Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Money Earmarked for Evacuation Redirected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:37 PM
Original message
Money Earmarked for Evacuation Redirected
Money Earmarked for Evacuation Redirected

By RITA BEAMISH
Associated Press Writer

September 17, 2005, 1:18 PM EDT

As far back as eight years ago, Congress ordered the Federal Emergency Management Agency to develop a plan for evacuating New Orleans during a massive hurricane, but the money instead went to studying the causeway bridge that spans the city's Lake Ponchartrain, officials say.

The outcome provides one more example of the government's failure to prepare for a massive but foreseeable catastrophe, said the lawmaker who helped secure the money for FEMA to develop the evacuation plan.

"They never used it for the intended purpose," said former Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La. "The whole intent was to give them resources so they could plan an evacuation of New Orleans that anticipated that a very large number of people would never leave."

In Hurricane Katrina's aftermath, attention has focused on the inability of local and federal officials to evacuate or prepare for the large number of poor people, many of them minorities, who had no access to transportation and remained behind.
(snip/...)

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-katrina-evacuation,0,6121844.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I KNEW it was the fault of the clenis!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no accountability on any level
for any of the money. When you pay your taxes you are flushing it down the toilet.This will NOT be the last tragedy due to incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wouldn't put it as harshly as you do
but I tend to agree. There are good bureaucrats, in fact I'd say that most career bureaucrats are really trying to do their jobs in the best way possible. Still, we're learning that all it takes to throw a giant monkey wrench into the system is to dismantle accountability mechanisms and hire key positions based on politics. The Republicans aren't alone in this, they've just taken political hackery to a whole new level. The sad fact is that this kind of thing has been going at least since the Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Please tell me something that has gone right?
I agree we do have a few good ones but they are so undermined by Bushit. When you think of the kinda money that is in the Federal budget and how it is wasted. When Governor Kean (thug!) says he is disappointed on how nothing has happened to protect us in 4 years......yadie yadie.....Where are all the checks and balances to ensure money goes to what it has been appropriated for ( what is the sense of having a Congress?)?
We are not just talking about cronyism. This is putting many lives in danger.This was a natural disaster(with 4 days notice)....God help us if the next isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Whoa dude. We agree.
What happened with FEMA and disaster preparedness in New Orleans was criminal and goes several steps beyond almost anything we've seen before although I can think of several instances that are on a similar scale such as the distributing of known defective M-16s to soldiers in the Vietnam war.

All I was pointing out is that many of the nameless, faceless bureaucrats that actually are responsible for the day to day functioning of the government are by and large good people. Throw in cronyism and remove accountability though and get stuff like this article talks about. It's nothing new, but the Bush administration has crafted this kind of criminal negligence into an artform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Aren't we STILL using the
M-16's in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The M-16's in Iraq
are a newer version that supposedly has the kinks worked out of them. Among other thing they have a three round limit per trigger pull built in when it's on automatic fire.

The M-16's in Viet Nam were a piece of shit that jammed up easliy. They must have had a few of them still around when I went in the Army in 1975. Several of us had problems with ours during basic training.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Better yes....BUT not great!
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 03:53 PM by serryjw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Well that is definitely what THIS administration wants the sheeple
to think. So we will demand even LESS government services, and be forced to rely even more on religious charities and corporations for services we have a right to receive from government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tauzin acts as though repukes weren't
running Congress for those full 8 years. Where was their oversight? Hey you Tauzin, where was your oversight? You're from Louisiana you SOB. If thoroughly checked, I am sure he profited off the redirection of the evacuation plan funds.

It is so amazing to me that these "people" actually say these things as though they were someone else's actions instead of their own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. the key word is: "Earmarked" there is zero accountability on earmarks
If anyone can exercise accountability for earmarked funds it's the congress critter that put the earmark in some omnibus spending bill. Thing is, who put what in, is not documented anywhere! There is a big article all about this in Harpers from a month or two ago. I'm surprised Tauzin is claiming it, since if anyone was going to check that the money was being spent correctly, it would have had to have been him! Surely he knows this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finecraft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a hoot---Billy Tauzin commenting about misuse of funds!
Here's how Billy's district worked: Everyone would go to Billy asking for money for "special" projects. Someone needed a new sewer plant, someone needed a new road, someone needed a new bridge...and the list goes on and on. Billy would get some money for the project, but it wouldn't be enough for the project...just a "study" of the proposed project. Billy had a large stable of people that loved to "study" projects....and also by coincidence, loved to contribute heavily to Billy's campaigns. Our parish has bookcases filled with "studies" that Billy got money for. Did one project ever get started? Sadly no...if the study said that the project was worthwhile, there was never any money available for the actual project. But there sure was a readily available pile of cash for more studies. I hate this man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm sorry.......BUT
my cat's BUTT doesn't stink! Photoshop it to skunks!..That's what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC