Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(UN) Summit failure blamed on US (The Observer)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:09 PM
Original message
(UN) Summit failure blamed on US (The Observer)
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 07:14 PM by Up2Late
(But, but, but, Freedom is on the march, Right?)

Summit failure blamed on US



Mark Townsend in New York
Sunday September 18, 2005
The Observer

The failure of last week's United Nations summit to deliver an agreement designed to prevent terrorists acquiring 'weapons of mass destruction' was sabotaged by the US, senior diplomats have told The Observer.

Officials involved in the negotiations have confirmed that the Bush administration's refusal to countenance any form of disarmament blocked attempts to push measures that would prevent regimes seeking to develop a nuclear capability. It contradicts reports last week that the US had in fact been furious that plans to crack down on nuclear proliferation were stripped out of the final UN document.

However, diplomats speaking on condition of anonymity have revealed it was in fact President Bush who scuppered what the UN believed was a crucial move in helping make the world safer from the risk of terrorists obtaining a nuclear threat.

Sources reveal that the move has heightened further tensions between the Americans and furious UN officials who believe the issue remains the greatest threat to world peace. Kofi Annan, secretary-general of the UN, told world leaders that the decision to drop all references in the final UN text to disarmament was 'inexcusable', saying that 'weapons of mass destruction pose a grave danger to us all'.

<http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1572824,00.html?gusrc=rss>
(more at link above)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. After seeing what Bolton did to the agreement that
a UN had been working on for this conference -- I'd say it was wrecked as soon as the members saw Bolton's revisions.

In some ways bushie is a dumb ass -- but he is an idiot savant when it comes to screwing up functioning organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheStates Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. The real terrorist revealed.....Dick Cheney...
And his terrorist friends selling weapons....proliferating them everywhere. It's time for the U.N. to leave America as its clearly not welcomed here, and clearly is doing no good with the crooks in charge of the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. My daughter's SO
is Canadian. I'm trying to copy his accent, in case I am ever able to travel overseas. I wish they would marry, only so that she might be able to someday claim Canadian citizenship. Otherwise, they have been together several years, are buying a home together, so it doesn't matter. Hmm...I wonder if mothers-in-law can settle in Canada easily?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. It is all well and good to blame it on the US but....
until the UN stands up and tells the US it is but ONE country among many and does NOT control the agenda, the UN must look into it's own mirror to see who is really at fault.

There was NO ONE unaware, within the UN and outside of it, that the US agenda, from the beginning, was to sabotage this summit and that was even further confirmed by the recess appointment of Bolton. For the UN to cry foul now is to negate their 'raison d'etre', imo.

BTW, I am a big supporter of the UN as it could and should be but am a severe critic of it as it currently exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This takes "Miserable failure" to new heights....
"it was in fact President Bush who scuppered what the UN believed was a crucial move in helping make the world safer from the risk of terrorists obtaining a nuclear threat."...and of course, with a little help from his enablers - Bolten et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Creative Chaos n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bolton = Nikita Kruschev's shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Until the UN is MOVED

from the US, it will remain the "second most miserable failure" in the world!

http://MoveTheUN.blogspot.com

Google "miserable failure" to see who is FIRST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC