Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'60 Minutes' to Include Clinton Camp's Denial of Freeh's Accusations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 10:59 PM
Original message
'60 Minutes' to Include Clinton Camp's Denial of Freeh's Accusations
Under strong pressure from former president Bill Clinton's advisers, CBS's "60 Minutes" has agreed to read a statement denying an explosive charge being made on tonight's program by former FBI director Louis J. Freeh. In the statement, Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, Clinton's national security adviser, challenges Freeh's assertion that Clinton failed to press then-Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to cooperate with an investigation of the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and used the occasion to ask for a contribution to his presidential library.

The Saudis made such a donation last year -- six years after the 1998 meeting.
Berger, who was at the meeting, said: "The president strongly raised the need for Saudi officials to cooperate with us on the investigation into the attack on Khobar Towers at the time when the FBI was attempting to gain access to the suspects. The president did not raise in any fashion the issue of his library."

Clinton spokesman Jay Carson said he told CBS's Mike Wallace that he had supportive accounts from five other former officials who were at the meeting, including those briefed about a private conversation between Clinton and Abdullah.

Freeh was not there, and Carson said Wallace told him he had not spoken to the source upon whom Freeh relied for his account. Said CBS spokesman Kevin Tedesco: "We will continue to report on this segment until it is broadcast on Sunday night, at which time our audience will find it to be both fair to the former president and factually accurate."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/08/AR2005100801128.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. They assume that since it is what * would have done, it must be what
Clinton did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. That's their standard response to everything.
"It is all Clinton's fault." No matter how long ago or what happens they Repuks always want to blame everything on Clinton because the alternative is admiting they're responsible for their own actions. They just won't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. These pukes are running rampant trying to pin the blame on the last...
"real" president we ever had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. They can do better
but I suppose they would prefer to live with sinking ratings and low profits.

I can't recall the last time I watched 60 minutes or any so-called news magazine show on the MSM.

Alas, I suppose they'll end up going the way of pet rocks and buggy whips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countmyvote4real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I can’t vouch for pet rocks, but buggy whips are alive and well in the fet
I suspect that they are equally alive and well, metaphorically speaking, amongst the * regime as they seek to salvage their stinking sinking ship. Sunday morning will be full of denials and accusations against mythological liberal media. Potato head will trip all over himself to defend the * regime while pretending to ask hard questions. (OK. That was easy. That happens every time.)

The truth will not be discovered on the Sunday programs. It will only be uncovered by refusing to believe their redirect. Look elsewhere and particularly look into what they discount.

This is for lurkers and not for OzarkDem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Weasels are
coming out of the woodwork trying to pass the blame.

Clinton better come out and set his record straight..he wouldn't need "advisors" for that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. forget freeh, what about the dsm?
or the strange case of dr. david kelly....fukk cbs, Corporate Bush Sukkholes (shee, excuse the distemper, but damn them 2 faced rat bastards)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I sent an email to 60 Minutes the other day
I told them that in the interest of equal time, and fairness in media, they were duty bound to interview someone to rebut the claims of Louis Freeh.

I reminded them that when they interviewed Richard Clarke about his book, they had Stephen Hadley (then Condi Rice's Deputy NSA), on to rebut Richard Clarke's claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will do what they did to Rather about the Bush AWOL allegations?
I am glad the Berger is challenging this shit. i hope Freeh gets caught in a lie. He hated Clinton and actually undermined him on several major itel operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Freeh is a big POS. He hated Clinton and is still after Clinton!
Freeh was incompetent to boot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
71. Funny ...when I saw the heading to this thread
I said the same thing...he is a POS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Freeh's a big MBNA executive,Biden's Senator MBNA,maybe they want
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:25 AM by Algorem
President MBNA,Hillary's in way ,or something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Louis Freeh
What a turncoat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. What took *'s Saudi friend's so long...
(The Saudis made such a donation last year -- six years after the 1998 meeting.)

Are the Saudi's slack on giving, or what?:sarcasm:

I'm SO sick of them blaming everything on Clinton.:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thats interesting since Freeh praised the Saudi cooperation.........
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/21/khobar.indictments/

Thirteen Saudis and a Lebanese were indicted Thursday on charges of murder and conspiracy for the 1996 bombing that killed 19 American servicemen in Saudi Arabia. The indictment alleges that the suspects were directed by Iranian government officials.

The 46-count indictment alleges that all 14 men were members of the Islamic militant group Hezbollah, which federal officials said received support and inspiration from individuals within the Iranian government. No Iranian officials were named in the indictment.
<snip>

While some government sources have criticized the Saudi government for being less than cooperative, Freeh thanked the Saudis for "world-class cooperation."

Freeh acknowledged that in the early investigative stages there was difficult because the FBI and Saudi police had never really worked together.

"I think there was an estrangement between the two services precisely because we didn't know each other," he said. "I think it was a relationship that had to grow and now is a very strong one."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Pre-911 article.
Interesting. I see Freeh as coming from the O'Neil school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. Maybe you should send this article to 60 minutes to refresh ......
Freeh's memory. I have always thought Freeh was nothing but a sleezebag who was incompetent at best. Now I read he is with MBNA a real sleezebag company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. I took your suggestion.......
and fired off an e-mail to 60 minutes. I think he is being disingenuous, mostly because he fumbled the case from the beginning and was sent to Saudi Arabia to get it on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Thank you!!!! That's great. We can watch the 60 Minutes show...
and if they don't bring this up we can all blast them for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. kick, kick, kick,
Freeh is a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
14. I agree - they should have learned their lesson from the last time NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
16. Can't wait to see the Right Wingnuts pounce on this story....
... as the epitomy of quality investigative journalism and built on a solid foundation of evidence. Even though it's they'd be calling for the shutdown of CBS if it was another expose on the Boy Prince.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. How long has Bill Clinton been out of office now?
Just checking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Freeh was the enemy from Day One. Ungrateful ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Huh? Dems get airtime? What's up with that? A trap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pearl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think they got alot of emails on this
I know I zipped one off the other day too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
22. Ever since I started reading and posting on DU, the number of news
sources I am able to trust have slowly dwindled. Not that I'm complaining mind you, I'd rather have the facts and the truth then be conned as the repukes are.

I use to watch 60 Minutes regularly. I thought they were the embodiment of true investigative journalism. Seriously I did. I have since sent them an e-mail telling them that they have lost my loyalty and viewer ship both to their program and their sponsors.

I miss the days when I was so naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I read mostly the foreign press, I want the truth. Not propaganda.
I canceled my Time and Newsweek subscriptions years ago.
Don't read the local paper or watch TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. Louie Freeh = Ghouliani's bitch nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
26. Take him to court Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. This is a Bush/Cheney/Rove diversion from indightments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
28. CBS is dumber than a bag of rocks
Why did they go though this stupid exercise? They should have allowed in the beginning what they are allowing now. Was it originally a fake ass attempt to get Clinton himself on the show? By gong this route, CBS has shown, to Dems, that Clinton bias in the MSM is still alive. They also shown to wingnuts that they will buckle to pressure, and, to the wingnuts, are nothing but Clinton toadies.
What the fuck can they do right? They sure as shit can't run a news organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. If there was any truth to any of this
They NEVER would have settled for Monicagate.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 09:53 AM by formercia
Louis Freeh should hope that his personal and professional relationship with Robert Hannsen isn't looked into to closely. I was detailed to the FBI for 9 months and had to work with Hannsen. The man was an asshole and tried to crush anyone that questioned his work. He was allowed free run of CIA facilities even after I took away his pass. Someone needs to be held accountable,for the damage done by Hannsen is far and above anything that occured as a result of Kobar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. Freeh is the guy who refused to use the $60 million Congress budgeted to
the FBI to improve the FBI's computer network, a network that would have greatly helped FBI agents to share information on terrorists. Freeh was an old school agent who didn't believe the FBI had to evolve it's computer system.

Freeh is a dolt who is following GOP tactics to blame Clinton for his screwups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Did Freeh have anything to say about the witch-burning at Waco?
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:18 PM by MetaTrope
Or the months spent by the FBI digging up landfills for evidence against Lee Wen-Ho while Saudi airline passengers were taking flying lessons in Florida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lister666 Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. It doesn't seem to have occurred to anyone ....
..that Sandy Berger is just about the last person who should be involved
in the defense here,given the recent guilty plea that he recently entered
in court,and the nature of the accusations behind to that plea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
37. Bubba's got a reputation to protect?
That's news to me. Whatta waste of airspace!

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. replace Italian with black and mob with gansta
and I think people would have called your post what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. you don't get it.i'm not a racist because you don't get it.got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. My grandfather was an Italian
and frankly I am sick of hearing that kind of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. like I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. If you have a link post it
otherwise you are simply engaging in stereotypes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. you don't know what I was engaging in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Yes I do
You are saying he is mobbed up because he is an Italian from NJ. That is stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. There you go again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Oh, he gets it. YOU don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Thanks for your misguided opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Not a damn thing misguided about it,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. That's your opinion,again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checks-n-balances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. Isn't Freeh scheduled to guest on The Daily Show this week?
Let's hope Jon stays on his toes during that one!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
40. CBS has a blog about the story that is open for comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Maybe CBS has allowed Freeh on the show...and now he is fair game
wherever he goes....could it be... that was their plan all along?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. Louis Freeh's federal campaign contributions:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mps Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. Freeh's disgust for President Clinton
Just saw 60 Minutes' Interview with Freeh. There was NO on-camera interview with anyone from the Clinton Administration debunking Freeh's comments about the Khobar Towers Bombing or about Clinton asking the Saudis for a donation for his library. There was only Mr. Wallace, off camera, telling the viewer that 2 former Clinton officials say Freeh's comments were not true.

As to Freeh's disgust for President Clinton being involved with all those investigations during his Presidency -- he pompously says he stayed as FBI Director so Clinton could NOT appoint another Director --, it is unbelievable to me for him not to say that these investigations turned out to be politically motivated. Any unbiased observer could not escape the stench of a Republican Coup d'Etat against a Legally Elected President. It seems that Mr. Freeh was part of this attempt. I wonder if one had 70 million dollars what would one come up with in Mr. Feeh's background that would put him in an unfavorable light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Hi, mps, welcome to DU!
I missed 60 Min tonight- was there anything "new" in Freeh's interview that hasn't been covered in the media?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. It was obvious. What a one-sided hatchet job.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 10:14 PM by BiggJawn
I thought i was listening to Gush Pflegmball, not CBS...

And did you catch Andy Rooney's No-Ball drivel tonight?
Overhead utilty lines? F'Cricso's sake, Andy, you think you gotta look at wire NOW....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #45
72. I saw it too. The so-called "rebuttal" was a joke
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 12:28 AM by Julius Civitatus
It basically involved Mike Wallace saying off-camera that some Clinton officials deny Freeh's claims. That's it. No other counter-interviews, no other testimony. Shame on CBS for allowing this farce on the airwaves.

The show was a huge platform for Freeh to lash out against Clinton, unrestrained, and without any counter-balance. It was disgraceful. I thought Mike Wallace had more integrity than this. What a joke!

One thing that was evident all through the interview was the disdain, no, rather disgust that Freeh feels about Clinton. His face contorted in a sour grimace every time he mentioned Clinton's name. It was an atrocity. If one thing was clear was that Freeh was not qualified to serve his post. He made many of his decisions with a rabid political hatred for his president, and went out of his way to counter the presidential powers (including staying in his post until a Republican president could name his successor-- yes, he said that). And let's not mention the way he facilitated the never-ending investigations of the Clintons on flimsy evidence.

He should have never been in that position. If there's something to bash Clinton about, is the fact that he nominated this imbalanced partisan to such an important post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drummo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. Freeh had the same feeling about John O'Neill
O'Neill, just like Clinton, was fairly flamboyant. Not exactly a straight-laced guy. He had a girlfriend while he was married and he didn't told her girlfriend about it.

The PBS documentary about O'Neill discussed the rift between Freeh/Pickard and O'Neill.
I'm sure O'Neill left the FBI because he had enough of the HQ.

Watch the doc here:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/knew/view/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
53. Did they ask about 9/11?
Hey, Louie... why did you happen to resign a month before 9/11? Did you know something big was gonna happen, and wanted to avoid getting blamed for the FBI's biggest fuck-up ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mps Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Interesting History On Freeh and his tenure at the FBI
From Jon Perr at his Perrspectives Blog:

"Freeh at Last: Revenge and Revisionism at the FBI

On Sunday night, former FBI head Louis Freeh will introduce his salacious new Clinton tell-all book, My FBI, on CBS 60 Minutes. For Freeh, the book is an opportunity not only to cash in, but to lash out. Scolded by the 9/11 Commission and savaged by the critics of his tenure at FBI, Freeh is now getting a chance to tell his side of the story. It's too bad he doesn't seem to be telling the truth."

Read the rest of the article at

http://www.perrspectives.com/blog/archives/000264.htm

Had CBS had the foresight to put Richard Clarke on as a Rebuttal Witness to Freeh's machinations, it would have been a real great television moment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Freeh obviously can't spell.
The title of the book should be "My FIB."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
58. Twisting political spin into "news"
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 08:33 PM by BrightKnight
It is made of hot air like a clown's balloon animal. It is troubling that CBS would air this kind of sensationalized pseudo-story.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Didn't Bush withold
like 75% of official records concerning the Clinton admin. from the 911 commission, even though Clinton had OKed turning them over?
We need the truth to come out in so many ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
59. Too bad Berger is the guy who was there.
Being a convicted criminal re: those stupid papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. convicted criminal? Berger?
When did this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. He plead guilty to
removing classified documents from, I believe, the materials gathered for the 9/11 commission. I think he lost his security clearance and paid a $50,000 fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #62
77. Couldn't they get somebody else?
I understand that Clinton didn't want to respond personally, and that Berger admitted to something less than earth shattering, but couldn't they have got somebody who isn't embroiled in his own scandal to be the point man for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. Well, Berger was THERE at the conference in question
so you woul have to trade one credibility for another. You could have the pope out front, but he wasn't there; the guy who was there wasn't the pope. So you're stuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
64. Why did Clinton nominate Freeh in the first place? THEN, why
didn't he just fire him? I thought all these people serve at the pleasure of the President?

I know it's probably a bit wrong to compare the actions of Corp. American with Gov't, but Corp. America is all I know. If someone is hired in a senior mgmt position, and there's a personality problem with the top guy...THAT MGR. IS GONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. Yup. I was wondering the same thing.
Why did Bill not fire him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #64
75. I recall Freeh was a Clinton olive branch to the CONs.
Clinton also stopped the Iran/Contra investigation.

I hope we learn from the CON response, just how worthwhile the CONs really can be. That is, CONs are not worth any trouble at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
66. How about an expose on Freeh's crazyass Opus Dei while they're...
at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
69. Freeh's trying to sell a book.
I guess he thinks he'll have better sales if he rehashes Monicagate one more time.

Most people see the Clinton investigations for what they were - law enforcement and partisan politics run amok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. Making Sandy look bad
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 12:49 AM by MattP
The dumbest thing I heard the other day while I was checking in on Gop tv was Hume saying they caught Beger doing 88 on the freeway and the judge in his case said he might do time for it, the same judge ignored prosucuters suggestion of a 5000$ and gave him a 50000$ saying how serious it was, what bullshit I do 90 every damn day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
74. Humm.....Freeh wouldn't comment for Frontline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC