Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source: Feds dismissed E-mail warning of plan to conceal items on planes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 02:30 PM
Original message
Source: Feds dismissed E-mail warning of plan to conceal items on planes
<snip>

Washington-AP -- A top Bush administration official says the man suspected of hiding box-cutters on two airline flights warned federal authorities in an e-mail.

But, the source says federal officials concluded the man "did not pose an imminent threat to national security."

The official says the man told the government he planned to conceal similar suspicious items on six planes and provided dates and locations for the plan.

<snip>

Link: http://www.wlox.com/Global/story.asp?S=1487698

:wtf::wtf::wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess he wasn't Arab looking
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah... But If He Did Not Pose A Security Threat, Then...
Why did they search every goddamned airliner in the U.S.?

:shrug:

Somethin fishy here, no???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because even after he warned them, they got caught with their pants down.
This is a prime example of what a joke airport security is, and how the FBI is really not that interested in keeping us safe (or are prevented from doing so).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good Point, But How Far Down Were Their Pants ???
IOW - Did they get the e-mail warning and dismiss it as a prank that was never gonna happen, or did they use it as some sort of idiotic 'test' of their response protocols???

Either way, they look like fools, and the airlines need this kind of news like they need another plane crash right now!!!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. airport security not the only bad joke
This business of registering food suppliers to 'protect the nation's food supply' is pretty ridiculous too. They can't protect us from e-coli in the meat supplied by processors which already are registered and inspected.

I fear this 'anit-terrorist' measure will be a way to put family farms and small producers out of business. To really assure safty, every apple, pork chop and quart of milk would have to have armed guards 24/7 all along the production, processing, transporting and grocery store route.

Who the dickens are they fooling with this security line of BS. The only think the malAdministration is iterested in protecing is their own misrable hides and corporate interests, in that order.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Perhaps because the TSI personnel searching the planes ...
... wouldn't tell the media about finding more such items? Maybe to keep the scope of such vulnerabilities from being "embarassing" to the madministration?

It's so easy to see all their actions solely in the light of their own personal self-interest. These are not "public servants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would like to know
at what level this decision was made.
federal officials concluded the man "did not pose an imminent threat to national security."


Were these "federal officials" career people, political appointees, hourly employees, family members of Whistle Ass or Whistle Dick? And was Turd Blossom Rove involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC