Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More U.S. Troops Possible As Turkey Balks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:18 PM
Original message
More U.S. Troops Possible As Turkey Balks
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3348847,00.html

More U.S. Troops Possible As Turkey Balks Tuesday November 4, 2003 9:46 PM By MATT KELLEY Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - In a major setback to U.S. efforts to attract military help in Iraq, a Turkish official said Tuesday his country won't send peacekeeping troops without a significant change in the situation there. That makes it virtually certain the United States will have to send thousands more U.S. reservists early next year. No additional countries have contributed forces in Iraq since the United Nations Security Council approved a new resolution last month.<snip>

... about 15,000 Army National Guard troops have been mobilized for possible service in Iraq beginning early next year, to replace weary active-duty troops who have been there nearly a year. The newly mobilized troops are members of National Guard brigades from Arkansas, North Carolina and Washington state who are intended to combine with fresh active-duty troops. In addition, the Pentagon might need to call up even more reservists in support units if Turkey or other countries don't end up sending troops, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Richard Myers said recently. U.S. officials have ruled out the idea of increasing overall U.S. troop numbers in Iraq, instead saying they will speed up the process of getting trained Iraqi security forces into the streets to deal with an increasingly sophisticated and deadly insurgency.<snip>

L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. diplomat who heads the American authority in Iraq, said Saturday that the issue of Turkish peacekeepers was between Turkey and the Iraqi governing council. Turkey doesn't see it that way, Logolu said. ``For whatever reason, this (Bush) administration saw fit not to put too much counterweight on the Iraqi Governing Council,'' Logolu said. ``If the U.S. perception of the need for Turkish troops in Iraq changes, then perhaps that could change.''

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Take the Money and Run
Those Bush's get played by EVERYONE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is getting VERY DRAFTY in here
I mean it, the staffing crisis gets closer and closer

Bush will soon have the choice of Cut and Run (not good for mamy
reasons, chiefly how more instablity it will bring yes I said that
that is why this mess has to be internationalized)

the draft... we do not have enough personnel to do this.

By the way, for the record I do not favor a draft, never have,
never will, but married to a military man I know the US Armed Forces
are beyond over extended (and abused)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. US troop deployment can last until March 04'
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 11:53 AM by jmcgowanjm
We can't afford troops overseas now, much less sending more.

BTW-Reported by eyewitnesses in US bases in
Fairford and Welford UK dramatic increase in overflights
of US planes.

And this: We're threatening Russia
because it won't sell majority stake in
Hydrocarbon industry.

We just gave Israel $2B more in War Help.

PeakOil is Here and the jockeying has begun.
Batten down the hatches.

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2003/11/04/006.html

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1066565630866&p=1012571727102

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/05/international/europe/05YUKO.html?hp

http://www.albawaba.com/news/index.php3?sid=262707&lang=e&dir=news

http://slate.msn.com/id/2090585/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are no troops available.
Hmmm. Now what could that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dumbya's last chance
This is strange: why wouldn't Cheney make sure there was enough pressure on the INC to allow Turkeys' troops over the border? Everybody knows that if the U.S. does not get more foreign troops on the ground we can expect the support for this war at home and abroad to continue to slip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. All goes back to OttomanEmpire
Iraq was once a colony of Turkey
Also the Turks have always wanted to deploy
on their border-read stop the Kurds.
The Kurds are The one ally the US has.
And we have screwed them so many
times before that the Kurdish Region would
be anarchy at best.

The US wanted to station Turks in Fallujah,
Beiji, Haldiyah, places like that, away from
Kurds. Turks would get transfer tubes home
w/ no immediate results
and 95%+ of Turks disagree w/ US invasion
anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. iC
I understand now from what you wrote that the large proportion of Kurds on the IRC would be an obsticle to getting the IRC as a whole to support the presence of Turkish soldiers in Iraq.

I recall that public support for the invasion was practically nil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeebusH Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-03 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. so much for that UN resolution ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. You have to wonder.....
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 02:01 AM by cliss
what are these policymakers thinking?

I'm dumbfounded by the amateurishness of these Keystones. Considering that these people had months to prepare for this unauthorized war, I would have expected them to be more prepared for contingencies. Instead, I read that there were NO post-war plans for Iraq. This shows.

They had the goofy idea for a while to recruit Hindu troops, because tanned troops were seen as less obnoxious than US ones. Never mind the fact that hindus and muslims have been at loggerheads for centuries. That fell by the wayside. They tried with Turkey earlier, and they declined at that time. I believe Japan raised its hand to volunteer, what ever happened to that plan?

So here we are, full circle. We're back, knocking at Turkey's front door. Let's hope they have enough sense to say no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Japan??? Never happen!
For any number of reasons... First, the Japanese are (wisely) deeply averse to getting their people killed in any situation, let alone this one. Second, the Japanese are largely Buddhist--no more popular among Moslems than Hindus are. And third, there's a pretty damned effective left-wing/pacifist resistance is Japan that knows how to raise hell with extraordinary efficiency.

Hmm, I said pacifist... well, sort of. They can throw riots like you've never seen. Protecttice gear as good as any riot police, sticks, bottles, Molotov cocktails, you name it, they've got it. No Japanese government would last long if they pissed these folks off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. They know Molotov cocktails
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 11:55 AM by saigon68
I am fascinated by watching a Japanese riot. There are no pantywaists there. They kick ass. The Chimp would need an ARMY if confronted by those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernsoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-03 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. hmm, can we try to get B*sh to Tokyo sometime soon?
Japanese Reds take no shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC