Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senators cut funds for food and heat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:14 AM
Original message
Senators cut funds for food and heat
WASHINGTON — Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins faced the uncomfortable choice Friday of either shutting down the federal government or cutting three-quarters of the funding for a program for heating-oil assistance and food banks in Maine. While they sided with keeping the government open, Maine's Republican senators said funding would be restored within weeks for the poverty programs.

"It was an unfortunate dilemma, but it's absolutely essential that we keep government open and operating," Collins said. "This is a temporary setback for the program that I strongly support, but I'm confident in the end that funding will be there for it."

The conflict arose because the federal government's fiscal year ended Friday. Congress has approved only two spending bills for the year that starts today, for the Interior Department and the legislative branch of government. Ten other bills are pending.

In order to keep the government running while those 10 bills are debated, Congress needed to approve a temporary spending measure. The measure funds everything from the Agriculture Department to the Defense Department until Nov. 18.

http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/051001snowecollins.shtml

Wonderful! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. congress can not even do its work in a timely fashion!







...The conflict arose because the federal government's fiscal year ended Friday. Congress has approved only two spending bills for the year that starts today, for the Interior Department and the legislative branch of government. Ten other bills are pending.

In order to keep the government running while those 10 bills are debated, Congress needed to approve a temporary spending measure. The measure funds everything from the Agriculture Department to the Defense Department until Nov. 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. At least we can rest assured that
Tom DeLay's state is receiving no pork.


Unbelievable! Georgia shuts down schools for a few days to save gas & Maine cuts funds for food & heat for the poor, while our ultra-rich citizens get tax relief on their millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But we have tons of ice from FEMA! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. Compassionate Conservatism at work...watch your step!
This is just BIZARRE. And tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yes, its a good demonstration of "Compassionate Conservatism"...
...because Collins at least said it was an "unfortunate dilemma", right before she pulled the rug out from underneath the destitute and downtrodden. It just warms your heart, doesn't it?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. WHY are they Republicans? Most Mainers are not wealthy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Oh - but Mainers are "conservative New Englaners". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Mainiacs are generally fiscal conservatives and social moderates
with the a Yankee libertarian streak. That's pretty much the platform of the old Republican party. They aren't mouthfoaming neocons or members of the doughy yacht set, although a considerable number of the latter have summer places in the state.

Snowe is old-school party loyalist Republican. I wish she would emulate Maine's most famous female senator,Margaret Chase Smith,who is remembered for standing up to Joe McCarthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Democratic party is the party of fiscal conservatism.
Both the Democratic and Republican parties have an undeserved reputation in that respect -- but in opposite directions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well if we starve and freeze the needy to death we won't have the...
problem anymore. Our representatives in Washington have become a bunch of useless, corrupt bastards. Why did the funding have to stop at all, that is plain BS and cruel to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Seems strange they would leave that out. Well, no
it doesn't but why didn't the two senators yell, stamp their feet, and say NO WAY you are going to take that away? In the next senatorial election Mainers should vote for the Girl Scouts. I'm sure they could do a better job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
47. starving and freezing to death the needy is called
"redistricting".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know. Shutting down the government for 1 day a week sounds
like it could work to me. It would only be "a temporary setback" for a government that everyone strongly supports."

What good is the government when the people it governs are frozen to death in a Maine winter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. rather we need to take away congresscritters paychecks
until they can balance the budget. To actually shut down the government means that routine menial work doesn't get done...I think we suffer enough from their inefficiency without making them less accessible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Hmm,, maybe. Maybe not. Things would still get done - just a little
slower. And there would be a few xtra $$$ to feed people and keep them warm.

Essential office staff would of course not be subject to forced furloughs.

Management and salaried officials could give up 10% of their pay and work half days on Friday or some such thing. They have been getting tax breaks - xtra $$$ in their pockets. Where is that coming from?

No point waiting for help from B*shCo and the publicans. The American people need to look after eachother since their government has cut them loose. If our elected officials would rather see their constituents freeze or starve than help them out, we need to re-consider who we are putting into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
46. Their paychecks? With
the millions these crooked bastards make their paychecks go un-noticed. Take away their JOBS.....support one term and out!

One term in ANY office and NEVER again in any federal office, fair for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzsaw_23 Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. You're on your own
But we do have socialism in the military.
$800 billion a year

Savage capitalism

This article says it all-just the headline is enough

nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Now, now, buzzsaw_23. The military needs every penny it can
get so that it can protect us like it did on 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RushIsRot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just so long as they didn't trim any funds from their own
obscene pay raises...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. OK, so the Senators chose to let people without means freeze in
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 09:29 AM by no_hypocrisy
the "comfort" of their own homes, leading to illness and/or death while maintaining the tax cuts for the 1% top wealthy citizens who will use the funds saved to overheat their megamansions to 72+ degrees in rooms that they don't even use from one week ago to the beginning of May.

Yep. Uh huh. Right. God Bless America.

Throw the bastards out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. This sure looks bad right now
and bringing it back as it was won't be enough this year.

Almost all the funds they want to cut seem to be social programs...but this is not the year to cut any heating programs...it needs to increase drastically. I doubt it will.
But even middle income will feel the pinch of 71% increase in natural gas heating costs predicted this winter along with the increased cause of gas for transportation which leads to overall cost of everything...
And at the time credit card minimum payments are doubled, fewer employers offer good health insurance, medical assistance programs are cut everywhere, too bad if you need to declare bankruptcy and on and on.

We...are in some trouble.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. we need to organize calls to those two women
and tell them to shut down the government. If they did that, it would pull the next series of threads to end this seedy "government" who would freeze most of its citizens for their personal gain.
SHUT IT DOWN! END THE MADNESS!
IMPEACH GEORGE BUSH AND SEND THEM ALL TO THE HAGUE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Emails for Snowe & Collins - will be back with phone #s
Send email to Olympia Snowe at
Olympia@snowe.senate.gov

Send email to Susan Collins at
senator@collins.senate.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Phone #s for Snowe
To contact Senator Snowe's offices toll free within Maine,

you may dial 1-800-432-1599
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auburn, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe
Two Great Falls Plaza, Suite 7B
Auburn, ME 04210

Phone: (207) 786-2451
Fax: (207) 782-1438
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Augusta, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe

Edmund S. Muskie Federal Building

40 Western Avenue, Room 408 C

Augusta, ME 04330

Phone: (207) 622-8292
Fax: (207) 622-7295

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bangor, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe
One Cumberland Place, Suite 306
Bangor, ME 04401

Phone: (207) 945-0432

Fax: (207) 941-9525
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biddeford, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe

231 Main Street, Suite 2

Biddeford, ME 04005

Phone: (207) 282-4144

Fax: (207) 284-2358
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Portland, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe
Three Canal Plaza, Suite 601
Portland, ME 04101


Phone: (207) 874-0883

Fax: (207) 874-7631

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presque Isle, Maine

Senator Olympia J. Snowe

169 Academy Street, Suite 3

Presque Isle, ME 04769

Phone: (207) 764-5124

Fax: (207) 764-6420
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Washington, D.C.

Senator Olympia J. Snowe
154 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-1903

Phone: (202) 224-5344
Fax: (202) 224-1946
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Susan Collins Phone
Washington, D.C. Office (202) 224-2523

Augusta Office (207) 622-8414

Bangor Office (207) 945-0417

Biddeford Office (207) 283-1101

Caribou Office (207) 493-7873

Lewiston Office (207) 784-6969
Portland Office (207) 780-3575


-I'm one mad Maineiac right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. thanks for making it so easy to call
I'm right on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. You are most welcome. I know folks who were already hurting w/gov aid
now they are totally screwed unless Snowe & Collins make it up later which I fear and doubt they will unless they get bombarded over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. There are alot of vulnerable people in the Gulf Coast states
that are in urgent need NOW. Shutting the govt down is not the answer- there should be extreme pressure on these senators to make sure that this gets put back into the 2006 fiscal year budget, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. What'd they call it, The Cozy, Toasty, Well-fed People Act?
Compassionate conservatism: behave immorally but say you feel REAL bad about it.

Insufficient food, even for a short time, can affect a child's development.

And considering the expected increase in oil costs, this cut is significantly greater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
17. They act like shutting down the government is the end of the world
Remember when Newt did it? We survived (though had Monica not been allowed to roam all over the West Wing, Clinton may have been better off). They even stopped paying civilian government employees, and sent them all home, but intern money came out of a different pot.

You know when they restore funding, it will not be the full amount. Someone will end up cold this winter....get out the axe and saw, Martha! We're a-heading to the woods to chop down trees, and failing that, we'll burn the furniture!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. I have a modest proposal, but...
...I'm not sure how much meat is actually on a senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PennyK Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. Solve two problems at once...
Let's use the ice to build igloos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
21. Guess maybe Congress could use that time back....
... that they wasted on Terry Schiavo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Shut it down, I say!
It's obviously NOT working. I think the first to feel the pinch should be those whose policies have created the mess in the first place.

From here on out, all high-ranking officials in State & Federal Gubmint should make no more that $25,000/per year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
23. Bad move Olympia
You're up for reelection next year - have you forgotten?????

If Maine has a bad winter and people die - you will be the toasty one come election day 2006...

(not to mention that you have hooked your wagon to Frist, Delay, Cheney and the rest of the crooks in the GOP).

Shoulda shut it down....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketsquareguy Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. of course it won't be put back. those two are nazis. running the govern-
ment is less important than ONE PERSON FREEZING OR STARVING TO DEATH! when
will these fuckers be voted out of office, the worthless asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
26. She has no choice, like the Louisiana guv. n/t
stop social security checks from going out or....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here's an idea: Let's take a few billion from the Pentagon so that the...
...program can remain fully funded? Oh, silly me, I forgot, we can't ever talk about cutting their budget....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo411 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. How about suspending their pay instead.
Why is it that they feel the need to take from the poor and needy in order to pay their own salaries while they look for ways to take more from the poor and needy.

Posted by Bravo411
http://bravo411.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. Compassionate conservatism at work! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. So which states are the other "dozen" that decline 75%?
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 06:51 PM by WePurrsevere
(bolding mine)
"Harkin argued that the lower spending would hurt 6.5 million Americans who rely on it for assistance buying food and heating oil. Because of an obscure 1990 provision, funding for Maine and a dozen other states would decline 75 percent rather than just 50 percent, Harkin said.

Snowe and Collins joined the Senate in rejecting his amendment on a 53-39 vote."

Although I'm not positive I believe NY may be one of those "dozen"... I hope not. HEAP is already too low to cover much in the way of heating expenses for NYers, especially upstate and northern where it gets easily below freezing in Jan/Feb.

Seems to me they should cut PORK crap before help that is very much needed by the poor and low income folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerOstrich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. can someone help me understand......
I use to be an ostrich and so there are still many things I haven't learned.

Based on this paragraph it sounds like there were many many different items in the temporary spending bill from Agriculture to Defense.

In order to keep the government running while those 10 bills are debated, Congress needed to approve a temporary spending measure. The measure funds everything from the Agriculture Department to the Defense Department until Nov. 18.

and I think I get this for each of those items for the temporary measure they were going to use the amount it cost this year unless what was in the pending bill was less than this years (how often does that happen?). In other words the lesser of the two values.

The level of funding in that temporary measure, however, is what was disputed. The House approved the measure Thursday setting funding at whichever is the lowest level among either this year's spending or pending legislation in the House or Senate.

I assume this means that the Senate had to either accept the thing or it wouldn't be approved because the house cut in ran (way to cooperatae on an emergency spending bill).

The problem Friday was that if the Senate made any changes, they couldn't be reconciled with the House, which had adjourned.

Okay, here is where I start getting lost. It sounds to me like the house had already slashed the program by 50% (eg this year $641 new year $320 so when I said above how often does that happen it at least happened once in this case). So it seems Harkin proposed to restore the level back to $641...but the house is already gone.

Despite that problem, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, proposed an amendment to keep funding level for Community Service Block Grants. The House agreed earlier to cut the program to $320 million from $641 million, so the temporary spending bill will distribute money at that lower number.

Harkin says it's going to hurt people blah blah. Then what obscure provision where did the additional 25% come from? So he is saying it's not really $641 to $320 it is $641 to $160?

Harkin argued that the lower spending would hurt 6.5 million Americans who rely on it for assistance buying food and heating oil. Because of an obscure 1990 provision, funding for Maine and a dozen other states would decline 75 percent rather than just 50 percent, Harkin said.


But according to this Snowe and Collins weren't alone in this as 51 of thier cohorts went with them hand in hand. Had they joined the 39 that voted for the ammendement it still would not have shut down the government would it (51-41)?

Snowe and Collins joined the Senate in rejecting his amendment on a 53-39 vote

So what does this really say? I think it says there was a planned reduction. Harkin is not in agreement with the reduction and was going to make the point even if it was an a emergency spending bill. Plus, while Snowe and Collins didn't stand up for anything they really didn't sway things one way or the other. At first I thought it was like they were just taking things out and my question was isn't there any other items that could have been slashed. However, the way I see it now is the thing approved "as is" or it shut down. "as is" for this item had the planned slash. So when they get ready to try to put it back in it's not a matter of it having just been cut for the emergency bill its the proposed cut period. Or am I way messed up on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. Why not have a "temporary cutback" for the military!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
42. Where's the Big Dog when you need him...
For all of his faults, Clinton had the stones to shut down the government rather than cave to their blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
44. Every time I read a story like this, I think of a DUer named Kanary.
She was poor, and (rightfully!) desperate to get attention for issues regarding the poor - a part of society that the Dems used to help, before most of them got fat off corporate campaign contributions.

She often worried about cuts like these, and said she was already living on the edge of survival.

Does anyone know if she's even still alive?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. I have thought of her often in the past number of months
and have no idea how she is doing - but hope she is doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC