Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venezuela takes over 32 privately operated oilfields

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ny_liberal Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:50 PM
Original message
Venezuela takes over 32 privately operated oilfields
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - Thirty-two privately operated Venezuelan oilfields returned to state control Sunday with the start of the new year, the government said.

At midnight Dec. 31, a deadline expired for all private companies with contracts to independently pump oil to agree to joint ventures that will give Venezuela's state oil company majority control.

The 32 operating agreements were signed between 1990 and 1997, when Venezuela's petroleum industry was open to private and foreign capital. The objective at the time - when the price of crude was below $10 US a barrel - was to increase production at low-priority oil fields that had been closed because of their location or lack of resources and which Petroleos de Venezuela S.A., or PDVSA, had no plans to reactivate.

As oil prices crept back up in recent years, President Hugo Chavez's government sought to boost its control and share of profits from the industry. In 2001, it passed a hydrocarbons law that made the operating agreements illegal by requiring oil production to be carried out by companies majority-owned by the government.

As of Sunday, Venezuela had successfully completed "the recovery" of the 32 fields, Venezuelan oil minister Rafael Ramirez said in a statement.

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2006/01/01/1375488-ap.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!
Chavez means business and is very smart. Wanna bet Bush has sicced the CIA on him, big time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Double-wow.
OMG, I can't imagine how pissed those oil companies must be right now. I remember reading an article about 2 weeks ago that said Chavez gave the oil companies an ultimatum: become government venture partners, or you're out...Exit Stage Left. Persona Non Grata.

I just assumed they would all swallow their pride and go for it. Less profits are still better than no profits.

And as of right now, they've got NO profits. In Venezuela at least. Yow, Chavez did not waste any time. His deadline was Dec. 31 and he held good on his threat.

I will be watching this story with great interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Um, how about "exit stage right"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Chavez has powerful enemies
Exxon Mobil for one, and I believe it's already obvious that he has been in their cross-hairs long before now and I mean that literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Big oil loves this. Its an excuse to raise prices.
The less oil available to the US market the higher the prices/profits.

Despite the mewlings from Bushco, they love this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Bush does not care too much about oil price rape
A survey of the sheeple determined that
the fucktards considered 2.25 to be a fair high price.
The price 'fell' to that and now the sky is the limit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. As I recall, the US canceled lots of Iraqi oil contracts, too
Oil companies are big boys. They know the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-01-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. Oil is too important to be in the hands of corporations. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Ginny Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Exactly what I was thinking
When Exxon announced 10B in profits during a national emergency, they made the case for govt control of oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Poor Chavez
bush will quickly burn him at the stake, just as the US did Castro when he nationalized and shut out all the american owned businesses and properties. They really thought they would own Castro the same as they owned the former dictator. Chavez may well be bush's nemesis because he at least can give oil to the poor of the US and the president would rather they just freeze! The poor and the old have no place in bushamerica!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Chavez is not poor; nor is Latin America, while Bush has bankrupted
these United States & squandered our military.

Even the CIA is having a tough time these days.

If BushCo had the chance of maintaining superiority in Latin America, he blew it, big time. Lets hope our belief in checks and balances restrains BushCo from the police state invasive tactics it seems to favor, "fighting terrorism" while depriving freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Not if we impeach Bush, or at least make one kickass effort to
Let's keep the criminal monkey in the WH busy worrying about whether or not he can continue his crime wave. Let's move for impeachment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Bush is a little busy these days....
I wonder if Bush can "multi-task". I hear he's getting ready to bomb Iran and Syria. And let's not forget the quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan he created.

Such a mess. And the rest of the world despises us. Well, I'd say Bush has lit a lot of fires. I hope destroying Chavez is way down on his list of Urgent Must-do's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NI4NI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Exxon Mobil is only company to not agree
Edited on Mon Jan-02-06 03:17 AM by NI4NI
"Exxon Mobil is the only company that so far has not ageed to switch to a joint venture and now faces the prospect of being forced out of the oil fields it currently operates".

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That'll be interesting...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. When's the invasion?
I can hear the rich bastards now "Now george, you KNOW that oil is ours!!"

Fuck em, I applaud Presidente Chavez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. From the article...
Edited on Mon Jan-02-06 02:54 PM by madeline_con
"Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil had resisted the contract changes, which will significantly reduce the oil companies' share of profits and control over operations and could also undermine the value of their Venezuelan assets."

How long until "civil unrest" breaks out, a "humanitarian crisis" begins, and troops have to be sent to Venezuela? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. How long does it take to route arms to opposition groups? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Just like how corporations can take over land a private person owns.
Big government = bad.

Nobody's yet told me how big corporation (or how big corporation owns big government) is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC