Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US reiterates strong opposition to Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:05 PM
Original message
US reiterates strong opposition to Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline
We oppose the gas pipe line deal connecting to Iran, India, and Pakistan that will be signed this June and start construction in 2007 with a 2011 operational date, - but we like the others

http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/afx/2006/01/05/afx2428505.html

US reiterates strong opposition to Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline
01.05.2006, 01:56 AM


WASHINGTON (AFX) - <snip>Iran is reportedly nearing an accord with India and Pakistan for the 2,600-kilometre pipeline costing more than 7 bln usd.

'The US government supports multiple pipelines from that (the Caspian) region but remains absolutely opposed to pipelines involving Iran,' senior State Department official Steven Mann told a forum in Washington late yesterday. <smip>

....generally, "piped gas was economically favourable versus LNG (liquefied natural gas). TAP (the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan project) and the Iran-Pakistan-India options appear viable and competitive versus LNG," Millison said.<snip>

Millison said although the 1,680-kilometre trans-Afghan gas pipeline was shorter and less costly, as of last month, India and Pakistan were 'moving forward' with the project with Iran. <snip>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tough tittie
I think we are going to have an increasungly difficult time with what we like or dislike in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ditto....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Very silkily put. Worthy of a diplomat.
You could imagine a diplomat using that to put the point over to Bush as gently as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm not a diplomat
and I can turn the air blue, given the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I'm sure most diplomats also can and do. It was meant as a
compliment Pat. An attempt of mine at euphemistic humour. I found the pithy, sardonic, elliptical way you expressed yourself very funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. the same idiots in charge
The same idiots that have been making all the poor decisions concerning Iraq, tax cuts etc are also tyring to convince the world their way is the best way. Just as they failed misirably at everything else; they are not suddenly going to come up with some briliant ideas to help American interest. Take away their control of the most powerful military the world has ever known and you have nothing. Never has America been hurt so much by poor decisions from their leadership. Children that gow up spoiled and never held accountable for their poor decisions never learn, and it is the same with presidents, every president makes a few mistakes early on, but they are held accountable and learn from their mistakes. Wheras the bush team was never held accountable, they never learned and consequently continue to make poor decisions in everything they do.
Actually, you could argue that because of the "free ride", the decision process has gotten worse rather than better. It is a sad time for America, no, it's a sad time for the people of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. so are we going to bomb it or something?
like a kid having a temper tantrum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. it'll be INSURGENTS ! ! !
likely a new chapter of al qaeda! yeah, thats it. those new guys, the ones who trained at fort bragg or possibly heresford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. We prefer the pipeline from Kazakhstan,through Afghanistan, to India
Edited on Thu Jan-05-06 04:14 PM by patcox2
Seriously, this is why we provoked the 9/11 attacks, we were pressuring Afghanistan's Taliban to grant Unocal the right to build a pipeline from kazakhstan (or one of the stans down there) through afghanistan, then through a bit of Pakistan, then on down to the Enron plant in India. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. True - But the neo-cons scream there was no oil pipeline! -forgetting gas
pipelines that were actually the plan!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. and we helped a little bit too
lihop evolves into mihop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is Paks' and Indians' version of being "strategic"
They're climbing up the mullahs' asses in one of their usual attempts to form a regional South Asian power block and be "nonaligned". Nothing wrong with that, but in this case they might have closed ranks with the Afghans instead. Also, they're just aping the western powers' cheesy realpolitik maneuverings. They might exercise a little imagination and stop doing what the British foreign service taught them 100 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. We invaded Afghanistan for absolutely nothing them...they scooped us
on the pipeline to the Indian/Asiam market anyway. The 9-11 terrorist thing was pure nonsense...THIS was the reason for the invasion...the traansAfghan pipeline to tap the Asian market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. greedy ideologues
easy to sucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. none of our business
None of the oil or territory involved belongs to us. So how exactly is this plan any of America's business?

I'm just happy to see India and Pakistan cooperating for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-06-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. WAAAAAAAAH ! ! ! !
assholes. not EVERYTHING on earth has to have a 'approved by emperor bush' sticker on it. (and a halliburton sticker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC