The Federal Opposition has accused the Government of being "drunk with power" after announcing it will present two major pieces of legislation into Parliament on consecutive days. The Government plans to introduce the anti-terrorism laws on Melbourne Cup day and the workplace relations package the day after. Labor's Stephen Smith thinks it is proof the Government is out of control. "This whole process angers me because what we find is a Government drunk with power, arrogantly ramming things through the Parliament," he said. Labor argues it is crazy to introduce bills on Melbourne Cup day. Federal Opposition Leader Kim Beazley thinks Prime Minister John Howard has stooped to new depths by introducing the bills on Cup day.
Mr Beazley believes Mr Howard is trying to hide behind the famous horse race to avoid scrutiny of the legislation. One of the major sticking points with state and territory leaders has been the shoot-to-kill policy in the package. "Now we've seen them do some pretty low things over the years but hiding behind Australia's great national sporting event, the Melbourne Cup, to have Parliament debate and pass through your shoot-to-kill laws is as low as you can go," Mr Beazley said. But Prime Minister John Howard disagrees. "The idea that Parliament, having decided to sit on Melbourne Cup day, you somehow or other calibrate the legislation to introduce on that day is ridiculous," he said.
The Government wants both bills debated on the day they are introduced. Mr Howard says he has had discussions about the anti-terrorism legislation with some state and territory leaders and he believes the talks are progressing well. "I have spoken to three of them and I hope to speak to more of them today ... and I think we are making quite good progress," he said. Victorian Premier Steve Bracks believes the Federal Government is prepared to compromise over the shoot-to-kill provision.
The states have raised objections about the shoot-to-kill provision, saying it was not part of the original Council of Australian Governments (COAG) agreement. Mr Bracks says he spoke to Mr Howard yesterday and suggested a compromise that would make the legislation reflect the original agreement. "That could be done by using the existing criminal code and not required to have behind preventative detention any other special arrangements," he said. "The Prime Minister supports that and we'll seek some other legal advice on that matter."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200510/s1491150.htmthis sounds familiar