Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq probe into soldier incident

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:06 AM
Original message
Iraq probe into soldier incident
"The Iraqi government has launched an inquiry into the events that led the British Army to storm a police station in Basra in search of two UK soldiers.

Both men were members of the SAS elite special forces, sources told the BBC's Richard Galpin in Baghdad.

The soldiers were arrested by police and then handed over to a militia group, the British Army says."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4264614.stm

Falseflaggate just gets deeper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. BBC: Iraq probe into soldier incident (undercover Brits)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4264614.stm

<snip>

Iraq's interior ministry ordered the police force in Basra to release the soldiers but that order was ignored.

Instead they ended up in the hands of Shia militia, prompting the flattening of a wall at the police station and the later dramatic rescue, the Ministry of Defence said.

Basra governor Mohammed al-Waili said the men - possibly working undercover - were arrested for allegedly shooting dead a policeman and wounding another.


British Army vehicles under attack during bid to recover arrested servicemen

Richard Galpin said al-Jazeera news channel footage, purportedly of the equipment carried in the men's car, showed assault rifles, a light machine gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear and medical kit.

This is thought to be standard kit for the SAS operating in such a theatre of operations, he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the place is just chaos
when will they decide it IS a civil war...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. If true, they likely didn't want to release them because they'd killed...
...their fellow officers. Can you imagine how tough it's got to be to be an Iraqi policeman? If I'd seen these guys pump rounds through my comrade's bodies I'd give the finger to releasing them too...

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. An Interesting Juan Cole Assesment of Events in Basra....
http://www.juancole.com/

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

British Storm Basra Jail with Tanks

Sabrina Tavernisse of the New York Times gives the only account of alarming events in Basra I have yet seen that makes sense.

The Guardian seems to me to have left out some key information.

Anyway, here's my timeline for what happened.

more.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That is interesting.
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 10:37 AM by bemildred
I am skeptical about parts of it, and there seems to be
a good deal of disagreement about the timeline. I expect it
will only get murkier as time goes on, unfortunately.

Prof. Cole stays away from black ops as always, and simply
assumes that the locals were up to something and the two SAS
fellows intervened. It's worth noting that he is disregarding
the testimony from the police about what occurred when these
two fellows were arrested. One can take the point of view -
which is quite consistent with past reports - that there is
no central authority with any ability to enforce its will in
the South, and so we have all these competing groups duking it
out for control, one of which is the British Army.

There is clearly a good deal of lying going on all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. the "dual sovereignty" bit gets me ...
sheesh! Who knew there would be a revolution? :sarcasm:

I agree they all are lying. Perhaps Juan feels the need to stay away from the obvious in regard to the black-ops boys. Why, I am not sure. It is plain as day to see what "undercover" means in Iraq and Boykin admitted they were running death squads months ago. He was fucking proud of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Let the Shia join the insurgency
that's one way for Iraq to regain its sovereignty. The current puppet Iraqi regime lives behind the confines of the Green Zone, just as our Afghan puppet Karzai lives confined to his palace in Kabul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think why Prof. Cole would stay away from the black-ops is obvious.
No point in making yourself a target. We can get away with it,
we are nobody, but he has credibility, is a public figure, and
he can expect to be attacked vigorously if he brings certain
subjects up.

WRT the black ops, I was thinking about it last night, and keeping
the Shi'ia and the Sunni resistance separated seems to me to be the
only credible goal for such actions as we see. The other POV, that
we need chaos as an excuse to continue the occupation does not seem
to hold up to me. We can continue the occupation just fine whether
order is restored or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think "zero sovereignty" is closer to the true situation.
It's the law of the gun and devil take the hindmost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. If Iraq is stable
a substantial majority of the Iraqi population wants us gone, not to mention servicemembers who are on their fourth TOD and want to come home. There is little justification for remaining there.

How would these actions serve to keep the Shia and Sunni resistance separated?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't the US will abandon the fourteen military installations
that are being build in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Exactly my point
but they need a public excuse for both Iraqis and Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. If Iraq is stable you can keep a smaller garrison there and the
"Vietnamization" strategy works. You get to stay there
because the stooge government signs a SOF agreement. If you
can show that the stooge government will not sign such an
agreement and that the occupation knows that, then there is
an argument for keeping the stooge government scared.

Convincing the Shi'ia that the Sunni resistance and/or the
islamic jihadis are killing them in the hundreds in bombings
would seem like an excellent way to keep them (the Shi'ia)
alienated from the purported bomber/killers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. noticed that one too
How can there ever be "dual sovereignty"? You have sovereignty, and then you have revolution, where sovereignty changes from day to day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. There can be only one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds like the Brits are pretty good spinners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. This WH likes to send messages....
Maybe the message here is that when your allies kill your fellow officers, don't take any prisoners cuz they will just bust'em out.

No prisoners.... then one side gets to tell the stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sablefish Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. False flag operation
China news said that their car was full of explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. The article sounded like a pack of lies
Just like when the Brazilian was shot by the police in London - the first reports stunk then too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sablefish Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Here's a link explaining what happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sablefish Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Here's another link for op ed news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC