http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=55735Rewrite of National Park Policies Contains Damaging Proposals; New Draft Released Last Week Retains Key Elements of Earlier Overhaul by Political Appointee Who Lacks Park Experience
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Following is a press statement by National Parks Conservation Association, the Wilderness Society, Bluewater Network-A Division of Friends of the Earth, Wildlands CPR, Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Sierra Club and Natural Resources Defense Council:
As reported on the New York Times editorial page, the Department of Interior has rewritten the policies that govern protection of America's national parks, diminishing park protection and boosting commercialism as priorities for the National Park Service.
Contrary to statements by the Department of Interior last week, the proposed policies redefine the overarching duty of the Park Service, weakening references to longstanding, legal mandates that clearly emphasize preserving the country's heritage. Additional changes steer the national parks toward greater commercialization and exploitation. The proposed policies ease the way for increased air and noise pollution and increased high-impact uses previously barred from most national parks, such as Jet Skiing, snowmobiling, and livestock grazing. Additionally, the draft policies dismantle protections for existing and potential wilderness.
<snip>
A statement by the above-mentioned groups is as follows:
"Several key proposals in this current draft weaken protections for our national parklands. The changes significantly reduce clarity provided to park managers in the current Management Policies about their overarching duty to conserve park resources. The revisions could lead to increased use of snowmobiles, Jet Skis, off-road vehicles, commercialization, and grazing while weakening protections for wilderness and air quality."
"We are concerned that these changes do not reflect what Americans consistently tell the National Park Service they want in their national parks and we question the impetus for this rewrite. We renew our call for the Department to explain why these changes are necessary and who is demanding this rewrite. We believe it was a fundamental mistake to issue this proposal and urge the Department of Interior to withdraw it."