Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Gives Estate Tax Repeal Bill ‘Zero’ Chance Of Success

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:09 PM
Original message
Senator Gives Estate Tax Repeal Bill ‘Zero’ Chance Of Success
:popcorn:

Senator Gives Estate Tax Repeal Bill ‘Zero’ Chance Of Success,
by Mike Godfrey, Tax-News.com, Washington 05 September 2005

Sen. Charles Grassley (R - Iowa), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, has stated that there is virtually no chance that the Senate will back a full repeal of the estate tax when the chamber reconvenes to address the issue once again after the summer recess.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R - Tenn.) is planning a vote on H.R.8, which would repeal the estate tax beginning this year, and it could be one of the first bills on the Senate's legislative agenda during the September session, despite the more pressing issue of dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, which has devastated the city of New Orleans and much of the Gulf Coast area.

However, it is widely acknowledged by lawmakers and analysts that Frist lacks the minimum 60 votes needed to prevent a filibuster, a point Grassley noted whilst speaking to reporters in his home state of Iowa last week.

"I would imagine we have 55 or 56 votes to repeal it, but it's not going to get done," commented Grassley, who went on to add that the chances of a permanent repeal of the tax are "zero".

<SNIP>

http://www.tax-news.com/asp/story/story_open.asp?storyname=21005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I bet they pass a compromise
at about $ 3 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I thought 1 million was already exempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. It's more than a million
I think it's 1.5 million this year, and going up each year until 2010, but then it goes back down to $ 1 million permanently.

I think $ 1 million is too low. Supposedly the Democratic leadership is willing to go to about $ 3 million which seems fine in my opinion. Three million would take care of most small businesses and people who just saved well during their lives.

For years it was $ 600 k and that was too low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. A Republican Senator to boot!! they concerned about losing in 06 bigtime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. And what a great filibuster it's going to be, too
I can't wait to hear the fiery speeches condemning welfare for billionaires while the poor are starving and drowning, literally. Why do the rethugs even want to try this now? Are they that idiotic?? Let's hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm with you, I can't believe they'd be stupid enough to bring this up...
...then again, the Republicans never cease to amaze with their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I heard that one day last week
the RNC sent an e-mail to their constituency to call their congresscritters and push that this goes through. Did you hear anything like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. They did send that out
The RNC chair sent it out on 9/1/05. It has been posted on several threads here on the DU. It is not a rumor, it is not a lie, they sent it out. They hope with everything else going on that it will go through and not be noticed. They hope that Katrina, 2 SCOTUS appointees, the war in Iraq etc... will provide enough distraction and this can slip through unnoticed. They hope that it will not be the headline, only a footnote and the time is right to have this as a footnote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You mean the Millionaire rich kids' tax
They call it the death tax.

The real death tax is the number lost in Iraq, whose families are left in dire straits.

Nothing like benefiting the few at the dear expense of the many.

PS: How many of our fallen soldiers in Iraq/and families do you think would have benefited from repeal of the MRKT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. The death tax
they are going to give relief to the dead. That is the one, that is the most pressing thing that will be on the congressional slate when they return as far as republicns are concerned.

Don't take life so serious, your not getting out alive anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. The real "death tax" was paid by our soldiers in Iraq
And how many millionaire rich kids do you think were included in that number?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. I got a letter from Rick Santorum on the dreaded "death tax" Wednesday
while images of desperate survivors were all over the TV. What filthy greedy cold-hearted pigs these Republicans are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Can someone recommend this one up please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bring_em_home_bush Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Oh, you're right, I think it would push Middle America right over the edge
Please, please, let them try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Leave it to the Republicans.
A major US city is in ruins and all these fuckwits can think of is pimping for another tax benefit for the very rich. Even if it doesn't pass, it's a disgrace that they'd even bring it up under these circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Eleanor Clift predicted this on the McLaughlin Group....
Iraq and Katrina, no way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. next to go ...
hang on pukes, you'll be losing your Tax Breaks for the Rich too ... and you can thank * for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. I bet Frist never brings it to a vote. None of these guys like to lose,
and if he knows it's not possible, or even a done deal, it will die on the shelf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:27 PM
Original message
Nice thing about being in the majority
You get to decide what gets brought up to a vote and when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Nice thing about being in the majority
You get to decide what gets brought up to a vote and when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Strategy options -
1. Use Grassle to downplay vote count when they really have 60+ - in an effort to soften the pre-vote criticism of addressing estate give-ways ahead of the sturggling victims and their saviour-helpers who are suffering and laboring all along the Gulf Coast.

or

2. If Grassle's count is accurate - say they are going to address it first, then announce that in view of the disaster, they will postpone the vote so that they can look like the good guys.

Is it true that the estate vote will cost the country 1.5 million a day in lost tax revenue? Or is it 1.5 billion? Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope they put it forward anyway to show just how lovely they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yea, so do I.
Should be interesting to see how many DINO's will vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. The fact that they are even considering it after Katrina
should be stuffed down their throats by the congressional democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thank God somebody's finally standing up for the millionaires!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. I am so embarrassed that Frist represents Tenn. I didn't vote for
the heartless, uncaring, self-serving egotist. Instead of introducing legislation to help the victims of Katrina, Frist introduces legislation to give tax cuts to the rich. I hide my head in shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Which Democrat In Name Only is going to vote for it?
If it comes to a cloture vote, if one of our Democrats votes on the wrong side of this, we must mak it our mission to rid the party of that a*hole at any cost. If our leaders will not discipline the congressional delegation then it is up to us to do it for them.

And furthermore, our 'opposition party' had better use the oppostunity to connect the atrocity on New Orleans with the deliberate effort by the Cabal to defund the federal government's non-military agencies. They had better start drawing the connections and spelling it out at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Bill Nelson is a co-sponsor
TomPaine.com lists some defectors and undecideds, though I think Katrina might have changed some of these dems' positions...

In addition, Bob Novak was recently floating the probable lie that Obama might defect.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050831/the_chazer_caucus.php

It’s pretty certain that the Republicans also have three Democrats: Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas) and the Nelson boys. Bill Nelson (Forida) signed on as a co-sponsor of Sen. Jon Kyl’s repeal bill; Lincoln has long been for full repeal and her pet policy is unlimited exemptions for farms and business, which is awful tax policy. Ben Nelson (Nebraska) gives as his excuse that he has a tough re-election next year—but he’s been off the reservation for a long time. So Frist already has 58 votes to end debate and crush a filibuster—just two votes shy.

The other Democrats who apparently are most ripe to topple are: California’s Dianne Feinstein, who is personally rich, so I guess this is her looking after her heirs; Mark Pryor, who sees this as a way to suck up to his home-state Arkansas Wal-Mart heirs; Evan Bayh, who has to court financial contributors for his presidential run; and Mary Landrieu, who won a close re-election in Louisiana thanks to the low-income black voters who will take the biggest hit from the repeal. By the way, Landrieu, Bayh and Pryor all voted for the bankruptcy bill earlier this year—yet another bill that hurt average working families but helps the well-connected and powerful (in this case, the credit card industry).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. These faux Dems must go.
We must take note and remember these and those that voted for the bankruptcy bill. I swear I will weep if Obama defects. Like Bill Maher said, tax cuts are Jesus in BushWorld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Democrats Should Filibuster With Katrina
what they should do is constantly make connections to lack of funding and the disaster in NOLA. Talk about Katrina's victims living in poverty and other people getting money.

Or, is that just exploitative politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. I bet they're glad the nuclear option didn't go through now
Now they can hide behind the threat of a Democratic filibuster to shy away from their aggressive agenda, since they know it's poison to them after Katrina. I hope the Democrats can keep their distance and not let themselves be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. I will believe it when I see it - they won't pull the trigger
because they would be pointing the gun at their own heads, and they know it. If they do, they are ruthless, AND DUMB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. The Hurricane Katrina disaster will cost 10s of billions or more.
And these fuckheads' solution is to repeal the estate tax.

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC