Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US regret over diversity convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 05:43 PM
Original message
US regret over diversity convention
THE US said a diversity convention UNESCO adopted today could jeopardise the free flow of goods and ideas under the guise of protecting world cultures. "The US is very disappointed by the decision of the general conference to adopt the convention," the US State Department said in a statement. "The US is a multicultural society that fully supports the diversity of cultural expressions at home and abroad. We are committed to free trade and we regret that the convention reflects the efforts of some countries to advance an agenda of trade protectionism under the disguise of protecting cultural diversity.

"We also support the free flow of information and we regret that the wording of the convention could be misread to allow some governments to justify restricting this flow of information," the statement said. The United States found itself isolated in the international culture forum UNESCO, which approved the convention that supporters hope could help slow Hollywood globalisation.

The "Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions" was approved by an overwhelming majority of the 191 member states at UNESCO's biennial General Conference, with only Israel joining the United States in opposition. Australia was one of four countries that abstained.
Even Britain - normally Washington's reliable ally but currently constrained by its six-month presidency of the European Union - joined the majority, with ambassador Timothy Craddock describing the text as "clear and carefully balanced".

Just two years after the United States returned to the Paris-based body following a 19-year boycott, the vote was likely to be seen by conservative supporters of President George W. Bush as new evidence of anti-American bias in the United Nations.
The US ambassador to UNESCO, Louise Oliver, criticised the treaty, saying it might be used to impede rather than facilitate the circulation of cultural property, and that it could be used to justify human rights violations.
Vigorously championed by France and Canada, the diversity convention is held up by supporters as a vital tool for combating English-speaking cultural standardisation.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16988671%255E1702,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to see that the good ole USA has so much clot int the world after
Bush!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. This story lost In the Fitzmas shuffle
My husband told me about it and I looked it up and hardly could find anything about it from the media (surprise surprise), then I did a search and of course a DU'er knew about it. This is just so sickening, and predictable. Free trade, yeah sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. soooo predictable too imho
i can see the us being opposed just on general bushista principles, but israel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC