Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeLay indicted on two new charges (TWO not one, new charges)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:19 PM
Original message
DeLay indicted on two new charges (TWO not one, new charges)
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 08:36 PM by Pirate Smile
AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - A Texas grand jury on Monday indicted U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay on two new charges including money laundering, following a conspiracy indictment last week which forced him to step aside as the second-ranking Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The new indictment, for money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering, was issued shortly after DeLay's lawyers sought to dismiss the original charge on a legal technicality.
DeLay denounced the latest action as an "abomination of justice."

The charges accuse DeLay of conspiring with two colleagues to launder $190,000 in corporate contributions to his Texans for a Republican Majority through the Republican National Committee for distribution to candidates for the Texas Legislature in 2002.

Texas law forbids the use of corporate money in political campaigns.

DeLay could face up to life in prison if convicted of money laundering and up to 20 years for conspiracy to commit money laundering.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-10-04T001036Z_01_YUE381522_RTRUKOC_0_US-DELAY.xml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's two, two, two hits in one!
It doubles my pleasure, doubles my fun!:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't drop the soap Bugman
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 09:07 PM by sasquatch
:D
I hear they get some kick ass parathion in the joint too so maybe this won't be so bad for you.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Doin' time at the Roach Motel
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
55. He'll be taking his work home with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #55
68. to Purity, Susquach, all 4 of you:
:rofl:

Bless you all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. life plus 20years?
I think they should maybe reopen one cell at Acaltraz so my kids and grandkids and great grand kids and their kids and grandkids can visit him. Live long and prosper, DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. up to 'life in prison' seems extreme to me.


Texas law forbids the use of corporate money in political campaigns.

DeLay could face up to life in prison if convicted of money laundering and up to 20 years for conspiracy to commit money laundering.

DeLay, who represents a Houston area district, had been U.S. House of Representatives Majority Leader from 2002 until last week's indictment.

Because of House Republican rules, he quit the leadership post, where he had played a key role in passing President George W. Bush's agenda including tax cuts and a prescription drug benefit for older Americans. He was able to keep his congressional seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. just heard that the law for conspiracy in TX only went into effect in 2003
Because of this the first conspiracy charge will most likely be tossed out- as the charge susposedly happened in 2002.


DeLay's defense team had filed a motion earlier on Monday to dismiss the first indictment on grounds the conspiracy charge did not apply to Texas elections until September 2003, said DeLay lawyer Dick Deguerin.

The motion was filed with state District Judge Bob Perkins, who did not rule because he is away on vacation, Deguerin said.

DeLay accused Travis County, Texas, District Attorney Ronnie Earle of "prosecutorial abuse" and denied all charges.

"He is trying to pull the legal equivalent of a 'do-over' since he knows very well that the charges he brought against me last week are totally manufactured and illegitimate. This is an abomination of justice," DeLay said in a statement issued by his office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. No.

The law that explicitly applies conspiracy to election matters went into effect in 2003. The law that applies conspiracy to all felonies was on the books at the time. The original indictment may still stand. These new charges may not, in fact, stem from a need to bolster the case at all. They may simply be additional charges.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. There was a law for conspiracy in TX in 2002, as well.
A law professor has been quoted saying the language of the 2002 law ("any felony") would include this issue but, that is the technicality being fought over. Assuming that the law against corporate donations precedes 2003, which seems obvious, and that breaking it was a felony under state law, which is what seems to be the case, then conspiracy to break that law is itself a felony under the 2002 law, even though it didn't say, "any felony, including violations of the election law".

It seems Earle is not powerless to deal with the potential lack of clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. IMHO Ronnie Earle would have NOT made
an error like this. I want more information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. This one sounds right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. In fairness, I have to agree...
And given the fact that this is DeLay, I hate saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. I can live with it
He's as much a traitor as Benedict Arnold. Life in prison for him wouldn't break my heart. Don't buy his whining--he knew what he was doing, and what the penalties were for doing it. That's why he's fighting so hard now. He thought he was God, and he got slapped for it. I just hope he stays slapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. "I AM the federal government." –Tom DeLay

10 Mind-Numbingly Stupid Quotes by Tom DeLay

http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/stupidquotes/a/tomdelayquotes.htm

Yes, a traitor like him deserves life in prison.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
86. Not at all.
Corruption among public officials is perhaps one of the most serious offenses conceivable.

When a public official breaks the rules for their own benefit, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people's lives are adversly affected.

When DeLay used his power and authority to play a key role in passing Bush's agenda "including tax cuts", people died.

Life in prison is perfectly appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like we have a VERY smart prosecutor in charge of this one. Wow!
That man is fast on his feet! DeLay tries to wiggle out on a technicality. Slam-bang he's back, with a DOUBLE-charge. Not to mention a couple of smart grand juries. Go, Texas! Throw the tyrants off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
88. One interesting tidbit I learned yesterday
In a civil case, the accused's lawyer can get access to all the evidence and get copies of it...in a criminal case they can't. Their lawyers might be able to see it and write notes but things can be sprung on them.
From my observation of Dick DeGuerin in the Houston legal scene, he is on the short list of good criminal lawyers. In the mold of Racehorse Haynes. You might remember him as defending the Branch Davidians against the gov. He takes a case for fame, money, or principles and he loves a good fight. I think he took this case for fame and money. He is good, very good.
Ronnie Earle was planning to retire but postponed his retirement to take this case. I think he views this case as a culmination of his career. Ronnie Earle is motivated by democracy and the rule of law. He has had a very successful career. However, one of his losses was the case against Kay Bailey Hutchinson. He got his hands burned badly on that one and had kept a low profile for a while. That brings me to this case. Ronnie has played hardball with the big boys and knows the score. DeLay's underlings are charged with crimes that get you prison time. My guess is that he has gotten one of them to flip on DeLay. Look for a juicy trial. Also look for them to seek a change of venue out of Austin. The town is definantly antiDeLay and liberal to boot (Molly Ivins, and Sherly Crow call it home to name a few).
Many in Texas have been stewing over the re-redistricting. It was illegal, patently political, and the court, pack with GOP loyalist, upheld the redistricting. Our DEM legislature left to prevent a quorum as a last ditch effort to get justice-and you all remember the MSM reaction to that. Tons of money was pumped into these new districts to unseat good long standing DEM's. The rural and poor have lost their voices. The rigging here allowed the GOP to pack the legislature here and add GOP seats for a majority in DC. We just got off of one of the worst legislative sessions I can remember in a long time. No offense to my northern friends but it had a distinct carpetbagger feel to it.
Many here are rooting for Ronnie so pass the popcorn, it's gonna be a good show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #88
104. Criminal case the defense lawyer is entitled to see exculpatory evidence.
Brady evidence, I believe it's called, but I could be wrong about the name there. Anyway, if there is mitigating evidence or evidence that would lead a reasonable person to assume innocence on the part of DeLay *snort* then that evidence must be turned over to DeLay's defense counsel.

I don't think there will be any surprises. Earle will subpoena every damn document that DeLay ever wrote, touched, or even thought of. I sure would like to see Eliot Spitzer as associate counsel on this :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindwalker_i Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. The other half of the laundering?
So, am I the only person who this has occurred to? DeLay sent the RNC $190,000, which the RNC promptly sent back, thus turning soft money into hard money. If this is true (tryin' to keep the innocent until proven stuff going here), then yeah, DeLay is guilty of breaking Texas campaign finance law and of laundering money.

But what about the RNC? They should also be charged with laundering money. Does this only hit one person or does it involve the organization more as a whole? Is the RNC now a criminal organization?

-mwalker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. Time to whip out RICO, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Im with Rosey Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. Great question!
I've been so ficused on the bugman I hadn't thought of the reverse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. mwalker, I think it would depend
on whether or not the RNC knew where he got the money from. I suspect that they did, or that at least some of them did. But you have to be able to prove it in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindwalker_i Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #54
70. that would depend...
Good point. It's probably not provable, but as Jon Steward once said, all you have to do is insinuate :D

I bet a lot of people would find it at least believable that the RNC knew what was going on and went with it anyway. We;'ve all followed the many instances of corruption from all over the Republican spectrum.

-mwalker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. Repeat the point over and over so even water sticks on glass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
89. Of course, they knew where he
got the money. How could they not know? Why in the world would DeLay give the RNC the money and they turn right around and give it back? There was no reason for DeLay to give it to them in the frist place - unless it needed laundering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
92. Oh, those careful phone logs!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
63. I wonder if that would be Texas jurisdiction?
The RNC is allowed to donate that money. The crime would be in knowing that they were breaking Texas law. I don't know if Texas has jurisdiction on that or not. A federal case? The DOJ? Any lawyers looking in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #63
87. They don't have to know they're breaking Texas law.
Ignorance is no excuse. It's their job to know these things. The only ignorance that could excuse them is if DeLay lied to them about the source of the finds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
77. Yes - I agree! That wouldn't be Earle's territory, so who is going to step
in to examine the other half of these dirty deals? Barely laundered campaign slush funds have been sloshing around the GOP for years now with no oversight or enforcement from *their* DOJ at all.

We need to push to get the other half of this dirty circuit exposed and prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. It would be real interesting if....
...during the arraignment it was determined that Bugman is a flight risk and he has to spend his time in a Texas hellhole with Butteff Bubba (6'8", 275lbs).

Gives a whole new meaning to the word "Bitch."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. If DeLay has to do time it will probably be where the Watergate
criminals were locked up. In Fort Grant Arizona a country club to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
61. Well, we can dream for awhile, anyhoo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Could somebody explain...
the significance of this being the first action from a new grand jury?

<The new charge was the first action from a new Travis County grand jury, which started its term Monday. Another grand jury, which ended its term Sept. 28, handed up 41 indictments in the three-year investigation.> Per MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy65 Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. New Grand Jury
I served on a federal grand jury for sixteen months our time was finished for us. A new grand jury is picked and they serve for sixteen months and the evidence keeps going on until all the eva dance is presented. If this grand jury doesn't hear it all it goes to another grand jury. In fact the case we heard was going on for five years. I was picked for a special grand jury in Philadelphia involving the Mafia. We had all kinds of witnesses from undercover agents to mafia to lawyers. I wouldn't be surprised if more indictments come down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Cool...thank you....
i'm amazed at how little i know. Would you, or perhaps somebody else know what the process is from indictment to trial? Like, how long? And, once arraigned can more charges be added and prosecuted at the same time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Same here, stillcool47
Du is a fantastic learning experience, and a great place to rant, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Two really, I heard about one on TV tonight, money laundering
what was it two counts of that or was there something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. One for conspiracy to launder
One for the laundering.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. How can you not smile
This is just sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. The arrogant little prick deserves everything he gets!
I hope there are even more charges forthcoming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hope they use RICO
He'll lose everything he ever owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. RICO is Federal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. If there's justice, they'll find a way.
He needs a serious bit of hurt. I don't care how they do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Well if they used the wires or mails or anything interstate, that MAKES
it federal, right? And with the money going into a nationwide organization like the RNC, you would think that would make it federal, too.

OOOOOHHHHHHH sweet. Prosecute the entire leadership of the Republican Party under RICO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. Well, the money laundering did cross state lines
If there is a case here, the Feds could certainly file additional charges I should think. Of course, whether they will or not is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. STOP!
Hammer Time:



Sorry for the hotlink. I've gotta get some hosting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. OT: I love your user name
I may be fifty, but that's still one of my all-time favorite books. In fact, it's been a while since I've read it- I may have to dig it out and crack it open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
62. Its on my annual required reading list.
Some books are just too good to leave on the shelf. I enjoy it every time I read it. I may be 52 years old, but there is still a young girl in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
67. I must confess...
... that my nom-de-forum is not taken from "A Wrinkle in Time" by Madeleine L'Engle. In fact, I've never read any of her works and only learned of her from fans like yourself. It was shamelessly stolen from the lyrics of a great pop song titled "Headache" by The Pixies, viz:

This wrinkle in time, I can’t give it no credit
I thought about my space and I really got me down
(got me down)
Got me so down, I got me a headache
My heart is crammed in my cranium and it still knows how to pound

{It loses a lot without the music}

Then I realized that "wrinkle in time" is what we all do.

If my assumption about your username is correct: "Be seeing you".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #67
95. Not by the Pixies!!
It's by Frank Black! I love that guy......

I was counting the rings
And I fell me into sleep
I peeked to see if you were way back when

I was counting the trees
Until a day when there was one
I'd hoped beneath, asleep is where that you had been


Yea, the music adds something, but he still writes some of the best lyrics in rock & roll today.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Can I dance!
OK, I feel like dancin'

If I drank, I'd feel like gettin' hammered.


Sometimes someone's misfortune brings a smile. This is one of those times.

Yeee haw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. OMG! I"m ROFLMAO.
I love your name, too. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
59. Love that Hammer Time. So cool. Who DOESN'T feel like dancing, by now?n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
72. Can we make Delay wear the Hammer pants in orange instead of the
jumpsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. SCOTUS: conspiracy to launder money is a crime, even if no action taken
Unanimous decision, 1/12/05


http://talkleft.com/new_archives/009284.html

In a unanimous decision in the consolidated cases of Whitfield v. U.S. (docket 03-1293) and Hall v. U.S. (03-1294), the Court ruled that a money laundering conspiracy count does not require proof of an overt act to further the plot. The ruling, written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, relied primarily upon the Court's decision in U.S. v. Shabani in 1994. The Shabani decision found there was no need to show an overt act to prove a conspiracy to commit drug crimes. That law and the money laundering conspiracy statute involve nearly identical language, the Court noted.

The law at issue can be traced back to the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986. It criminalizes the intentional transfer of money from unlawful activity, and transactions involving property that was obtained during a crime if the value is more than $10,000. As originally enacted, neither of those sections included a conspiracy provision, so the government relied on a general conspiracy statute. But, in 1992, Congress wrote into the Money Laundering Control Act a provision making it a crime to conspire to commit any offense under that Act. That was the provision at issue in Tuesday's ruling.

In the Court's prior rulings in Shabani, as well as in earlier rulings (Singer v. U.S. in 1945 and Nash v. U.S. in 1913), the Court had ruled that, where Congress omitted from a conspiracy law any language expressly requiring an overt act, the Court would not read such a requirement into the statute. That concept controlled the ruling Tuesday, O'Connor wrote.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. That's fabulous!
Thanks for posting that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. Maybe that is why Russert asked him if there was a list of donors
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 08:59 PM by kikiek
who had contributed. A breakdown of how much to send and to which campaign to send it to also. He didn't answer really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Step on this, Roach Boy!
And cue the Vonage theme!

:woohoo:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. Delay BROKE HIS WORD AND WENT BACK ON HIS DEAL TO PLEA
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 09:08 PM by Beetwasher
By trying to have the charges dismissed, he went back on his plea bargain that was speculated about when the first indictment came down. Earle struck like a viper with these charges that were all ready to go. Gave all the evidence to a new GJ w/ the final report and BAM. They only needed a day to read through it and bring the more serious charges. All because Delay is piece of vermin who can't stick to his deal.

That's my theory anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. That's what it looks like. When Delay recinded his waiver, the
Duke of Earle squished him like a bug.

From a two year max to life in prison max. Whoa, Delay thought he could just lie his way out....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
78. I suspect DeLay can't get his head around the concept that he ISN'T
all-powerful, that he CAN'T intimidate or destroy anyone he pleases to get whatever he wants. Mr. Earle is running a bully education class here, but the BugMan is flunking big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm still waiting for DeLay's apology for his role in the Clinton impeach
Until that happens I will root for him to be imprisoned for life in our Texas prison system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzsaw_23 Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. Shoulda' stayed on Bug Patrol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
38. MSNBC: Texas grand jury indicts DeLay again

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9583433/

Former House majority leader charged with money laundering, conspiracy

AUSTIN, Texas - A Texas grand jury on Monday indicted Rep. Tom DeLay on charges of conspiring to launder money and money laundering after the former majority leader attacked an indictment last week by a separate grand jury on technical grounds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. I think we should have a fundraiser to buy DeLay a big jar of Vaseline
He will need it in the slammer when they put him in Bubba Henry's cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Bubba, here's 'De Lay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
96. Bwahahahahahaha.....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. WP: Texas Grand Jury Indicts DeLay on New Charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
44. Yahoo News: Grand Jury Re-Indicts DeLay on New Charge
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051004/ap_on_go_co/delay_indictment

AUSTIN, Texas - A Texas grand jury on Monday re-indicted Rep.
Tom DeLay on charges of conspiring to launder money and money laundering after the former majority leader attacked last week's indictment on technical grounds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. ltreason
Treason is punishable by death. If Delay is found guilty of treason, for attempting to overthrow the government of the United States, and if he is sentenced to death and is placed on Texas' death row, Dubya will FINALLY have someone on death row he can pardon. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yahoo News: DeLay indicted on two new charges
(Reuters)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20051004/pl_nm/delay_dc_6

"DeLay could face up to life in prison if convicted of money laundering and up to 20 years for conspiracy to commit money laundering."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. Three indictment, anybody say four....say MORE
Pile them on. Stack them up! Fill up the room. Pile them up so high he will never see the end of it. Make him have another charge to answer to each month for the rest of his miserable life. And then get those lousy people out of the White House and put them in Jail too!

Whoo Hooo.... GET THEM ALL


:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
53. DeLay is an abomination.
I hope he get's life. Oh, please! Let him get life in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. life in prison plus 20
life in prison? I got one thing to say about that . LIVE LONG AND PROSPER, DELAY, in prison.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. WOOHOOO!! Life + 20 baby!!!
Welcome to DU Dennis00 :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis00 Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Mr Spock,
Hey Mr Spock. Glad to be here. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. How many cards have to fall--
before the House of Bush comes a tumblin' down!

:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
65. My FAVORITE Sentence In That Whole Article Is...
DeLay could face up to life in prison if convicted of money laundering and up to 20 years for conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malmapus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #65
91. Loved that too, it leaves a nice tingling sensation to say it out loud too
hhehehehehehehehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
100. LMBAO....I want to share in your laughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulGroom Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
66. This is an attempt to get Delay to plead out.
I expect the result of the new charges will be Delay pleading to the original conspiracy charge and getting a light sentence, maybe a year suspended.

Unless Delay is stupid enough to actually go to trial with life hanging over him, or if Earle hates Delay that much that he wouldn't offer him a plea. I couldn't much blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. Either way, he should be forced to resign. EOM
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
69. Hammered: Tom DeLay, Godlessness, Money laundering,
... and the fall of the Republican Congress.

Tom (The Bugman) DeLay facing Life + 20 years... Wow! That feels good when you say it out loud. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
71. Looks like the Bugman just might be checking into the Roach Motel.
Bugs check in, but they can't check out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue agave Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
75. I predict that the next charge against bugman will be
Perjury in the Abramhoff investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. oooooh, that would be very, very fine and not at all a surprise. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #75
85. You just gave me goosebumps. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
76. Well, there goes his wish to be President.....right outta da window
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
njdemocrat106 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
80. The feel-good topic of the evening
Here's to hoping that DeLay gets life in prison! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiffon Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
81. Hey now!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
82. Money laundering?
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 01:11 AM by kgfnally
Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Buh-bye. Thanks for flying. Bye, now. Buh-bye. Have a nice day. Bye. Buh-bye. Bye, now.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
83. DeLay faces money laundering charge
CNN -

Former majority leader calls indictment 'abomination of justice'

Tuesday, October 4, 2005; Posted: 4:25 a.m. EDT (08:25 GMT)

DeLay and two associates are now also charged with conspiring to illegally steer $190,000 in corporate donations to state legislative candidates in 2002 and to disguise its source by sending it through national Republican campaign committees.

In a written statement, the congressman called the indictment another example of "prosecutorial abuse" by District Attorney Ronnie Earle. (See video on DeLay's legal troubles -- 2:16)

"He is trying to pull the legal equivalent of a 'do-over,' since he knows very well that the charges he brought against me last week are totally manufactured and illegitimate," said the Texas Republican. "This is an abomination of justice."

More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. He got the "abomination" part right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
90. When Democrats were protesting about election fraud
Delay was calling us whiny sore losers and it's all sour grapes. His "abomination of justice" sounds like sour grapes to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. Losing one right to vote like interest and losing ones rep (Edwards) is
protesting inequality, not whining. This man knows nothing about democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiblazer Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
94. God is punishing Delay
I must say this again. God is finally punishing Tom Delay for his corrupt and greedy sins. Delay has always been a self-serving manipulator and he lacks any ethical or moral fiber. REAL Christians need to wake up and see that the Republican party has become an evil and arrogant tool for corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
97. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NIGHT TRIPPER Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. doubt what you say is true--sounds a little off
This is just tooooo big to be a weak case!!!--Texas Mafia may be dissapointed but who the hell cares!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #97
101. I think what you are saying is total bullshit..
Texas Democratic politicians are more sick of DeLay then the all of the DU'ers put together. They loathe him like DUer's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. snicker snicker,, oh well. Guess we lose again. Shucks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #97
105. No offense against your dad; file under category "some people say"
Just sayin' ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
99. Just heard on MSNBC that
the Rethugs don't want him back as ML. One down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
102. Yes
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC