Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Gets Injected w/ Social Issue(might encourage sex)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:54 PM
Original message
Cervical Cancer Vaccine Gets Injected w/ Social Issue(might encourage sex)
WP: Cervical Cancer Vaccine Gets Injected With a Social Issue
Some Fear a Shot For Teens Could Encourage Sex
By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 31, 2005; Page A03


A new vaccine that protects against cervical cancer has set up a clash between health advocates who want to use the shots aggressively to prevent thousands of malignancies and social conservatives who say immunizing teenagers could encourage sexual activity.

Although the vaccine will not become available until next year at the earliest, activists on both sides have begun maneuvering to influence how widely the immunizations will be employed.

Groups working to reduce the toll of the cancer are eagerly awaiting the vaccine and want it to become part of the standard roster of shots that children, especially girls, receive just before puberty.

Because the vaccine protects against a sexually transmitted virus, many conservatives oppose making it mandatory, citing fears that it could send a subtle message condoning sexual activity before marriage. Several leading groups that promote abstinence are meeting this week to formulate official policies on the vaccine....

***

The jockeying reflects the growing influence that social conservatives, who had long felt overlooked by Washington, have gained on a broad spectrum of policy issues under the Bush administration. In this case, a former member of the conservative group Focus on the Family serves on the federal panel that is playing a pivotal role in deciding how the vaccine is used....


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/30/AR2005103000747.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. what next? "Turn your head and cough?" is out too? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
91. No. Male sexuality is just boys being boys don't you know
(unless they like other boys, of course). Females must be controlled, at all costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh holy fuck!! This disease is passed to women from men
Conservatives ought to deal with the fucking men instead of potentially blocking a vaccine that would prevent cancer in women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. and that shows you exactly
how they feel about women. we are nothing but chattel to them. FUCK THEM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
50. Conservatives are MEN
Any other conservatives are the women that believe they (men) could never possibly even look at any other woman! Men find it very hard to believe any action of the male is ever harmful, be it abuse of wife, child, mother, nun, or right up to even murder of the female.
Just check out history for this truth of the worst miscarriages of justice right here and the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. The religious will be the death of this country. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
65. or at least a lingering malignancy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. A legacy of TALIBORN again Fundy Nut-Jobs
amerika = land of religios whack-jobs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
90. i am SO fucking sick of fundies.
Today I was out and about collecting pieces to put together a couple of fans for the north bridge of the nForce2 chipset in my uncle's computer. Everywhere I went, I heard conversations about "god" and "church." In this county, there are very, very few liberal churches.

I was born and raised here and now I feel like I don't belong.

LH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hi, god has punished me w/cervical cancer. wanna have sex ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am so sure
that worrying about cervical cancer has kept knees closed for centuries.

Yeah, right.

Didn't bother ME any!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good one, TallahasseeGrannie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Going out to dinner encourages sex

Better ban it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. being nice to someone can make you seem lovable
better stop that shit right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
71. Having a conversation with a guy is as good as an invitation
to have sex. No more talking between the sexes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. My neighbor died a horrible death July -04 from fuckin cerv. cancer.
Tell her 2 children, 14 & 12, why it should not be prevented.

Focus on the Family is a fucking terrorist organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. BINGO
I could not have said it better myself.

Someone had better stand up to these sick, sick, bastards.

If the Democratic party doesn't do it, than I say THE HELL WITH ALL OF THEM!

I AM SICK OF THIS SHIT!

Keep your freaking Bible out of our schools, our hospitals, our bedrooms, and OUR BODIES!

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
76. Just nominated them for the Top 10 Conservative Idiots
Should get a lot of "just plain evil" icons. http://www.democraticunderground.com/top10/nominate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. what is the noodly appendage?
I am so curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. The "noodly appendage"...
is the hand of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

When the fundies invented "intelligent design" as a way to get the Book of Genesis taught in science classes (because the Bible is just so scientific, y'know?) a scientist posited that the Earth was created by a flying spaghetti monster.

Now Flying Spaghetti Monsterism is kind of a running joke on the Internets. People who call themselves Pastafarians are praising this flying spaghetti monster...it's all in great fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. omg *snort*
now I get it. That is hilarious. Yeah, I'd been seeing it a lot on the internets too. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Got it? Well, get it MORE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. That is friggin' sick
Let a woman die of cancer.

The thing is, they need the vaccine even if they're married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Tell me about it
According to their sex education, if you are faithful in marriage that solves ALL PROBLEMS. You won't need contraceptives and you won't get any sexual diseases. Wanna buy a bridge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. There really should be a limit to how much of this fundamentalist shit
we are willing to put up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
72. It's got to get so bad that it slaps the moderates in the face. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Isn't the easiest solution
to group it into a multi-vaccine like the MMR shot that was created because certain people thought that vaccinating chidren against the measles was a bad idea (because measles infection creates immunities that the vaccine does not) but that not vaccinating against rubella and mumps was a worse idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Mark that, Banning X-nity is the easiest solution.
n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Uh...
Being a teenager itself kind of encourages sexual activity.

You mean...people have sex? I'm shocked! I'm appalled!

Why don't these histrionic fundamentalists stop trying to force their beliefs on all people, since they don't speak for all, and let families deal with young people on their own?

:wow:

Also, vaccinations might keep people from dying.

Now we wouldn't want that, would we? No, we've got to be stern and domineering and insist that teenagers will, uh, just stop doin' it.

Yeah. That's reality.

There will be a sudden wave of people who hold off until their first marriage, probably sometime between the ages of 25 and 35.

Right!

And pigs can fly!

God, denial is stupid.

I think these pinheaded ultra-conservatives deliberately want to pick a standard so unrealistic it is bound to fail. Then they can whine about how it must be everyone else's fault.

Know how my parents kept me aware of this issue? They talked to me every day. Didn't spend one minute relying on some stupid meddlesome group of cranks.

I'd wager the majority of spread of STDs occurs in adults anyway. So why are we turning everything about kids into a big scary rigamarole?

It's nice to blame kids. Then you can feel smug about yourself.

:grr: :nuke: :sarcasm: :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
47. But that would be anti-family...
to let families deal with this sort of thing on their own.

And the it doesn't matter that the vaccines keep people from dying. It's not as if we're talking about fetuses or brain dead people. I mean, then it would be a big deal, but healthy young women dying? C'mon!:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. i hate these fuckers
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 08:07 PM by JI7
forget about the women whose lives could be saved. it's about their own need to promote their stupid fucking agenda. fucking assholes.

oh, no, lets not save the women because people might have sex. fucking pricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wha.. WHAT?
This has not been a good day for issues to be angry about. Aren't these the same people who are against sexual education in schools? The ones that say it's the parents job? So why to they want to interfere in anyway in a fucking vaccine for young girls? They need to mind their own business. In fact, they need to go away and let real human beings continue to socially, mentally, physically and spiritally evolve and grow. There are just in the goddam way. I'm really beginning to think assholes like these come from a different species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
88. Yes, they're big proponents of 'abstinence-only' sex-ed --
which is why the nation's teen pregnancy rate is on the rise again.

If they're allowed to withhold widespread use of this vaccine, they'll also be responsible for the needless deaths of thousands of young women.

Or put another way, murder.


Someday the electorate will wake up -- but will it be too late? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Would you bet your daughter's health on the impeccable behavior of her
future spouse (who she hasn't met yet)?

Let's say your daughter is 8, and is being offered the vaccine this year.

Maybe you're absolutely certain your daughter won't engage in premarital sex, because, you know, your own kid never does what you tell her not to. Further, you're certain that she'll choose a partner who shares those values. Because love follows those dictates exactly, you know, and you're certain she'll kick a young man to the curb if she's heard he had sex once, back when he was 17.

OK, let's assume all of that just happened the way you wanted it to.

Do you trust that young man to remain faithful? Remember -- you didn't raise him; you haven't even met him yet.

Would you bet your daughter's life on this young man's fidelity?

Would you bet your daughter's life on your fervent hope she'll never be the victim of a sexual assualt?

If you answered "yes" to these questions, I strongly suggest you remove your head from the sand or your ass, or wherever you've kept it for the last...ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What, where is your proof that men run around on women?
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 08:13 PM by VegasWolf
Hah! Just kidding!!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Well said. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is such ignorance it should be laughable
I, however, won't laugh at it until they lose this battle.

If this were a vaccine against herpes would they also try and block it? How about AIDS?

What would make them happy? To just let everyone who doesn't share their values die until they're the only ones left?

It's a very sick and hate filled person who would rather see someone die than than have sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
59. Herpes can be self-vaccinated against,
Simply scratch the herpes sore so as to re-infect yourself, and you will become self-vaccinated against your particular strain of herpes. I did it to myself twenty-five years ago, and it worked. It also gave me partial resistance to another different strain of herpes, which I was exposed to a decade later.

I know there's no money to be made with this self-vaccination technique, and a lot of money to be made when big pharma sells a life-time supply of pills that expensively treat but never cure herpes. If you try self vaccination, you will see that it works. If you have AIDS however, I don't know if it would work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwcomer Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #59
74. That doesn't make any sense
R Hickey, I know that you have very good intentions by telling this story. However, the immune system just doesn't work this way. If you are going to pick up resistance you would have done so just as well from the initial infection as from any subsequent sore picking. There is no need for what you've described. People should not self treat VD's; that is precisely the sort of behavior which leads people to end up with cervical cancer. Furthermore, this will not help anyone with AIDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Actually my immune system does work this way.
The problem that my immune system had with herpes was that the system didn't get a long enough exposure to the virus. The virus sealed itself off in blisters. By re-infecting myself, the immune system got enough exposure to create the antibodies needed to keep the disease at bay.

jwcomer, I don't care if you believe me or not. I wouldn't say this stuff if it weren't true. In my case I was getting a new sore about every two months, they were in four or five places, lasted up to two weeks, and had been occurring for around three years. I tried self vaccination as described, and it worked at once. I got zero herpes for many years after giving my immune system that extra load of live virus. That was twenty five years ago. I currently get about one sore every four years. When they occur, they are small and only last a couple days.

Perhaps you ought to read about how vaccination works. I mean the story of the first discovery of the cowpox and smallpox vaccinations. Its all pretty basic stuff. If you have a degree in medicine, may I suggest that you conduct a study to see if what I say is true. Perhaps you can become famous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let me guess...the f**ked up Fundies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. lets allow teen boys to be crippled by syphillis!
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 08:27 PM by bettyellen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. anybody presents this argument to me, i just look over my glasses deadpan
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 08:34 PM by truthisfreedom
and say calmly, "alcohol, you nitwit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. The American Taliban at work again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope springs eternal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. They tried to ban that too, remember?
I sure as hell didn't come up with that Prohibiton shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. The LAST fucking thing on my teenage mind was cervical cancer.
Oh honey, you got The Shot! ooooo, now now now. Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. As someone who suffered from an HPV cancer, I have to ask
WHY THE FUCK IS ANYONE LISTENING TO THESE SELFISH, MYOPIC, CONTROLLING FUCKSTICKS? WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO STOP PEOPLE FROM GETTING A SHOT THAT WILL KEEP THEM FROM GETTING ILL? :grr: :grr: :grr:

Jesus. It's cost a few hundred of thousands of dollars so far and I'm STILL not back to work and will NEVER be the same. And just existing will cost me or someone else (Medicare) a great deal of money, for the rest of my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I'm so sorry, miss_kitty. Thanks for your post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. I wish I could hand a copy of your post to every one of those
selfish, myopic, controlling fucksticks.

Except, then they'd insist that tax dollars shouldn't go to HPV cancer victims.

My sister contracted HPV years ago at a fairly young age...tried to tell us that the doctor said "it was an airborne virus". :eyes:

I'm really worried about her, now. She recently (in the last 5 years or so) joined the Baptist Church and started voting with the X-tian wacko party. I wonder if she's had a decent check-up, and if she'll do anything about any cancer they might find. We used to be close; but we really aren't now.

As angry as she makes me sometimes, I'm deeply troubled by her health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miss_kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. well if tax dollars weren't available for me
I'd be dead and it would have been a long drawn out agonising death-because of course-these shitheads would not allow a hastened death for the suffering terminally ill. They're all about prolife.

Your sister should have a Pap smear every 6 months, tests to see if the HPV is active and if she has trouble with hemorrhoids, they should be removed or she should have anal exams from time to time-especially if she has a hemorrhoid that doesn't go away.

Airbourne-yeah, and I got VD from a toilet seat once :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Thanks for the info...
I'll try to pass that along to her. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Let's stop treating TB..
... leads to breathing.

These people are simply FUCKING INSANE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh, yeah, encourage sex... right.... I can just see the pick up lines now:
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 08:40 PM by Endangered Specie
"Hey there is that a vaccine in your pants, or you just happy to see me?"

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aimah Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. They don't seem to care about curing anything that happens...
in that area of the womans body anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Exactly! If we were talking about a virus that didn't affect...
women, but caused cancer of the penis or testicles, I'm dead certain that the vaccine would be mandatory!

The stupidity of these people is unreal!:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. This will backfire on the Fundies big time...
Just from reading this thread somebody either has had this cancer or knows somebody that did. This will be the same in the Repug women that hear that some group of white men do not want to protect their daughters. IMHO even the normal Repug women will say fuck off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. My goodness, could these people be any dumber?
I was immunized against rubella when I was approximately eight years old. Why was I immunized against rubella at that age? Partly because somewhere along the line, someone must have thought it was a good idea to prevent kids from getting rubella. But I don't remember that as being the big reason--young as I was.

The reason, I was told, was so that I wouldn't get rubella someday when I was going to have a baby...because if you're going to have a baby and then you get rubella, your baby could be born deaf, or with a hearing impairment. Thus, I was being immunized well before I had to even think about the possibility of having a baby (which, I was given to understand, would happen a looooong way off in the future, after I was married and all that). This was all told to me quite matter-of-factly when I got the shot.

No one seemed to be afraid at the time that, because I had been injected with the rubella vaccine, I, or any other girl who received the shot, was now going to go out and have sex because, hey, we could do that now, and if we got pregnant (not that we could have at that age anyway), well, at least the baby wouldn't be deaf.

Why is this any different? Why does ANYONE have to assume that giving a girl an immunization against a disease--*especially* a potentially FATAL one--is an invitation for her to start having sex? I certainly didn't think my immunization against rubella was an invitation to go ahead and start doing that which can make you pregnant. The thought frankly never crossed my mind.

Do these nutjobs really think that if prepubescent girls get immunized against cervical cancer, they're all going to suddenly run out and start humping like bunnies?

Or is that a dumb question, because...of course, they do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. As the mother of a cherished daughter, and the grandmother of 3, and
great-grandmother of 1 great-granddaughter...I will say, without any hesitation, that given a choice between protecting my beloved children's lives, and having them potentially have sex when they aren't married, I'll take the unmarried sex any day! I care about them, and want them in my life, and would fight tooth and nail against anybody who tried to deny them any weapon in the medical arsenal needed to preserve their health.

I'm so sick and tired of these talibornagains trying to shove their religious and moral views down our throats. If they don't choose to be protected, fine. For my young female relatives, including nieces and cousins, I want any and everything possible to preserve their health and lives. I can deal with their sexual choices, as long as they are here in this life for me to love and protect.

Do NOT fuck with my daughters, granddaughters, nieces, or cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. honestly, what's next? they develop a vaccine for HIV and the fundies say
no?

fuck the fucking fundies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
42. You have to be pretty evil to be pro-cancer...n/t
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 10:19 PM by Heaven and Earth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
43. Just say no...
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 10:20 PM by Wrinkle_In_Time
... to fundamentalist whack-jobs sticking their bibles (or whatever) into public health policy. They said the same thing about "the pill". They said the same thing about safe-sex education and barrier methods preventing STDs. They are still wrong.

Since the scientists don't go to their churches to educate them, they should stop trying to insert their beliefs into {currently} secular society.

"Focus on the Family" can just kiss my
***CARRIER LOST***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. This exposes the real agenda of these people
It's not about saving unborn babies, it's not about protecting the mental and physical health of women, it's not about any of that--

It's about keeping young women from having sex.

(Lemme tell ya, if this were prostate cancer instead of cervical cancer, you'd see no opposition to a vaccine.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
46. God forbid!
God forbid that a vaccination should be used to prevent a girl from recieving her just punishment of cervical cancer for being bad. I'm sure that all good Christian parents want to rest securely in the knowledge that their daughter will have a good chance of getting cancer if she's a bad girl. What decent parent wouldn't want that for their child?:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
49. This is a shockingly evil stand for them to take.
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 11:57 PM by kgfnally
Honestly, I question the very humanity of these evil, twisted beings. Can we get a DNA test to make certain they're part of the species homo sapiens?

Yes, that's right, fundies... an infant or a two-year-old is definitely going to make that connection, especially after living their lives free of the disease and thus knowing less about it than we do- because it's not a problem for them.

Edited to add: having read the article, I now understand this is going to be (yes, that's right, fundies, it's going to be, and I dare you to stain yourselves with the blot of trying to stop it) given to preteens. Fine, whatever. All you have to tell them is, one of their shots will keep them from getting a certain kind of cancer. That's enough to scare them into wanting it, badly. I predict the curious may ask which one and what disease, but you don't have to tell them everything there is to know for them to benefit from it!

For example, lots of people my age only know about polio that it's a debilitating or deadly disease. We don't know about all the precautions that were taken to stop its spread, or the impact it had upon families and communities at the time. We don't know, because we don't have to know. We've conquered that disease; it's no longer for us to worry about, given we've all had our proper vaccinations.

Hey fundies, I have a question: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
51. Baby Jesus cries
When women don't get cervical cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittPoliSci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
52. we shouldn't be having any sex at all.
we should all stop reproducing so much. sex bad, BAD!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
53. Hope stem cell research-
will someday give a MAN a way to impregnate himself and give birth!
Until that time he will still know that female is only a bone from him.(biblical ribbing):rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildClarySage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
54. TOTAL anti-female bullshit.
Very few of the teens I worked with in groups at the high school level had ever heard of HPV. How would being vaccinated against this virus prevent teens from exploring abstinence?

Kids don't base sexual experimentation on potential risk- they almost all operate on the belief that 'it can't happen to me'. The real issue here is that "women don't deserve protection if they dare to engage in promiscious behavior" according to these hypocritical shitheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
55. The Post strikes again- placing fundamentalist views on par
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 12:58 AM by depakid
with science and rational public policy.

This paper just makes me sick (as it does all the other students & profs in PSU/OHSU's public health program).

We've seen scores of these kinds of articles over the past few years on issues ranging from "abstinance education" (or what should be the demonstrated failure thereof) to FDA proceedings.

This is OLD NEWS- Katha Pollit wrote about these nuts back in May:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/19/opinion/main696613.shtml

ALL that the Post is trying to do here (yet again) is to give the fundamentalists a forum where they can publicize their drivel in a "fair & balanced" "he said/she said" format.

As they've proven time and again- the Post is utterly incapable printing ANYTHING related to science or medicine that isn't full of slanted copy or that doesn't attempt to legitimize far right viewpoints (which often include outright false statements of fact that are rarely challenged).

It's even more insidius than the Wall Street Journal- because it tries to portray itself as objective, when 9 times out of 10, it's clearly not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
56. And how is this pro-life??
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #56
67. According to fundie illogic...
...you only have the right to life if you haven't been born yet. Once you pop out into the world, you only have the right to life if you can afford it. If you're poor or make mistakes, screw off and die as far as they're concerned. Utter hypocrisy, and antithetical to the Savior they pretend to believe in.

Todd in Beerbratistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
57. The Conservatives are
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 01:51 AM by burrowowl
words escape me!
What about married hubby who had picadillos in his youth and became born again or whatever, etc.
Just shows how anti-woman the idiots are and how about rape victims, etc.
Yet these conservatives are all for Viagra (jeeze shouldn't they consider impotence as god-given and they allow procreation by infertile couples and then want the embryos to be considered humans and how much money does it costs to keep these things and and ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
58. oh for fuck's sake
Goddamnn fundies are gonna kill us with their ignorance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
60. if they don't want to vaccinate their girl children ...
that's what i'm tempted to think.

can't quite get there though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
61. Idiots!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
62. Conservatives are EVIL
That is the only possible conclusion I can draw from this. The sooner they all get raptured and go to hell, the better.

I really hate these fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
63. Jesus FUCKING Christ!
I would have liked to have this vaccine so I wouldn't have had to have a hysterectomy at the age of 30 and have gone into menopause at 40. What the fuck is wrong with people? What country is this - Talabani Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
triguy46 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
64. yes, historically the threat of cancer has been successful...
in changing the behavior of teenagers.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
66. PERFECT issue for the fundamentalist control freaks
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 09:41 AM by LizW
Men get, and spread HPV too, but it is usually symptomless. There is not even an FDA approved test for HPV in men. But the disease is so easily spread that it is pervasive in sexually active people.

But only women get cancer from it. And it is symptomless until a woman starts having abnormal Pap smears.

Perfect for the fundies to say, "See? You must stay pure until marriage, and then you can have the vaccine. If you keep your legs closed until then, you will not die."

And what about the boys and men who have the virus and spread it around? Who cares, they're only spreading it to slutty women who have sex before marriage (and thus, before vaccination).

Mark my words, the right will argue for the vaccine to be given at the time of marriage, and not before. It is all about controlling women. This issue is perfect for that.

The Bible says "The wages of sin is death." Remember that many of the fundamentalists take that sentence absolutely literally. They believe that women who sin by having sex before marriage should die. They believe that it is God's will.

In Saudi Arabia, they stone unchaste women to death. Here, they just let them die of cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
69. Does anyone recall ever reading about the research OR development of
an anti-cervical cancer drug??? Suddenly it appears, and is being forced on mid-America's teenagers?

1 + 1 does NOT equal 3. Something IS wrong here...seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
70. Does anyone recall ever reading about the research OR development of
an anti-cervical cancer drug??? Suddenly it appears, and is being forced on mid-America's teenagers?

1 + 1 does NOT equal 3. Something IS wrong here...seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
73. I am very alarmed at the growing influence these religious crackpots
have in our society today despite them representing a minority viewpoint. These religious extremists would be well-served if they studied up on our history and reminded themselves of what prompted our forefathers to leave England all those years ago.

They want to ban birth control, do away with safe-sex education programs, overturn Roe v. Wade and now this. I never thought I would see the day that a small but rabidly extremist segment of society would exert such influence on this nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
77. I don't know ANYBODY who has given up sex ...
... because of links to cervical cancer. I know a few people (men and women) who are celibate, but none of them have cited cancer risk -- or any other disease, even HIV -- as a reason. Even a secondary one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
78. So, let me get this straight:
It's better that women die of cervical cancer than that they have consensual sex?

Someone please just shoot me now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
79. Funny how I don't remember any such arguments when Viagra first came out
DOUBLE STANDARD ALERT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. Oh for crying out loud!!!!!!
Can't these people just get over their own obsessive twisted and demented thoughts about sex?
Is this just what they sit around and think about all the time???:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
81. this is what Lakoff would call a strategic issue
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 04:45 PM by Strawman
these RW'ers are so nutty that they would rather allow women to have cervical cancer than have premarital sex. that's the cabal that picked this SCOTUS nominee and this position should be brought up in every argument with them involving reproductive rights. THEY are the ones who should be on the defensive and shit like this is exactly why.

this is a prime example how far far out of the mainstream these RW fundamentalist extremists are on reproductive rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
82. Someone should ask Marilyn Quayle how she feels about it
I seem to recall that she was treated sucessfully for cervical cancer way back when we didn't know that its sole cause is the Human Papilloma Virus, and therefore is a complication of a sexually transmitted disease. She may want to discuss this issue with Danny Boy as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
83. I believe any kind of alcoholic beverage also leads to "sex"
or should we say, a drinking a beer could send a subtle message condoning sexual activity before marriage. Remember? "Party till she's cute!"

Let's reinstate the 18th Amendment as a foil to pre-marital sex! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
84. This is absolutely batshit crazy
These jackasses should be locked up in a nice quiet rubber room. Religious fundamentalism is mental illness, pure and simple.

Asshats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC