Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP - cut Federal Retirees benefits to pay for Katrina

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:49 PM
Original message
GOP - cut Federal Retirees benefits to pay for Katrina
A group of Republican House members called Wednesday for cuts to some federal retirees' benefits to help offset the cost of Hurricane Katrina recovery.


The House Republican Study Committee released a package of recommendations known as "Operation Offset" Wednesday that called for calculating retirement annuities for federal employees based on an average of their five highest-earning years of service. Currently, employees' annuities are based on a high three-year average. Adding two years of lower pay would tend to decrease the average, and thus reduce retirees' defined benefits....

National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley -
"This is a deeply flawed proposal that falls disproportionately on the backs of those who can least likely afford it," Kelley said.

http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=32299&dcn=e_gvet

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not cut subsidies to corporate entities? CORPORATE WELFARE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Nah that's their base
And they don't come any baser than that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
55. Or the Pentagon/War budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does federal retirees include the House members?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. how about this
eliminate retire benefits for elected government officials.

starting with Bush and Cheney. after all, they don't need the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Why don't Republicans in the House and Senate simply resign?
That would save alot of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. Yeah, Eliminate Congress Retirement Benefits
and the Presidents as well. When was the last time a poor person was elected to federal office (a person earning less than the median wage at the time he/she was elected)?

Bill and Hillary Clinton don't need it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
56. Eliminate ALL pensions for POLS!
See how long they stay in office then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Eliminate their health insurance, let them see how that feels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I know this isn't talking about VA is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. This particular thing would effect VA employees, its hard to
believe the repubs would cut veterans benefits any more than they already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunately recommending this bad news...
Tax Cuts? Are we repealing those?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. You're a funny fella.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wwagsthedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. How about no more war!
Total waste of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. W needed the war to pay back his buds
and keep their profits flowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. That would be a good start
Bring home the troops from all over the world. It's time to start fixing this country.



Cut all medical benefits for Congress, the Senate and Bush and Cheney. They don't need us to pay for their medical benefits, they are wealthy enough to pay for their own. It's outrageous that so many Americans are paying for them, when they don't have medical coverage themselves.

Roll back Bush's tax cuts for the rich, that's the most obvious thing to do.

Cut out all pork that is attached to bills passed in Congress. We don't need bridges to nowhere in Alaska.

Cut back on the prison population by decriminalizing marijuana and other drugs. That would save billions of wasted money that could be used for better purposes, like education and treatment.

No more no-bid contracts where money is wasted, and more oversight of government contracts.

Pay a livable salary to the working poor. That would stimulate the economy far more than tax cuts for the rich, imo.

I'm sure if I spend a little time, I can think of a million ways these idiots waste our money. I wish I could spend like a drunken sailor, like this administration has, without any consequences.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
30. Welfare for the wealthy...
"Cut all medical benefits for Congress, the Senate and Bush and Cheney"


I don't know why republicans don't see this for what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. GOP plan two: Sell your children to the Saudis to pay for Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wait until they have to find funds for Rita
to subsidize W's Texans. Implement a poor tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. If you think haliburton has been paid well already, just wait. Fixing
oil rigs was their first business, and TX is their home base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. OK, does that include congressmen and senators and presidents?
these chumps are going to be voted out big time I think, they are way into "over-reach" mode
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. yes, Congress shut cut their benefits also!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. The big boys
including the Senior Executive Service (department service heads and such) fall into very specialized areas when speaking of pay, benefit, etc. This move would only affect 'worthless' retirees like myself, grounds maintenance foreman, postal carriers, medical technicians, others who fall under the GS, WS and WG pay grade systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. My favorite cut: Stop paying for penile implants with Medicare
It's in Section III.

Do they really expect to spend $660,000,000 in the next 10 years on penile implants? That can't be right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. Medicare should pay for testicular implants for Congressional Democrats!
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 08:05 PM by CreekDog
Now that's a spending program I think we can all get behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncertainty1999 Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is a TAX INCREASE for federal retirees - thanks, Bush! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. start with the house and senate and work your way up the chain
since they are willing to sacrifice :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. This paragraph is the heart of it right here:
Most of what conservatives are advocating in "Operation Offset" is a rehash of policies fiscal conservatives have long trumpeted -- funding cuts for NASA and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, eliminating so-called pork in the highway bill, cutting subsidies for Amtrak, and reining in foreign aid, among others.


They are evil, evil evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. Cut Highway Spending? Hello Rita!
have they seen the news pics of the roads out of Houston? And they want to CUT funding for roads? Because, we just have too many highways, you know.

What is pork anyway?
Answer: spending on a large project in a Congressional district other than your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. Cut benefits to working people instead of rich, lazy slobs. Typical.
I hope their plan gets plenty of airplay. Katrina has pulled back the wizard's curtain, and I hope people do pay attention to what's behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. They should cut theirs first including retired members before
cutting retirees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
23. yep - GOP gotta keep rich tax cuts but slice $ of those on fixed
income - that was earned by serving as a public employee for years. Renege on the employment promise to these retirees - but keep the taxcut windfalls for the really rich... and Sen Shelby still looks for an example of someone effected by the estate tax who died in Katrina.

They really are looking vampiresque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
24. Other proposal will raise health insurance premiums of retirees
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 06:03 AM by wishlist
"The RSC also recommended lowering the government subsidy for some federal retirees who participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits plan. RSC members said they want to "reduce health benefits for new retirees who had relatively short federal careers, although it would preserve their right to stay in the program." Currently, the government pays for 72 percent of all participants' premiums, regardless of the length of their federal careers.

According to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, under the proposal backed by the RSC, "the government's share of premium costs would be cut by two percentage points for every year of service less than 30. In the case of a retiree with 20 years of service, for example, the government's contribution would decline from 72 percent of the weighted average premium to 52 percent."

Charles Fallis, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, said the proposals are insulting to federal employees.

"Not only would these proposals dishonor the government's obligation to its workers, but it also makes public service a much harder sell," Fallis said."


I know many federal retirees who pay $300 per month already for their health insurance premiums for insurance that still leaves them having to pay significant deductibles and copays too.

Since when is 20 to 30 years of service not considered lengthy?

Also, Federal retirees pay taxes on all of the health insurance premiums that are deducted from their pensions already. Congress has failed to pass legislation to relieve them of this unfair burden!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. Again - the estate tax then goes into effect... and the retirees who
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 06:02 AM by applegrove
are not wealthy end up subsidizing the rich.

Totally unfair.

I think this is saber rattle ling. The Rove WH really, really wants to sink government in the bathtub. They know they only have a year to pass anything.

Don't know - but I cannot imagine why else they would do this. Except that the old die and therefore don't have long memories.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. Very unfair to cut retiree benefits
People retire with an understanding from the company. Cutting these benefits after the fact seems very wrong to me.

The fact that it's the US Government breaking its promise to retirees bothers me a great deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
27. Over 100 in Congress voted for this last year (for bill that was defeated)
Few people realize that many Republicans in Congress already tried to push through these proposals last year in a bill that was defeated but got a lot of Repub votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
28. How do you like him now, Federal Republican employees?
But it will truly only really hurt the lower paid employees. The top of the Fed pay scales already make much more money than they are worth and most are political appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. Unfucking believable.
Do you have any idea how old some of those retirees are? Jesus Christ. Why don't the asshole Republicans do the one thing that would make them human? Tax the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
32. All Repuke proposals are deeply flawed and fall disproportionately
on those who can least likely afford it: that's their essence, mission, goal, job # 1. They are killing our society, one step at a time with malice of forethought: they like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
33. I wonder how those federal employees who marched in the "Freedom parade"
after hurricane Katrina think about their retiree pay and benefits being cut? I bet they just love it. Stupid people doing stupid things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
34. I just sent this to my wing-nut Bush loving

Mother...who also happens to be a federal employee soon to retire. He's been pissing her off lately...maybe this will finally get her to saunter in from her slumber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm sure my retired from the Fed Gov't GOP father is going to LOVE this!
Can't wait to see what he thinks of his beloved GOP on this one.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. My GOP dad, too
my dad isn't a federal employee, but my grandad was a postmaster for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
36. never trust a Republican, their word is always worthless
they'll keep their word to you only as long as it's usefull to them to do so. There's another term for republican mind-set, it's: psychopathic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
37. How Republican of them! Does that include congresscritters?
Wait - I have a better idea. How about limiting Congressional pensions to the median federal employee pension? That should generate quite a bit of offset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
39. Starting with the retirees from Congress, that would save a lot
and how about they get the same kind of health insurace we do? How about rasing their premiums as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. Some of my best friends are NTEU members
and it's true - this has been tried before.

The reality here is the same as many times before. The best disinfectant is sunshine.

This is a trial balloon. They need to hear loud and clear that it's full of lead.

I, for one, will be calling my Reps and Senators. LTTEs, call-ins, and a call to the WH seem to also be in order.

At the same time, they still want to eliminate the Estate tax for the wealthiest of the wealthiest.

These lying, cheating, thieving bastards want to pay for their tax cuts on the backs of middle and lower income Americans - again!

Good God Man! Have you no soul??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. And so many Federal employees have Potomac Fever
...they retire out of those little boxes in DC to the suburbs in VA and MD...they're too close and they will waddle in to town and gripe it up!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Not all federal employees work in DC
and feds aren't the only ones moving to the burbs in VA and MD. Most feds I've met are pretty cheerful people.

Is it fair to pay for five years of tax cuts, mismanagement, and war profiteering by reducing federal employees' pensions? Again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. I think you misunderstand me---SUBSTANTIALLY
I spent many years as both a federal worker, albeit senior military, with no small number of federal civilian military subordinates, and additionally as a homeowner in the METRO DC area. What I am saying is that many of my neighbors/friends/subordinates/co-workers were RETIRED types who drew federal, civilian pensions--and STAYED in METRO when they retired. This translates to CLOUT.

It is certainly more difficult to ignore the "barbarians" when they are at your very gate....so to speak.

In the event that you fail to understand my stance, I say, I completely support the federal workers, I relied on them, I valued them, and I continue to believe that they play a major role in our governance.

On a personal level, I especially appreciated the fact that most of the federal workers on my staffs were not blinded by ideological lunacy. They cared about family, friends, and their communities.

I do not understand where we differ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohtransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. I'm not sure we disagree.
My response was aimed at your phrase, "gripe it up". In my experience, to gripe is to complain, moan, whine, etc... indiscriminately.

I see now your use of the term was intended to suggest they're assert their rights to organize, to contact their representatives and congresspersons, write LTTEs. Maybe more people should do that...Hmmm...revolutionary concept as they say.

I've also worked as a federal worker and enlisted military. As you know feds make the choice to work for uncle sugar instead of a private employer for many reasons. Chief among those reasons are security issues like health insurance and pension (although FERS doesn't hold a candle to CSRS. We all make trade offs. Job security has become a memory fr many feds.

In retrospect, I also don't understand where we differ.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-25-05 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. We are on the same page
I guess it is a difference in terminology. In my sphere, if you took the time and effort to gripe, you intended to get results from it, or fall on your spear in pursuit of principle, or perhaps 'screw the pooch' for someone following behind you that you felt was on the wrong track.

In senior military circles, griping always has consequences--you either do it because you are on your way out, and just want to shit in the punch...or you want to make a difference!

In any event, it is done with a bit of thought behind it, as well as purpose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. they could cut that perpetual paycheck that politicians receive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
42. OMG news flash to the Repubs
Bring the troops home and we'll save lots of money, instead of screwing retirees.
I'm gonna have to borrow a Mike Malloy line and say "Have I told you lately how much I HATE these people"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. How typical of Republicans - no ethics whatsoever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
48. Will Congress get a payraise this year?
You can count on it! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Pay raise for our CON ladies and gents.
greed trumps need everytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakeguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
50. why not cut the benefits all congress members get instead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Ooh ooh - I like your plan!
Bush and his fellow "elected" idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
52. After You, Gaston!
What will they think of next? And no member of the Bush Family or the Evil Empire contributed to this fiasco! Proving that GOP is a disease worse than TB or AIDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
54. cut wh and congress current and future benefits and all retirement
ken lay stole ordinary people retirement - these jokers don't deserve what they are paid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
57. Beyond the pale
simply beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC