Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hutchison decries leaks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:51 PM
Original message
Hutchison decries leaks
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:54 PM by sabra

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/13023160.htm

Hutchison decries leaks

WASHINGTON _ Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, reacting to the indictment of Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff in the unmasking of a CIA agent, urged against a rush to judgment in the case and suggested that the investigation was tarnished by news leaks.

"Constant leaks about a leak investigation are not only ironic but unfair to those involved," the Texas Republican said in a statement after a federal grand jury indicted I. Lewis ``Scooter’’ Libby for perjury, obstruction of justice and making false statements.

...

"Out of respect for our system of justice, everyone needs to take a deep breath and not judge those involved until it has been proven they are anything other than innocent," Hutchison said in the statement. "Today's announcement is the middle of the process, not the end."

"The integrity of our judicial system demands an untarnished process void of prejudgments," she said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. BWAHAHAHA!!!
High Comedy indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Long Time Lurker Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Considering what she has said in the past
This is really rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tarnished by news leaks... by the defense!?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone catalog her statements of outrage against Ken Starr's leak factory?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. never heard her say one thing against Ken Starr
and she seems to think that a perjury charge against Libby during a Grand Jury investigation should be nothing - but here is her statement about Clinton and his Grand Jury testimony:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/senate.statements/hutchison.html

excerpt:

THE PRESIDENT'S APPEARANCE BEFORE THE GRAND JURY

After months of negotiation for an appearance by the President, on July 17, 1998, the President was subpoenaed to appear before a Federal grand jury in Washington by the Independent Counsel assigned to investigate multiple issues concerning the President, including issues involving potential perjury by both the President and the Intern in the Arkansas sexual harassment case, issues relating to the President's relationship with the Intern, and issues relating to alleged actions taken to influence the testimony of witnesses in the Arkansas case and before the grand jury, attempts to discredit the Intern by describing her as a 'stalker,' as 'ignorant,' and as 'stupid,' all done in an alleged effort to cover up and conceal the underlying relationship between the President and the Intern, to obstruct the right of the Arkansas plaintiff to pursue her sexual harassment claims in the Arkansas Federal Court, and to obstruct the proceedings of the grand jury itself.

After various losing motions and court proceedings asserting various executive privileges against a Presidential appearance before the grand jury, the President, on August 17, 1998, gave testimony voluntarily to the grand jury by deposition given in the White House and piped live to the grand jury. The prior subpoena was withdrawn by the Independent Counsel.

During and since this appearance, the president has repeatedly acknowledged publicly that he had an inappropriate relationship with the White House Intern but has insisted that he was misleading but truthful in his depositions in the Arkansas case and before the Federal grand jury and did not commit any act that would constitute an obstruction of any legal proceeding or the rights of any party associated with any portion of this historic tale.

...more...

and then the bitch goes on to vote for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who takes her seriously anymore?
She's a joke even to other GOP Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. OH. MY. GOD. Her hypocrisy knows absolutely no bounds.
They practically had daily press briefings on what was going on the in the Clinton "investigation." There were so many leaks it was like the Titanic.

Is she up for re-election in '06? I will donate huge $$ to her opponent whenever her term is up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. You just keep trying to plug that sieve, Kay.
I for one can't see it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this a press release from 1998?
Oh, it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rights for the accused? Hey, what about rights for the victims of crime?
Like, um, say Halliburton for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hutchison decries her shit stinking
Put a cork in it already. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:05 PM
Original message
Funniest thing I have ever seen was Kay B. H. being thrown out of the ...
Petroleum Club because she wasn't a member and showed up with a non-member. A few members requested she be removed, including Cecil Green....they couldn't stand her....She was fuming....But the reality is, all members have the right to request a non-member removed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Notice they keep trotting her out and no one else?
Is she the legal/ethical voice of that rotten bunch?

I think this has something to do with the Delay situaion. Remember they keep bringing up her indictment by Earle in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I think she is for the "women point of view"
I think it is strange she has become the main lead in talking points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I remember this happening to some extent during the Clinton persecution.
At some point, when the Monica crap started gaining momentum (because it soon became the one thing that people realized would "stick"), all of a sudden, you had people you'd never heard of before - out speaking for the Democrats. Most of the big-name people were in hiding, probably out of embarrassment, or perhaps because they just didn't want to deal with it, take the beatings in public, and have themselves perceived as somehow attached to the Clinton mess. So all of a sudden you had a guy like Lanny Davis and a few other never-heard-of-'em's out in high-profile "spokesman" positions on the talking head beat all the time. The A-team'ers and the marquee names were all MIA.

So now, we have some GOPers like the IDIOT kay bailey hutchinson (sorry, she now forfeits her capitalized initials), and others like ed rogers (a bush-the-first mid-level advisor), and GOP attorney brad (WHO?) blakeman (WHO???).

The pattern repeats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. They'd truck John Cornyn out but are scare to death that
that he might start talking about Box Turtles. So they figure that Kay Bailey Hutchinson is a little stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. what a stupid piece shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Relax, Kay. The bastard is guilty as hell, but we'll give him a fair trial
don't be such a worrier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Memo to Kay: No one gives a shit what you think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. And how many of those "leaks" KBH decries...
can be attributed to Patrick Fitzgerald's office?

Oh, that's right. The leaks were coming from the DEFENSE attorneys!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fitz is not leaking anything- can these guys ever NOT lie? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mokawanis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. hutchison is a hack
and makes me :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. The ..
.... bag-o-hammers or is it box-o-rocks ladys speaks again. You'd think she'd shut up and let us guess that she's stupid, rather than speak and remove all doubt.

This is not a "leak" case. It never was a "leak". It was the intentional divulging of classified information for political ends.

"Leak" is what Kay does in her Depends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. I know what she is and am sure everyone except
wingnuts also know. What a lovely person, not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. Say What?
that was the tightest investigation I had ever seen and it was the lawyers that did most. Frankly, I think that the Admin cannot attack Fitgerald directly so Kay Bailey it the puppet stooge You know, one day someone needs to access the WH fax and alter the talking points before they go out....well, just a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why worry about a little technicality? Where is her sense of
proportion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Since there wasn't ONE leak in the
investigation so far, I think she can be certified as class a repuklican liar. The leaks from the Starr investigation should have been prosecuted as the illegal acts they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. What Fantasy-World Is She Living In?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. I wonder if that wonder of pancake make-up ever...
listens to her own bullshit. Jesus H. Christ! I think, out of respect for the America that was, Hutchison should probably do what she does best, quit the senate and go to work for Max Factor as a PR shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC