Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British soldiers in custody in US on rape charge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 05:48 AM
Original message
British soldiers in custody in US on rape charge
British soldiers in custody in US on rape charge
03/09/2005 - 10:54:59

Two British soldiers have appeared in court in the US, charged with rape.

22-year-old Scott Aitken, from Edinburgh, and Andrew Leighton, a 28-year-old from Leeds, are alleged to have attacked a woman in June while on a training exercise in Wyoming.

Both pleaded not guilty to a charge of first degree sexual assault, which carries a maximum jail term of 50 years imprisonment.

They will be held in joint British and American military custody until their trial in December.
(snip/...)

http://www.breakingnews.ie/2005/09/03/story219030.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Odd the news hasn't been made public until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oscarmitre Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will be interesting
to see if they are tried by the British military or the US civil authorities. For mine they should be tried by US civil authorities. However if they follow precedent then the British military will try them which would be totally inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What precedent?
They just appeared in a US court, so that would appear to be the precedent they are following. The British military can't claim authority (unlike, say, Iraq, where they got laws passed saying the foreign troops aren't subject to Iraqi law). I would always expect cases like this to be tried in the civil courts where the offence was committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC