Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge supports CNN request to cover Katrina's toll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:40 AM
Original message
Judge supports CNN request to cover Katrina's toll
This news is a few hours old, but the CNN posting is recent.

Saturday, September 10, 2005; Posted: 1:30 a.m. EDT (05:30 GMT)

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/09/10/katrina.media/index.html

HOUSTON, Texas (CNN) -- At the request of CNN, a federal judge in Texas Friday night blocked emergency officials in New Orleans from preventing the media from covering the recovery of bodies from Hurricane Katrina.

Attorneys for the network argued that the ban was an unconstitutional prior restraint on news gathering.

U.S. District Judge Keith Ellison issued a temporary restraining order against a "zero access" policy announced earlier Friday by Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, who is overseeing the federal relief effort in the city, and Terry Ebbert, the city's homeland security director.

A hearing was scheduled for Saturday morning to determine if the order should be made permanent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. so why didn't they do this re Iraq?
would have turned the world around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I suspect they were afraid of being labeled "unpatriotic."
But your guess is as good as mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. No jurisdiction
The military is a world all its own, and Bush is its master.

God help them!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. The Pentagon runs the world....*ush is a puppet on it's strings....
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:16 AM by jus_the_facts
....we all are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Bushbots have declared a miracle in Katrina
Only 7 are dead. They credit Bush & Fema and their planning for this wonderful news per Faux News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. it was 312 as of this mornign
it is a miracle I tell you, the saviour has come back in multiple forms!

This is the miracle of the fish and the bread loaves but with the son of god this time....

(And my apologies to those who are Christian, but this coudl not be helped)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good. Great to see the judge ruling in favor of open news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is Honore in charge of the LA National Guard?
And therefore under Blanco's control?

If not, please enlighten me re: the command and control structure as it stands.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The minute the levees broke it came under federal control
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 01:09 AM by Erika
for national security. What Blanco did or did not do was irrelevant at that time point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. From what I understand, Honore is not in charge of the NG.
He is in charge of the federal troops. The NG is under the command of Major Gen Landreneau, the director of the state Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness. So Honore is independent of the state. As for the command and control, the state and feds are working side by side, making it up as they go along, communicating their needs to each other.

Somebody correct me if I'm misrepresenting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks to this Houston Judge Keith Ellison who issued
a temporary restraining order against a "zero access" policy announced earlier Friday by Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, who is overseeing the federal relief effort in the city, and Terry Ebbert, the city's homeland security director.

This is the right thing to do. Protect our Constitutional Rights before they are all gone. Thank you Judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. How long before the RW start
yelling about "activist judges" again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. when the sun rises
I mean does the sun rises every morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Who could possibly envision such a thing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Just remind them
of the "activist judge" who just struck down the Constitutional rights of an American citizen (Padilla)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
27. Activist judges supporting librul media.
Wouldn't that be great?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Radical Liberal Judge...
needs to be impeached! Everyone call Delay..get him on this one right away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Definitely a step in the right direction.
I hope the hearing makes the order permanent.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. How could the ruling be anything else?
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 06:27 AM by teryang
Where does the executive branch get off making patently unconstitutional policies?

Where does the general get off? What about their oath to uphold the constitution?

Interesting how they rationalize their obviously illegal actions with phony solicitude for the feelings for the survivors. Everyone knows this censorship is politically motivated ass covering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
19. I was watching Anderson cooper yesterday
And a doctor that Was in the dome stated he saw around 50 bodies yet the official death toll in New orleans is under 200.
me thinks something is fishey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. This is good news -

Hopefull, we can get as much media in there as possible. I am sure they still will make it incredibly difficult for the media - but at least they can survey the scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Maybe the media will finally show the plight of the animals.
As of yesterday, dogs could be heard barking in attics all over town. I hope they can be saved, and that the "authorities" stop blocking the heroes who are trying to rescue them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. It's not that I want to see pictures of the bodies
But it's important that we know that care is being taken in the recovery.

I want to think that everything will be done properly but...unfortunately, I have my doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. text from another DUers post (please getcher credit)
I swiped and sent to all media outlets yesterday:

Any journalism that doesn't include complete depictions of the disaster is not journalism.

We're not interested in gruesome details - this is not about disrespect or morbidness. We're not interested in seeing blackened rotting flesh or faces swollen with insects crawling out of the eye sockets after days of submersion. I know what a corpse looks like up close, and I also know that every one of those corpses used to be a person, and many with families who don't WANT to see Poor Aunt Vera rotting photogenically for the camera.

I want to see long shots that tell the larger tale, and I want to see reality, and I want to see the truth. I don't want this mal-administration revising history as it happens. They don't get to, don't let them.

They "asked". Why should you do anything this adminstration "asks". The only thing they've ever done for you is diminish the profession of journalism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I don't want to see them either
I didn't look at the pix of the dogs feeding off the corpses in NOLA.
But I was glad that it was documented and that the recovery process of the human remains will be too by our newly awakened press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
49. If they have big semi-trucks hauling the bodies to the
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 10:51 AM by anitar1
morgue they established in St. Gabriel, are they only putting a few bodies in each huge trailer? I saw film of at least 5 semi's going in there. What is going on here? These trucks have been up and running for 2 or 3 days. edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
81. You're right. It's not about seeing the bodies, but,
if the press is excluded we will never know the truth of the situation. They could (and would) tell us just what they wanted us to know. The press needs to be there to document the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. Restraining order is only good until today.
the hearing scheduled for this morning will determine whether or not we still have a genuine first amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Podface Donating Member (92 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thank God!
I hope this becomes a big story. The Government trying to control the new coming out of NO is fascist. This is a prime example of what would have happened if the Governor turned over control to the prez and feds.

I doubt many folks in the main stream know that the feds were trying to censor reporters. Show the dead! it's real. People need to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hell, yeah
Maybe Katrina really did save the media, or at least some of them.

Good for CNN, Good for judge Ellison, Good for America!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. U.S. drops banning media from body hunt
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 10:15 AM by dweller
Saturday, September 10, 2005; Posted: 11:05 a.m. EDT (15:05 GMT)
HOUSTON, Texas (CNN) -- Rather than fight a lawsuit by CNN, the federal government abandoned its effort Saturday to prevent the media from reporting on the recovery of the dead in New Orleans.

Joint Task Force Katrina "has no plans to bar, impede or prevent news media from their news gathering and reporting activities in connection with the deceased Hurricane Katrina victim recovery efforts," said Col. Christian E. deGraff, representing the task force.

U.S. District Court Judge Keith Ellison issued a temporary restraining order Friday against a "zero access" policy announced earlier in the day by Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, who is overseeing the federal relief effort in the city, and Terry Ebbert, the city's homeland security director.

In explaining the ban, Ebbert said, "we don't think that's proper" to let members of the media view the bodies.


http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/09/10/katrina.media/index.html


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Excellent news!
Thanks for posting this! Kudos to CNN for fighting back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. HMMM. Wonder what the next trick up their sleeves will be? You know
that they cannot afford, nor do not want images of bodies on the tv screen or the front page.

We haven't heard the last of this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I wonder if giving in was the only thing they could do to avoid
being seen as even WORSE. After all, banning media is something "those Russhun commies" did and would raise serious questions about what they have to hide, even among many conservatives.

I'm hoping they have no more tricks and this was the only thing they could do. Unless we have another "terror attack," these people are finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Unless we have another terror attack. I'm sure that is inevitable. The
WHERE is what I wonder about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #32
43. Even if they "enable" another terra attack, they are finished.
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 10:34 AM by Amonester
They've been lying off for so long about protecting the public ("fight them there so ... --- insert the rest of their BS here ---), and just doing not only nothing, in reality, but doing even worse by cutting all the funds that would have been necessary to secure ALL loopholes, and taking them to pay for an illegal, unnecessary war of aggression based on blatant lies, for their own greedy and corrupt goals.

IMHO, any other terra disaster and they're finished even faster.



Well, we sure hope there won't be any attack to start with... Because, they're on their way down and out anyway, so let's wish they won't go as low as they are capable of...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Reporters missing or shot by "gangs"?????
Isn't it awful that such a thing could even cross your mind for a minute, but that is Bush's Amerika!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. Maybe they already hid what they needed to?? Who knows
I don't trust them for a second. Also, they may very well SAY they will let them, and then just do what they want to do anyway. They'll get flack, but do they care? They could just lie their way out of that.

Disgusting, but very likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. That's what I thought: the fix is in...
Maybe they "took care of the problem," like the Harvey Kaitel character in Pulp Fiction, "the cleaner." Or maybe they have found less bodies than originally expected and have less to fear.

Still, I think we are beyond giving this corrupt, ineffectual administration any benefit of the doubt. They would stop at nothing, and there's no low they would not reach. There's no reason why we have to think they would do the right, honest thing. So far they haven't. Not once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dez Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. That's great!
Good for CNN!! Let them pohotograph the fuck ups of chimpie, and let the whole world see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Time to "crank the freak switch up" a notch and demand they
lift the ban on the returning caskets from Iraq too. Time to get back to telling the truth to the people, even if it is painful.



Just a note - the "freak switch" comment is stuck in my head from a tv commercial. It seemed to be fitting for this application.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
50. Hey, Sydnie!
Long time no see! Isn't this a step in the right direction for once?
It seems my copy of the Bill of Rights is still valid. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
75. Hey Patsy!!!!
:hug: I have missed you all so much, but I have had some personal tragedy to deal with in my own life lately. I need to get back to my regular scheduled clubhouse meeting though, don't I?

:loveya:

I am so excited by this news too!! The new media we see evolving now just might be what we need to save this country -- FINALLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. As I posted elsewhere, it's not that I want to see the bodies
I do want to see that someone is watching to make sure things are done properly. It's sad when I can't trust my government. I think that's one of the biggest travesties of this administration!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. ...
I'm surprised that there wasn't more of an outrage about how the dead were treated in this situation. I don't know of any other culture that would stand for dead bodies to be left out in the street for days on end. This entire incident has left a bad taste in my mouth for America and what it stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. As long as there were real live people needing to be rescued, I
was willing to give them a pass on leaving the bodies there. It's a matter of priorities. The dead can wait.

Aesthetically, it's not a nice thing, but I sure wouldn't want to have troops more concerned about retrieving a dead body than retrieving my sick granny and her old dog, or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. In this country, which is rich in resources
Why couldn't we have done both in a more timely fashion. This is almost two weeks later. I'm not saying that the dead should have been given priority over the living, but wouldn't dead bodies being left to rot create a health hazard to the living? Not to mention that it's just not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. Agree 100%
This is just another aspect of the clusterfuck response from FEMA. They should have been capable of multi-tasking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #45
71. As surprising as it may seem, dead bodies left lying around do NOT
pose a significant health threat to the living, as long as they are not allowed to contaminate clean drinking water, or they didn't die of infectious disease. If they drowned or died of dehydration, it's a crying shame, but not a communicable disease threat.

It is disgusting, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
38. The media spine seems to be growing bigger & bigger.
Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. They will just start calling them
looters and shoot to kill now. Oops, we made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. Won another Battle
Notice the trend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
46. Now they'll just mistakenly shoot them like they do in Iraq.
"I could've SWORN he had a flat screen teevee on his back"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
47. maybe now we'll know why they need 50K+ bags for 10K bodies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
76. They're going to split hairs on whether the deaths were related to
Katrina

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_Times-Picayune/archives/2005_09_10.html#078783

Lee reports on deaths in Jefferson

Friday, 10:05 p.m.

Sheriff Harry Lee said Saturday night that the Jefferson Parish Coroner’s office had processed 152 bodies, but only 20 of those were deaths related to Hurricane Katrina. He said the coroner’s office was picking up bodies that are reported lying in the street and handling them to FEMA’s specifications. He also said that body count does not include bodies that may have been taken to the morgue in St. Gabriel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
51. NOLA ain't Gitmo where they can do what they damn well please
There's an annoying thing called the Constitution that they have to deal with whether they want to or not. At least the way it is right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
53. DHH puts storm dead at 154 so far
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 12:18 PM by sattahipdeep
Saturday, 11:10

State officials have confirmed that 154 people died as
a result of Hurricane Katrina, according to an update
provided by the Department of Health and Hospitals on
Saturday.

State and local officials had earlier predicted that
the loss of life would be catastrophic, as high as
10,000 people. But in New Orleans, officials are now
cautiously optimistic that number is a vast
overestimation of the people who perished during the
storm or its aftermath.

There are 90 bodies at the morgue in St. Gabriel,
three at the St. Charles Parish coroner’s office, 25
in the coroner’s office in Jefferson Parish and three
at the Iberia Parish morgue. The other 33 deaths were
attributed to Kenyon Worldwide Management Services,
the company hired by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to assist in the recovery of the deceased.

Anybody who died as a direct result of Hurricane
Katrina will be counted as a death caused by the
storm. This would include people who drowned in
floodwaters, as well as patients who died when they
could not receive needed medical treatment.

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_Times-Picayune/archives/2005_09_10.html#078651

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
54. U.S. drops banning media from body hunt
CNN filed suit for access to search for New Orleans' dead

Saturday, September 10, 2005; Posted: 11:05 a.m. EDT (15:05 GMT)

HOUSTON, Texas (CNN) -- Rather than fight a lawsuit by CNN, the federal government abandoned its effort Saturday to prevent the media from reporting on the recovery of the dead in New Orleans.

Joint Task Force Katrina "has no plans to bar, impede or prevent news media from their news gathering and reporting activities in connection with the deceased Hurricane Katrina victim recovery efforts," said Col. Christian E. deGraff, representing the task force.

U.S. District Court Judge Keith Ellison issued a temporary restraining order Friday against a "zero access" policy announced earlier in the day by Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honore, who is overseeing the federal relief effort in the city, and Terry Ebbert, the city's homeland security director.

In explaining the ban, Ebbert said, "we don't think that's proper" to let members of the media view the bodies.

More - http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/09/10/katrina.media/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. First smart thing they've done
It's too late to stop the media from showing the truth now anyway. Unless there are new additives to our water supply making us believe we are all suffering mass hallucinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. They only did it because they knew they'd lose in court.
Trust me on that one. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. Right
It really was the only thing they could do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. agreed - it was a slam dunk (nt)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. They had no choice - the law is clear on "prior restraints" on the press
The precedent goes all the way back to the Pentagon Papers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. Too bad KKKarl!!!!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. Ya know the mutha's gonna stroke out over this.
Good going CNN.

Jeez, did I just say that??
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Well, thereya go...
The body bag embargo ends.

GOOD. That's what's kept public outrage to a minimum about Iraq. Out of sight, out of mind. Won't be the case here. EXCELLENT!!!!!!! THANK GOD!!!!!

IMPEACHMENT NOW!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. Bush flip-flops! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. Very bad news for Bushco....
The only reason Bush has gotten away with his vanity war in Iraq is that
Americans cannot see what we are forking over billions for.

Visual images are very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #54
65. Has there been anymore talk of the "much lower than anticipated
death count"? I remember that coming out shortly after the media ban. I thought for sure they would be hiding bodies in mass graves or fresh concrete being poured by Hellaburnin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. 154 people died
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 12:17 PM by sattahipdeep
State and local officials had earlier predicted that
the loss of life would be catastrophic, as high as
10,000 people. But in New Orleans, officials are now
cautiously optimistic that number is a vast
overestimation of the people who perished during the
storm or its aftermath.

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_Times-Picayune/archives/2005_09_10.html#078651

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. I'd like to feel thankful, but I just don't trust them. They have lied
and deceived for so long now, and with this coming on the heels of the media ban...we'll have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #67
79. Why is this pathologist talking about large volume and thousands?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1771258

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050909/NEWS01/509090338


snip>

DeJong, medical director of forensic pathology at Lansing's Sparrow Hospital, is working with other professionals to identify some of the thousands of people who died during or after the hurricane.

The federal team's effort will last weeks if not months, she said by cell phone Thursday.

"I do this job day in, day out, but seeing this volume ... we have young people who have died here ... children who have died," said DeJong, a veteran of seven disasters. "Seeing this at this volume ... it does affect you."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. Storm death toll reaches 197 in Louisiana. (Sunday)
The confirmed death toll from Hurricane Katrina increased to 197
Sunday, state health department officials said late Sunday.

Although body-recovery operations were still under way, the death toll
represents the number of bodies that have been counted where the
deaths were a result of Katrina’s winds, rains or floodwaters, or those
who died as a result of medical equipment that became inoperable
during the hurricane.

http://www.nola.com/newslogs/breakingtp/index.ssf?/mtlogs/nola_Times-Picayune/archives/2005_09_11.html#078881

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4740621#4740643
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. Thanks, there are some interesting links in that DU thread to keep an
eye on. The Wikpedia one looks especially interesting. Hope they keep it maintained.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Katrina#Death_toll_.28summary.29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. Ebbert said, "we don't think that's proper"
Uh, fuck you Mr. Ebbert. Take your fascist enabling bullshit elsewhere.

Homeland security, my ass.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
68. How many people are actually missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. 50,000 or so but many
may just have left.-there was an ABC article -NBC's Bryan Williams who discussed the media suppression on the Jon Stewart show mentioned bodies being everywhere. To me it was so spokey that you read of 25,000 and then 50,000 more bags being ordered , and of a mortician who is working on this being told they should expect as many as 40,000 victims and then right after you read about the media suppression -you hear the governments "good" news that FAR fewer have died. I wanted to be glad but it is way to soon.
Beside whatever the number it is still horrific and the reality of what occured and why does not change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #69
78. The lower the count, the better of course
But there are 1000 city/county workers missing, 1000 children missing, 300 police and police employees missing, someone mentioned a 1000 Federal employees missing, etc. It has been a week and a half...one would think most would have made some contact by now, or at least an appreciable part of that number would have.

Somebody is cooking the numbers, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo411 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
70. Just the fact that they've tried to ban the media...
tells you that there is a big problem considering that it is unconstitutional to do so.

Posted by Bravo411
http://bravo411.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
73. The media now needs a judicial ruling to report the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:30 PM
Original message
dupe. n/t
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 07:21 PM by Tatiana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. It's sad, isn't it?
I thought in America we understood the concept of freedom of the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
77. Oh Good...Guess Bush can't hide the truth after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verminator Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #77
82. Katrina Satellite Pics.
Can someone start a new thread with this please as i can not as i'm new here.

Katrina Satellite Pics.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/new-orleans-imagery.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC