Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Case Dropped Against U.S. Officer in Beating Deaths of Afghan Inmates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 11:20 PM
Original message
Case Dropped Against U.S. Officer in Beating Deaths of Afghan Inmates
The Army has dropped its case against the only officer to face criminal charges in connection with the beating deaths of two prisoners held by the United States in Afghanistan, military officials said yesterday.

The officer, Capt. Christopher M. Beiring, led a reservist military police company that was guarding the main American detention center in Afghanistan when the two men were killed within days of each other in December 2002. The prisoners died after guards kneed them repeatedly in the legs while each was shackled to the ceiling of his cell.

Captain Beiring, 39, had been charged with lying to investigators and being derelict in his duties, in part by neglecting after the first death to order his soldiers to stop chaining up prisoners by the arms at the behest of military interrogators who wanted to deprive them of sleep before questioning.

"They certainly had a case to investigate - two guys died," Captain Beiring said yesterday in an interview. "And, obviously, some soldiers did some stuff wrong and needed to be punished. But I think it got blown out of proportion. At some point, they were just playing politics."

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/08/international/asia/08bagram.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of. Course. It. Was. Dropped.
Shocking and totally unexpected. Whodathunkit? :shrug:

:sarcasm:

And the shit just keeps on flowin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hugh Thompson is rolling over in his grave already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3.  Courageous hero like K. Benderman gets 15 months for refusing to kill.
Edited on Sat Jan-07-06 11:32 PM by Tom Joad
See http://bendermantimeline.com/
And the rest of the real Iraq/Afghanistan war heroes (those that resist):
http://tomjoad.org/WarHeroes.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the perspective.
1984 indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. No Court-Martial for Officer in Afghan Abuse Case
No Court-Martial for Officer in Afghan Abuse Case

Associated Press
Sunday, January 8, 2006; Page A10

FORT BLISS, Tex., Jan. 7 -- The only officer charged in a 2002 Afghanistan prisoner abuse case will not face a court-martial.

Capt. Christopher M. Beiring said Army prosecutors told him on Friday that the charges of dereliction of duty and making a false official statement have been dropped by Fort Bliss officials.

Beiring was in charge of a Cincinnati-based reservist military police company stationed at a detention center in Bagram, Afghanistan, when two prisoners died in December 2002. Beiring and 10 of his soldiers were charged in the case. Four military intelligence interrogators from Fort Bragg, N.C., were also charged in the investigation.

An Army colonel assigned to investigate the charges against Beiring, 39, recommended last month that he not face a court-martial.
(snip/...)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010701386.html?nav=rss_nation

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bagram torture and prisoner abuse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
In 2005, a 2,000-page U.S. Army report suggests the possibiliy of abuse, not torture with the connection of the deaths of two unarmed civilian Afghan prisoners suspected to be Taliban by U.S. armed forces in 2002 at the Bagram Collection Point. In addition to assaulting the prison guards to which they were legally restrained by physical force, Habibullah and Dilawar were chained to the ceiling and beaten which contributed to their deaths. Military coroners did not immediately ruled the first death a homicide but did the second. Autopsies of the two dead detainees revealed severe trauma to both prisoners' legs, describing the trauma as comparable to being run over by a bus. Seven soldiers were charged.
(snip)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagram_torture_and_prisoner_abuse

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Dilawar, one of the two dead prisoners:
Dilawar
Dilawar, died on December 10 2002, was a 22-year-old Afghan taxi driver and farmer who weighed 122 pounds and was described by his interpreters as neither violent nor aggressive.

When beaten, he repeatedly cried "Allah!" The outcry appears to have amused U.S. military personnel, as the act of striking him in order to provoke a scream of "Allah!" eventually "became a kind of running joke," according to one of the MP's. "People kept showing up to give this detainee a common peroneal strike just to hear him scream out 'Allah,' " he said. "It went on over a 24-hour period, and I would think that it was over 100 strikes."

The Times reported that:
On the day of his death, Dilawar had been chained by the wrists to the top of his cell for much of the previous four days.
"A guard tried to force the young man to his knees. But his legs, which had been pummeled by guards for several days, could no longer bend. An interrogator told Mr. Dilawar that he could see a doctor after they finished with him. When he was finally sent back to his cell, though, the guards were instructed only to chain the prisoner back to the ceiling.
"Leave him up," one of the guards quoted Specialist Claus as saying. Several hours passed before an emergency room doctor finally saw Mr. Dilawar. By then he was dead, his body beginning to stiffen.
It would be many months before Army investigators learned a final horrific detail: Most of the interrogators had believed Mr. Dilawar was an innocent man who simply drove his taxi past the American base at the wrong time.<2>
(snip)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bagram_torture_and_prisoner_abuse#Dilawar



Dilawar, and his three brothers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. They were just playing politics.
Jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is why the ICC exists, and why the U.S. is terrified of it....
Edited on Sun Jan-08-06 03:40 PM by mike_c
The ICC exists to prosecute in cases where the nation with jurisdiction refuses to comply with international law, or simply does not competently prosecute. The U.S. fears the ICC because it routinely gives the wink and nod to crimes committed by it's agents abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-08-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. "they were just playing politics"
yes, i'm sure they really do think that way. that their own crimes are justified somehow, but that to expose 'em are 'politics'. scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC