Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers To Senate Intelligence Panel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:31 PM
Original message
Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers To Senate Intelligence Panel
Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers To Senate Intelligence Panel
By Murray Waas, special to National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Thursday, Oct. 27, 2005

Vice President Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, overruling advice from some White House political staffers and lawyers, decided to withhold crucial documents from the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 when the panel was investigating the use of pre-war intelligence that erroneously concluded Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, according to Bush administration and congressional sources.



Among the White House materials withheld from the committee were Libby-authored passages in drafts of a speech that then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell delivered to the United Nations in February 2003 to argue the Bush administration's case for war with Iraq, according to congressional and administration sources. The withheld documents also included intelligence data that Cheney's office -- and Libby in particular -- pushed to be included in Powell's speech, the sources said.

The new information that Cheney and Libby blocked information to the Senate Intelligence Committee further underscores the central role played by the vice president's office in trying to blunt criticism that the Bush administration exaggerated intelligence data to make the case to go to war.

The disclosures also come as Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald wraps up the nearly two-year-old CIA leak investigation that has focused heavily on Libby's role in discussing covert intelligence operative Valerie Plame with reporters. Fitzgerald could announce as soon as tomorrow whether a federal grand jury is handing up indictments in the case.

Central to Fitzgerald's investigation is whether administration officials disclosed Plame's identity and CIA status in an effort to discredit her husband, former ambassador and vocal Bush administration critic Joseph Wilson, who wrote newspaper op-ed columns and made other public charges beginning in 2003 that the administration misused intelligence on Iraq that he gathered on a CIA-sponsored trip to Africa.

http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1027nj1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like Dick's getting in more hot water -- ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I picture it more as boiling oil ...........eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike_The_Computer Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
119. And what happens when a Dick's dunked in hot water?
Shrinkage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #119
130. That's cold water.
Hot water makes limpage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms liberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #119
140. Had to say...
Welcome to DU! I love your username...one of my favorite books is Moon is a Harsh Mistress. I keep wondering why it's never been made into a movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politick Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #140
154. Because
they'd screw it up.

Wait, that's not a very good argument, is it? I think they purposely see to screw great books up.

I don't know either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #140
158. Ummm...
You ever see the movie "Starship Troopers"??

And you want them to make a movie of "Moon"?

Oh! The horror!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
129. A dick in hot water...
not a pretty thought. Unless, it's a hot dog, of course, and Cheney ain't.

See Dick.
See Dick lie.
See Dick lie some more.
See Dick get caught.
See Dick run, run, run all the way home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh what a tangled web we weave
When we practice to deceive.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ruh-Row!
This could be bad, scooby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
112. Sure could
So much for the GOPer argument that "everyone had the same intelligence."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
138. Rheney,Ribby&Rove reads roo ra rog round..right Rush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. And Pat Roberts knew damn well and was complicit every step of the way.
THAT is why he won't allow the panel to finish their job that Kerry demanded with nine other senators in that DSM letter of inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. pats name popped into my head immediately
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Remember when we mediablasted to get them to notice and no media picked
up on it or even bothered to report it?

Roberts was an obvious suspect when he planted those Rove talking points against Wilson into an official report.

He sealed his complicity when he wouldn't allow DSM inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Yeah, but how pissed must Hatch be? And Snowe?
They were lied to too (presumably).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Hatch and Bond were in it with Roberts.
I doubt Snowe was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. No kidding, this is really damning to Roberts
<snip>

After the release of the report, Intelligence Committee, Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Vice Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said they doubted that the Senate would have authorized the president to go to war if senators had been given accurate information regarding Iraq's programs on weapons of mass destruction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Pat aided them all the way - watch the rats run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
83. I read an article about a month ago of his own blocking of the papers.
But I can not find it now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
116. Here is the Pat Robertson story
Senate Intelligence chairman quietly 'fixed' intelligence, and diverted blame from White House over Iraq

Larisa Alexandrovna

Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, President George W. Bush issued an order to the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department, and his cabinet members that severely curtailed intelligence oversight by restricting classified information to just eight members of Congress.

?The only Members of Congress whom you or your expressly designated officers may brief regarding classified or sensitive law enforcement information,? he writes, ?are the Speaker of the House, the House Minority Leader, the Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, and the Chairs and Ranking Members of the Intelligence Committees in the House and Senate.?

-snip-
But what was said to be an effort to protect the United States became a tool by which the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Pat Roberts (R-KS) ensured there was no serious investigation into how the administration fixed the intelligence that took the United States to war in Iraq or the fabricated documents used as evidence to do so.

Coupled with limited access to intelligence documents, RAW STORY has found that Roberts and a handful of other strategically-placed Washington players stymied all questions into pre-war intelligence on Iraq and post-invasion cover-ups, including the outing of a CIA covert agent, by using targeted leaks and artfully deflecting blame from the White House.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/HowSenate_Intelligence_ch...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #116
152. That's a great rundown of the story on Pat Roberts' coverup.
Pat Robertson, of course, is another evil matter. heheh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neohippie Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #116
155. broken link
can someone point me to this story about Pat Roberts. and the executive order.

That link is broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
141. I hope Roberts gets indicted.
I'd like to see him do the ol' perp walk.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. impeachment
a real possibility...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Yoo hoo! Congress! You've been lied to over and over and over again.
Are you ever going to care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
48. One side of the aisle might.........
the other side? :shrug: They're all lying right along with them, why should they care? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
92. you'd think they would get tired of being lied to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
42. Resignation of the VP is damn likely, at a minimum
Remember, Condi cancelled a slew of appointments in Canada and raced home last night. She is probably the replacement for Cheney.

Question follows: who replaces Condi? Bolton? God save us all!!!!!

Cheney KNEW THIS WAS COMING. Once Judy's lawyer started bitching, he started househunting and bought that mansion right up the road from Rummy. He probably was HOPING it would blow over, but he was clearly planning all along for this eventuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. I didn't know condi came back to DC!
I have been gone all day and am trying to catch up. That is very interesting. wouldn't her replacement have to go through a senate approval process? How about condi, can he just sit her ass in the VP slot? OMG...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
62. Yes, she would have to get a Senate upcheck
But hey, they upchecked her as State. There is no reason why they wouldn't do the same for the VP job, absent any indictments, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #62
80. Remember, she lied to them too. If they're pissed enough she's toast too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #62
103. but Hadley was apparently involved; he was her asst when she was
National Security Advisor......he now has her job

if he's involved, isn't she??

as secretary of state, she's high on the list of presidential succession

The Vice President Richard Cheney
Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
President pro tempore of the Senate1 Ted Stevens
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez2
Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao3
Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
Secretary of Homeland Security4 Michael Chertoff
NOTE: An official cannot succeed to the Presidency unless that person meets the Constitutional requirements.
1. The president pro tempore presides over the Senate when the vice president is absent. By tradition the position is held by the senior member of the majority party.
2. Carlos Gutierrez was born in Cuba and is ineligible.
3. Elaine Chao was born in Taiwan and is ineligible.
4. In late July 2005, the Senate passed a bill moving the Homeland Security secretary to number 8 on the list. The bill is awaiting House approval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #103
109. If she can establish and maintain plausible deniability
she can make it through the gauntlet. Of course, it all depends on who is singing, what indictments come down, and the direction that the Special Prosecutor is taking. She could easily end up as a witness rather than a co-conspirator, depending on how the chips fall.

Of course, she could have rushed home from Canada to take advice from a lawyer--we won't know until the great unsealing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #103
115. I have a feeling that Hadley is on the Fitzmas list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #103
134. Shit Ted Stevens! Now thats a psycho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #62
149. I think that's "upchucked"
not "upchecked". :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. Condi left Canada earlier than scheduled, cancelled some interviews..
She apparently seemed very testy with reporters questions at times. Maybe this plamegate thing is fraying her nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
82. some Canadian reporter said that after a phone call she flew out early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
117. The XXV Amendment
Who ever takes the VP nomination would have to win the support of both houses of congress. Here is the text of the 25th.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDMENT XXV
Passed by Congress July 6, 1965. Ratified February 10, 1967.

Note: Article II, section 1, of the Constitution was affected by the 25th amendment.

Section 1.
In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Section 2.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Section 3.
Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 4.
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. If he resigns I get to do something special:
I get to remove Dick's evil mug from the school cafeteria bulletin board with "OUR LEADERS" in big red letters above it. It's already been approved by the principal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Sometimes, it is the most local thing that can make us feel ALIVE!!!
We will be with you in spirit! Do poke a tack through his eye before you haul him down for us, now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #49
147. Truly something to look forward to!
(Poke him in the eye for me, too!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Condi is a WHIG
she will not be replacing anybody.

The only thing Bush will be able to do if he is lucky is to nominate the next VP. Then it is up to Congress.

BTW: Where did you here about Condi running home last night? Interesting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. How close to that bunch is she, though?
Did they have minutes of their meetings? Has she put anything in writing? Does she have plausible deniability (to quote Nixon's bunch)?

I heard about Condi's fast dash home here--there was a thread on it, somewhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
66. She was on the trip to Africa
where the memo was passed around. She was in on it from the beginning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. Yeah, but she had good reason to be on that flight
She was National Security Advisor at the time. Hell, even the SECSTATE was on the plane.

Her presence on that flight is not in and of itself a warning flag. It is logical to bring your NSA on diplomatic trips, especially when visiting regions we have given short shrift to in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Another Possible CoIncidence--Suspicious Timing
I wonder if Harriet Miers got a letter of intent from the grand jury and withdrew today because of it. It's fascinating, watching the rats scurry--or is it cockroaches in the light?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. If she touched any of those documents, if she KNEW stuff was
being withheld from the Senate, destroyed, whatever...she is in it up to her ass, and indeed, VULNERABLE. You cannot hide behind privilege when you are breaking the damn law.

You could well be right on that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
127. the far right pulls the strings, condi will not be VP
It'll probably be Vice President Hastert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #127
163. NO, they know Denny is reliable where he is at
Why move him? He gits it done in the job he has. Plus, he is too fat, does not translate well to the national stage, and does not have a media persona.

If not Condi, it will be some cretin in the Cheney mold--Hastert, with all his faults, is way too moderate for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
148. Damn right, all the roads lead to impeachment of Cheney
and if Fitzgerald impanels a new grand jury to look into the forging of Niger documents, as it is being reported this morning, this could well lead into criminal indictment of Cheney and perhaps Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Veeeery interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
63. Preparing the public-these are no longer leaks-more tidal waves
of info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #63
145. Yeah!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Cheney must be impeached before Bush
I look forward to seeing them both brought up on charges, sooner rather than later. Maybe tomorrow, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is not good for them, boys and girls.
Not good at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is that Blood I smell?
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 03:45 PM by BadGimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. I keep thinking about
Joe Wilson's descriptions of the neo-cons as a cult. A small cult that has taken over our government. The good news, there is only a few of them. The bad news is all the enablers that refuse to name them for what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
75. Seymour Hersch as well...I have
heard him on a number of occasions say the invasion; neo-kon agenda; is controlled by 7 or 8 men...the only problem is WHICH 7 or 8?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Scooter, Cheney have maybe one, single, "Get out of Jail Free" card
Perhaps Fitz is waiting to see if either one of them will be the first to say "Bush knew too."

Without that, it looks to me like both Scooter and Cheney have some jail time ahead of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
108. The talk of plea bargaining has to do with the damage a 2-year
televised court proceeding will have on the minds of the voters. "The Iraq War itself will be on trial." But there would be no plea bargain if no one surrenders the bigger fish.

The Pukes didn't out just Joe Wilson's wife, but an entire operation whose purpose was to accurately assess the threat to our national security by middle east nations. What's gonna happen when people realize this wasn't just a poke at Joe?

The War on Terra is being exposed. Stay tuned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. When the war criminals are indicted, send to Fresh Landkills,gather remain
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 03:55 PM by evolvenow
That would be the best use for them, that way the families that have been trying for years to receive any remains of their loved ones will be found, and the bodies and debris can be tested with proper forensics, the truth will finally be announced to the world about 9/11 and then the whole murderous Cabal can all go to the Hague, and hopefully the war in Iraq will end, and we can have a planet creating sustainable, renewable solutions instead of endless death and destruction for the profits of a small number of wealthy psychopathic killers.



kick for the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proReality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. The more that comes out,
the more obvious it is that he has been acting as president and Bush is a figurehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sure looks like a concerted effort to leak info that insulates Bush from
the crimes of the Administration. 'Course, that doesn't leave much behind:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
57. Oh, gosh. That cartoon says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
59. Exactly...look at the sources
"...according to Bush administration and congressional sources."

Somebody (maybe Rove?) is trying desperately to throw Cheney and Libby under the bus and keep Dubya's hands clean.

Something big is happening. Really big.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #59
97. I think you are right. Something very big is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
86. Yes, I noticed that immediately...
Vice President Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, overruling advice from some White House political staffers and lawyers, decided to withhold crucial documents from the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 when the panel was investigating the use of pre-war intelligence that erroneously concluded Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, according to Bush administration and congressional sources.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #86
91. yeah, all his vaunted loyalty to "friends" gets trumped when his own
sorry ass is threatened. What a bunch of horrors those people are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximovich Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. It Get's Stickier Everyday
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 04:01 PM by maximovich
And the "Holier Than Though" align themselves with this scum?! Laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Cheney, Libby Blocked Papers To Senate Intelligence Panel
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1027nj1.htm

<snip>
Vice President Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, overruling advice from some White House political staffers and lawyers, decided to withhold crucial documents from the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 when the panel was investigating the use of pre-war intelligence that erroneously concluded Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, according to Bush administration and congressional sources.


Cheney had been the foremost administration advocate for war with Iraq, and Libby played a central staff role in coordinating the sale of the war to both the public and Congress.


Among the White House materials withheld from the committee were Libby-authored passages in drafts of a speech that then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell delivered to the United Nations in February 2003 to argue the Bush administration's case for war with Iraq, according to congressional and administration sources. The withheld documents also included intelligence data that Cheney's office -- and Libby in particular -- pushed to be included in Powell's speech, the sources said.

The new information that Cheney and Libby blocked information to the Senate Intelligence Committee further underscores the central role played by the vice president's office in trying to blunt criticism that the Bush administration exaggerated intelligence data to make the case to go to war.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. hhmmm IS that blood I smelll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. it is...
The knives are out for Cheney and the rats are fleeing the sinking ship. The main concern now is saving their own slimy selves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I smell the same thing...
...but I thought it was Dick Cheney's chestnuts roasting o'er an open fire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
121. This is going to be a good holiday season
"It's begining to look a lot like Fitzmas", and the other big holiday chart topping smash hit "Cheney's nuts roasting o'er an open fire".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Murray Waas is the #1 source for all things related
to this investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Yep. I do believe that is the scent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I'm sure the Senate will get right on this
right after they finish their investigation of the Plame leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Typical.
The usual suspects always behavior in the usual way.

Anyone surprised by this?

Sickening, but predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I don't think the constitutional writers ever envisioned
such a powerful executive branch. Withhold critical documents from those who pay the bills (congress)?

"Hiding" is what criminals deliberately do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I do. They were quite aware of the excess of Olilver Cromwell
dictator of the English Republic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Then why didn't they close down the use of
"executive order", which over the course of time leading to today has ascended in practice to defacto legislation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
56. Because in the execution of the law, the governance of the bureaucracy
and the execution of foreign policy, not to mention to direct the military, the actions of the executive cannot or should not wait for an enabling legislation for every move.

The capacity to go to war was not granted to the president because it was so dangerous to the republic. Consider how many of the revolutions of western nations led to military dictatorships. The Americans understood, anticipated, and protected against that.

The founders anticipated bad leaders. That's why there are provisions
for removal.

They tried to set up a form of government that could work to prevent abuse.

Of course checks and balances depend on periodic checking of one branch of government by another. Over time the presidency has been both weak and strong. The current administration seems to exert executive power primarily by denying the other branches the information they need to provide the checks and balances.

Obviously, a one-party government in control of all the branches has little capacity to control against ideological excesses.

As far as de facto legislation is concerned the regulatory agencies exercise tremendous capacity to put in place _rules_ without legislation. In the case of the regulatory agencies, all powers the power to write rules, regulate societal activity under those rules, and judge violations and determine penalties for breeches of the rules rests _inside single agencies_.

These agencies influence our day to day lives much more than executive orders. The reason they operate so independently is that many aspects of regulation require special technical knowledge and understanding that the legislature mostly made up of lawyers simply doesn't have. The executive can direct the agencies to some extent, and congress can attempt to limit their scope of action and budgets, but I'm more concerned about abuse there than I am in executive orders.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. Very nice level-headed explanation.
Executive orders, I suppose, then, are the lesser of two evils.

Thanks for the info. History/civic lessons always welcome. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #56
95. Wow! Your writing/explanation is so illuminating.....
...I wish somehow your exchange with Simple Trend could have a thread of it's own (so that more people could read your post!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Hey bleever - What Are They Hiding?
Time to get out the bumper stickers again.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. What are they hiding? Why are they hiding it? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. overruling advice from some White House political staffers and lawyers
Whaddaya wanna bet one of those lawyers was HARRIET?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
65. Cheney OVERRULED Bush, or that's what this article implies.
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 05:04 PM by maryallen
Now, tell me who's in charge.

My god, are the American people too dense to see what has happened under their very noses?

Uh, ... yes, it seems so ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
34. What prompted this revelation today???
Suddenly, what was them saying that the papers reflected "deliberative discussions" among "executive branch principals" and were thus covered under longstanding precedent and executive privilege is not longer important???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
89. Cushioning the blow?
The info comes from "Bush administration and congressional sources", so maybe this is something that will be brought out with the indictments :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
99. Maybe trying to buy time.
Hoping for Fitz to extend the GJ. Syria is in the crosshairs. I am sure they don't want that effed up. Who know, just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. So basicly Cheney & Scooter made up false information and
put it in Colin Powells report!!! Colin was set up to be the fall guy all along!!!

What the hell is a Vice President job??? Its not this stuff!!!

and Halliburton was the winner!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
54. So true, especially when combined with Exec Order giving
Halliburton a carte blanch with no legal recourse to Iraq...that was in 2003 I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. This dovetails nicely with a Cheney resignation
Will serve up a tasty response for those who want big heads to roll over Plamegate, and will also nicely dispose of any more of those nasty "fixed the intelligence around the war" accusations.

Cheney will still be able to run the country from his new mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
39. I predict jail time for these folks in the future...
There is just too much evidence of illegal manipulation of critical information here. It's a shame, couldn't have happened to nice people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. Jane Hamsher: "Boy when it comes to treason these clowns make Aldrich Ames
... look like a piker.

http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005/10/wheels-are-coming-off.html

And, the hurt keeps comin ....


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. The noose around Dick's neck becomes tighter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
43. This just gets better and better...
and these people have the gall to call themselves patriots! When are the people of this country going to demand that the "people's house" investigate all this treasonous behavior?

This needs to be brought to the attention of someone who can call a press conference and get it reported in "prime time." Over 2000 people of our citizens, and God knows how many others, have died or been crippled for a lie to get us into an illegal and immoral war.

Do the freepers not care about this. Are they so damned blind that they can't recognize the truth when it hits them square in the face? All patriotic Americans should be demanding answers and accountability, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. Trying to write History. or rewrite history
they will be written as traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. Kick it for later reference.nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. lets not forget their accomplice, Pat Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #50
70. And the media ...
Are accomplices, too.

Big time, huh, Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennisnyc Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
87. Roberts, the one who's supposed to be investigating this?
My, My, they are smart.
More info on Roberts at www.truthempowered.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
52. What I would like to see, if this thing takes off,
is for them to bring Powell into court and tell under oath what he knew about the whole Iraq war issue. If that were to happen I think it could potentially be more than just damaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oioioi Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
126. What makes you sure that they haven't already?
Where do you think they are getting this stuff if it isn't for good old "Palm Tree" Powell?

My guess is that "Palm Tree" saw the writing on the wall a long time ago and cut a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #52
135. I'm with you
Powell would have a chance to choose his country over these evil, corrupt assholes who are masquerading as our leaders. I really believe he would, finally, choose his country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bostonbabs Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
64. Question?....Could the families of our dead soldiers
based on the (yet to be determined) fact that this evil cabal took us into a war for profit sue in civil court for damages? I would love to see each one of them penniless and behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
118. Good question, bostonbabs! I tend to think not--there must be laws...
...that try to insulate gov't officials from the consequences of their decisions--but it is worth exploring. It sure has strong moral foundations. Also, they lied and broke laws. Maybe that would remove any legal insulation they might have. I picked up, in the last few days, a rumor that one of Fitzgerald's charges will be a conspiracy to deprive Joseph Wilson of his civil rights. What about conspiring to deprive someone of life itself? Our soldiers. The Iraqis. A massive lawsuit that could, collectively, recover all the money they've looted. And if it won't be permitted here, take it to the Hague, convict them there, and start international boycotts of any companies they are associated with, and any and all war profiteers--starting, say, with the attendees at Cheney's secret energy meetings in early 2001.

I can dream, can't I? But, really, we need some legal minds on the reparations/damages matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #118
132. Dream? It's an absolute necessity
If what you describe takes place, maybe we can then start to hold our heads up as respectable members of the global community.

Unless we do this, we will never regain any respect and we can even expect retaliation in some form or another. We all know how bush has increased the terrorist threat ten thousand fold. Does anyone seriously think there will no retaliation for the horrible wrongs that have taken place in Iraq?

In addition, we must demonstrate to the world that we will not allow something comparable to happen again. This means media divestiture. It means billions to rebuild Iraq, probably under the control of some int'l governing body and the U.S. entirely out of Iraq. It means honest elections because eventually, it's going to come out that that both elections were manipulated/stolen. See this GAO story:

http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1529




Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #132
136. Where are the good Americans?
the world is watching....and hoping....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
67. They 'forgot' to send the documents
Yeah, that's the ticket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
68. Pat Roberts and Porter Goss are slime just like their co-conspir-
ators in Congress and the White House. They deserve no quarter' they use their power for Bushm not the people that they represent. Goss did such a fine job covering Stump's tail in Congress that he now gets to do it in the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
69. Everybody is scrambling......Fitz will clean house!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
71. and the motive?
Cheney--pure evil greed-for money and for power as if he could never ever get enough, even though his days on this earth are limited and he could never spend any of it. Libby? don't know. Perhaps he is just the hanger on to the wealth and the high of being connected to the wealth and the power and we do not know his worth either at this point.

But, let us not forget or ignore Bush and Condi and Powell and others.

They ALL participated in this. Surely they were not "innocent" in their complicity. If Bush is the leader, he is responsible. If
Condi is as smart as some say in her "intimacy" with Bush, surely she was or should have been aware of this treason.

Ugh it is just too ugly and ultimately too sad when I think of the human life lost on the evil intentions of people like this.

Enjoy your new home in Maryland, Mrs. Cheney, one of the several you and Dick own. I hope everytime you turn on the shower, one of the many installed in your new mansion, it turns to blood before your very eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
73. High Crimes and Misdemeanors? Hardly! This is Treason!
Folks, this story should have every American sick in their guts at how these two men tricked Congress and betrayed the American people...

And most of all, how these two men are now to blame for the deaths of 2,000 American soldiers and Marines and 15,000 wounded young Americans.

Call it by its name: it is treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. To be fair, Treason is oft considered a "High Crime" -- maybe the highest!
But I agree with the rest. The fact that this isn't causing riots in the streets stands as a monument to the apathy of the American people and the effectiveness of the Republican propaganda machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #78
110. Hi Organism.
As much as I would like to see Bush impeached by the House and removed from office by the Senate, I would much rather see him indicted for the crime of treason and tried in a federal court where he could be convicted of a crime and sentenced.

But we are on the same page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #73
131. treason and sedition
They have conspired to destroy the peoples United States of America and turn into the Coporate Confederated States of the World.:grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
76. Wow. The DIRT on these fuckers! This is just freaking AMAZING!
This is going to make Iran-Contra look like a Cub Scout meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
79. even people who've been unaware that anything has been going on,
who are only just now finding out that BushCo have been misbehaving, and who might have trouble catching up on the whole complicated WMDs = lies story will be able to grasp the relevance of this paragraph:

Had the withheld information been turned over, according to administration and congressional sources, it likely would have shifted a portion of the blame away from the intelligence agencies to the Bush administration as to who was responsible for the erroneous information being presented to the American public, Congress, and the international community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
81. omg... "the Intel Comm. is still working on the second phase of investigat
Yeah, I am sure Pat Roberts has been up all night for 2 years working on it... :puke:

<snip>

The Intelligence Committee at the time was trying to determine whether the CIA and other intelligence agencies provided faulty or erroneous intelligence on Iraq to President Bush and other government officials. But the committee deferred the much more politically sensitive issue as to whether the president and the vice president themselves, or other administration officials, misrepresented intelligence information to bolster the case to go to war. An Intelligence Committee spokesperson says the panel is still working on this second phase of the investigation.

Had the withheld information been turned over, according to administration and congressional sources, it likely would have shifted a portion of the blame away from the intelligence agencies to the Bush administration as to who was responsible for the erroneous information being presented to the American public, Congress, and the international community.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. they are not working on it. Roberts has not called the committee together
cause he is in the thick of withholding these docs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. I know that
and you know that. apparently No One In The Media Knows that! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #85
90. This was mentioned briefly on Tweety tonight but not elaborated on.
The Left guest mentined it. It is running now. catch it if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennisnyc Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #81
88. Dems have to take back the House and get some real investigations going!
OR as Congressman Nadler has suggested, expand the scope of Fitz's investigation to include this, the use of pre-war intel, etc.

Nadler was on Hannity and Colmes talking about this last night.

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny08_nadler/FitzgeraldwarMemo102005.html

Nadler: Fitzgerald Must Broaden Investigation

“Did the Bush Administration deliberately mislead Congress about the war?

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In light of recent developments in the CIA leak investigation and other recent revelations, Congressman Jerrold Nadler today called for Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to expand his investigation to include a criminal investigation to examine whether the President, the Vice President, and members of the White House Iraq Group conspired to deliberately deceive Congress into authorizing the war in Iraq. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
93. This is Treason
Put them in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. Lets all send to Keith Olberman and ask him to report on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
96. This part is nice too:
"A former senior administration official familiar with the discussions on whether to turn over the materials said there was a "political element" in the matter. This official said the White House did not want to turn over records during an election year that could used by critics to argue that the administration used incomplete or faulty intelligence to go to war with Iraq. "Nobody wants something like this dissected or coming out in an election year," the former official said.

But the same former official also said that Libby felt passionate that the CIA and other agencies were not doing a good job at intelligence gathering, that the Iraqi war was a noble cause, and that he and the vice president were only making their case in good faith. According to the former official, Libby cited those reasons in fighting for the inclusion in Powell's U.N. speech of intelligence information that others mistrusted, in opposing the release of documents to the Intelligence Committee, and in moving aggressively to counter Wilson's allegations that the Bush administration distorted intelligence findings."

-----------

Hmmmm...wonder who the former senior official might be? Withholding information during "an election year"? CIA not "doing a good job gathering intelligence" so they just made some shit up? Good job guys. This is NOT bolstering your case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #96
125. there is that ' noble cause' thing!


But the same former official also said that Libby felt passionate that the CIA and other agencies were not doing a good job at intelligence gathering, that the Iraqi war was a noble cause, and that he and the vice president were only making their case in good faith. According to the former official, Libby cited those reasons in fighting for the inclusion in Powell's U.N. speech of intelligence information that others mistrusted, in opposing the release of documents to the Intelligence Committee, and in moving aggressively to counter Wilson's allegations that the Bush administration distorted intelligence findings."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #96
133. Evidence of how far off course they are
Hmmmm...wonder who the former senior official might be? Withholding information during "an election year"? CIA not "doing a good job gathering intelligence" so they just made some shit up? Good job guys. This is NOT bolstering your case.

This just shows how effing warped they are and how far over the top they've gone. They actually think this is a legitimate excuse.

Sick bastards. Totally, completely, wholly devoid of a conscience, sense of responsibility, or a sense of what is right or wrong.




Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
98. Indict Bush & Rumsfeld: War Crimes Act of 1996
New evidence from the general overseeing the Abu Ghraib makes it likely that a prosecutor could obtain convictions against top Bush Administration officials, punishable by life in prison or worse, concerning their role in condoning torture.

The full article is posted here:

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/10/indict-bush-rumsfeld-war-crimes-act-of.html

(This is my first post to DU, so I can't start a new thread. In any event, it is still relevant to this thread.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. Thanks for the link and welcome to DU
Crazy times huh? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #98
105. love your duer name, welcome to DU and thanks for the link! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #98
143. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
101. Why doesn't anybody ask the big obvious question?
What did Powell tell Bush about all this? Did Powell knowingly watch this major attempt to place unreliable intelligence before the public without letting Bush know there was a problem? How could Powell not tell Bush that the intelligence Bush was getting from Cheney and Libby was so flawed?

And

If Powell did tell Bush, why did Bush lie up to the last minute, when he said there could be no doubt that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction?

Why doesn't anybody in the press ask this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
102. Dirty word of the day: Pardon
Boys and girls, aren't we forgetting Bush's ability to grant presidential pardons?

Figure it this way:

1. Cheney didn't want to be VP to begin with (not far enough from the seat of power to hide in the shadows).
2. He's got a bad ticker (see 3).
3. The legal sharks are circling.
4. Cheney takes blame/credit for everything.
5. Bush grants him a pardon.
6. Cheney retires to new mansion, enjoying the profits from the last bone thrown to Halliburton (New Orleans, that is).

Don't hate me for pointing out the obvious ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. pardons
the pardon question is tricky.

What would you rather have, those responsible for this war based on lies, convicted and in jail, or the dismantling of the Republican party for years which certainly would happen if tons of pardons are thrown around.

it's a tough choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #104
111. "Tons" unlikely
Bush need only pardon those who get caught. Cheney can take a big part of the charges with him, probably clearing Scooter and Rove, Rumsfeld and Condi.

This isn't Nixon's Republican Party. Thirty years later and Republicans have lost most of their ethics (McCain is an exception).

And what does Bush care? He's done with running again. If your a Rep up for re-election, do you want to admit that Bush, Cheney, Frist and DeLay are all up to their turd blossoms in corruption? Or would you rather sit on this until it explodes like an overused outhouse and hope it doesn't go till after election day?

As for dismantling the Republican Party for years, keep in mind what happened the last time: Ford(1/2), Carter(1), Reagan(2), Bush I(1), Clinton (2), Bush II(2). You didn't keep them down very long last time and you had the press, the youth movement, and more of the electorate cared more for ethics than power.

Bush isn't going to risk what happened to Nixon. Nixon refused to protect his henchmen. For Bush that's just a way of doing business.

btw, with all the concern shown about Miers impartiality when dealing with Bush appeals, did anyone ask that of Roberts? Got the idea they were sizing Miers up for making decisions when it comes time to roll Bush's butt out the WH? Getting two of your cronies onto the Supreme Court ahead of the lynch mob's arrival seems a tad too coincidental to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #102
106. Yes, pardons are almost certain. however,
it doesn't save the pardoned party's party from being damaged in the public eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. At which point
Bush's entire agenda is deader than Jimmy Hoffa. It's a great plan, if they just want the idiot king to sit around in the Oval Office for 3 years while nothing happens toward furthering the right's agenda.

Oh, and this sort of a move would certainly put his approval ratings into the teens, making it next to impossible for the evil little fuckers in charge of the House NOT to draw up articles of impeachment, if for no other reason than to save their 2006-skins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #107
113. They still control the government
All that might happen is Bush has to sign whatever the Republicans put in front of him. They'd probably like that given the curves he's thrown them.

Besides, Bush will get on TV and put out the whole sob story about poor Cheney and how hard he's worked and how much he's contributed and it is better to be a forgiving Christian yadda yadda...

He can't possibly allow Cheney to testify. If Dick were forced to it, he'd spit nails at everyone he could take down, especially the guy who didn't bail him out of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spurt Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #102
120. Don't overlook...
...the fact that the Pres can't pardon in cases of impeachment.

Article 2, Section 2 of the constitution includes....

"...and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offences against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0749819.html

I also take issue with Dirty Dick not wanting to be vice. As I understand it he was tasked with identifying Shrubs running mate, and picked himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. It won't get that far
Nixon bailed when he was certain articles of impeachment were coming. Cheney will get just as much notice and will resign rather than face impeachment for the very reason you've given. Why risk impeachment and no pardon when you can be sunning your toes thanks to Halliburton and Bush's pardon?

And as I recall the story, Bush didn't like any of Dick's choices. Dick was first choice, but refused, so he was tasked to find a VP and couldn't find any Bush liked. That's when Bush insisted and Dick agreed.

I always had the impression that Dick would have preferred to be CoS. In the thick of things without any obvious responsibility when the outhouse burns down.

Seems to me Cheney has redefined the position of VP. It's not just about throwing rockets into the air anymore.

And that Bush/Cheney grand jury interview should be reconsidered. It looks a -lot- more like keeping their stories straight (Bush's memory being what it is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
114. DEM LEADERS NOTICE. "You voted for the war based upon lies."
Here's your out...no more bullshit "hugging the fence" on your Iraq Invasion vote for fear of appearing weak on defense.

YOU VOTED FOR THE INVASION BASED UPON LIES AND DECEPTIONS. IF YOU KNEW THE REAL TRUTH, YOU WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED. YOU TRUSTED OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF TO NOT BE DECEPTIVE AND COULDN'T FATHOM HIS ADMINISTRATION LYING TO GET CONGRESSIONAL SUPPORT.

The next Dem who doesn't take the tack above when asked about his/her Iraq Invasion vote is NOT really a Dem and/or is completely stupid.

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #114
123. npr on Roberts -Senate Halts Iraq Intelligence Investigation



http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4530810

Politics & Society
Senate Halts Iraq Intelligence Investigation

Listen to this story... by Mary Louise Kelly

Morning Edition, March 11, 2005 ·

The chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee says the probe into whether the Bush administration manipulated pre-war intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is over. Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) says since the panel earlier found intelligence to be flawed, there's no need to continue the probe. But other officials say the issue isn't dead yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #123
150. Well, I wonder if Pat is still acting as arrogant today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #114
137. A-fucking-men to that
and welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
124. "trouble at mill" UK involved too?
not only doea it implicate the US government in their quest for war with Iraq it also implicates the allied governments. Especially the UK. Most of these countries relied on this garbage intelligence and forgery to go to war to get a cut. Since there was an official UK enquiry into this very thing and Blair got off the hook. Still there is going to be more time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spurt Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #124
142. I'm wondering...
...too. When will the UK & Australian people wake up.
It is quite sad they haven't been on to it earlier, from which I choose to infer that their governments/media are similarly corrupt.
Remember Robin Cook resigned his senior position in Bliars gov't to protest the war. And Claire Short also.
But most parliamentary members chose to sanction the lies, despite being clearly told it was all bullshit.

Makes one think about the state of democracy generally across the western world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #142
146. We're fine but we're wondering about you
Democracy is actually doing rather well in the western world. Here we have an innate and well-founded concern for American imperialism. Despite being a banana sharing a cage with a 900-pound gorilla, we've stood firm against Bush's adventurism as well as his shafting us over NAFTA.

I suspect one of the reasons Condi left early had to do with the fact our reporters kept asking her about the softwood lumber fiasco. You don't want the world press constantly witnessing Canada's reaction to being cheated by it's NAFTA partner. Why do you think we were last on her list?

But you guys, two questionable elections in a row? Bush re-elected after the obviously deceitful propaganda campaign to get you into Iraq? No WMDs? Abu Ghraib? Night and Fog for alleged terrorists? Torture, torture, torture?

We're really worried about where you plan to go with this: Fourth Reich? Empire? Or are you finally going to get a grip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryxyouth Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #146
153. NAFTA was bad for Everybody
CAFTA will be worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #153
156. Don't be too sure of that
Despite the fact there is plenty of gasoline for use in Canada, we're paying through the nose for it because our domestic price must match our export price. Needless to say we export to America. Our export price is not as high as it should be because of the domestic market, and the domestic price is too high because of NAFTA.

There are about 30 million Canadians who'd like to see NAFTA trashed so we can jack up the price of gas we sell to America and use some of the profits to support our economy. And Bush is encouraging us to do just that over the softwood lumber dispute.

And right now we have a minority government, which means the current government of Canada lacks the votes to sustain itself through a non-confidence motion. Should it lose such a vote over a money bill, it must resign and we have an election.

Minority governments are usually -very- eager to please as many people as possible. Cancelling NAFTA might be one of those things offered to gain votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
128. Murray Waas blog
In my National Journal article, I mention an aide to Cheney whose name hasn't come up before in Iraq pre-war intelligence fiasco and the Fitzgerald investigation, yet has been ubiquitous in both. That is David Addington, the general counsel to the Vice President. Addington has been fairly good at exercsing his authority behind the scenes....

http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/10/i-have-brand-new-national-journal.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
139. Somebody put that man on suicide watch
The walls are tumbling down on Libby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
144. Demand resignations! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
151. Cheney needs to resign or be indicted himself.
we cannot let the MSM soft ball this, after today all of us should try to email a MSM outlet to force them to keep digging deeper and deeper......

this abuse of power must end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
157. UPDATE:Jay Rockefeller demands White House turn over docs
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 10:18 AM by RedEarth
This is from Murray Waas' site and deals with this article....

"Lost in the more significant news of the moment, the vice-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, Democrat of West Virginia, last night renewed demands on
the White House to turn over materials regarding Libby's role in allegedly distorting intelligence information to make the administration case to go to war with Iraq.

Rockefeller was reacting to a report that was posted online yesterday in the National Journal, and which I wrote, disclosing that Vice President Cheney and Libby personally overruled the advice of some political staff and administration attorneys that they cooperate with the committee probe. (see post below for more details.)

Here below is Rockefeller's statement:

"In February 2003 the White House provided input to the CIA during the preparation of Secretary Powell's United Nations speech. During the Senate Intelligence Committee investigation into prewar intelligence on Iraq, I believed it was important for the committee to obtain and review the White House drafts.

"On October 31, 2003, I wrote to CIA Director George Tenet requesting this and other White House documents. I repeated that request in writing on two subsequent occasions.

"Despite these and other efforts, the Committee never received the White House documents.

"The fact is that throughout the Iraq investigation any line of questioning that brought us too close to the White House was thwarted.

"For several years, I've called on the Committee and the Congress to get to the bottom of whether this administration misused intelligence in making the case for going to war.

"That question is no less relevant today than it was then."
posted

http://whateveralready.blogspot.com/2005/10/libby-to-be-charged-later-today.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobrit Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
159. The fall guys
The fall Guys always have to go.
Those pulling the strings always seem to wriggle out of it somehow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
160. There's something about this ...
There's something about this story that has a familiar ring to it. Are we beginning to see a pattern here?

Anyone want to take bets on how long before Cheney has to resign for health reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
161. Documents prepared at taxpayer expense are not available for taxpayer
review....Democracy or Bushtocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Judged Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
162. Cheney: Just trying to follow Paperwork Reduction Act?
Preliminary reports indicate that Cheney was just trying do do his part in supporting the Paperwork Reduction Act, according to a "person" close to the inner workings of an allegedly top secret cabal in the WH who cannot be named because they are forbidden from acknowledging that such a cabal exists and it would be illegal if they were to have their name attributed to this leak, but they will get away with it because I am only saying here that they are a "person" close to the allegedly top secret cabal in the WH.

He would never mislead the nation into war!

Also, he is not the political type.

He just lets those in the intelligence community do their job, and respectfully treats their final determinations as credible.

Notices that being a Republican is not easy because Liberals are trying to criminalize goodness, righteousness, and innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC