Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolivia may be just the start

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 07:56 AM
Original message
Bolivia may be just the start
After two decades of *democratic* reforms Bolivia remains the poorest country in South America, 20% of indigenous children die before their first birthday and 14% more die before they reach school age. Meanwhile, indigenous people across Latin America are beginning to revolt--not a good sign for US economic hegemony.

<clips>

Much of Central and South America ripe for leftist revolutions

Wracked by deep social and racial divisions and plagued by profound economic problems, Bolivia has just passed through its worst crisis in two decades.

But it is the rest of Latin America that should feel uneasy.

Weeks of deadly clashes between government troops and indigenous peoples, leftist labour leaders and student groups saw Bolivia's streets barricaded, its capital placed under siege and its elected president forced to flee.

While Bolivia's revolution may be rooted in poverty, it is also anchored in racism and has a distinctly undemocratic leftist flavour.


<http://www.nationalpost.com/world/story.html?id=CE62CCFC-155E-4420-A0C3-C97A319B781D>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bolivia: Mass upheavals topple US-backed president
<clips>

...The change at the top appeared to have been worked out in consultation with Washington. Among Mesa’s first acts as the new president was to meet with US Ambassador David Greenlee, who formerly served as the CIA’s chief of station in the volatile country.

In the midst of the rebellion, the US Embassy and the State Department in Washington had issued explicit threats of US retaliation if the mass movement succeeded in toppling the existing government. Greenlee told the Bolivian press, for example, that “in the case of a government arising out of pressure from the street, the international community will isolate Bolivia.”

...The US Southern Command in Miami, meanwhile, confirmed Friday that it was sending a “security team” of military advisors to Bolivia. A spokesman said that the team would “perform a technical assessment of the situation down there,” and advise the US Embassy and the US Military Group in the country.

The Bush administration is determined to prevent the Bolivian events from spinning out of control for fear that the defiance of the economic policies demanded by the IMF and the US-based multinationals could spread throughout the continent.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/oct2003/boli-o21.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. that national post article is full of propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. As opposed to the FreeLiberalUS Media
I honestly don't believe Americans realize
the imminent danger they face of being
dragged into yet another disaster of a war,
much more deadly and much, much more
expensive than Iraq. The eventual solution
to the neocon-paleocon problem is simply
to double the size of the U. S. army, and double
the size of the Pentagon budget.-xymphora

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Really?? "Thousands Protest IMF Accord in Honduras"
<clips>

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras - Thousands of protesters across Honduras blocked streets and burned tires Tuesday to demand the government not renew a debt-payment agreement with the International Monetary Fund.

The protests were launched by the left-leaning Political Block and Democratic Unification Party, and supported by 30,000 elementary and high school teachers, doctors, nurses and blue-collar workers who staged a one-day work stoppage. The demonstrations also caused massive traffic jams.

Groups across Latin America, including the Political Block and Democratic Unification Party, long have argued that countries pay too high of a price to meet IMF conditions, which call for governments to slim down their operations, including cutting back on social programs, in exchange for debt relief.

The protests came a day after representatives of the IMF arrived in the capital to see whether Honduras qualifies as a highly indebted poor nation, which could result in the organization forgiving $960 million of $4.4 billion in foreign debt.

http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/news/world/7013362.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. "Oil firm in legal battle in Ecuador"
<clips>

... Lawyers and tribal leaders from Ecuador charge Texaco with dumping toxic wastewater and crude oil into open pits and rivers, causing high rates of cancer. The plaintiffs say clean-up and medical monitoring costs for the 30,000 affected Ecuadoreans could exceed $1 billion.

"This is not a case that any- body is going to get rich from," said Cristobal Bonifaz, a Massachusetts-based lawyer and a native of Ecuador who filed the lawsuit in 1993. "This is a case that had to be done because that country got raped."

A judge will begin the trial today by hearing ChevronTexaco's response to the lawsuit and then hear evidence from the plaintiffs. After the six days of hearings, the judge then will be able to visit the affected region, conduct interviews and hear more testimony. There is no jury in the Ecuadorean system, and a verdict is not expected for six months to a year.

"We intend to vigorously defend the company against what we view to be a lawsuit without merit," said ChevronTexaco spokeswoman Maripat Sexton. She said that government of Ecuador, the national oil company and four municipal governments released Texaco from any claims after it sponsored a $40 million cleanup effort and funded social programs.

http://www.trivalleyherald.com/Stories/0,1413,86~10669~1713001,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Bianca Jagger: ChevronTexaco Must Pay for Damage in Ecuador
<clips>

Welcome and thank you for coming. I am going to talk about what I have witnessed in the last few days in the Ecuadorian Amazon during my first trip to your beautiful country.

I have spent much of the last two decades traveling the world to defend victims of human rights violations and war crimes. My travels have taken me to many parts of Latin America, Afghanistan, Brazil, Pakistan, Bosnia, Iraq, and many states in the United States to fight against the death penalty.

If there is one lesson I have learned from my experience, it is that no country; not the United States, not my home country Great Britain, not Iraq, and certainly not Ecuador should grant immunity to any person or any corporation that commits crimes and human rights violations. These crimes and violations often impact the most innocent, vulnerable people of a country. They can take place both because of repressive policies of governments who want to silence their political opponents, or by unscrupulous officers of corporations who want to make as much profit without regard to the consequences to human life.

None of my past experiences prepared me for the environmental devastation of apocalyptic proportions I witnessed in the provinces of Orellana y Sucumbios. Nor was I prepared for the stories of human suffering I heard; suffering which resulted because of decisions made by Texaco to dump millions of gallons of toxic waste into what was once a pristine and invaluable natural heritage of this country.

<http://www.oneworld.net/external/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazonwatch.org%2Fview_news.php%3Fid%3D726>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. "Strikers block 40 percent of Ecuador"
<clips>

Striking banana growers in Ecuador have blocked 40 percent of the country's exports of the fruit in angry protests demanding exporters pay more for their crop, officials said on Wednesday.

Banana producers in El Oro province on Ecuador's southern Pacific coast went on strike on Tuesday, blocking roads with burning tires and carrying thick machete blades to demand exporters pay the minimum legal price set for the fruit.

The strike prompted Ecuador --the world's biggest banana exporter-- to declare a state of emergency and promise to fumigate crops for disease to help growers in El Oro, which produces about a third of the country's bananas.

But protesters took to the streets again on Wednesday, halting banana exports from Puerto Bolivar, the port where about 40 percent of the fruit leaves the country, a senior port official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

<http://www.borsaitalia.it/fwa-cgi-bin/news.pl?id=1066254307nN15287683&tit=Strikers%20block%2040%20pct%20of%20Ecuador>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. NARCO NEWS RETIREES ASSOCIATION STARTS A BETTING POOL:Who falls first?
http://www.bigleftoutside.com/archives/000183.php


NARCO NEWS RETIREES ASSOCIATION STARTS A BETTING POOL

Here at the retirees club, Luis Gómez and I have bet a bottle of Huari, the champagne of Bolivian beers, on the following
question:

Who falls first?

Alejandro Toledo of Perú?

or

Lucio Gutiérrez of Ecuador?

Gómez says Perú.

I say Ecuador.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Overthrown by the people or USSouthern Command? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You're not familiar with N.N. obviously, or you'd know.
www.narconews.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Well, Toledo at Least Started Out as a Populist
with support of the leftists. But I understand he's made deals with the IMF and done some other things to lose a lot of support among the people who elected him.

So no, without reading NN further, I don't know either if the reference is to a popular revolution or a US-led coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bolivia's ex-president blames conspiracy
Conspiracy, riiiight. </sarcasm>

<clips>

The former Bolivian president, Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, has accused drug traffickers and trade unionists in his country of having forced him from office.

Mr Sanchez de Lozada, who left Bolivia shortly after he resigned on Friday, was speaking to the BBC from Washington. Here are extracts from the interview:

Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada: My departure was the product of a conspiracy, of sedition by armed groups, 'narco-syndicalist' groups, terrorist groups and cartels who created a confrontational situation, leaving me no way out but to resign.

But we haven't lost the thread. My successor is the vice-president, so the constitutional succession has been maintained. I hope he will be there to promote aid.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3210458.stm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Come on back Sanchez
but you'd better find some more
SpecOps.

What, they're tied down in Colombia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. No oil-Bush doesn't care
He cares about Venezuala, they have oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. So what is natural gas, chopped liver?
Google - Pacific LNG

http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/v-print/story/7629568p-8570133c.html

A little reading brings me to the conclusion that Pacific LNG is just an Enron redux and confirms Bush* plan in all things: Privatize the profits and Socialize the cost. Bush* cares a lot and he's hoping this plum doesn't get away from him and the BFEE. I would not be surprised if Bush* creates a quick mini-war in that region to bolster his sagging poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
13.  Ex-Bolivian president willing to face courts over protest deaths
Sure. That's why the US spirited him out of Bolivia and placed him firmly in Miami with the rest of the US-condoned terrorists.

<clips>

WASHINGTON : Bolivia's former president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada said he would be willing to respond to any court charges over decisions he took in a month long crisis that left 80 people dead.

Asked by reporters whether he would be prepared to face justice in relation to deadly protests over unpopular plans to export natural gas to Mexico and the United States through estranged Chile, the ex-president said: "But of course."

"The president is reponsible for everything," Sanchez de Lozada said. "If it doesn't rain, it's the president's fault. If it rains too much, it's also (the president's fault). In the case of something as delicate at the death of people, I have to respond to that," he said.

Bolivia's new president, Carlos Mesa, said Saturday that those responsible for the deaths of dozens of people in the Bolivian capital La Paz and the suburb of El Alto would be brought to justice "without revenge."

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/53344/1/.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Amnesty International Report (October 17, 2003)
<clips>

Bolivia: Put an end to the alarming deterioration of Human Rights in the country

In the light of recent developments in the Human Rights crisis in which the country is immersed, Amnesty International reiterates its urgent call to the authorities and to all sectors of Bolivian society to prevent an increase in the escalation of violence and further bloodshed.

"The spiral of violence must be stopped", said Amnesty International. "The authorities must give orders to the highest levels of the security forces to refrain from using excessive force against demonstrators."

According to information received by Amnesty International, the number of deaths since mid-September exceeds 70 and hundreds of people have been injured. Reports indicate that the majority of victims were wounded by gunshot.

"The Bolivian state has both the right and the obligation to maintain public order and respect for the law" said Amnesty International. "However, the authorities also have the unavoidable obligation to respect and protect at every juncture the right to life, to physical integrity and to freedom of expression of the whole population, as prescribed by international law."

http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR180122003

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. People power rules in S. America
What the article fails to point out is that the *strongmen who overstayed their welcome* were US-supported dictators.

<clips>

LIMA, PERU – Latin America's biggest leadership problem used to be strongmen who overstayed their welcome. These days, leaders are just as likely to be tossed from the presidential palace before their time is up.

Bolivia's Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada can now be added to a growing list of elected South American presidents forced from office in the past six years by massive social protests.

Mr. Sánchez de Lozada resigned on Friday, 14 months into his second term. His government crumbled amid demonstrations that began in mid-September when his administration decided to go ahead with plans to sell natural gas to the United States and Mexico. At least 65 people were killed in 33 days of clashes between soldiers and demonstrators.

Though some say the popular ousting of elected leaders represents democracy run amok in Latin America, the events that led to the collapse of governments in Ecuador, Argentina, and now Bolivia reflect a major shift in the way the region responds to crises, analysts say. Whereas in the past, using the military might have been considered a legitimate response to putting down unrest, once Sánchez de Lozada unleashed the Army, support from his political allies evaporated. Today, countries here are increasingly relying on political solutions - albeit sometimes messy ones.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1021/p06s01-woam.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. Justice on the streets
<clips>

The ousting of Bolivia's president is a warning that the demands of Latin America's poor cannot be ignored

Bolivia's president of 15 months, Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada, was protesting to the last when he finally resigned on Friday after months of street protests. His resignation, he remarked sourly, was a blow for democracy in Bolivia and Latin America.

The president's democratic credentials were not impeccable: he was elected, certainly, but with only 22% of the vote. By last week, he retained the loyalty of less than half of even the small minority who had actually voted for him. He presided over government forces that shot 50 demonstrators dead in the days leading up to his resignation.

Democracy, it is true, has had a pretty patchy run in Bolivia. In the 50s, one president abolished the army, only to be overthrown (with US encouragement) shortly thereafter. Twenty years of military dictatorship finally reached its apogee in the early 80s - after one spectacular episode when there were five presidents in a single day - with the coca-peddling General Luis Garcia Meza. At this point the US belatedly concluded that military dictatorships were not necessarily reliable allies.

Perhaps the fact that Bolivians have not been blessed with much in the way of sound government goes some way to explaining why, when they are exercised about an issue, they tend to take to the streets rather than write to their MP. Experience has taught them that governments give them little that the people have not wrested by force, and that when foreigners take an interest in Bolivia's natural resources, fortunes are made by the few and the mass of Bolivians stay hungry. It was like that under the Spanish, when tens of thousands of Quechua and Aymara died working the great silver mountain at Potosi to fund the Spanish empire. It was like that under the military dictatorships and now, they have discovered, it is like that under elected governments too.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1067411,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Embassy: U.S. didn't guide military during protests
Hey, these sound like familiar lies....

<clips>

LA PAZ, Bolivia - The American Embassy did not direct the Bolivian military on how to respond to violent protests last week but did allow the air force to use U.S.-funded anti-narcotics planes during the crisis, the ambassador said Monday.

The embassy has come under fire for unsubstantiated reports in the alternative press that accuse U.S. military officials of calling the shots last week when the Bolivian military and police repressed civil disturbances, killing dozens of people.

A report in the weekly newspaper Pulso said military advisors counseled Bolivians on how to respond to the thousands of demonstrators on the streets protesting a proposal to sell gas through Chile.

''The accusation is that there's a little unit in the embassy that runs Bolivia,'' U.S. Ambassador David Greenlee said Monday. ``We were not directing traffic in any way.''

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/americas/7066479.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. US help? Well.. we had to help the constitutional government. LOL
Posted on Tue, Oct. 21, 2003
Embassy: U.S. didn't guide military during protests
Reports accuse the U.S. military of calling the shots for Bolivian forces during last week's citizen uprising. An ambassador denies that, but says U.S. funded planes were used.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/americas/7066479.htm
The American Embassy did not direct the Bolivian military on how to respond to violent protests last week but did allow the air force to use U.S.-funded anti-narcotics planes during the crisis, the ambassador said Monday.

The embassy has come under fire for unsubstantiated reports in the alternative press that accuse U.S. military officials of calling the shots last week when the Bolivian military and police repressed civil disturbances, killing dozens of people.

-

<US ambassador>Greenlee acknowledged that he did let Bolivia use planes that are leased by the U.S. government specifically for anti-narcotics purposes. The C-130s normally are used to shuttle troops that participate in coca eradication programs.

When Bolivian military officials want to use the planes for other purposes, they must ask permission. Greenlee said he gave it.



Here's a real hoot from the same article (bold mine)..
`Can we use the planes to move some people here in a time of crisis in support of the constitutional government?' we would say, `Sure.'

''I don't apologize for that,'' Greenlee said. ``Our position was to support constitutional government that was under threat and under siege. The government had the right to defend itself.''



Isn't that laughable, considering the US's logistical and political support for the coupsters in Venezuela?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Their plane took the ex-pres to exile in Miami where all terrorist
live together happily ever after. Got him out of the country before the human rights people could nail him. Typical US action, no?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bolivia is not the start.
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 11:11 AM by bemildred
It's been going on for some time. Chavez in Venezuela, Lula in
Brazil, the debacle in Argentina. The fellow in Ecuador was
put in power, in part, by indigenous parties, whom he promptly
betrayed, and that is partly why he is in danger.

It's a damn shame we are all tied up in Iraq, isn't it? </sarcasm>

The options the US has to counter this are limited, and the more
places there are issues, the more difficult it becomes to stop.

It is important to remember that the indigenous peoples represent an
existential threat to the existing power structures in these countries,
they were there first, so they have a prior claim to ownership that
cannot really be disputed. This is why, in these colonial situations,
the indigenes tend to be treated so badly. It will not be a pretty fight.

It is interesting to note that Sen. Chavez in Venezuela views it as
his mission in life to prevent this sort of popular insurrection in
that nation by taking steps to see that the poor's needs are met through
the democratic political process. An idea that his peers in other
Latin American nations would do well to consider.

I do somewhat agree with the fellow above who claims this is propaganda,
it has elements of red-baiting and domino-theory political cant
laced through it, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. There already is a revolution of center-left governments
taking control all over South America.

These are 70s-era socialists. These are moderate left governments.

It's a measure of the fascism in the US today which makes this look like a left wing revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bolivia's gas region rejects president's call for voters to decide on gas
<clips>

LA PAZ, Bolivia, Oct 21, 2003 (AP WorldStream via COMTEX) -- Bolivians living near the country's underground natural gas reserves announced a march Tuesday to voice disapproval of the new president's plans to have voters decide whether to export the gas abroad.

The rejection of the president's offer of a referendum marked a resurgence of public scrutiny of the controversial issue that sparked monthlong protests that ousted the former president and left 65 dead.

Civic leaders and businessmen in Tarija, a southern Bolivian state that is home to most of the nation's gas reserves, scheduled a march later afternoon in favor of exporting gas to North America.

"This is a vital project not only for the development of our region, but for the development of the entire country," Roberto Ruiz, a civic leader in Tarija, told the Bolivian daily La Razon.

<http://investor.stockpoint.com/leftnav/newspaper.asp?SectionID=90&SubSectionID=&LastLevel=false&SearchCriteria=bolivia&SearchCriteriaType=2&Fixed=0&SearchSection=90&PckgID=8&SearchString=bolivia&UPSearchCriteriaType=255>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. Anti-neoliberal insurrection
<clips>

THEY are not an image of terrorism, those weather-beaten faces of Bolivian miners and campesinos creased with premature yet ancient wrinkles who flooded the steep streets of La Paz in their rivers of rebellion.

On the contrary, they are the features and fortunes shared with indigenous Ecuadorans, the Chiapas native Indian population and those on Argentine picket lines.

The popular insurrection in Bolivia that resulted in the resignation of President Gustavo Sánchez de Lozada is not an isolated incident in Latin America, where general causes, as well as logical national differences, are common.

A savage neoliberalism, strictly imposed and applied within the continent, includes amongst its victims thousands who died in Caracazo in 1989 - when a lethal oppression ordered by Carlos Andres Pérez to crush the rage sweeping across the hills surrounding the Venezuelan capital.

The current uprisings in La Paz, El Alto and other settlements in that Andean nation have resulted in more than 70 deaths and 200 injuries. But this time, armed tactics against the people could not contain the demands of diverse sectors of society.

http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2003/octubre03/lun20/42boli3-i.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. A healthy development in Bolivia!
When you've seen your silver and your guano trade stolen from you as Bolivia did in the 19th and 20th centuries, you aren't about to let go of your natural gas, too. Bravo, Bolivians!

You know, Bolivia currently exports $1.2 billion in natural gas. Its whopping return on that? $90 million. Bone crushing poverty exists in a land rich with this valuable resource.

Note also that the IMF was eager to have Bolivia deliver this natural gas to the US for a song. Big surprise, that. The IMF is our pimp, and the Bolivias of this world are meant to be our tireless whores.

Here are two primers on the issues that are a far sight better than the National Post's mewlings:

1.
"IMF and Bolivia"
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=52&ItemID=4359

2.
"Q&A on Bolivia"
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=52&ItemID=4364
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Primer 3. COB Proposes Minimum Program to New Government
{The following report on the COB’s actions is from the web site
Bolpress.com. It has been translated with the help of Eduardo
Quintana, a trade union activist in Arizona whose native language is
Mexican Spanish.}


“COB Proposes Minimum Program to New Government”

(Bolpress.com)—An enlarged session of the leading body of the COB,
with the participation of twenty different affiliates (trades or
branches of industry), decided, overnight, to continue the open-ended
general strike until the next government has made a commitment “in
front of this organization, not to export gas, either to Chile or
Peru, and to repeal the Law on Hydrocarbons.” {Apparently this is a
recent law that allows the multinational corporations, once again, to
gain control of Bolivia’s gas and oil. In Bolivia’s great national
revolution of 1952, those natural resources were nationalized.}

In addition, the COB approved a document that presented the new
government with a minimum program. Most prominently, the program calls
for revision of privatization contracts, annulment of the agrarian
reform law sold on the market], revival of national industry, and the bringing to
justice of those responsible for “genocide” against the people during
the so-called ‘gas war.’ {“Gas war” is the journalistic name that has
now been given to the mass protests since late September against the
exporting of Bolivia’s natural gas by foreign multinational
corporations.}

The COB decided not to give support to the new government, because it
considers the ouster of Sanchez de Losada to be only a change of
individuals, not a change in economic policy {literally, “no change in
the economic model”}.

In addition, the COB prefers to maintain its “class independence,”
that is, not to compromise with a government that is not of the
working class. But since the COB ought to be responsive to the
existing situation, COB President Jaime Solares indicated that, in
order for the indefinite general strike to be called off, the
government would have to “make a commitment, in front of this
organization (the COB), not to export the gas, either through Chile or
Peru, and to repeal the law regarding gas and oil.”

In this connection the COB presented the new government with a minimum
program, which in its view expresses “the outcry of the people.” As
long as the newly mandated government works in this direction, the COB
will remain alert and vigilant. If the opposite occurs, “the roads and
streets will again be turned into barricades.”

Among the points in the proposal are: “Review by the Congress of all
privatization contracts, ‘shared risk’ contracts, and leasing of
petroleum deposits, mines, and state-owned companies, so that the
Political Constitution of the nation will be respected.” {The Bolivian
constitution apparently intends that the mineral wealth of the country
be preserved for the nation as a whole.}

The proposal also demands: “Annulment of the agrarian reform law,
which commercializes the land. Redistribution of the land. And
respect for communally owned land and land originally owned by the
indigenous peoples.”

The third point in the proposal specifies: “Restoration of the social
rights of the Bolivian workers. Immediate annulment of ‘free
contracting.’” {“Free contracting” apparently allows employers to hire
and fire at will, without any legal restrictions.} In addition, the
proposal urges: “Revival of national industry, rejecting the kind of
‘free trade’ that the FTAA would establish.”

The final demand is “bringing to justice those responsible for
genocide against the people of Bolivia, who rose up in defense of the
nation’s natural resources and in defense of democracy.” The COB also
demands “annulment of the Law of Security of the Citizen” {which
apparently gives excessive powers to the security forces}.

The enlarged session began at five in the afternoon, after the arrival
of miners from the cooperatives of Caracoles, who entered the Plaza of
San Francisco, setting off dozens of sticks of dynamite. This group of
miners were received with applause {by the crowds of protesters in the
plaza; it is estimated that as many as 350,000 had turned out in La
Paz that day}. The miners {on their way to La Paz} had suffered two
fatalities in the locality of Patacamaya, when the army cowardly fired
on them. Immediately a rally was organized, in which the miners’
leaders participated, along with David Vargas {the former police major
who helped leaded the police rebellion of February 2003}.

At the closing of the enlarged session of the COB, at eight in the
evening, Solares called for another enlarged session at 10:00 a.m. the
next morning, at the Teachers’ Social Center, for the purpose of
discussing such subjects as the strengthening and unity of the COB,
and for the purpose of calling an Assembly of the People, which is the
political solution, for the medium term, that the workers will be
discussing and analyzing.

The enlarged session of the COB also approved a letter that will be
sent to the acting president of the National Congress, Carlos D. Mesa,
in which the COB “demands that the Congress publicly reject any
request to allow foreign troops to enter Bolivian territory.” This
letter followed hot on the heels of an announcement that the Pentagon
would be sending troops to Bolivia to defend U.S. citizens and the
U.S. embassy.

They are demanding that the U.S. not interfere.

Yesterday morning {October 16}, 100 U.S. residents in Bolivia issued a
statement demanding that their government “not intervene in this
internal conflict.” They reminded their government that “the people of
Bolivia have the right to determine their own political future free
from pressure or sanctions by the United States.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belab13 Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hooray for Revolution!
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 09:16 AM by belab13
when the rest of the resource rich areas of the world catch on and start resisting the exploitation, it will be a bright and bold day for humanity. Flush the irresponsible multinational, flush the politician that perpetuates this exploitation, flush the current world order. Oh did I forget to mention our standard of living in the U.S. might be impacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Say_What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
30. Harvard Crimson: Bolivia is Burning
<clips>

Bolivia is burning again, like it burned before, and the flames will not die soon. Their president, elected by a razor thin margin, has resigned and flown to Miami. Democracy hangs by a thread. There are big issues at work there, fights at high levels over globalization and free market reforms. But if you want to understand Bolivia’s unrest, just look at the pictures.

Look at the old president and the new; look at their white skin. Look at the 15 members of the new cabinet. They are no different. Look at the protestors: the miners, the coca growers, the poor and hungry. See their faces: dark and wrinkled. They have different brows, different cheeks. They are the color of the earth in Bolivia.

...Bolivia’s natives are not ignorant of their oppression, or that it comes largely at the hands of the white ruling class. Protesters now see the current natural gas battle as another attempt by the ruling class to rob Bolivia’s native people of their resources, and they have brought the government to its knees in their outrage.

“Globalization is just another name for submission and domination,” protesting miner Nicanor Apaza, 46, was quoted as saying in The New York Times. “We’ve had to live with that here for 500 years, and now we want to be our own masters.”

http://www.thecrimson.com/today/article349498.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC