoffvenezuela.org

Throw that hypocricy right back in their POS faces!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Calling the Radical Cleric Robertson a terrorist! Love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Radical Cleric Pat Robertson
I like that. His name should always be prefaced that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. They should call for putting the US on the list of "terrorist nations"
I hope they pursue all legal avenues. Bush invaded Iraq to avenge a plot to kill his dad so this leaves plenty of room for Chavez to act.
But deep down inside I know Chavez is above the US low-life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. A fatwa by any other name would smell as rancid...
as Pat Robertson's rotting soul. The man IS a radical cleric. I'm just glad that Chavez is a few thousand miles away from Robertson's robotic followers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatwa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
77. GITMO
put that terrorist away NOW! I'm sure Pat would enjoy the good food and tropical breezes (as long as they don't pee on his bible.)
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well said.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 12:40 PM by redqueen
I doubt it'll matter... they've been trying to oust him since at least 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. April, 2002! There was a DU'er in Venezuela at the very same time.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 12:45 PM by Judi Lynn
He kept in frequent touch with D.U. throughout the entire ordeal, which was absolutely spell-binding.

What a vile event: US right-wing idiot President's financing yet another attempted overthrow. It worked in Chile, to the great wicked destruction of so many, many thousands of lives. It failed this time, thank God.



Scum of the earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetsGoMurphys Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. that picture almost forced me to put a fist through my monitor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. I Had The Same Reaction
I want so badly to beat one of these old hags with a goddamn shoe. Hard. And I am a very peaceful gal but that just caused a visceral reaction in me. She is so fucking ugly all the way round. Demon Crone. Fuck you you nasty slag of flesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. WTF is that a pic of? Some ugly right wing old hag who wasn't wearing a
big enough band-aid to cover her farce, I mean face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Remember the Republican National Convention last year?
They handed out these dandy little band-aids with purple hearts on them to the delegates, as a way of mocking John Kerry's Purple Heart he received in Viet Nam.

It was their way of claiming anyone could get a Purple Heart, and that he didn't really deserve it as he wasn't shot up well enough, in a life-threatening way, in their view.

Really shabby, sub-normal behavior, once more from the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Oh, forgot about that childish crap but the band-aid was still too small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
72. no I don't remember that but then I didn't watch the GOP convention
either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
60. I wanna wipe that smile
off her face! And i'm usually such a peaceful man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
74. What was even more vile were the DU scum who actually supported the coup!
Some of them are still around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is an excellent action taken by the Venezuelan gov't......
Not one American'ss first amendment rights extends to making verbal threats against the leader of a foreign power.

It would do my heart good to see Pat Robertson brough up on charges of any kind. It's time that American religious leaders were put in their earthly place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's just a Fundy Right Wing Nut-Job
Out to FLEECE the SHEEP in his flock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe before.... but now, he's a terrorist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. In a very real sense that man is a terrorist. Remember his audience
is comprised of people who have bombed abortion clinics and killed doctors and workers in the name of Jesus. If that is not radical religion I don't know what is.

They are a scary group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. excuse me, "women's health clinics"
women patronize these medical servies for many reasons aside from pregnancy termination. These clinincs actually help women who want a child to go through a safe preganancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheModernTerrorist Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. and men too...
I had to take a friend in for an abortion once, and as pro-choice as I am, I still found it troubling. They talked to me a bit, and helped to calm my nerves. So don't forget, they are really there for anyone who needs them :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #40
75. You are so right. My mom used to go to the one in Amherst NY north of
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 10:29 PM by TankLV
Buffalo, where that doctor was murdered. And she was in her 70's.

Hardly an "abortion" seeker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #40
86. Oh sorry - And when I was in college I went to one and got birth control
These places PREVENT unwanted pregnancies also. I also think you can just walk in and they will give you condoms - no charge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
57. And of people
Who as we speak are behind the murders of hundreds of thousands of civilians in the Middle East.

But no, this isn't another Crusade. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. far-right religious terrorists like robertson should be shipped to gitmo.
maybe they could learn a little something about the American way down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if there is some law in the US Legal System or Int'l World Court
that an open threat or suggestion of assasination against a World Leader can be tried somehow?

I think that the whole world should be able to see what the Christian Taliban in America and one of its "moral" leaders is saying - that he on national television called for a "Fatwa" against an elected leader of a country....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. "Terroristic Threat" is a real law. That is why people get arrested
for phoning in fake bomb threats.

The man needs to be arrested. What group is going to have the courage to do it? And since it isn't a local thing wouldn't the FBI be the ones who have to arrest him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. Someone mentioned earlier
That the hate radio hosts in Rwanda who helped spur the genocides there were charged with war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. Tis true, I heard and saw it in "Hotel Rwanda".
It needs to be nipped in the bud that's gotten outta control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:19 AM
Response to Reply #58
82. Good! Then add Rush, Melanie Morgan, Hannity and Bill O'leilly et al
to that growing list with Pat Robertson and when we finally wake up from our nightmare in America, that they all be tried for war crimes against the country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. GOOD!
His remarks were despicable. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. we are only a nation that obeys the 'rule' of law when it's
to our advantage.
Otherwise, we consider ourselves 'above' the law.

I'm ashamed once again of what is being passed off as "America".

PLEASE world- prove me wrong!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Yep. Law enforcement when convenient is the hallmark of a police state.
Our legislatures are producing laws at breakneck pace, including all manner of victimless crimes, crimes of "intention," and crimes of "affiliation." At the same time, the entitled are "deregulated." A government of entitlement, but not rights, is NOT a democracy; it's a fascist police state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. From Venezuela's VP Rangel
Rangel called Robertson "a man who seems to have quite a bit of influence in that country," adding sarcastically that his words were "very Christian."

The comments "reveal that religious fundamentalism is one of the great problems facing humanity in these times," Rangel said.

Amen to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I too agree, lately this seems to be the Christian Armies way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karla Marx Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
61. Pat Robertson is no better than Osama...
...with remarks like that. I'm glad Venezuela ain't taking his shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. That's what I told my friend
earlier before I got on DU today. Exactly who I compared robertson to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
64. I hope Jose Vincente Rangel
knows the "influence" that robertson has is with the nut cases only! Granted there are quite a few in the good 'ol USA.

This is a very astute comment that Rangel has made.."The comments "reveal that religious fundamentalism is one of the great problems facing humanity in these times," Rangel said."

Hallelujah and pass the ammo!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's exactly what he is. A terrorist who advocates assassinating
a democratically elected head of state. The only purpose being to get their natural resources by installing a pro-Bush puppet.

I'll never mention his name without the proper descriptor before it-
"terrorist Pat Robertson".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
65. Terrorist pat robertson and
Bad Fruit..

"At that time Jesus said to the disciples, 'Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheeps clothing, but unwardly are revenous wolves. By their fruits you will know them. Do men gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore, by their fruits you wil know them.'" Matt 7:16-21"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. A decent American president would call upon
the Radical Rev. Robertson to issue a written apology and a vocal apology to Chavez and the Admerican people. No, a decent president would order it. We have fallen so far since election 2000 if the earth was flat we would already have fallen off into space. My sister returned from visiting friends in London and she told me everyone she spoke with absolutely hates Shrub. Mostly they wonder when U.S. citizens will start fighting back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
66. Supposedly it was the fundies who
threw bush over the top..3 0r 4 million votes coming out of nowhere.

We have a chimp in the white house who can't tell his masters to apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jon8503 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. My comments on an earlier post of this idiotic comment by Robertson
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 12:44 PM by Jon8503
10. Venezuela should call for his extradition for trial or he should be deported for spreading hate. Aren't we arresting people for preaching hate.

Jon - "The greatest wealth is to live content with little" Plato

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
76. Deported for spreading hate.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 11:31 PM by NYC
UK:

Since the July bombings, the British authorities have threatened a series of tough new counterterrorism measures aimed in part at firebrand Muslim clerics.

The home secretary, Charles Clarke, who is in charge of law enforcement, said Monday that he would "this week be publishing and then acting upon new ways of dealing with preachers of intolerance and hatred and extremists who try to exploit the openness of our society to oppress others." He did not give further details.

Sadly, also from the same article:

While some of the government's proposed new measures seem to limit civil rights, a survey published in The Guardian on Monday said 73 percent of respondents were prepared to relinquish some freedoms in return for enhanced security.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/082305Y.shtml

The New York Times at Truth Out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignoramus Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Did you see the daily show's hit piece on chavez?
Not exactly on topic, but: A few days back, the daily show had a skit that consisted of showing Chavez in military clothing talking at a podium, while Jon Stewart said something to the effect that we have a dictator right here in latin america. Then there was a voice over, to pretend to be Chavez, ordering people to wear their underwear on the outside, so they can check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's low. Would never have expected that from Stewart. God.
He could spend some time reading Venezuelan history, for a little perspective. He's way off base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. The use of dictator was sloppy,
But its a comedy show, and the overall piece was not anti-Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Hit piece? Are you kidding me.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 12:50 PM by K-W
C-O-M-E-D-Y
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Once upon a time, a populist military leader would be to the right ...
... of the US. No longer. It's more a commentary on how far to the fascist right the US has lurched and tumbled. Chavez is no Gandhi. Chavez is no libertarian. On the Political Compass, he'd fall somewhere close to -1, +5 ... above the X-axis and only slightly to the left of the Y-axis. We should remember that 'liberal,' when related to a democratic government, means that minority rights and liberties are protected from majoritarian infringements. Populism is not 'liberal.' It looks good in comparison to a Pinochet-style of right-wing authoritarianism ... which the US is becoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Bananas
It was a refernce to the Woody Allen movie, Bananas.

So, should leftist leaders be sacred cows who can not be made fun of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignoramus Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Jokes do have a meaning
Everyone should be subject to being made fun of. But, there is a meaning behind a joke.

When the daily show makes fun of John Kerry for having a wooden commentarly on Lance Armstrong, it is different than the ad associating Howard Dean with pierced nose, hollywood liberal blah blah. They aren't just jokes, they are political commentary. The daily show's comment about John Kerry is like "Kerry's demeanor reflects a weakens of democrat's political strategy". When the group that produced the anti-dean ad was commenting something like "democrats are weird. Apply the hate you have for weird people to Dean". I call that a hit piece.

The meaning behind the Daily Show's skit about Chavez appeared to be nothing more than "Chavez is a dictator". So, I call it a hit piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
73. True. Also, most Americans are in the dark on Chavez
Stewart was reinforcing the negative view
of Chavez as portrayed by Fox.

Very disappointing. Chavez is awesome, if Stew
is going to say anything about him it should at least be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
27.  Robertson Is on commercial TV. We could get them to cancel his show.
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 01:07 PM by TheBorealAvenger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Sent mail to my local broadcaster
urging them to remove The 700 Club from their lineup because of Robertson's comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Well done
The home page of WUAB has a poll: are video games becoming too violent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Sounds like a job for the DU activist corps! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. Extradite! Extradite! Extradite! Extradite!
Better yet, send Robertson off to Gitmo! He IS advocating terrorism, after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. Pat Robertson put himself into the category of Terrorist when he
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 02:10 PM by mtnester
backed the assassination of Chavez. If a hard core fundamentalist of another country said that about our president we would hunt them down and arrest them for...oh wait.


(Really though, wouldn't it be fun to watch? Forget the WOULD, it WILL be fun to watch.)

Pat be wakin up in Carracas one day soon I am thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. Wouldn't it be something
A snatch team grabs bro pat and the next thing we know he's up against the wall in Carracas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. WWJA?
Now we know the answer.

(Who would Jesus assasinate?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. And another thing...not only did this effin terrorist threaten a
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 01:44 PM by mtnester
world leader, I would like to remind you that he also wants a holocust against gays.

Scare yourself about him and his buddy Falwell some more here: http://www.hatecrime.org/subpages/hatespeech/robertson.html

No pity for him...none...may Jesus show him the mercy he deserves.

God repays a man for what he has done; he brings upon him what his conduct deserves. (Job 34:11)...

Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Matthew 23:28
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
41. Viva Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. Venezuela Says Robertson Call to Kill Chavez Criminal (Bloomberg)
<snip>
Aug. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Venezuelan Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel said that calls by U.S. television evangelist Pat Robertson to kill Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez were ``criminal.'' U.S. Senators Norm Coleman and Mel Martinez called Robertson's statements ``irresponsible'' and ``incredibly stupid.''

``It was an incredibly stupid statement and has no reflection on reality,'' Coleman, the chairman of the Senate's Foreign Relations subcommittee on the western Hemisphere, told reporters while on a trip to Rio de Janeiro. ``I met with President Chavez on my last visit a couple of months ago and he related that concern to me, about how the U.S. was out to assassinate him. I told him not to lose any sleep about it.''

Chavez, 51, in June said there was ``evidence'' that the U.S. wanted him dead, an act that would violate an assassination ban first signed by Gerald Ford in 1976. The Venezuelan leader has repeatedly accused President George W. Bush of backing efforts to topple his government, a charge the U.S. denies.

``This type of statement justifies the Venezuelan government's worry about preserving the life of its president,'' Rangel said. ``President Bush said yesterday that his government rejects all forms of terrorism. The reaction of the U.S. to this presumably religious man will put to the test U.S. rhetoric.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aniyHDU_tsDI&refer=us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
68. Yeah, there's much more to it
than pat robertson calling for an assassination of my man Chavez.

Chavez is on record for being rightly concerned about it. I like it that even the fascist wing is calling pat robertson's remarks incredibly stupid and they might as well apply that to robertson, himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. Maybe they're thinking about a preemptive strike?
Hey, we did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
83. BIG surprise--Savage praises preemptive 'necessary' attack on Chavez
preemptive attack on Iraq was also necessary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Time for one of those "I'm sorry" web sites
Apologizing for our religious crackpots - the ones that run the U.S. government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. This should finish Pat Robertson

But it won't. That crackpot has uttered more non-sense than my 10 month old baby boy.

I am flabbergasted at the level of this man's idiocy, but am more astounded at the followers of this moron. UNBELIEVABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. I really think he's a bit "mental", not "reality based".
The result of being surrounded by sycophants for too long, like Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. Why don't they indict him...
and then seek his extradition. That would REALLY put the ball in the chimp's court. The Christian Right would go nuts. I love it. What if someone here said the same thing about Bush. The Secret Service would be all over him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Don't forget
he also called for the bombing of the State Department a while ago. Nothing happened to him then either.

If US law forbids the assassination of foreign leaders, then isn't a crime for a public figure (remember, he is not just a radical cleric, he ran for the presidency) to call for such an act?

The whole world should express outrage over this comment, since he is so close to the Bush administration and is not just an ordinary citizen out of his mind, ranting. He has influence in this government and Venezuela has already said such plans are in the works here in the US.

Anyone else saying what he said about the State Dept. would have been arrested ~ he wasn't. That shows the influence he has ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Bush must be afraid of him because he has right-wing clout.
Don't want to offend the looney-toons. Where ELSE would they get their votes?

It shows how much power he has if they didn't chastise him on that State Department spew. Maybe he served their interests by attacking Secretary Powell, who had dared to timidly challenge them at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. CNN poll:Do you think Pat Robertson's comment about Venezuela's Hugo Chave
Do you think Pat Robertson's comment about Venezuela's Hugo Chavez was out of line?

Currently:

Yes 80% 99794 votes

No 20% 25101 votes

Total: 124895 votes

http://www.cnn.com/

Lower right corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #55
69. cnn doesn't know that's why they ask
incredibly stupid questions!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
56. Good. Take Robertson to the wall on this one using the law. It
will be a nice contrast: a man using the system against a terroristic threat and a man breaking the law by advocating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
59. The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
Rock on Chavez! Here's a link to the awesome Chavez documentary "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" (no surprise considering the current corporate media state): http://www.chavezthefilm.com/html/home.htm

International Jury : "The best television programme in the world this year"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. You are too kind! I'm saving this
for later. It will be nice to have some of this history on Chavez as information when I'm trying to get out the news that Chavez is one of the Good Guys!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
62. Buy your gas from CITGO and you buy from Venezuela/send msg to Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #62
71. I do! I did before I even knew
it was Venezuelan. We used to have a DUer who's "name" was "buycitgo"..I don't know what happened to him but that's how I found out that Citgo was the gas to buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
78. How would people react if OBL advocated the assasination of Bush?
This is an identical situation. Pat Robertson is no different than Osama bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
79. What if
Chavez said Robertson should get "whacked"? That wouldn't stand would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
80. Tele-terrorist Robertson should be in jail.
This tele-terrorist and his cult followers should be rounded up and jailed before they try to carry out their guru's murder plans.

This demented tele-terrorist has also recently prayed on TV for the death of supreme court judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
81. Roberts, part of the Christian Taliban ...
an extremist is an extremist. Go Venezuela!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheesloaf Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
84. ...and the U.S. State Department replies...
On August 23, McCormack dismissed Robertson's remarks as the views of a private citizen that do not reflect U.S. policy.

"We do not share his view," he said. "His comments are inappropriate."

read the article here: http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/m-news+article+storyid-12246.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheesloaf Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. follow-up info from the briefing:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING

TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2005
(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)

12:58 p.m. EDT

MR. MCCORMACK: Good afternoon. I don't have any opening statements, so we'll jump right into questions.

QUESTION: I want to ask you about Pat Robertson's suggestion that the United States assassinate the President of Venezuela as a way of getting rid of a dictator and not having to spend $200 billion getting the job done.

MR. MCCORMACK: I would say that Pat Robertson is a private citizen and that his views do not represent the policy of the United States. We do not share his view and that his comments are inappropriate and that, as we have said before, any allegations that we are planning to take hostile action against the Venezuelan Government are completely baseless and without fact.

QUESTION: Thank you.

QUESTION: Can I have a follow up on that?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yes.

QUESTION: In other cases when somebody, a private citizen suggests the killing of a foreign leader you consider that guy a terrorist. Do you consider Pat Robertson -- his ideas to be -- also embracing terrorist -- acts of terrorism against other leaders?

MR. MCCORMACK: I've said what I'm going to say on the matter.

QUESTION: Can I ask though about Mr. Chavez? Do you agree that Venezuela under Chavez is a launching pad, as Pat Robertson said, for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism? I mean, you guys have been pretty tough on Mr. Chavez. Would you go that far, though?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, first of all, let me separate the two issues of Mr. Robertson's comments about action against President Chavez.

Concerning Venezuela, we have expressed our concerns in the past regarding some of Venezuela's behavior in the hemisphere. What we have said is that Venezuela should try to play a positive role in the hemisphere. We have invited the Venezuelan Government to join our positive agenda for the hemisphere in which we seek to promote democracy, promote greater prosperity for all the citizens of the hemisphere. This was the focus of the recent summit of the OAS in Florida, and we have an Embassy in Caracas and we are in contact with Venezuelan officials. So our agenda is a positive one for the hemisphere.

We invite Venezuela to join in that positive agenda for the hemisphere and in its contacts with its neighbors and other countries of the neighborhood that they play a transparent and open and positive role with those countries.

QUESTION: Does it follow that their agenda is a negative one?

MR. MCCORMACK: Again, we have in the past, you've heard us and the various officials talk about Venezuela and certain actions that they have taken in the hemisphere. We urge Venezuela, as all countries in the hemisphere, to play a positive role in the hemisphere and in their relationships with other countries in the hemisphere to have an open, transparent and positive relationship that you would have between two sovereign states anywhere around the world.

QUESTION: (Inaudible.)

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, we'll move around here.

Yeah, Nicholas.

QUESTION: Sean, you say Mr. Robertson is a private citizen, but he clearly expresses the views of people who are clearly the President's base -- a big part of that base, at least, which are Christian conservatives and Republicans. Do you -- you don't think that much of the world may interpret this as much as you can say that he is a private citizen as perhaps expressing the views that are shared by a big part of the Republican Party?

MR. MCCORMACK: I would think that people around the world would take the comments for what they are. They're the expression of one citizen. And we have been very clear -- I have been very clear that this is not the policy of the United States Government. We do not share his views and that his comments are inappropriate.

Yes, ma'am.

QUESTION: Which one?

MR. MCCORMACK: Right in front of you and then we'll get to you, if you're talking about Venezuela.

QUESTION: Is this -- do you consider it's not ambivalent from the U.S. Government to consider for one hand or do you suggest that Venezuela possibly -- probably is using its oil supply potentially to interfere in political issues in other countries? And by the same time, you are asking and requesting cooperation from the Venezuelan Government with the Drug Enforcement Agency. Is it not an ambivalent position from your government?

MR. MCCORMACK: No. I don't think I ever talked -- I don't think I talked about Venezuela trying to use its oil or money or oil --

QUESTION: What do you suggest?

MR. MCCORMACK: -- for any particular purpose. I was asked this question yesterday of whether or not I thought that they were trying to use their influence. What I said was what I said today. and that is we would expect that they play an open and a positive role in the hemisphere and that holds with their neighbors as well. Anytime you have relations -- a relationship between two sovereign states we would expect that that relationship would be on the basis of a mutual trust and respect and transparency.

And with regard to fighting the production, the processing and the transit of illicit drugs, we would think that that's a good for the hemisphere. I don't think anybody argues that it's important and necessary to cooperation in fighting the spread of drugs. So I don't -- that's our agenda. And with respect to the Venezuela Government on -- their views on those subjects, you can ask them.

QUESTION: But what do you consider --

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, we're going to move it around.

QUESTION: -- open and transparent manner?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah.

more here: http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/m-news+article+storyid-12224.html
(sry, should have all of this in one post, but this was a bit long)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
87. agreed
robertson should be prosecuted for making a terroristic threat

could even be charged w. conspiracy if he was sending a message to others w. his broadcast, isn't this what we accuse osama of doing, sending terroristic messages in coded phrases
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
88. Please stop playing into Robertsons' hand by giving him attention
If people would ignore the sonofabitch he'd be a lot less of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC