Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: The 'Second' Man (Al-Qaida deputy really No. 2?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:02 PM
Original message
Newsweek: The 'Second' Man (Al-Qaida deputy really No. 2?)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9518556/site/newsweek/

The 'Second' Man
The slain Abu Azzam may not have been Zarqawi’s top deputy after all. Will his death have any effect on the Iraq insurgency?

Sept. 28, 2005 - U.S. intelligence officials and counterterrorism analysts are questioning whether a slain terrorist—described by President Bush today as the “second-most-wanted Al Qaeda leader in Iraq”—was as significant a figure as the Bush administration is claiming.

...

“This guy was a brutal killer,” Bush told reporters in remarks that were also carried live on cable TV. “He was one of Zarqawi’s top lieutenants. He was reported to be the top operational commander of Al Qaeda in Baghdad.”

...

But veteran counterterrorism analyst Evan Kohlmann said today there are ample reasons to question whether Abu Azzam was really the No. 2 figure in the Iraqi insurgency. He noted that U.S. officials have made similar claims about a string of purportedly high-ranking terrorist operatives who had been captured or killed in the past, even though these alleged successes made no discernible dent in the intensity of the insurgency.

...

Three U.S. counterterrorism officials, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject, also told NEWSWEEK today that U.S. agencies did not really consider Abu Azzam to be Zarqawi’s “deputy” even if he did play a relatively high-ranking role in the insurgency.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. again? boy, they sure have a bunch of #2s!
they seem to be catching one every week now..! -grin-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and the MSM is finally checking them on the propaganda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Caught a lot of # 3's too!
I wonder if any Retugs believe them anymore? I really think everyone's getting wise to this joke of a president.

Here's to you bush......:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Alqaeda like a bank, EVERYBODY's an exec. vice president. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. It never mattered anyway
No one actually bought any of this because even if we get lucky and kill number 2 then a new number 2 will be in place in minutes.

The only person impressed with this thinking is Bush because like Richard Clarke said, he can cross names off the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Again ! I ask, to please please
see the org chart. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. If we're talking about terrorist cells, wouldn't a "number 2" be someone
at the top of a particular cell? And if there are 30 cells, wouldn't that mean 30 "number 2s"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess they figured we wouldn't by the #3 caught again BS
#2. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. The 'Second' Man - Azzam may not have been Zarqawi’s top deputy after all.
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 12:18 AM by Roland99
The 'Second' Man
The slain Abu Azzam may not have been Zarqawi’s top deputy after all. Will his death have any effect on the Iraq insurgency?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9518556/site/newsweek

Sept. 28, 2005 - U.S. intelligence officials and counterterrorism analysts are questioning whether a slain terrorist—described by President Bush today as the “second-most-wanted Al Qaeda leader in Iraq”—was as significant a figure as the Bush administration is claiming.

<...>

Bush’s comments came one day after Gen. Richard Myers, the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon that the U.S. military considered Abu Azzam the “No. 2 Al Qaeda operative in Iraq, next to Zarqawi.”

But veteran counterterrorism analyst Evan Kohlmann said today there are ample reasons to question whether Abu Azzam was really the No. 2 figure in the Iraqi insurgency. He noted that U.S. officials have made similar claims about a string of purportedly high-ranking terrorist operatives who had been captured or killed in the past, even though these alleged successes made no discernible dent in the intensity of the insurgency.

“If I had a nickel for every No. 2 and No. 3 they’ve arrested or killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, I’d be a millionaire,” says Kohlmann, a New York-based analyst who tracks the Iraq insurgency and who first expressed skepticism about the Azzam claims in a posting on The Counterterrorism Blog (counterterror.typepad.com). While agreeing that Azzam—also known as Abdullah Najim Abdullah Mohamed al-Jawari—may have been an important figure, “this guy was not the deputy commander of Al Qaeda,” says Kohlmann.


How's that strategery working now, Mr. Propagandist?

:eyes:



Oh...and rate up the article, too!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Damn anybody surprised?
Nah, nope, not at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. not me, maybe by touting it all week since Sunday they themselves
have exposed it as the pr sham it is? Deadly pr is all this administration ever amounted to, and now more than ever. Gets old after a while, and then the press gets tired of being had? I suppose it could happen with everything they try to make a big pr deal out of from here on out. And since they literally do make EVERYTHING a pr event/operation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You mean we get to go after yet another #2 guy?!
I know I'm shocked. Not. :eyes: How many false #2s have they arrested and/or killed so far, anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Just like British 60s TV's "The Prisoner." Different No. 2 every week!
Edited on Thu Sep-29-05 12:50 AM by Hissyspit
I knew it was a great show all these years, but really didn't know how prescient and insightful it was...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. And No. 1 turned out to be... Ourselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Why do you hate America?
Terrorist appeaser.



:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yawn, same ol' same ol' Of course, no one will notice the correction
The U.S. public only hears the first headline. "We Got No. 2!"

We've heard all this before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Did Al Qaeda's head of Human Resources make a statement?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I could make a fortune placing bets that these kind of war claims
have no merit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. See! He WAS the #3, I knew it!
They definitely think we are all stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. LOL!
Good replique!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Reminds me Iago's comments in Aladdin
Iago: Oh, there's a big surprise. That's an incredible... I think I'm going to have a heart attack and die, from that surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Didn't this episode of "Mistaken Identity: Opps, our bad!" air last year?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NIGHT TRIPPER Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. "DEPUTY" Dawg, "LEIUTENANT" wearing his stripes, "TOP AID" helping out
WHICH IS IT?
These "terms" they use--Where the hell do they come up with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. But wait...Who's on First, What's on Second and I don't know...
is on third...

that is what this is turning inot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC