Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brzezinski believes U.S. needs to shed paranoia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:04 AM
Original message
Brzezinski believes U.S. needs to shed paranoia
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/112747512617590.xml&coll=2

Friday, September 23, 2005

...Our country has lost its sense of absolute security, Brzezinski said, and we're not handling it well. For the first time, we're feeling the vulnerability that other nations feel, he said.

"We're not used to this, so we have a tendency to dramatize the threat and to overstate the fear," he said, citing the war in Iraq.

The lack of global support for the war shows other countries knew our reasons were based on suspicion, not knowledge, Brzezinski said. That paranoia isolates us from the rest of the world and destroys our credibility, he said. The United States will need other countries to help with concerns such as North Korea and Israel, but first we need to regain their trust by cooperating, he said.

"If we want to be leaders," he said, "we have to have those who are willing to follow us."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think shedding the president and his administration would solve this.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Says our reasons for Iraq were suspicion,not knowledge.Try lies.Seems
like he's just providing more b.s. to cover it all up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aion Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He can't make the same mistake in exposing the mistake
...that would only provide more fuel for the fire.

I likened the situation to a suspicious white man who sees a suspicious black man carrying boxes of roses into his wife. Would that suspicious white man be justified in kicking down the door of that suspicious black man? I mean, surely there could have been sawed off shotguns and all sorts of other mischief going in through those rose boxes.

We have lost sense of 'a priori' and 'probable cause'. And the world knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Exactly. I didn't have any paranoia about the U.S.
until that gang of thugs hijacked the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. FDR had it right
Fear is our only true enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Sorry, but this administration is our true enemy. Of the entire world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. But it is fear
that gives them their power. If people were unfraid, Bush would hold no attraction. But since there are a lot of people afraid of several different things (terrorists, gays, etc.) Bush is empowered. So, in the final analysis, fear is the principle enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I see what you mean now. And I certainly agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. The only way BushCo knows how to rule
is by using fear. Their paranoia gets old after awhile.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's fun
"Brzezinski was recognized with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1981 for his influence on foreign policy."

Certainly a well deserved award. And they say the Carter years were a failure.

http://www.usacc.org/contents.php?cid=2

Also involved with the US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce. I'm sure they're big corn growers over there. Although no corn corporations in that chamber.

Brzezinski is just an empire builder of a more diplomatic look than some others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. he predicted the fall of USSR and was scoffed at as a result
He talked about how Poland would be a moving force in the east, and they called him names. he said that Afghanistan would be USSR's viet nam, and the MSM made a decision to ignore him.

Who was that ancient truthsayer who was accurate, but destined to be ignored by all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Cassandra. A good alternate name for so many of us here, too.
We all knew enough about bush and the people around him to try to warn everyone we thought might listen - NOT to vote for him. We tried. Dear God, we tried...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. He said Afghanistan would be the USSR's Viet Nam...
...because he was determined to make it their Viet Nam.

The initial funding of the Mujahadeen began under Carter and Brzezinski. They were just more responsible than the Reagan Administration with who they funded and what they funded them with.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. good point, but the money really increased under raygun.
Don't forget Iran Contra at the same time - major league $$$$ for kicks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. he also made sure Carter let indonesia rape east timor nearly to death
fuck zBig he needs should pay for his past "policy crimes" before opening his mouth now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. He deliberately provoked the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan--
--for exactly that purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. I cannot agree with this. I've studied some of the archives in Moscow
and the plans and intentions were laid down long before Zbig had anything to do about it. The increases in training, the forced conscriptions, the training for mountain fighting and the learning of local languages - all that preceded Zbig by many years. The USSR was not some bend in the wind reed, twisted by some nefarious plan of Zbiggie. There was nothing that zbiggie could do to provoke an invasion of a muslim nation by the USSR. They were going in regardless of what he or carter did.

The election, then the "revolution", followed by the "invitation" of soviet forces was a dance directed and choreographed by the Kremlin, not Washington DC. Did Big Zbig see an opportunity? sure. Was this born out of fear over oil supply lines, you betcha. Was the congress to GOoPered to provide overt support? absolutely.


Did the CIA funding of many millions make a difference? Not at first. For several years, the Soviet army ran roughshod over most elements. And for the most part, the afghans were poorly trained, poorly led, and poorly supported. Only when this was seriously expanded and included training, Stingers, and other high tech stuff, did they begin to make a dent into Soviet occupation and administration. Until the era of Raygun, the Soviets were winning the battle, the war, the everything.

Also recall Carter's reaction to this invasion. He stated in public that he was "surprised", "dismayed", and felt as though he finally understood the Soviets for the first time. An odd admission, given his life in the military, training to be in charge of an attack sub, with the express purpose of blowing up millions of Ruskies. Carter may have been a fine man (and I have no doubt that he still is), but as a detail oriented, picker of nits, naive and wishful, beholden to his religion, and believing that everyone should or would be too, he was not a shining example of great presidents in our time.

No, Zbig did not provoke the invasion (I, too, have read that revisionist history, and found it factually and logically wanting) and did not cause the Muhajadeen to organize into some real fighting guerrilla force. What he did do was set aside his vile hatred of the USSR and describe and analyze it clearly and rationally, which led to his predictions about the USSR's ultimate collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. He admitted as much in a 1998 interview
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs <"From the Shadows">, that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. uh huh. Let's see. one small step by the US; and one HUGE
invasion involving over 200,000 soviet soldiers, tanks, helicopters, armored personnel carriers, supplies, water, food, ammo, and communications systems. All waiting for Zbig to make a move.

right.

Excuse me, but, despite what he may have said two decades later, reality has to set in. The USSR, by its own account, spent years planning on invading Afghanistan. Before the fact. LONG before Zbiggie and his Carter pills.

Their problem, as they (the USSR) saw it, was huge. despite being a secular nation, except for the religious belief in Marxist-Leninist People's Socialist Republic, was a huge growing population of anti-USSR peoples in a whole bunch of countries ending with the last few letters of 'stan. Chechnya was their first and foremost problem, and the source of two decades of black market profiteering, and worse. some of the central-southern states were listening to voices from further south, and those voices were carrying nothing but Islam.

IF you take a HUGE reality check, take a look at all of the events of the late '70s, early 80s and some of the movements in the USSR's southern regions. Zbiggie had no, and I mean NO, input into their deccision to invade. That was made long, long before Carter even considered runnig for pres.

Please, take no offense. I know and have read the same sources that you have. But, sometimes, people's egos get in the way. Like Zbig's. Think about it. 200,000 troups, PLUS support staff, plus infrastructure, plus costs/money/etc - SIMPLY because Carter did one thing to support a small, ineffectual group of anti-Soviet Arabs?

hardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe the American people will have to face up to the fact
that being "the World's Only Superpower" doesn't provide much protection.

Being able to blow up the world many times over certainly didn't provide much protection on September 11th. As a matter of fact, one would be hard-pressed to demonstrate it provided any protection at all.

All those weapons of mass destruction, all those trillions of Dollars spent (owed now to countries such as Red China) and little if any security.

It's time for some new priorities, America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Paranoia would be George's middle name .... yup ...
40 years of booze and coke, combined with an Oedipal complex, tends to do that to people ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. But paranoia is what allows Rove &co. to shove their loony agenda
down America's throat....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. "our reasons were based on suspicion, not knowledge,"
It bugs me that people like Brzezinski still say things like that. He knows as well as we do that the reasons for going to war were PNAC related and not based on any information.

We need to stop acting like the war was a mistake and start telling the truth. It is in the DSM's so let's hear it from those who can tell it without risk like Brzezinski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. Although Brzesinski is scum like Kissinger
At least he's not totally brainwashed in his own self-righteousness. He's an intelligent man, and a calculative one at that. He's right on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Why is he a "scum"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. because
Are we all forgetting his aiding of the Mujahedeen, later Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban?

Brzesinski was in the decision making process for most foreign policy decisions of the United States for the last 30 years. He still believes the U.S. has the right to lead the world, as long as it PRETENDS to take their feelings into account.

Kissinger is an arrogant, imperial bastard. Brzezsinki is an imperial bastard, with some intelligence and a nice face.

Don't forget he's still a former National Security Advisor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Absolutely no comparion between Kissinger & Brzesinski
Now if you said John Negroponte, I'd agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. I have a co-worker that STILL goes on and on about 'commies'
and 'pinkos'

but then, he's a clueless idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not until "they" admit the election was stolen will "we" "shed" anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is it just me or anybody else think they'll call him an anti-Semite
because of this sentence? "The United States will need other countries to help with concerns such as North Korea and Israel..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. As long as the United States continues its meme of "rugged individualism"
it will continue to be a pariah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. People like Jerry Boykin and Pat Robertson are running this
country while junior & cheney count their shekels, while people like Abramoff and Frist have free reign to rip and tear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. The only way to shed paranoia is to shed our current leaders. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Brzezinski dimly glimpses the idiocy of the policies he long advocated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick and recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. If we are going to be plagued by empire builders--
--we may as well have them connected to reality as Zbig obviously is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aion Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
32. Shed?
An interesting choice of words, in my opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-24-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
35. Well that would defeat the whole purpose of the 911 "attacks"
...and the interminable "terror alerts" and the paranoid build up to the fraudulent wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC